Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

1 results

  • 4 - How Psychological Transformations Change Conflict Understandings

  • Justin Schon, University of Florida
  • Book:
    Surviving the War in Syria
    Published online:
    17 September 2020
    Print publication:
    08 October 2020, pp 101-112

  • Summary

    This chapter shows how PTG and PTSD influence civilian understandings of conflict. It focuses on how civilians consume narratives that elites produce. If civilians lose their ability to continue believing narratives as they evolve, then they undergo a narrative rupture. Narrative ruptures include a loss of understanding of options for survival, so it tends to prompt motivation for migration. The chapter's development of the concept of narratives allows the book to connect processes of PTG and PTSD with how civilians select specific survival strategies. It then describes government and opposition narratives in Syria, illustrating how elites compete to produce the narrative that the largest amount of civilians will believe. After that, it provides numerous examples of narrative ruptures that occurred for respondents that the author interviewed. Finally, the chapter concludes with a discussion of implications for narrative rupture on the debate over safe return vs. voluntary return.