Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T21:01:02.089Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Risk of non-affective psychotic disorder or bipolar disorder in autism spectrum disorder: a longitudinal register-based study in the Netherlands

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 November 2018

R. Schalbroeck*
Affiliation:
School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands Rivierduinen Institute for Mental Healthcare, Leiden, The Netherlands
F. Termorshuizen
Affiliation:
Rivierduinen Institute for Mental Healthcare, Leiden, The Netherlands
E. Visser
Affiliation:
University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, University Center for Psychiatry, Rob Giel Research Center, Groningen, The Netherlands
T. van Amelsvoort
Affiliation:
School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
J. P. Selten
Affiliation:
School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands Rivierduinen Institute for Mental Healthcare, Leiden, The Netherlands
*
Author for correspondence: R. Schalbroeck, E-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

Individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) appear to be at increased risk of non-affective psychotic disorder (NAPD) and bipolar disorder (BD). However, most previous studies examined the co-occurrence of ASD and NAPD or BD, ignoring possible diagnostic bias and selection bias. We used longitudinal data from Dutch psychiatric case registers to assess the risk of NAPD or BD among individuals with ASD, and compared the results to those obtained for the Dutch population in earlier studies.

Methods

Individuals with ASD (n = 17 234) were followed up between 16 and 35 years of age. Kaplan–Meier estimates were used to calculate the risk of NAPD or BD. We conducted separate analyses to reduce possible bias, including an analysis among individuals diagnosed with ASD before age 16 years (n = 8337).

Results

Of the individuals with ASD, 23.50% (95% confidence interval 21.87–25.22) were diagnosed with NAPD and 3.79% (3.06–4.69) with BD before age 35 years. The corresponding figures for the general population were 0.91% (0.63–1.28) and 0.13% (0.08–0.20). Risk estimates were substantially lower, but still higher than general population estimates, when we restricted our analyses to individuals diagnosed with ASD before age 16, with 1.87% (1.33–2.61) being diagnosed with NAPD and 0.57% (0.21–1.53) with BD before age 25 years. The corresponding figures for the general population were 0.63% (0.44–0.86) and 0.08% (0.05–0.12).

Conclusions

Individuals with ASD are at increased risk of NAPD or BD. This is likely not the result of diagnostic or selection bias.

Type
Original Articles
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2018

Introduction

Recent years have seen a growing interest in the long-term prognosis of individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), and in particular their risk of developing non-affective psychotic disorder (NAPD) or bipolar disorder (BD). However, risk estimates vary greatly. Two reviews reported a range of prevalence figures of NAPD in individuals with ASD from 0% to over 34% (Skokauskas and Gallagher, Reference Skokauskas and Gallagher2010; Chisholm et al., Reference Chisholm, Lin, Abu-Akel and Wood2015). Another review reported a prevalence of BD in individuals with ASD of up to 9% (Vannucchi et al., Reference Vannucchi, Masi, Toni, Dell'Osso, Marazziti and Perugi2014), but the authors also noted a general lack of investigations.

Most of these studies examined the co-occurrence of ASD and NAPD or BD, but this can result in diagnostic and/or selection bias. Since some signs typical of ASD, such as social withdrawal, are also common in NAPD and BD, some clinicians might erroneously diagnose ASD based on the assumption that these difficulties were present since early childhood. Selection bias may occur if individuals with previously unrecognized ASD are diagnosed with ASD after they have been diagnosed with NAPD or BD.

These sources of bias are less likely in studies in which young individuals with ASD are followed over time, because NAPD and BD generally do not develop until late adolescence or adulthood. However, earlier studies with such a design had small sample sizes, with few including more than 100 (and no more than 200) individuals with some form of autism (Volkmar and Cohen, Reference Volkmar and Cohen1991; Billstedt et al., Reference Billstedt, Gillberg and Gillberg2005; Cederlund et al., Reference Cederlund, Hagberg, Billstedt, Gillberg and Gillberg2008; Hutton et al., Reference Hutton, Goode, Murphy, Le Couteur and Rutter2008, Mouridsen et al., Reference Mouridsen, Rich and Isager2008). A Swedish population-based study included individuals registered with ASD before 16 years of age over an 11-year period (n = 9062) and calculated their odds of developing NAPD or BD within that period (Selten et al., Reference Selten, Lundberg, Rai and Magnusson2015). Compared with non-ASD peers, individuals with ASD had a higher risk of developing NAPD or BD (adjusted odds ratio 4.6 and 4.3, respectively); however, the study did not take into account the sequence of diagnoses in time. Overall, more large longitudinal studies examining the risk of NAPD and BD are needed, especially studies that consider the sequence of diagnoses in time (ASD preferably before NAPD or BD) and the age at which ASD is diagnosed.

The current study investigated the risk that individuals with ASD aged 16–35 years would develop NAPD or BD, using longitudinal data from Dutch psychiatric case registers (PCRs). Several analyses were conducted to minimize the possible contribution of diagnostic and selection bias. We compared the risk estimates with those for the Dutch population reported in earlier studies. Additionally, we assessed potential risk factors for NAPD or BD in individuals with ASD.

Methods

Psychiatric case registers

Data were retrieved from two PCRs in the Netherlands (PCR Northern-Netherlands and PCR Middle-Netherlands), which received anonymized diagnostic and demographic information on all patients attending inpatient/outpatient facilities for mental healthcare in a specified geographical area. We extracted data collected between 2000 and 2012 by PCR Northern-Netherlands and between 1999 and 2015 by PCR Middle-Netherlands. Data for each patient included information on Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)-IV diagnoses (diagnosis and date of diagnosis), sex, date of birth, country of birth, and country of birth of each parent. Informed consent was not obtained from individual patients, as Dutch privacy law permits the use of anonymous data for medical research.

Cases

The initial extraction included all individuals registered with a DSM-IV diagnosis of ASD (codes 299.xx) during the above-mentioned periods (n = 39 434). Individuals with ASD were excluded if information on their date of birth, date of first PCR registration, date of ASD diagnosis, or date of NAPD or BD diagnosis (if made) was missing (n = 195), or if the date of the ASD, NAPD, or BD diagnosis had been registered retroactively (n = 4855), that is, if the diagnosis had been made before 2000 (PCR Northern-Netherlands), before 1999 (PCR Middle-Netherlands), or before the first PCR registration. Furthermore, as we were interested in the risk of NAPD and BD in individuals aged 16–35 years, we excluded individuals diagnosed with NAPD or BD at or before 16 years of age (n = 129), who were younger than 16 years when the PCR closed (n = 12 785), or who had been diagnosed with ASD when aged 36 or older (n = 4236). In total, 17 234 individuals with ASD were included in the analyses.

Outcomes

The outcome of interest was a diagnosis of NAPD or BD made between 16 and 35 years of age. NAPD was defined as a DSM-IV diagnosis of schizophrenia, schizophreniform disorder, or schizoaffective disorder (codes 295.x), delusional disorder (code 297.1), or psychotic disorder not otherwise specified (NOS) or brief psychotic disorder (codes 298.x). BD was defined as a DSM-IV diagnosis of bipolar I disorder (codes 296.0x, 296.4x, 296.5x, 296.6x, or 296.7), bipolar II disorder (code 296.89), or BD NOS (296.80). If individuals were diagnosed with both NAPD and BD (n = 42), we assumed that the last diagnosis reflected a valid revision of the previous one. In these cases, only the last diagnosis was used in the analyses but the date of the previous diagnosis was used as an estimate of the age at onset. Two individuals were simultaneously diagnosed with NAPD and BD and were only included in the NAPD analyses.

General population estimates of the cumulative incidence of NAPD were obtained from a 2-year first-contact study conducted in The Hague, the Netherlands, in the period 1997–1999 (Selten et al., Reference Selten, Veen, Feller, Blom, Schols, Camoenie, Oolders, van der Velden, Hoek, Rivero, van der Graaf and Kahn2001). General population estimates of the cumulative incidence of BD were obtained from a population-based cohort study conducted in the Netherlands in the period 1996–2007 (Kroon et al., Reference Kroon, Wohlfarth, Dieleman, Sutterland, Storosum, Denys, de Haan and Sturkenboom2013). Incidence rates for different age groups (for NAPD 15–19, 20–24, 25–29, 30–34 years; for BD 15–24, 25–34 years) by sex were provided by the researchers involved in these studies and were used to estimate the cumulative incidence.

Statistical analyses

Risk of NAPD or BD

The risk of NAPD among individuals with ASD was calculated using Kaplan–Meier survival estimates, which reflect the proportion of individuals with ASD who had not been diagnosed with NAPD at a certain age. Individuals were followed up until they were 36 years old, until NAPD or BD was diagnosed, or until the PCR closed, whichever came first. Kaplan–Meier estimates for men and women separately, and their comparison with general population estimates, are reported in online Supplementary Table S1.

In the first analysis, we estimated the risk of a first diagnosis of NAPD between ages 16 and 36 among all individuals diagnosed with ASD before 36 years of age. Here we did not consider the sequence in which diagnoses were made or the age at which ASD was diagnosed. Consequently, we expected a greater likelihood of diagnostic bias (i.e. signs of NAPD being mistakenly diagnosed as ASD) and selection bias (i.e. individuals being recognized and/or registered with ASD due to the development of NAPD). The follow-up started at the age of first contact with mental healthcare services for any DSM-IV diagnosis or at age 16, whichever came later.

In the second analysis, we excluded individuals who were diagnosed with ASD after they had been diagnosed with NAPD, or who were diagnosed with ASD and NAPD simultaneously. By restricting the analysis to individuals still at risk of being diagnosed with NAPD at the time they were diagnosed with ASD, we expected that the influence of diagnostic and selection bias would be reduced. Follow-up started at age 16 or at the age of ASD diagnosis, whichever came later.

In the third analysis, we further restricted the analysis to individuals diagnosed with ASD before 16 years of age. We expected selection or diagnostic bias to play a minor role if ASD was diagnosed at an early age. Of note, individuals diagnosed with NAPD or BD before 16 years of age had already been excluded.

In the fourth analysis, we restricted the analysis to individuals diagnosed with ASD after (or at) 16 years of age. In these cases, a diagnosis of NAPD shortly after ASD was diagnosed may indicate that ASD was only diagnosed because of the development of NAPD. Therefore, we also conducted a fifth analysis from which we excluded individuals diagnosed with NAPD within 1 year of the ASD diagnosis.

The risk of BD among individuals with ASD was calculated using the same analyses described for NAPD, but with a diagnosis of BD as the outcome of interest.

For general population risk estimates, we calculated the cumulative incidence of NAPD or BD by subtracting the survivor function S(t) = {exp[−H(t)]} from 1, in which S denotes the probability that a member of the general population did not receive a diagnosis of NAPD or BD up to t years, and H represents the cumulative hazard function (Cleves et al., Reference Cleves, Gutierrez, Gould and Marchenko2010). This formula was equated to S(t) = exp{−∑(incidence(t)·Δt)}, in which we implemented the NAPD and BD incidence rates for different age groups, as provided by Selten et al. (Reference Selten, Veen, Feller, Blom, Schols, Camoenie, Oolders, van der Velden, Hoek, Rivero, van der Graaf and Kahn2001) and Kroon et al. (Reference Kroon, Wohlfarth, Dieleman, Sutterland, Storosum, Denys, de Haan and Sturkenboom2013). The 95% confidence interval (CI) of the cumulative incidence for the general population was compared with the 95% CIs of the cumulative incidence for individuals with ASD (1 minus Kaplan–Meier estimate) to examine whether they significantly differed. For the general population estimates, CIs were calculated assuming a Poisson distribution of the number of NAPD/BD cases (Rothman, Reference Rothman2015). For the comparison of the cumulative incidence, relative risks (RRs) are also provided.

Risk factors for NAPD or BD

Cox regression analyses were used to identify potential risk factors for the development of NAPD or BD. For these analyses, we used information from individuals diagnosed with ASD before age 16 years and from those diagnosed with ASD after (or at) this age, provided that NAPD or BD was diagnosed at least 1 year after ASD was diagnosed. We expected that the contribution of diagnostic or selection bias to the risk estimates would be small in these individuals.

The following potential risk factors were evaluated: sex, intellectual disability (ID; DSM-IV codes 317, 318.x, 319) present before or at the moment of the ASD diagnosis, migrant status based on parental country of birth (non-migrant if both parents were Dutch, migrant if at least one of the parents had been born abroad, or other if this information was unknown), ASD subtype [autistic disorder v. pervasive developmental disorder-not otherwise specified (PDD-NOS) or Asperger's syndrome], and age at ASD diagnosis (four age groups: 0–7, 8–15, 16–25, 26–35 years). Owing to the limited data available for the Cox regression analyses for BD, migrant status was not included, and the age at ASD diagnosis was split into three groups (0–15, 16–25, 26–35 years). An alpha of 0.05 was used to examine whether a variable violated the proportional hazard assumption and to evaluate whether a variable was significantly related to an increased or decreased risk of NAPD or BD.

Missing data

Information about sex was missing for six individuals with ASD (0.03%). Data for these individuals were omitted from Kaplan–Meier estimates by sex and from the Cox regression analyses. Migrant status could not be ascertained in 3019 individuals (17.5%). As described above, in the Cox regression analyses the migrant status of these individuals was coded as ‘other’.

Software

Data were prepared with SPSS version 22.0 (IBM). STATA version 13.1 (StataCorp) was used to calculate Kaplan–Meier survival estimates (using the sts list and sts graph commands) and for Cox regression analyses and corresponding proportional hazards tests (using the stcox and estat phtest commands).

Results

Risk of NAPD or BD

Table 1 gives an overview of the characteristics of the individuals with ASD included in each analysis. Figure 1 shows the estimated risk of NAPD or BD in each analysis, which are compared with general population estimates in Table 2.

Fig. 1. The Kaplan–Meier survival estimates per analysis showing the estimated proportion of individuals with ASD registered in Dutch PCRs remaining without a diagnosis of NAPD (left panel) or BD (right panel) with increasing age. Note that the scale on the y-axis differs for the two figures. The large increase in risk of NAPD after age 26 years in individuals who were diagnosed with ASD before age 16 is the result of a small number of remaining cases.

Table 1. Characteristics of individuals with ASD registered in Dutch PCRs

ASD, autism spectrum disorder; NAPD, non-affective psychotic disorder; BD, bipolar disorder; ID, intellectual disability; s.d., standard deviation.

a No restrictions with regard to age or sequence in time of diagnosis (ASD before or after NAPD/BD).

b Restricted to ASD cases still at risk of a first diagnosis of NAPD or BD at the time of the ASD diagnosis.

c Restricted to cases diagnosed with ASD before age 16.

d Restricted to cases diagnosed with ASD after (or at) age 16.

e Restricted to cases diagnosed with ASD after (or at) age 16, in which an NAPD or BD diagnosis was not made within the first year after the ASD diagnosis.

f Calculated over total number of cases. Information about sex was missing for n = 6.

g Diagnosed before or simultaneously with ASD.

Table 2. Estimated cumulative incidence (%) and associated 95% CIs (in brackets) of NAPD and BD as reported for the Dutch general population and for individuals with ASD registered in Dutch PCRs

CIs, confidence intervals; NAPD, non-affective psychotic disorder; BD, bipolar disorder; ASD, autism spectrum disorder; RR, relative risk.

a, b Retrieved from Selten et al. (2001; NAPD) and Kroon et al. (2013; BD).

c No restrictions with regard to age or sequence in time of diagnosis (ASD before or after NAPD/BD).

d Restricted to ASD cases still at risk of a first diagnosis of NAPD or BD at the time of the ASD diagnosis.

e Restricted to cases diagnosed with ASD before age 16.

f Restricted to cases diagnosed with ASD after (or at) age 16.

g Restricted to cases diagnosed with ASD after (or at) age 16, in which an NAPD or BD diagnosis was not made within the first year after the ASD diagnosis.

h Individuals from the general population were included from age 15 onward. ASD cases were included from age 16 onward.

* 95% CIs not overlapping with (known) general population estimates.

The results of the first analysis, which did not take into account the age at ASD diagnosis or sequence of diagnoses, showed that an estimated 24.36% (95% CI 22.68–26.14) of individuals with ASD were diagnosed with NAPD and an estimated 4.00% (95% CI 3.23–4.95) were diagnosed with BD before 36 years of age.

For the second analysis, we excluded 464 of 845 individuals with NAPD (54.91%) and 55 of 116 individuals with BD (47.41%), as these diagnoses had been made before or simultaneously with an ASD diagnosis. Of the remaining individuals with ASD, 13.27% (95% CI 11.80–14.91) were diagnosed with NAPD and 2.39% (95% CI 1.77–3.24) were diagnosed with BD before 36 years of age.

In the third analysis, we restricted to individuals diagnosed with ASD before 16 years of age. These individuals could not be followed up until 36 years of age because the PCRs were not operational long enough, but an estimated 1.87% (95% CI 1.33–2.61) were diagnosed with NAPD and 0.57% (95% CI 0.21–1.53) with BD before 25 years of age.

We restricted the fourth analysis to individuals diagnosed with ASD at or after 16 years of age. The results showed that an estimated 16.46% (95% CI 14.37–18.82) were diagnosed with NAPD and an estimated 2.61% (95% CI 1.93–3.52) with BD before 36 years of age. In total, 159 of 313 of individuals diagnosed with NAPD (50.80%) and 22 of 48 individuals diagnosed with BD (45.83%) had been diagnosed within 1 year of the ASD diagnosis. After exclusion of these individuals in the fifth analysis, an estimated 7.90% (95% CI 6.70–9.31) of individuals were diagnosed with NAPD and an estimated 1.35% (95% CI 0.89–2.04) were diagnosed with BD before 36 years of age.

Overall, 623 of 845 NAPD diagnoses (73.72%) and 77 of 116 BD diagnoses (66.38%) were made before, simultaneously with, or within 1 year of the ASD diagnosis.

In general, the risks of NAPD and BD were higher in individuals with ASD than in the general population (with non-overlapping 95% CIs), irrespective of the restrictions that we applied to the analysis. These differences were not explained by sex, as both men and women with ASD had a higher risk of developing NAPD or BD than did men and women without ASD. As shown in online Supplementary Table S1, risk estimates for NAPD and BD among men diagnosed with ASD before 16 years of age were an exception to this. The risk estimates were larger than the risk estimates among men in the general population, but the 95% CIs were partially overlapping.

Risk factors for NAPD or BD

We then examined potential risk factors for NAPD. The proportional hazards assumption was violated for the variable sex (χ2 = 6.94, p = 0.008), but not for other variables (all p values >0.05). Inspection of the data showed that the risk of NAPD among men and women with ASD was similar between 16 and 25 years of age, but diverged between 26 and 35 years of age. For this reason, we added a term for the interaction between time (follow-up during ages 16–25 v. 26–35) and sex to the analysis.

We initially conducted univariable analyses and subsequently added all variables to a multivariable model (see Table 3). Univariable analyses showed that men with ASD had a higher risk of NAPD than women with ASD, but only during the follow-up between age 26 and age 35 years. This risk remained increased in the multivariable model. Univariable analyses also showed an increased risk of NAPD among migrants than among native Dutch individuals (p = 0.04). In the multivariable model, this relative risk was of borderline statistical significance (p = 0.07). We found no other significant univariable or multivariable results (all p values >0.05).

Table 3. Cox regression analyses examining potential risk factors for NAPD or BD among individuals with ASD registered in Dutch PCRs (n = 16 528)

NAPD, non-affective psychotic disorder; BD, bipolar disorder; ASD, autism spectrum disorder; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; ID, intellectual disability.

a Analyses were restricted to cases diagnosed with ASD before age 16 and cases diagnosed with ASD after (or at) age 16 who remained without NAPD and BD diagnoses for at least 1 year.

b 221 cases diagnosed with NAPD.

c 39 cases diagnosed with BD.

*p < 0.05.

**p < 0.001.

In the analysis of risk factors for BD, none of the variables violated the proportional hazards assumption (all p values >0.05). Univariable analyses showed that men with ASD had a lower risk of BD than did women with ASD. This finding remained significant in the multivariable analysis. No other variables were significantly related to risk of BD (all p values >0.05).

Discussion

The results of the current study show that men and women with ASD are at increased risk of developing NAPD or BD. Men had a relatively higher risk of developing NAPD and women a relatively higher risk of developing BD.

It is difficult to estimate the contribution of bias to the variability in risk reported in earlier studies. However, this study confirms and extends those earlier findings by showing that the increased risks persist after adjusting for potential diagnostic and selection bias. That is, when we restricted our analyses to individuals already diagnosed with ASD before age 16, approximately 1.87% were diagnosed with NAPD and 0.57% with BD by 25 years of age (Table 2, analysis 3). We obtained similar results when we restricted our analyses to individuals diagnosed with ASD after 16 years of age who were not diagnosed with NAPD or BD within a year of the ASD diagnosis (Table 2, analysis 5). Of these individuals, 2.55% were diagnosed with NAPD and 0.51% with BD by 25 years of age, which increased up to 7.90% and 1.35% by 36 years of age, respectively.

Strikingly, we found that 74% of NAPD diagnoses and 66% of BD diagnoses were made before, simultaneously with, or within 1 year of the ASD diagnosis. An earlier study that followed up children diagnosed with ASD also reported that a subsequent diagnosis of schizophrenia spectrum disorder was most often made within a year (Maibing et al., Reference Maibing, Pedersen, Benros, Mortensen, Dalsgaard and Nordentoft2015). How can these observations be explained? One possibility is that these individuals had had a milder form of autism since childhood that was only recognized by healthcare services when their mental health deteriorated. Alternatively, some clinicians may have forgotten that autism-like signs and symptoms are part of NAPD and assume too readily that these have been present since early childhood. This interpretation fits with the observation of Kendler (Reference Kendler2016) that some clinicians equate ‘schizophrenia’ with its DSM criteria only. It is less clear whether such confusion exists between ASD and BD, although signs such as irritability and being overly talkative appear in both disorders and may result in similar confusion.

The sex difference in the risk of developing NAPD or BD warrants further investigation, as previous studies show mixed results (Stahlberg et al., Reference Stahlberg, Soderstrom, Rastam and Gillberg2004; Billstedt et al., Reference Billstedt, Gillberg and Gillberg2005; Hofvander et al., Reference Hofvander, Delorme, Chaste, Nyden, Wentz, Stahlberg, Herbrecht, Stopin, Anckarsater, Gillberg, Rastam and Leboyer2009; Lugnegard et al., Reference Lugnegard, Hallerback and Gillberg2011; Croen et al., Reference Croen, Zerbo, Qian, Massolo, Rich, Sidney and Kripke2015). The same applies to the finding that the risk of NAPD was high among migrants with ASD. We found no relation between risk of NAPD or BD and DSM-IV subtypes of ASD or age at ASD diagnosis. Furthermore, we did not replicate the finding of Selten et al. (Reference Selten, Lundberg, Rai and Magnusson2015), who reported that individuals with ASD and ID had a lower risk of developing NAPD and BD than peers without such disability.

The current study has several strengths. To the best of our knowledge, it is the largest to study the risk of NAPD or BD in individuals with ASD. Furthermore, we conducted longitudinal analyses and took steps to avoid diagnostic and selection bias. However, the study also has a number of limitations. First, general population risk estimates were retrieved from previous studies, which collected data in partially non-overlapping periods and geographical areas. The study of Selten et al. (Reference Selten, Veen, Feller, Blom, Schols, Camoenie, Oolders, van der Velden, Hoek, Rivero, van der Graaf and Kahn2001) was conducted in The Hague, which is a large city in the Netherlands, whereas our data were partially collected in more rural, northern parts of the Netherlands. Since the risk of psychosis is reported to be higher in urban areas (e.g. van Os et al., Reference van Os, Hanssen, Bijl and Vollebergh2001), the relative risk of NAPD in individuals with ASD may have been underestimated. As Kroon et al. (Reference Kroon, Wohlfarth, Dieleman, Sutterland, Storosum, Denys, de Haan and Sturkenboom2013) excluded individuals with BD and co-morbid ID, the relative risk of BD among individuals with ASD may have been overestimated. A second limitation is that misdiagnosis cannot entirely be excluded as an explanation for some findings, as we did not have information about the diagnostic process. In this respect, the availability of extensive diagnostic information can be seen as a strength of some of the previous smaller studies (e.g. Stahlberg et al., Reference Stahlberg, Soderstrom, Rastam and Gillberg2004; Billstedt et al., Reference Billstedt, Gillberg and Gillberg2005; Lugnegard et al., Reference Lugnegard, Hallerback and Gillberg2011; Joshi et al., Reference Joshi, Wozniak, Petty, Martelon, Fried, Bolfek, Kotte, Stevens, Furtak, Bourgeois, Caruso, Caron and Biederman2013).

There is still much uncertainty about why individuals with ASD have an increased risk of NAPD and BD (Padgett et al., Reference Padgett, Miltsiou and Tiffin2010 Chisholm et al., Reference Chisholm, Lin, Abu-Akel and Wood2015). Understanding the mechanisms underlying the increased risk will be an important next step for the prevention and treatment of these disorders in individuals with ASD. Shared risk factors, such as genetic overlap between ASD, NAPD, and BD (Carroll and Owen, Reference Carroll and Owen2009; Cross-Disorder Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium, 2013), may increase the risk of all three disorders. Individuals with ASD may also be exposed to environmental risk factors, such as an urban upbringing (Lauritsen et al., Reference Lauritsen, Astrup, Pedersen, Obel, Schendel, Schieve, Yeargin-Allsopp and Parner2014), or psychosocial factors, such as social exclusion or childhood trauma (Cappadocia et al., Reference Cappadocia, Weiss and Pepler2012; Kerns et al., Reference Kerns, Newschaffer and Berkowitz2015), that increase the risk of developing NAPD and/or BD (Read et al., Reference Read, van Os, Morrison and Ross2005; Laursen et al., Reference Laursen, Munk-Olsen, Nordentoft and Bo Mortensen2007; van Dam et al., Reference van Dam, van der Ven, Velthorst, Selten, Morgan and de Haan2012; Selten et al., Reference Selten, van der Ven, Rutten and Cantor-Graae2013; Cunningham et al., Reference Cunningham, Hoy and Shannon2016). Additionally, it may be worthwhile to consider the possibility that there are different risk factors for distinct, DSM-independent, autism subtypes (Chisholm et al., Reference Chisholm, Lin, Abu-Akel and Wood2015).

In conclusion, the current study showed that individuals with ASD are at increased risk of developing NAPD or BD. These results are likely not the result of diagnostic or selection bias. Future research should examine the mechanisms underlying these increased risks.

Supplementary material

The supplementary material for this article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291718003483.

Author ORCIDs

R. Schalbroeck https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9855-5797.

Acknowledgements

We are thankful to Janneke Giele for her assistance with the PCR data, and to Hjalmar Bos for his help with data preparation and literature search. Furthermore, we wish to thank Jojanneke Kroon for her substantial help in providing data about the incidence of BD in the general population.

Financial support

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Conflict of interest

None.

References

Billstedt, E, Gillberg, IC and Gillberg, C (2005) Autism after adolescence: population-based 13- to 22-year follow-up study of 120 individuals with autism diagnosed in childhood. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 35, 351360.Google Scholar
Cappadocia, MC, Weiss, JA and Pepler, D (2012) Bullying experiences among children and youth with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 42, 266277.Google Scholar
Carroll, LS and Owen, MJ (2009) Genetic overlap between autism, schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Genome Medicine 1, 102.Google Scholar
Cederlund, M, Hagberg, B, Billstedt, E, Gillberg, IC and Gillberg, C (2008) Asperger syndrome and autism: a comparative longitudinal follow-up study more than 5 years after original diagnosis. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 38, 7285.Google Scholar
Chisholm, K, Lin, A, Abu-Akel, A and Wood, SJ (2015) The association between autism and schizophrenia spectrum disorders: a review of eight alternate models of co-occurrence. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 55, 173183.Google Scholar
Cleves, M, Gutierrez, RG, Gould, W and Marchenko, YV (2010) An Introduction to Survival Analysis Using Stata. Stata Press: Lakeway, TX.Google Scholar
Croen, LA, Zerbo, O, Qian, Y, Massolo, ML, Rich, S, Sidney, S and Kripke, C (2015) The health status of adults on the autism spectrum. Autism 19, 814823.Google Scholar
Cross-Disorder Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium (2013) Identification of risk loci with shared effects on five major psychiatric disorders: a genome-wide analysis. Lancet 381, 13711379.Google Scholar
Cunningham, T, Hoy, K and Shannon, C (2016) Does childhood bullying lead to the development of psychotic symptoms? A meta-analysis and review of prospective studies. Psychosis 8, 4859.Google Scholar
Hofvander, B, Delorme, R, Chaste, P, Nyden, A, Wentz, E, Stahlberg, O, Herbrecht, E, Stopin, A, Anckarsater, H, Gillberg, C, Rastam, M and Leboyer, M (2009) Psychiatric and psychosocial problems in adults with normal-intelligence autism spectrum disorders. BMC Psychiatry 9, 35.Google Scholar
Hutton, J, Goode, S, Murphy, M, Le Couteur, A and Rutter, M (2008) New-onset psychiatric disorders in individuals with autism. Autism 12, 373390.Google Scholar
Joshi, G, Wozniak, J, Petty, C, Martelon, MK, Fried, R, Bolfek, A, Kotte, A, Stevens, J, Furtak, SL, Bourgeois, M, Caruso, J, Caron, A and Biederman, J (2013) Psychiatric comorbidity and functioning in a clinically referred population of adults with autism spectrum disorders: a comparative study. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 43, 13141325.Google Scholar
Kendler, KS (2016) Phenomenology of schizophrenia and the representativeness of modern diagnostic criteria. JAMA Psychiatry 73, 10821092.Google Scholar
Kerns, CM, Newschaffer, CJ and Berkowitz, SJ (2015) Traumatic childhood events and autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 45, 34753486.Google Scholar
Kroon, JS, Wohlfarth, TD, Dieleman, J, Sutterland, AL, Storosum, JG, Denys, D, de Haan, L and Sturkenboom, MC (2013) Incidence rates and risk factors of bipolar disorder in the general population: a population-based cohort study. Bipolar Disorders 15, 306313.Google Scholar
Lauritsen, MB, Astrup, A, Pedersen, CB, Obel, C, Schendel, DE, Schieve, L, Yeargin-Allsopp, M and Parner, ET (2014) Urbanicity and autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 44, 394404.Google Scholar
Laursen, TM, Munk-Olsen, T, Nordentoft, M and Bo Mortensen, P (2007) A comparison of selected risk factors for unipolar depressive disorder, bipolar affective disorder, schizoaffective disorder, and schizophrenia from a Danish population-based cohort. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 68, 16731681.Google Scholar
Lugnegard, T, Hallerback, MU and Gillberg, C (2011) Psychiatric comorbidity in young adults with a clinical diagnosis of Asperger syndrome. Research in Developmental Disabilities 32, 19101917.Google Scholar
Maibing, CF, Pedersen, CB, Benros, ME, Mortensen, PB, Dalsgaard, S and Nordentoft, M (2015) Risk of schizophrenia increases after all child and adolescent psychiatric disorders: a nationwide study. Schizophrenia Bulletin 41, 963970.Google Scholar
Mouridsen, SE, Rich, B and Isager, T (2008) Psychiatric disorders in adults diagnosed as children with atypical autism. A case control study. Journal of Neural Transmission (Vienna) 115, 135138.Google Scholar
Padgett, FE, Miltsiou, E and Tiffin, PA (2010) The co-occurrence of nonaffective psychosis and the pervasive developmental disorders: a systematic review. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability 35, 187198.Google Scholar
Read, J, van Os, J, Morrison, AP and Ross, CA (2005) Childhood trauma, psychosis and schizophrenia: a literature review with theoretical and clinical implications. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 112, 330350.Google Scholar
Rothman, KJ (2015) Episheet: spreadsheets for the analysis of epidemiologic data (version October 29). Available at http://www.krothman.org/episheet.xls (Accessed 19 April 2018).Google Scholar
Selten, JP, Veen, N, Feller, W, Blom, JD, Schols, D, Camoenie, W, Oolders, J, van der Velden, M, Hoek, HW, Rivero, VM, van der Graaf, Y and Kahn, R (2001) Incidence of psychotic disorders in immigrant groups to The Netherlands. The British Journal of Psychiatry 178, 367372.Google Scholar
Selten, JP, van der Ven, E, Rutten, BP and Cantor-Graae, E (2013) The social defeat hypothesis of schizophrenia: an update. Schizophrenia Bulletin 39, 11801186.Google Scholar
Selten, JP, Lundberg, M, Rai, D and Magnusson, C (2015) Risks for nonaffective psychotic disorder and bipolar disorder in young people with autism spectrum disorder: a population-based study. JAMA Psychiatry 72, 483489.Google Scholar
Skokauskas, N and Gallagher, L (2010) Psychosis, affective disorders and anxiety in autistic spectrum disorder: prevalence and nosological considerations. Psychopathology 43, 816.Google Scholar
Stahlberg, O, Soderstrom, H, Rastam, M and Gillberg, C (2004) Bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, and other psychotic disorders in adults with childhood onset AD/HD and/or autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Neural Transmission (Vienna) 111, 891902.Google Scholar
van Dam, DS, van der Ven, E, Velthorst, E, Selten, JP, Morgan, C and de Haan, L (2012) Childhood bullying and the association with psychosis in non-clinical and clinical samples: a review and meta-analysis. Psychological Medicine 42, 24632474.Google Scholar
van Os, J, Hanssen, M, Bijl, RV and Vollebergh, W (2001) Prevalence of psychotic disorder and community level of psychotic symptoms: an urban-rural comparison. Archives of General Psychiatry 58, 663668.Google Scholar
Vannucchi, G, Masi, G, Toni, C, Dell'Osso, L, Marazziti, D and Perugi, G (2014) Clinical features, developmental course, and psychiatric comorbidity of adult autism spectrum disorders. CNS Spectrums 19, 157164.Google Scholar
Volkmar, FR and Cohen, DJ (1991) Comorbid association of autism and schizophrenia. American Journal of Psychiatry 148, 17051707.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. The Kaplan–Meier survival estimates per analysis showing the estimated proportion of individuals with ASD registered in Dutch PCRs remaining without a diagnosis of NAPD (left panel) or BD (right panel) with increasing age. Note that the scale on the y-axis differs for the two figures. The large increase in risk of NAPD after age 26 years in individuals who were diagnosed with ASD before age 16 is the result of a small number of remaining cases.

Figure 1

Table 1. Characteristics of individuals with ASD registered in Dutch PCRs

Figure 2

Table 2. Estimated cumulative incidence (%) and associated 95% CIs (in brackets) of NAPD and BD as reported for the Dutch general population and for individuals with ASD registered in Dutch PCRs

Figure 3

Table 3. Cox regression analyses examining potential risk factors for NAPD or BD among individuals with ASD registered in Dutch PCRs (n = 16 528)

Supplementary material: File

Schalbroeck et al. supplementary material

Table S1

Download Schalbroeck et al. supplementary material(File)
File 58 KB