Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

1 results

  • 11 - The Complex Life of Rafal Lemkin

  • Edited by Frédéric Mégret, McGill University, Montréal, Immi Tallgren, University of Helsinki
  • Book:
    The Dawn of a Discipline
    Published online:
    04 September 2020
    Print publication:
    24 September 2020, pp 280-305

  • Summary

    This chapter inquires how the historical context and biographical formative experiences shaped Lemkin’s intellectual career, leading to the definition of crimes of barbarity and vandalism, and later inventing the term ‘genocide’. It critically contextualizes Lemkin’s role at the dawn of international criminal law, showing the importance of his warnings and actions against the Holocaust, but also his romantic belief in the power of international law, his idealism, inconsistencies and contradictions. On one hand Lemkin raised a strong voice of advocacy for individual rights when criticizing the Soviet and the Italian penal codes in the 1920s; on the other, he became obsessed almost atavistically with the collective rights and the criminal intent to destroy ethnic, religious and national groups. In his emphasis on groups he departed from humanitarian law and human rights, both focusing on the individual. Lemkin’s life, private and public, was uneven; he simply could not find purpose in anything else than the Genocide Convention and its ratification.