We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected]
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Low-profile stent implantation remains a rescue treatment for aortic coarctation and branch pulmonary arteries stenosis in small children. Stent re-expansion to cope with vascular growth remains problematic.
Objectives:
To evaluate ex vivo feasibility and mechanical behaviour of over-dilating BeSmooth peripheral stents (Bentley InnoMed, Germany).
Methods:
Three BeSmooth peripheral stents in diameters of 7, 8, and 10 mm were dilated to nominal pressure and then 13 atm. BeSmooth Ø7 × 23 mm was sequentially post-dilated using 12, 14, and 16 mm high-pressure balloons. BeSmooth Ø10 × 57 mm was post-dilated with a 14 mm balloon and then with a 48 mm bare-metal Optimus XXL stent hand-mounted on a 14 mm balloon (stent-in-stent). BeSmooth Ø8 × 57 mm was directly post-dilated with a 48 mm bare-metal Optimus XXL stent hand-mounted on a 16 mm balloon (stent-in-stent). The stents’ diameter and length were measured. Digital inflation pressure was noted. Balloon rupture and stent fracture patterns were closely evaluated.
Results:
At 20atm pressure, BeSmooth Ø7 × 23 mm shortened to 2 mm forming a 12 mm diameter solid ring circle and the woven balloon ruptured radially. At 10 atm pressure, BeSmooth Ø10 × 57 mm fractured longitudinally in various dispatched breaking points at a diameter of 13 mm without shortening and ruptured the balloon with multiple pinholes. At 10 atm pressure, BeSmooth Ø8 × 57 mm fractured centrally at three different points at a diameter of 11.5 mm without shortening and the balloon broke radially in half.
Conclusions:
In our benchmark tests, extreme shortening, severe balloon rupture, or unpredictable stent fracture patterns at small balloon diameters limits safe post-dilation of BeSmooth stents beyond 13 mm. BeSmooth stents are not ideal candidates for off-label stent interventions in smaller patients.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.