Single-course, ad libitum meals are recommended for the assessment of energy intake within appetite research. This study represents the first investigation of the comparative sensitivity of two single-course, ad libitum meals designed to differ in palatability. We conducted two experiments using a preload study design. All protocols were identical except for the energy content of the preloads (Expt 1: 579 and 1776 kJ; Expt 2: 828 and 4188 kJ). During each experiment, ten healthy men completed four experimental trials constituting a low- or high-energy preload beverage, a 60-min intermeal interval and consumption of a pasta-based or a porridge-based, ad libitum meal. Appetite ratings were measured throughout each trial, and palatability was assessed after food consumption. Preload manipulation did not influence appetite (P=0·791) or energy intake (P=0·561) in Expt 1. Palatability and energy intake were higher for the pasta meal than for the porridge meal in both experiments (palatability P≤0·002; energy intake P≤0·001). In Expt 2, consumption of the high-energy preload decreased appetite (P=0·051) and energy intake (P=0·002). Energy compensation was not significantly different between pasta and porridge meals (P=0·172), but was more strongly correlated with preceding changes in appetite at the pasta meal (r −0·758; P=0·011) than the porridge meal (r −0·498; P=0·143). The provision of a highly palatable, pasta-based meal produced energy intakes that were more representative of preceding appetite ratings, but the moderately palatable, porridge-based meal produced more ecologically valid energy intakes. Ad libitum meal selection and design may require a compromise between sensitivity and ecological validity.

The rising rate of obesity has been blamed on increased consumption of sugar-sweetened soft drinks, such as carbonated sodas, which fail to satisfy hunger. The objective of the present study was to compare the effect on appetite and energy intake of a sugar-sweetened beverage (cola) and a chocolate milk drink, matched for energy content and volume. It was hypothesised that chocolate milk may be more satiating because of its protein content. Twenty-two healthy young men (age 23 (sd 1·8) years) of normal weight (BMI 22·2 (sd 1·5) kg/m2) were recruited to the randomised cross-over study. Visual analogue scales were used to record subjective appetite ratings every 30 min on each of two test days. A drink of 500 ml cola or chocolate milk (900 kJ) was ingested 30 min before an ad libitum lunch. Satiety and fullness were significantly greater (P = 0·0007, P = 0·0004, respectively) 30 min after chocolate milk than after cola. Ratings of prospective consumption and hunger were significantly greater after cola than after chocolate milk, both immediately after preload intake (P = 0·008, P = 0·01, respectively) and 30 min afterwards (P = 0·004, P = 0·01, respectively). There was no significant difference (P = 0·42) in ad libitum lunch intake after ingestion of chocolate milk (3145 (sd 1268) kJ) compared with cola (3286 (sd 1346) kJ). The results support the hypothesis that sweetened soft drinks are different from milk products in their impact on short-term hunger and satiety, although differences in subjective appetite scores were not translated into differences in energy intake.

The effects of sucrose and oil preloads were explicitly compared in a single-blind controlled trial using a between-subjects design. Eighty adult subjects (forty-three male, thirty-seven female) aged 18–50 years received at 11.00 hours one of four yoghurt preloads. All were 80 g low-fat, unsweetened yoghurt (188 kJ), containing additionally (1) saccharin (control, 23 kJ), or (2) 40 g sucrose (859 kJ), (3) 40 g maize oil (1569 kJ), (4) 20 g sucrose, 20 g maize oil (1213 kJ). Subjects were normal eaters and of normal weight (male mean weight: 68·8 (sd 3·2) kg, BMI 21·8 (sd 1·6) kg/m2; female mean weight: 53·7 (sd 5·1) kg, BMI 20·4 (sd 1·2) kg/m2). Food intake was measured with a food diary and mood with ten single Likert scales. ANOVA was conducted using preload type (saccharin, sucrose, oil, sucrose + oil), sex (male, female) and early v. late breakfast times as factors. Mood was analysed using the same design, with time of rating (immediate, 60 min, 120 min) as an additional factor. Men ate more after the saccharin preload than after the other preloads, but did not vary the time of their next solid food. Women increased the intermeal interval only after the oil preload, which also had the highest energy content value, but did not vary the energy content of their next solid food. The saccharin preload decreased rated tiredness at 2 h compared with the sucrose preload, possibly due to its lower energy content. The preloads containing sucrose or sucrose + oil increased calmness between 1 and 2 h afterwards, compared with the saccharin preload. It is concluded that both sucrose and oil increase the intermeal interval in men, but that women are less sensitive to preloading. The mood effects suggest that tiredness after carbohydrate at 2 h may in part be a decrease in rated energy compared with the increased rated energy found after a preload with low energy content. Carbohydrate may genuinely increase calmness. These effects apply to non-restrained eaters of normal weight.