Clozapine is the antipsychotic medication with the greatest efficacy in treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS). Unfortunately, clozapine is ceased in approximately 0.2% to 8.5% of people due to concerns about clozapine-associated myocarditis (CAM). The opportunity for clozapine rechallenge is important for people with TRS and CAM, due to limited alternative treatments. However, there is a lack of consensus regarding the optimal process, monitoring, and dose titration to achieve successful clozapine rechallenge. The study aimed to review the process, monitoring, and dose titration within cases of clozapine rechallenge after CAM, to identify features associated with successful rechallenge.

A systematic review of clozapine rechallenge cases following CAM was conducted. PubMed, EMBASE, Cinahl, and PsycINFO were searched for cases. Reference lists of retrieved articles and field experts were consulted to identify additional studies.

Forty-five cases were identified that described clozapine rechallenge, 31 of which were successful. Successful rechallenge cases generally used a slower dose titration regime with more frequent monitoring than standard clozapine initiation protocols; however, this data was not always completely recorded within cases. Six cases referred to published rechallenge protocols to guide their rechallenge.

The process, monitoring, and dose titration of clozapine rechallenge are inconsistently reported in the literature. Despite this, 69% of case reports detailed a successful rechallenge post CAM; noting limitations associated with reliance on case data. Ensuring published clozapine rechallenge cases report standardised data, including titration speed and monitoring frequencies, is required to guide the development and validation of guidelines for clozapine rechallenge.

Clozapine therapy presents a risk of agranulocytosis, necessitating monitoring of white blood cell count. The detection of benign ethnic neutropenia (BEN), in which neutropenia can be present without an increased risk of infection, is particularly important in preventing unnecessary withdrawal of clozapine. BEN is strongly linked to the CC homozygote of the single nucleotide polymorphism rs2814778 in the atypical chemokine receptor-1 (ACKR1) gene.

We introduced voluntary genetic testing for BEN in one of our clozapine clinics, with the aim of assessing the prevalence of undiagnosed BEN in patients on clozapine.

We offered genetic testing for BEN to patients undergoing medium- and long-term clozapine treatment, and conducted a comparative analysis of neutrophil counts across three identified groups: those previously diagnosed with BEN, those with newly discovered BEN and those confirmed by genetic testing not to have BEN.

We conducted genetic testing for BEN on 108 patients. Of these, 16 were already registered as having BEN and had the CC homozygote. A further 26 patients (24% of the cohort) who were previously not diagnosed with BEN by standard haematological monitoring were found to have the CC homozygote on genetic testing. Unadjusted mean neutrophil counts were lowest for those with previously diagnosed BEN (2.5 × 109/L, 95% CI 2.2–2.8; P < 0.001 v. other groups), but those with newly discovered BEN had mean counts that were significantly lower (4.1 × 109/L, 95% CI 3.6–4.7) than those with TT and CT genotypes (5.1 × 109/L, 95% CI 4.7–5.4; P = 0.006).

Undiagnosed BEN was common in our naturalistic cohort. The integration of genetic testing into standard monitoring would enhance the management of clozapine therapy, potentially allowing for the safe reintroduction or continuation of clozapine in patients with hitherto unrecognised BEN. All current and prospective clozapine patients should be genetically tested for BEN.

Clozapine is an atypical antipsychotic crucial for treatment-resistant schizophrenia, characterised by its multi-receptor targeting, including serotonin (5-HT2A, 5-HT2C) and dopamine (D1, D2, D3, D4) receptors, among others. This broad mechanism is effective against positive symptoms of schizophrenia with a lower incidence of extrapyramidal side effects. However, clozapine poses significant haematological risks, notably agranulocytosis, necessitating stringent blood monitoring protocols.

This study examined haematological parameters in 157 patients on clozapine therapy, analysing the prevalence and clinical correlations of haematological abnormalities such as leucocytosis, thrombocytosis, and alterations in red blood cell distribution width (RDW) and mean platelet volume (MPV).

The findings revealed leucocytosis in 36.9% of patients, thrombocytosis in 8.9%, and elevated RDW in 23.6%. Notably, higher clozapine doses were associated with leucocytosis, though no significant correlations were found between clozapine dose, duration of use, and changes in RDW, mean corpuscular haemoglobin concentration, or MPV.

The study’s results underscore the necessity of regular haematological monitoring to mitigate the risks of clozapine therapy while leveraging its therapeutic benefits. Additionally, the study suggests personalised dosing strategies to balance efficacy and safety, particularly in managing clozapine-induced haematological changes.

Although clozapine is the most effective antipsychotic for people with treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS), only 40% of people with TRS respond, and there is limited evidence for augmentation agents. Cannabidiol (CBD) reduces positive symptoms in individuals with schizophrenia, but no trials have specifically examined its efficacy in those with clozapine-resistant schizophrenia.

To examine the clinical efficacy of CBD augmentation in people with clozapine-resistant schizophrenia.

This is a 12-week randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group trial (registration number: ACTRN12622001112752). We will recruit 88 individuals with clozapine-resistant schizophrenia, randomised (1:1) to 1000 mg daily CBD versus placebo. Eligible individuals will be aged between 18 and 64 years, fulfil DSM-IV criteria for schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder, have a total PANSS (Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale) score ≥60, have received oral clozapine for at least 18 weeks and have a clozapine level of >350 ng/mL. Interim analyses will be conducted at 25, 50 and 75% recruitment; these will also provide an opportunity to reallocate participants dependent on conditional power. The primary endpoint will be the difference in PANSS positive scores at the end of week 12. Secondary endpoints include depression, anxiety, sleep, quality of life, alcohol consumption, change in weight and metabolic syndrome components, and neurocognitive measures, as well as safety and tolerability.

Novel treatments for clozapine-resistant schizophrenia are urgently needed. If found to be effective, CBD may have a role as a novel and safe adjunct to clozapine.

Despite proven effectiveness in refractory schizophrenia, clozapine remains underutilised, and it is important to understand potential reasons for this. This study’s aim was to examine in a National sample of Consultant Psychiatrists their knowledge of, attitudes and perceived barriers to clozapine use.

A novel questionnaire was designed and distributed by email to 275 Consultant Psychiatrists in Republic of Ireland.

Twenty-eight percent (n = 77) completed the survey, with 55% of respondents practicing for 15 or more years. Clinicians expressed confidence in managing clozapine treatment and side effects and were well aware of clozapine’s clinical effectiveness and guideline-based use. A majority indicated insufficient experience managing rechallenge and half expressed insufficient experience managing adverse events. Perceived patient factors were highlighted as barriers with 69% of respondents reporting patients’ concern about effectiveness and 50% regarding tolerability. Sixty-four percent (n = 40) indicated that a specialised/tertiary clozapine service would facilitate initiation, with 57% (n = 36) reporting less frequent blood monitoring would aid clozapine prescribing. A majority identified that access to dedicated staff (81%, n = 51) and dedicated day hospital services (84%, n = 53) would facilitate community initiation.

Consultants are familiar with clozapine use and related guidelines. Dedicated staff and facilities for clozapine use is one identified structural change to enhance clozapine prescribing in Ireland. Tertiary service or clinical advice service would assist in clozapine rechallenge cases or in managing significant adverse events. More structured patient education regarding clozapine effectiveness and professional development programmes focused on managing side effects and rechallenge may promote clozapine use.

A significant proportion of people with clozapine-treated schizophrenia develop ‘checking’ compulsions, a phenomenon yet to be understood.

To use habit formation models developed in cognitive neuroscience to investigate the dynamic interplay between psychosis, clozapine dose and obsessive–compulsive symptoms (OCS).

Using the anonymised electronic records of a cohort of clozapine-treated patients, including longitudinal assessments of OCS and psychosis, we performed longitudinal multi-level mediation and multi-level moderation analyses to explore associations of psychosis with obsessiveness and excessive checking. Classic bivariate correlation tests were used to assess clozapine load and checking compulsions. The influence of specific genetic variants was tested in a subsample.

A total of 196 clozapine-treated individuals and 459 face-to-face assessments were included. We found significant OCS to be common (37.9%), with checking being the most prevalent symptom. In mediation models, psychosis severity mediated checking behaviour indirectly by inducing obsessions (r = 0.07, 95% CI 0.04–0.09; P < 0.001). No direct effect of psychosis on checking was identified (r = −0.28, 95% CI −0.09 to 0.03; P = 0.340). After psychosis remission (n = 65), checking compulsions correlated with both clozapine plasma levels (r = 0.35; P = 0.004) and dose (r = 0.38; P = 0.002). None of the glutamatergic and serotonergic genetic variants were found to moderate the effect of psychosis on obsession and compulsion (SLC6A4, SLC1A1 and HTR2C) survived the multiple comparisons correction.

We elucidated different phases of the complex interplay of psychosis and compulsions, which may inform clinicians’ therapeutic decisions.

Sialorrhea is a common and uncomfortable adverse effect of clozapine, and its severity varies between patients. The aim of the study was to select broadly genes related to the regulation of salivation and study associations between sialorrhea and dry mouth and polymorphisms in the selected genes.

The study population consists of 237 clozapine-treated patients, of which 172 were genotyped. Associations between sialorrhea and dry mouth with age, sex, BMI, smoking, clozapine dose, clozapine and norclozapine serum levels, and other comedication were studied. Genetic associations were analyzed with linear and logistic regression models explaining sialorrhea and dry mouth with each SNP added separately to the model as coefficients.

Clozapine dose, clozapine or norclozapine concentration and their ratio were not associated with sialorrhea or dryness of mouth. Valproate use (p = 0.013) and use of other antipsychotics (p = 0.015) combined with clozapine were associated with excessive salivation. No associations were found between studied polymorphisms and sialorrhea. In analyses explaining dry mouth with logistic regression with age and sex as coefficients, two proxy-SNPs were associated with dry mouth: epidermal growth factor receptor 4 (ERBB4) rs3942465 (adjusted p = 0.025) and tachykinin receptor 1 (TACR1) rs58933792 (adjusted p = 0.029).

Use of valproate or antipsychotic polypharmacy may increase the risk of sialorrhea. Genetic variations in ERBB4 and TACR1 might contribute to experienced dryness of mouth among patients treated with clozapine.

Despite recommendations to initiate clozapine after two unsuccessful trials of antipsychotics, clozapine is underprescribed and initiated too late. The aim of this study was to describe different antipsychotic treatment sequences in the 36 months before the initiation of clozapine and to characterize clusters of treatment trajectories.

Using the French National Health Insurance database, a historical cohort study of the population in an area in western France was performed. The data from all new users of clozapine with a diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder in the period of 2017–2018 were evaluated. All outpatient reimbursements for antipsychotics during the 36 months before clozapine initiation were analysed. Successive reimbursements for identical treatments were grouped into treatment trials (TTs), and different trajectories were clustered using a state sequence analysis.

The results showed 1191 TTs for 287 individuals. The mean number of TTs per individual was 3.2. Risperidone, aripiprazole and haloperidol were the main treatments delivered. The frequencies of antipsychotics used differed between monotherapies and combination therapies. A three-cluster typology was identified: one cluster (n = 133) of ‘less treated’ younger individuals with fewer TTs and shorter TT durations; a second cluster (n = 53) of ‘more treated’ individuals with higher numbers of TTs and combinations of antipsychotics; and a third cluster (n = 103) of ‘treatment-stable’ older individuals with longer TT durations.

The results indicate that the median number of TTs during the 36 months before clozapine prescription was higher than the two recommended. The different trajectories were associated with individual characteristics and treatment differences, suggesting that additional studies of clinical parameters are needed to understand barriers to clozapine prescription.

To minimise infection during COVID-19, the clozapine haematological monitoring interval was extended from 4-weekly to 12-weekly intervals in South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust.

To investigate the impact of this temporary policy change on clinical and safety outcomes.

All patients who received clozapine treatment with extended (12-weekly) monitoring in a large London National Health Service trust were included in a 1-year mirror-image study. A comparison group was selected with standard monitoring. The proportion of participants with mild to severe neutropenia and the proportion of participants attending the emergency department for clozapine-induced severe neutropenia treatment during the follow-up period were compared. Psychiatric hospital admission rates, clozapine dose and concomitant psychotropic medication in the 1 year before and the 1 year after extended monitoring were compared. All-cause clozapine discontinuation at 1-year follow-up was examined.

Of 569 participants, 459 received clozapine with extended monitoring and 110 controls continued as normal. The total person-years were 458 in the intervention group and 109 in the control group, with a median follow-up time of 1 year in both groups. During follow-up, two participants (0.4%) recorded mild to moderate neutropenia in the intervention group and one (0.9%) in the control group. There was no difference in the incidence of haematological events between the two groups (IRR = 0.48, 95% CI 0.02–28.15, P = 0.29). All neutropenia cases in the intervention group were mild, co-occurring during COVID-19 infection. The median number of admissions per patient during the pre-mirror period remained unchanged (0, IQR = 0) during the post-mirror period. There was one death in the control group, secondary to COVID-19 infection.

There was no evidence that the incidence of severe neutropenia was increased in those receiving extended monitoring.

Although clozapine is the most efficacious medication for treatment-refractory schizophrenia, not all patients will have an adequate response. Optimising clozapine dose using therapeutic drug monitoring could therefore maximise response.

Using individual patient data, we undertook a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to determine an optimal therapeutic range for clozapine levels to guide clinical practice.

We conducted a systematic review of PubMed, PsycINFO and Embase for studies that provided individual participant level data on clozapine levels and response. These data were analysed using ROC curves to determine the prediction performance of plasma clozapine levels for treatment response.

We included data on 294 individual participants from nine studies. ROC analysis yielded an area under the curve of 0.612. The clozapine level at the point of optimal diagnostic benefit was 372 ng/mL; at this level, the response sensitivity was 57.3%, and specificity 65.7%. The interquartile range for treatment response was 223–558 ng/mL. There was no improvement in ROC performance with mixed models including patient gender, age or length of trial. Clozapine dose and clozapine concentration to dose ratio did not provide significantly meaningful prediction of response to clozapine.

Clozapine dose should be optimised based on clozapine therapeutic levels. We found that a range between 250 and 550 ng/mL could be recommended, while noting that a level of >350 ng/mL is the most optimal for response. Although some patients may not respond without clozapine levels >550 ng/mL, the benefits should be weighed against the increased risk of adverse drug reactions.

Hypersalivation is a major side-effect of clozapine in patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia.

We investigated the efficacy of topical anticholinergic formulation sofpironium bromide gel for improving hypersalivation in patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia receiving clozapine.

A double-blind, controlled crossover study was conducted with sofpironium bromide gel and a placebo gel to treat clozapine-induced hypersalivation in 16 patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia. Patients were randomly divided between groups A and B (each n = 8). Group A was treated with sofpironium bromide gel for 6 weeks, followed by a 2-week washout period and 6 weeks of placebo gel, after which they were observed for another 2 weeks. In contrast, group B was treated with placebo gel for 6 weeks, followed by a 2-week washout period, 6 weeks of sofpironium bromide gel and a 2-week observation period. One-minute saliva volume, objective salivation ratings (Drooling Severity and Frequency Scale and Nocturnal Hypersalivation Rating Scale) and subjective salivation ratings (Visual Analogue Scale) were assessed every 2 weeks.

All patients completed the trials. Three patients reported mild, spontaneously resolved skin itching. Compared with baseline values, the 1-min saliva volumes of both groups were significantly decreased by approximately 30% at the second week of sofpironium bromide gel treatment (P < 0.001), and significantly decreased by >40% at the fourth and sixth weeks of treatment (P < 0.001). The effects were maintained for over 2 weeks even after the treatment was discontinued.

We suggest that sofpironium bromide gel is effective in treating clozapine-induced hypersalivation in patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia.