We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected]
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Until the ECtHR entered the picture, Turkey’s legal landscape lacked the basic ingredients for access to justice. Justiciable rights were subject to significant restrictions, the judiciary was unreceptive to rights claims, and civil society was weak and disorganised. Without funding, rights-advocacy organisations or pro bono legal assistance, human rights victims lacked access to a support structure. Once Turkey recognised the ECtHR’s oversight, Kurdish lawyers mobilised owing to their historically embedded rights consciousness, relatively high level of organisation and resistance experience, and the sheer scale and density of state violence. They became the top litigant group in Strasbourg in terms of the number of petitions they filed and the precedent-setting judgements they won. Based on in-depth interviews, this chapter accounts how Kurdish lawyers have mobilised the ECtHR to resist state violence in an emergency context. It shows the complex ways in which Turkey’s recognition of the right of individual petition and efforts to accede to the EU, and the ECtHR’s post-enlargement reforms have affected and been affected by Kurdish legal mobilisation since the early 1990s.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.