We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected]
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
In vivo diode dosimetry proved its efficacy as a patient-specific quality assurance tool for 3DCRT. Its usefulness in IMRT is not sufficiently investigated.
Methods:
Four step-and-shoot IMRT plans were generated for different treatment sites using an Alderson Rando anthropomorphic phantom. Two in vivo semiconductor diodes were used to perform 33 entrance radiation dose measurements at central axis and max beam point dose on a water-equivalent slabs based on the anthropomorphic plans. Measured values were compared to planned ones, and detailed analysis per segment of each IMRT field was made to infer the reason behind the discrepancies of measurements from expectations.
Results:
Point dose measurements were performed on a beam and a segment basis. Agreement within ±5% action level with planned dose was 27% of beams at central axis versus 45% at max point dose and 10% of segments at central axis versus 25% at max point dose. For ±10% action level, 70% of beams at central axis versus 73% at max point dose, and 15% of segments at central axis versus 41% at max point dose. Classification of segments resulted in a significance of .021 for measuring at positions unaffected by the MLC partial and total blockage.
Conclusion:
Diode measurements are recommended at maximum dose coordinates for open beams/segments for more accurate patient dose verification results as part of in vivo dosimetry. This is important for limited resources centres treating with sMLC IMRT.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.