Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

1 results

  • 9 - Different Levels of ‘Legal Otherness’ in the Context of Expulsion and Entry Bans

  • from Part II - The Operation of Legal ‘Othering’ and the National–Foreigner Dichotomy in the EU
  • Edited by Moritz Jesse, Universiteit Leiden
  • Book:
    European Societies, Migration, and the Law
    Published online:
    13 November 2020
    Print publication:
    19 November 2020, pp 173-191

  • Summary

    This chapter explores the different levels of ‘legal otherness’ in European Union law in the context of expulsion and entry bans. It is based on the premise that deportability constitutes a clear indicator of 'otherness' and that the lack of a secure residence status marks an individual as an outsider. This contribution examines the impact of a foreigner’s nationality and the duration of her or his residence in the ‘host’ Member State on the level of ‘legal otherness’ as it emanates from the person’s protection against expulsion. The different levels of 'otherness' are analysed against the background of the rationale that a secure residence status has an inclusive effect and is conducive to the foreigner’s integration. A low level of protection against expulsion and an insecure residence status, by contrast, have exclusionary effects and are capable of hampering the foreigner’s integration into the society of the ‘host’ Member State.