We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected]
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
One of the prominent advantages of the gauge formalism as a field theory is its sophisticated mathematical structure, being based on analytical mechanics. Everything about the system dynamics that we need can be derived by rote out of a Lagrangian density of the system, which itself can be determined uniquely based on the prescribed symmetry underlying in the physical phenomenon we want to describe. In our case, we can find how the dislocation and defect fields should be incorporated into the continuum theory of elasticity, with direct correspondences to the differential geometrical (DG) counterparts introduced in Chapter 6. Also the formalism can provide us with a bridge between the DG pictures and the method of quantum field theory (QFT) discussed in Chapter 8 via the Lagrangian density.
The completion of the theory for MMMs (multiscale modeling of materials) is manifested itself partially as an identification of the right “flow-evolutionary” law explicitly, which describes generally the evolution of the inhomogeneous fields and the attendant local plastic flow accompanied by energy dissipation. The notion “duality” ought to be embodied by this law, although it still is a “working hypothesis,” deserving further investigations. Specifically, it represents the interrelationship between the locally stored strain energy and the local plastic flow as has been discussed in the context of polycrystalline plasticity in Chapter 12 for Scale C. In this final chapter, we will derive explicitly a candidate form of the flow-evolutionary law as a possible embodiment of the duality, which is followed by application examples.
Einsteins field equations are derived and discussed. It is argued that the Einstein tensor is proportional to the energy-momentum tensor and the constant of proportionality is derived by demanding that Newton’s Universal Law of gravitation be recovered in the non-relativistic limit. The modification of Einstein's equations when a cosmological constant is introduced is also presented.
In § 5.1 and § 5.2 we consider the simplest Lorentz metrics: those of constant curvature. The spatially isotropic and homogeneous cosmological models are described in §5.3, and their simplest anisotropic generalizations are discussed in § 5.4. It is shown that all such simple models will have a singular origin provided that A does not take large positive values. The spherically symmetric metrics which describe the field outside a massive charged or neutral body are examined in §5.5, and the axially symmetric metrics describing the field outside a special class of massive rotating bodies are described in §5.6. It is shown that some of the apparent singularities are simply due to a bad choice of coordinates. In §5.7 we describe the Godel universe and in §5.8 the Taub-NUT solutions. These probably do not represent the actual universe but they are of interest because of their pathological global properties. Finally some other exact solutions of interest are mentioned in §5.9.
In this chapter, we show that stars of more than about 1½ times the solar mass should collapse when they have exhausted their nuclear fuel. If the initial conditions are not too asymmetric, the conditions of theorem 2 should be satisfied and so there should be a singularity. This singularity is however probably hidden from the view of an external observer who sees only a ‘black hole’ where the star once was. We derive a number of properties of such black holes, and show that they probably settle down finally to a Kerr solution.
In §9.1 we discuss stellar collapse, showing how one would expect a closed trapped surface to form around any sufficiently large spherical star at a late stage in its evolution. In §9.2 we discuss the event horizon which seems likely to form around such a collapsing body. In §9.3 we consider the final stationary state to which the solution outside the horizon settles down. This seems to be likely to be one of the Kerr family of solutions. Assuming that this is the case, one can place certain limits on the amount of energy which can be extracted from such solutions.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.