We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected]
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
The EU only recently put AI at the top of its political agenda. However, data flows that are essential for the development of AI will need to fulfill European legal requirements. This chapter assesses whether the European legal framework on data protection may have an impact on the development of AI-based technologies. Given the size of the single market, European legal regulation of data flows inevitably produces legal effects outside the European territory. Those limitations may be challenged internationally as they constitute obstacles to trade for foreign companies and EU partners. The EU position tries not to be perceived as protectionist and promotes free flows of data that are essential for digital companies, in particular those developing the AI industry. This European way of dealing with digital trade and data flows in trade agreements is not shared by its trade partners. The contrast between the content of EU trade agreements and proposals and the last US free trade agreement illustrates how a possible transatlantic conciliation seems presently hard to attain. More broadly, fragmentation and new forms of sovereigntisms should continue to characterize the international free movement of data regime and impact future AI development.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.