Search

This article examines three high-profile House ethics cases involving former Speakers James Wright (1988–1989) and Newt Gingrich (1994–1997) and former House Majority Leader Tom DeLay (1997–2004). The analysis of the filing and disposition of charges in the three cases provides some evidence for the “politics-by-other-means” or “partisan-ethics-wars” framework that is sometimes used to evaluate ethics enforcement in Congress. However, the analysis also provides evidence of bipartisan agreement both in the ethics committee and on the floor. The article highlights the areas of bipartisan consensus and the principles behind that consensus. In paying attention to the content of the cases, it also highlights an important change in ethics investigations over time, specifically an increase in “political gain” cases. The article thus calls attention to aspects of House ethics investigations that are undervalued and inadequately addressed by the partisan-ethics-wars framework.

Search Results

Refine search

Refine search

Actions for selected content:

1 results

Beyond a “Partisan-Ethics-Wars” Interpretation of Congressional Ethics Investigations: The Cases of James Wright, Newt Gingrich, and Tom DeLay

Search Results

Refine search

Refine search

Actions for selected content:

Save Search

1 results

Beyond a “Partisan-Ethics-Wars” Interpretation of Congressional Ethics Investigations: The Cases of James Wright, Newt Gingrich, and Tom DeLay