The main objective measure to assess the health of the Fontan circulation is the pressure measurement of the superior vena cava or pulmonary arteries. We reviewed the literature for benefits of measuring resting pressure in the Fontan circuit and explored whether dynamic measurement by volume loading or exercise has the potential to refine this diagnostic tool.

PubMed was searched for articles showing a relationship between resting post-operative central venous pressure or pulmonary artery pressure and Fontan failure. Relationships between post-operative central venous pressure or pulmonary artery pressure and volume loading changes, such as during exercise or volume loading during cardiac catheterization, were also queried.

A total of 44 articles mentioned relationships between resting central venous pressure or pulmonary artery pressure and Fontan failure. Only 26 included an analysis between the variables and only seven of those articles found pressure to be predictive of Fontan failure. Ten articles examined the relationship between exercise or volume loading and outcomes and demonstrated a large individual variation of pressures under these dynamic conditions.

Based on current literature, there is not a lot of strong evidence to show that elevated resting central venous pressure or pulmonary artery pressure is predictive of Fontan failure. Some individuals experience dramatic increases in central venous pressure or pulmonary artery pressure under increased loading conditions with exercise or bolus fluid infusion, while others experience increases closer to that of a healthy control population. Further studies are needed to examine whether more dynamic and continuous monitoring of systemic venous pressures might better predict outcomes in patients with Fontan circulation.

Management of “failing” and “failed” Fontan circulation, particularly the indications, timing, and type of re-intervention, currently remains nebulous. Factors contributing to pathogenesis and mortality following Fontan procedure differ between children and adults.

Since organ systems in individual patients are affected differently, we searched the extant literature for a “failing” and “failed” Fontan reviewing the clinical phenotypes, diagnostic modalities, pharmacological, non-pharmacological, and surgical techniques employed, and their outcomes.

A total of 410 investigations were synthesised. Although proper candidate selection, thoughtful technical modifications, timely deployment of mechanical support devices, tissue-engineered conduits, and Fontan takedown have decreased the peri-operative mortality from 9 to 15% and 1 to 3% per cent in recent series, pernicious changes in organ function are causing long-term patient attrition. In the setting of a failed Fontan circulation, literature documents three surgical options: Fontan revision, Fontan conversion, or cardiac transplantation. The reported morbidity of 25% and mortality of 8–10% among Fontan conversion continue to improve in select institutions. While operative mortality following cardiac transplantation for Fontan failure is 30% higher than for other CHDs, there is no difference in long-term survival with actuarial 10-year survival of around 54%. Mechanical circulatory assistance, stem cells, and tissue-engineered Fontan conduit for destination therapy or as a bridge to transplantation are in infancy for failing Fontan circulation.

An individualised management strategy according to clinical phenotypes may delay the organ damage in patients with a failing Fontan circulation. At present, cardiac transplantation remains the last stage of palliation with gradually improving outcomes.