Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

1 results

  • Chapter 6 - The Irrelevance Theory and More Objections

  • Joshua Stuchlik, University of St Thomas, Minnesota
  • Book:
    Intention and Wrongdoing
    Published online:
    02 December 2021
    Print publication:
    09 December 2021, pp 134-161

  • Summary

    Chapter 6 responds to five objections to double effect from proponents of the Irrelevance Theory, the theory that an agent’s intentions and motivating reasons are not fundamentally relevant to assessments of moral permissibility. The objections are the following: (i) It is mysterious why something in the agent’s mind should matter for the moral permissibility of her bodily actions; (ii) the PDE leads to inconsistent judgments about cases; the PDE is objectionable from the perspective of the deliberating agent, either (iii) insofar as it makes the moral permissibility of doing things such as dropping bombs turn on the agent’s intentions rather than objective features of her situation or (iv) insofar as it requires a deliberating agent to focus her attention inward on her own mental states rather than on the world; (v) the PDE sometimes has absurd implications for how we ought to respond to agents with bad intentions. I argue that none of these objections seriously damage the PDE.