Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T06:44:07.190Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An investigation progress toward Be-based ablator materials for the inertial confinement fusion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2017

Bingchi Luo
Affiliation:
Research Center of Laser Fusion, China Academy of Engineering Physics, Mianyang621900, China Science and Technology on Plasma Physics Laboratory, Mianyang621900, China
Jiqiang Zhang
Affiliation:
Research Center of Laser Fusion, China Academy of Engineering Physics, Mianyang621900, China
Yudan He
Affiliation:
Research Center of Laser Fusion, China Academy of Engineering Physics, Mianyang621900, China
Long Chen
Affiliation:
Research Center of Laser Fusion, China Academy of Engineering Physics, Mianyang621900, China
Jiangshan Luo
Affiliation:
Research Center of Laser Fusion, China Academy of Engineering Physics, Mianyang621900, China Science and Technology on Plasma Physics Laboratory, Mianyang621900, China
Kai Li
Affiliation:
Research Center of Laser Fusion, China Academy of Engineering Physics, Mianyang621900, China Science and Technology on Plasma Physics Laboratory, Mianyang621900, China
Weidong Wu*
Affiliation:
Research Center of Laser Fusion, China Academy of Engineering Physics, Mianyang621900, China Science and Technology on Plasma Physics Laboratory, Mianyang621900, China
*
Correspondence to: W. D. Wu, Research Center of Laser Fusion, China Academy of Engineering Physics, No. 64, Mianshan Road, Mianyang 621900, China. Email: [email protected]

Abstract

The Be-based materials with many particular properties lead to an important research subject. The investigation progresses in the fabrication technologies are introduced here, including main three kinds of Be-based materials, such as Be–Cu capsule, $\text{Be}_{2}\text{C}$ ablator and high-purity Be material. Compared with the pioneer workgroup on Be-based materials, the differences in Be–Cu target fabrication were described, and a grain refinement technique by an active hydrogen reaction for Be coating was proposed uniquely. $\text{Be}_{2}\text{C}$ coatings were first prepared by the DC reactive magnetron sputtering with a high deposition rate $({\sim}300~\text{nm}/\text{h})$. Pure polycrystalline $\text{Be}_{2}\text{C}$ films with uniform microstructures, smooth surface, high density $({\sim}2.2~\text{g}\cdot \text{cm}^{3})$ and good optical transparency were fabricated. In addition, the high-purity Be materials with metal impurities in a ppm magnitude were fabricated by the pyrolysis of organometallic Be.

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2017

1 Introduction

Some properties of Be-based materials, such as nucleus property, physics property and ablation property cannot be substituted by any other metal materials[Reference Wilson, Simakov, Yi, Kline, Salmonson, Clark, Milovich, Marinak and Callahan1Reference Luo, Li, Kang, Zhang, He, Luo, Wu and Tang12]. In comparison to the conventional CH ablator, Be-based materials are the best inertial confinement fusion (ICF) ablator due to their low x-ray opacity, high density, high thermal conductivity, as well as having the highest mass ablation rate at every temperature and providing more ablative stabilization[Reference Wilson, Simakov, Yi, Kline, Salmonson, Clark, Milovich, Marinak and Callahan1Reference Marinak, Glendinning, Wallac, Remington, Weber, Hann and Collins4]. The lower opacity allows the x-rays to penetrate deeper into the Be shell and absorb more energy. The higher density allows more ablative material for a given shell. The higher thermal conductivity is advantageous of the temperature uniformity and forming the symmetrical DT ice layer. In addition, the higher ablation velocities allow implosion of more fuel, and the ablative stabilization reduces the effect of hydrodynamic instabilities during implosion[Reference Marinak, Glendinning, Wallac, Remington, Weber, Hann and Collins4]. As for the promising ignition targets, Be–Cu, $\text{Be}_{2}\text{C}$ and high-purity Be materials have aroused special research interest in the field of ICF[Reference Mehine, Björkas, Vörtler, Nordlund and Airilaet7, Reference Mateus, Carvalho, Franco, Alves, Fonseca, Porosnicu and Alves8].

As for one Be-based material, Be–Cu capsule, has been studied by the workgroups of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) and General Atomics (GA). The investigation contents mainly focus on the grain size, microstructure homogeneity, thickness uniformity, surface defect, surface smoothness, density, root-mean-square (RMS) surface roughness, stepwise dopant, as well as capsule metrology and characterization[Reference Xu, Nikroo, Wall, Doerner, Baldwin and Yu9Reference Wilson, Bradley, Hoffman, Swenson, Smitherman, Chrien, Margevicius, Thoma, Foreman, Hoffer, Goldman, Caldwell, Dittrich, Haan, Marinak, Pollaine and Sanchez11]. During the Be-based coating growth, the Be atoms array in the form of hexagonal-close-packed (hcp) structure, and the crystal grains grow along $c$ -axis orientation. The Be coatings are mainly characterized by a coarsening columnar grain, and display a strong anisotropy characteristics[Reference Luo, Li, Kang, Zhang, He, Luo, Wu and Tang12Reference Luo, Luo, Li, Zhang, Wu and Tang15]. These disadvantages weaken the mechanical property and affect ablation characteristics for Be-based materials; thus, a grain refinement method should be developed.

As for another Be-based material, $\text{Be}_{2}\text{C}$ ablator, is considered as an excellent potential target ablator because it combines the advantages of both hydrocarbon and Be, and achieves a more balanced ablation performance[Reference Brusasco, Letts, Miller, Saculla and Cook16, Reference Shih, Stephens and James17]. It owns the lower atomic number ( $Z=4.7$ ), and the higher density ( $\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}=2.4~\text{g}/\text{cm}^{3}$ ) and mechanical strength than many hydrocarbons[Reference Laref and Laref18, Reference Mallett, Durbin, Udy, Vaughan and Center19]. Xie et al. prepared $\text{Be}_{2}\text{C}$ films for the first time by plasma polymerization of diethyl-beryllium. However, it was difficult to control the ratio of Be to C. Meantime, Shih et al. developed radio frequency (RF) reactive magnetron sputtering for depositing $\text{Be}_{2}\text{C}$ coatings, which has a low deposition rate ( ${<}56~\text{nm}/\text{h}$ ). These shortcomings limited the development of $\text{Be}_{2}\text{C}$ coating fabrication[Reference Shih, Stephens and James17, Reference Xie, Stephens, Morosoff and James20Reference He, Luo, Li, Meng, Luo, Zhang, Zeng and Wu23]. Lately, DC reactive magnetron sputtering was adopted and provided a new promising method to prepare $\text{Be}_{2}\text{C}$ coatings[Reference He, Luo, Li, Luo, Zhang, Yin and Wu24].

As a Be material, especially a high-purity Be, it is indispensable for a raw material during the fabrication of Be-based materials. In the design of Be-based materials, the impurity contained is inversely proportional to the square of atomic number ( $Z$ )[Reference Haan, Amendt and Callahan25, Reference Haan, Salmonson, Clark, Ho, Hammel, Callahan, Cerjan, Edwards, Hatchett, Landen, Lindl, MacGowan, Marinak, Munro, Robey, Spears, Suter, Town, Weber and Wilson26] because of being sensitive to the implosion process. The larger the $Z$ is, the lower the impurity is. Usually, the impurity in Be materials is mainly O, C, Fe, Al, Si, etc, which is associated with the Be ore compositions. The S-65C Be materials with a purity of 99.54 wt.% was first produced by Brush Wellman in 1997[Reference Goods and Dombrowski27], and the main impurity included 0.6% BeO, 0.012% C, 620 ppm Fe, 185 ppm Al, 160 ppm Si and 130 ppm Ni. Subsequently, the Materion Corporation (previous Brush Wellman) announced the ultrahigh purity Be material with 99.99% in 2011. It is very regretful that the Be purification technique, in particular ultrahigh purity Be, is scarcely reported because of technique secrecy. Although some research institutions reported that they successfully purified Be via some technology[Reference Creutz and Gurinsky28, Reference Kaufmann, Grodon and Lillie29], such as vacuum distillation, zone melting, electrotransport processing and so on, they did not give the experimental details, impurity compositions and level.

The objective of this paper is to introduce the fabrication technology of Be-based materials, including Be–Cu capsule, $\text{Be}_{2}\text{C}$ ablator and high-purity Be material, as well as their research progresses, and then analyze the difference between ours and pioneer workgroup’s. In addition, a new grain refinement way by an active hydrogen reaction for strong anisotropic Be coating, an effective deposition method for preparing uniform $\text{Be}_{2}\text{C}$ coatings with a smooth surface, and a pyrolytic technology for Be material purification have been reported here.

2 Be–Cu capsule

2.1 Preparation principle of Be–Cu capsule

There are two kinds of technologies to fabricate the Be–Cu capsule, the physical vapor deposition (PVD) and chemical vapor deposition (CVD). At present, the main technology is the magnetron sputtering, which belongs to PVD methods. The magnetron can generate plasma by the glow discharge on its surface. The ionized gas atoms (in our case Ar) are accelerated by an electric field, and then collide with a target material of sputtering source. Be atoms or Cu atoms would be ejected from the target surface and deposit onto the substrate to form the coating. For a Be–Cu capsule fabrication, the substrate requires a spherical mandrel, such as poly(alpha-methylstyrene) (PAMS), Si, Ni and Fe, as a template onto which the metal is deposited. In order to improve the thickness uniformity, a bounce pan needs to be used, which is to provide a nearly random motion. The bounce pan is usually agitated by the knock, rotating, shake, as well as their combination mode during the coating.

There are many advantages for magnetron sputtering technique to fabricate the Be capsule. First, the target material can be fixed at arbitrary directions. The particle beam flux is from up to down, which is convenient to fabricate the Be capsule coupling the bounce pan. Second, there is small substrate thermal effect. When the sputtering power is lower than 120 W, the substrate temperature is less than $120\,^{\circ }\text{C}$ in our experiment. Accordingly, the plastic mandrels can be easy for selection, which is favorable to pyrolytic removal in the latter. Third, the incident particle energy during sputtering is about several to tens of electron volts, and the coating has a high density.

2.2 Dopant rule in Be capsule

The Be capsule used as ablator and DT fuel container usually needs to dope other element, which mostly is doped middle $Z$ . Its aim is to adjust the opacity, which keep x-ray flux and suprathermal electrons from preheating the inner DT ice layer, and ensure the hot spot with a low entropy compress before implosion. Moreover, the graded Cu-doped Be has less sensitivity to perturbations, which helps to reduce Rayleigh–Taylor instability during implosion[Reference Wilson, Bradley, Hoffman, Swenson, Smitherman, Chrien, Margevicius, Thoma, Foreman, Hoffer, Goldman, Caldwell, Dittrich, Haan, Marinak, Pollaine and Sanchez11, Reference Mallett, Durbin, Udy, Vaughan and Center19, Reference Haan, Salmonson, Clark, Ho, Hammel, Callahan, Cerjan, Edwards, Hatchett, Landen, Lindl, MacGowan, Marinak, Munro, Robey, Spears, Suter, Town, Weber and Wilson26, Reference Haan, Herrmann and Amendt30]. Due to the small Be atom radius, most elements are fully immiscible with Be each other. The doped elements in Be need to consider its solid solubility. According to the binary alloy phase diagrams[Reference Tanner and Okamoto31], there exist only four species $(Z<50)$ , such as Co, Ni, Cu and Pd, that solid solubility is larger than 1%. The solid solubility of Cu in Be, 9.5 at.%, is the largest than other. Therefore, the Cu element is first selected as dopant in Be for the National Ignition Facility (NIF) targets design, which can leave more margins to upgrade target. Previously, the Cu dopant concentration in Be is designed as 0.7 at.% in Rev 0[Reference Haan, Herrmann and Amendt30, Reference McElfresh, Gunther, Alford, Fought and Cook32], while the level of Cu dopant in Rev 6 Be–Cu capsule designed by Wilson et al. [Reference Wilson, Simakov, Yi, Kline, Salmonson, Clark, Milovich, Marinak and Callahan1, Reference Simaov, Wilson, Yi, Kline, Clark, Milovich, Salmonson and Batha2] has increased to 3.0 at.%. Obviously, the target development would be limited if other elements were selected.

2.3 Progress on Be–Cu capsule

The Cu-doped Be capsules were prepared by DC magnetron sputtering using the separate Cu and Be sources onto about 1.2 mm diameter PAMS spherical mandrels. Four round magnetrons were equipped with a Be target of 76.2 mm in diameter, fixed symmetrically around the center of the chamber, where one 50.8 mm Cu magnetron sputter source was positioned. The magnetrons point down toward a bounce pan that holds the samples. The base pressure was typically $2\times 10^{-6}$  Pa, and the sputtering pressure is in 0.1–1.0 Pa Ar environment. The distance between the substrate and Be target is 90 mm, which is not in good agreement with the Cu target to substrate distance of 300 mm. The four Be guns are operated at the range of 60–120 W, while one Cu gun is at 10–30 W. The coating rates are $0.3{-}0.42~\unicode[STIX]{x03BC}\text{m}/\text{h}$ at the situation.

The specifications of Be–Cu capsule prepared by the sputtering method in our experiment: the capsule diameter is 1.2 mm, RMS roughness 85 nm, average deviation of wall thickness $\pm 1.5~\unicode[STIX]{x03BC}\text{m}$ , the Cu dopant in the concentration range of 0.6 at.%–0.96 at.%, starting from the inside of Be shell, the thickness for each shell layer is $4$ , $3$ , $22$ , $7$ and $44~\unicode[STIX]{x03BC}\text{m}$ , while the Cu is distributed as 0, 0.6 at.%, 0.96 at.%, 0.6 at.% and 0, as shown in Figure 1. Further, the impurity and composition is detected by the inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) method, including 0.003 at.% Al, 0.04 at.% Si, 0.025 at.% Mn, 0.97 at.% Fe and 0.058 at.% Ni. Both O and C elements are quantitatively analyzed by energy dispersive x-ray spectrometer (EDS) at 1.3 at.% and 4.5 at.%, respectively.

Figure 1. Be–Cu capsule. (a) Optical microscope image, (b) SEM image, (c) micro-CT image, (d) polished cross-section morphology, (e) cross-section morphology, (f) Cu dopant distribution at cross-section.

Figure 1(a) presents the optical microscope images of Be–Cu capsule with 1.2 mm diameter, and the polished capsule surface looks smooth and glistening. Figure 1(b) reveals the scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of Be–Cu capsule. Figure 1(c) gives the micro-computed tomography (CT) image of Be–Cu capsule. The shell thickness can be clearly observed and the difference of gray value along radial direction indicates the dopant level change. Figure 1(d) gives the polished cross-section of Be–Cu capsule, and each dopant shell layer can be basically distinguished. Figure 1(e) gives the cross-section microstructure of Be–Cu capsule, which is characterized by the columnar grain. Figure 1(f) gives the EDS pattern and the Cu distribution along the radial direction, which is quantitatively determined via the ICP-MS scaling.

In order to further compare and analyze, the Rev 5 specifications for Be–Cu capsule[Reference Haan, Salmonson, Clark, Ho, Hammel, Callahan, Cerjan, Edwards, Hatchett, Landen, Lindl, MacGowan, Marinak, Munro, Robey, Spears, Suter, Town, Weber and Wilson26] designed and fabricated by the LLNL workgroup are given. The Be–Cu capsules are made of inner and outer layers of pure Be with three thin intermediate layers of Be with a Cu dopant. The capsule diameter is 2.36 mm, wall thickness deviation $\pm 1.5~\unicode[STIX]{x03BC}\text{m}$ , RMS roughness 20 nm, the Cu dopant in Be, the concentration deviation $\pm 0.1$  at.%. Starting from the inside of Be shell, the thickness for each shell layer is 5, 4, 23, 8 and 118  $\unicode[STIX]{x03BC}\text{m}$ , respectively. Be impurities can be controlled at $\text{O}<0.4$  at.%, $\text{Ar}<0.25$  at.%, $\text{C}<0.005$  at.%, $\text{Al}<0.01$  at.%, $\text{Si}<0.005$  at.%, $\text{Mn}<0.00015$  at.%, $\text{Fe}<0.005$  at.% and $\text{Ni}<0.001$  at.%.

Some differences on the fabrication technique of Be–Cu capsule still exist between LLNL workgroup and ours. First, our Be capsule has a small diameter of 1.2 mm, which is limited by the mandrel preparation technology. The PAMS mandrels with ${\sim}2.0$  mm diameter cannot be produced at present. Second, the surface roughness of Be–Cu capsule cannot still arrive at 20 nm, and the capsule polishing technology needs to be further studied. Third, the impurity elements listed in Rev 5 were also detected and they had high concentrations in Be–Cu capsule, especially O. The main reason is that the purity of Be targets is low, about 99 at.%. A high-purity Be target, which is difficult to fabricate and purchase, needs to be used during sputtering. Fourth, the target fabrication technology is still imperfect, and the investigation on drill hole and mandrel pyrolysis still remains to be done.

Figure 2. Be coating morphologies. (a), (b) and (c) surface microstructure, cross-section microstructure and XRD pattern of Be coating prepared by thermal evaporation, (d), (e) and (f) surface microstructure, cross-section microstructure and XRD pattern of Be coating prepared by reactive evaporation.

2.4 Progress on Be grain refinement

The Be capsule fabricated by anyone or any method is always characterized by a columnar grain with large diameter[Reference Montgomery, Nobile and Walsh33Reference Nikroo, Chen, Hoppe, Huang, Wall, Xu., McElfresh, Alford, Cook, Cooley, Fields, Hackenberg, Doerner and Baldwin37], which is relevant closely to a hcp structure of Be. The lattice constant, $a=0.2286$  nm, $c=0.3584$  nm, and the ratio $c$ to $a$ is 1.568, which is the lowest in all metals with hcp structure. Thus, the Be film is easy to grow along a preferential orientation and displays a strong anisotropy. The columnar grain reduces the Be capsule performance in the yield strength, fuel retention and ablation velocity, which is restricted in its development and application in the field of ICF. The nanocrystalline Be capsule can improve these capsule performances, which has aroused great research interest.

The Be coating is prepared by a reactive evaporation method[Reference Zhang, Luo, Luo and Wu38, Reference Zhang, Luo, Luo and Wu39]. After a Be coating is deposited by a thermal evaporation and achieves a thickness, the $\text{H}_{2}$ ionization source by RF fluxes into the vacuum chamber during the evaporation, which mixes into the Be atom beam and produces the $\text{BeH}_{2}$ . The amorphous $\text{BeH}_{2}$ can interrupt the growth of Be columnar grain and achieves the Be grain refinement. The base pressure of reactive evaporation equipment was typically $5\times 10^{-6}$  Pa, and the distance of source to substrate is about 150 mm. One condition of Be coating fabrication is the evaporation temperature of $1100\,^{\circ }\text{C}$ , the deposition time of 40 min, and the deposition rate of 5.5  $\text{nm}/\text{min}$ . Another condition of $\text{BeH}_{2}$ coating fabrication is the evaporation temperature of $1100\,^{\circ }\text{C}$ , the RF power of 200 W, the reflected power less than 20 W, the $\text{H}_{2}$ gas flow of 20 sccm, work pressure of 0.25 Pa, deposition time of 5 min, and the deposition rate of 1.7  $\text{nm}/\text{min}$ . Both conditions are alternant to be carried out, and the experimental results are plotted in Figure 2.

Figure 3. XPS spectra for films prepared at different $\text{CH}_{4}$ –Ar ratios after 30 min $\text{Ar}^{+}$ etching survey spectrum (a), deconvolution of Be1s peaks (b) and deconvolution of C1s peaks (c).

Figures 2(a), (b) and (c) show the surface microstructure, cross-section microstructure and x-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern of Be coating prepared by thermal evaporation. The Be coating is characterized by a hexagonal sheet grain with an average diameter of 510 nm, while the cross-section microstructure displays the parallel columnar grain each other. Figures 2(d), (e) and (f) show the surface microstructure, cross-section microstructure and XRD pattern of Be coating prepared by reactive evaporation. Although the Be coating consists of a ( $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}$ -Be) phase, the growth morphologies are different each other. Here, the surface morphology looks very similar to the cross-section morphology comprised by the fine grain with an average diameter of 45 nm. The Be columnar grain in the cross-section is interrupted by the chemical reaction of an active hydrogen with Be atom, and the produced amorphous $\text{BeH}_{2}$ film with a few nanometer thickness can interrupt the Be columnar grain growth. At present, the investigation on grain refinement of Be coating is still scarce, and has a little effect. The active hydrogen reaction method can offer new prospects to achieve the grain refinement for Be coating.

3 Be $_{2}$ C ablators

3.1 Fabrication principle of Be $_{2}$ C

$\text{Be}_{2}\text{C}$ ablators were prepared by DC reactive magnetron sputtering of Be target under argon–methane mixture plasma[Reference He, Luo, Li, Luo, Zhang, Yin and Wu24]. Argon and methane are ionized by the glow discharge. Then, Ar ions were accelerated by high voltage electric field and impinged the target surface. The sputtered target atoms react with the ionized reaction gas ( $\text{CH}_{3}^{+}$ , $\text{CH}_{2}^{2+}$ , etc) and deposit onto the substrate to form thin films. Evidently, the target surface atoms also react with the ionized gases and form a compound layer, which will result in the target poisoning. During the sputtering, the poisoning effect can be controlled by optimizing the sputtering chamber and the reactive gas influx mode[Reference He, Luo, Li, Luo, Zhang, Yin and Wu24].

3.2 Progress on Be $_{2}$ C ablators

In the present work, first, the process conditions were optimized to obtain pure polycrystalline $\text{Be}_{2}\text{C}$ films. Second, the properties of $\text{Be}_{2}\text{C}$ films were characterized to confirm its outstanding performance related to ICF application.

3.2.1 Be $_{2}$ C composition and crystallinity optimization

Figure 3 shows the variation of composition as a function of the $\text{CH}_{4}$ –Ar ratio, as given by x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) spectrum. It is found that the Be content decreases, while the C content increases gradually with the increasing $\text{CH}_{4}$ –Ar ratios. The pure hydrocarbon films will be formed when the $\text{CH}_{4}$ –Ar ratio exceeds the critical value. Similarly, the Be content in the films increases with the increase of sputtering power (not shown). Co-regulation of flow ratio and sputtering power is necessary for the preparation of pure $\text{Be}_{2}\text{C}$ films. The purest $\text{Be}_{2}\text{C}$ films have been obtained when the $\text{CH}_{4}$ –Ar ratio is 10% and sputtering power maintains at 150 W.

Figure 4. (a) High-resolution TEM image and corresponding FFT pattern (inset upper right) for film deposited at room temperature, (b) typical XRD pattern of films with in situ annealing.

Figures 4(a) and (b) give the typical high-resolution transmission electron microscope (TEM) image of $\text{Be}_{2}\text{C}$ film deposited at room temperature and typical XRD pattern of film grown at $600\,^{\circ }\text{C}$ , respectively. $\text{Be}_{2}\text{C}$ films without in situ annealing exhibit a nanocrystalline composite structure and cannot be detected by XRD. Films grown at high temperature show obvious diffraction peaks similar to the standard $\text{Be}_{2}\text{C}$ powder diffraction card (PDF-33-0191)[40], which indicate the films are mainly composed of polycrystalline particles without preferential orientation.

Thus, it can be concluded that: in the reactive sputtering process, the flow ratios and sputtering power mainly affect the compositions, and the substrate temperature influenced the crystallinity of the $\text{Be}_{2}\text{C}$ films.

3.2.2 Property characterization

One of the key factors for the ICF target is the surface finish, which usually gets worser as the thickness of the Be films increases. Thus, the relation between the surface finish and film thickness is critical for ICF applications, and needs to be investigated.

The influence of thickness on morphologies and roughness in $\text{Be}_{2}\text{C}$ film was studied by SEM and atomic force microscope (AFM). Figures 5(a) and (b) show the surface morphologies of films with thickness of 530 and 2300 nm, respectively. Both of them exhibit very similar morphology that many small spherical-shaped granules homogeneously distribute over the surfaces. The corresponding surface roughnesses (RMS) for films with thickness of 530 and 2300 nm are 2.63 and 3.23 nm, respectively. Similar surface morphology and roughness indicate that the surface finish of $\text{Be}_{2}\text{C}$ films is not sensitive to the thickness. Figures 5(a1) and (b1) are the cross-sectional morphologies of $\text{Be}_{2}\text{C}$ films measured by SEM. The cross-sectional morphologies reveal the uniform microstructure (without columnar crystal) of $\text{Be}_{2}\text{C}$ films, which is conducive to improving the symmetry of the ablation in ICF.

Figure 5. Typical surface and cross-sectional morphologies of $\text{Be}_{2}\text{C}$ films with different thickness: (a) and (b) surface morphologies by AFM, (a1) and (b1) cross-sectional morphologies by SEM.

Figure 6. Typical optical transmittance spectra of the $\text{Be}_{2}\text{C}$ films and corresponding photograph (inset).

Figure 7. SEM micrograph of compressed Be powders.

Based on the mass gain and thickness measured by SEM, the density and deposition rate of $\text{Be}_{2}\text{C}$ coatings were studied. The results revealed: the density of the deposited coatings reached ${\sim}2.2~\text{g}/\text{cm}^{3}$ , which fully embodied the high density advantages of $\text{Be}_{2}\text{C}$ coatings with respect to beryllium and hydrocarbons; the deposition rate of DC reactive magnetron sputtering reached ${\sim}300~\text{nm}/\text{h}$ , which showed the obvious advantage over RF sputtering ( ${<}56~\text{nm}/\text{h}$ )[Reference Xie22].

As ICF capsule materials, optical transparency is another advantage of $\text{Be}_{2}\text{C}$ over Be coatings. Figure 6 shows the typical optical transmittance spectra of the $\text{Be}_{2}\text{C}$ films and corresponding photograph. It reveals that $\text{Be}_{2}\text{C}$ coatings are transparent yellow-brown with sufficient $({\sim}40\%)$ transmittance in the visible region and higher transmittance in the near infrared region (80%). The optical transparent properties of $\text{Be}_{2}\text{C}$ make it possible to characterize the DT layers in $\text{Be}_{2}\text{C}$ capsules by optical methods and homogenized by infrared heating.

4 High-purity Be materials

4.1 Purification principle

Most purification methods separate the impurity by some difference of physical or chemical property between metal and impurity, such as the saturated vapor pressure, evaporation rate, melting point, as well as solubility difference between liquid phase and solid phase. Here, the pyrolysis method of the organometallic Be is used to generate the high-purity Be materials[Reference Baker, Brendel, Lowrance, Mangham, Marlett and Shepherd41]. At first, the Be raw material (98.5 wt%) is chloridized to produce the $\text{BeCl}_{2}$ . Afterward, the $\text{BeCl}_{2}\cdot \text{2Et}_{2}\text{O}$ reacts with the t-butyl Grignard reagent to produce di-t-butylberyllium etherate, whose purity can reach at 99.999 wt% by the distillation. Finally, the high-purity di-t-butylberyllium etherate (provided by Nanjing University) is pyrolyzed to form high-purity Be.

4.2 Progress on high-purity Be materials

The high-purity Be powder was prepared by the pyrolysis method. Figure 7 shows the SEM image of the compressed Be powder. The powder particle looks nearly spherical from SEM images, and its average diameter is about $1~\unicode[STIX]{x03BC}\text{m}$ .

The chemical compositions and impurity level in Be block were determined by a high-resolution ICP-MS (ppb) and ICP atomic emission spectrometry (AES) (ppm) after the sample was chemically digested with high-purity water and high-purity acid. The ultimate analysis results are needed to subtract the background value from the blank experiment, which was a complete ICP characterization except for adding Be powder into acids. In an ICP guide determination, the whole spectrum of Be powder was scanned first, and then nine impurities were quantitatively determined. Table 1 lists the content of Al, Fe, Mn, Ni, Cr, Ga, Co, Mo, Sb, O and C, etc.

Table 1. The content of impurities in Be powder.

The total content of the nine metal impurities is 61 ppm, and mainly includes the two major impurities, the Al of 34.7 ppm and Fe of 23.8 ppm. In the process of Be purification, the dodecane was only used as a solvent. The impurity in the solvent was also determined by ICP-MS and ICP-AES. The results show that there exists no impurity in the dodecane. It can be plausibly deduced that the impurities in the Be powder are mostly from the raw materials of di-t-butylberyllium etherate. Both C and O contents are determined by LECO. There is a high content for C and O, 0.82 at.% O and 2.22 at.% C. The C results from the alkylberyllium produced by incomplete pyrolysis of di-t-butylberyllium etherate, and its content depends on the pyrolysis temperature[40]. The O in the Be powder is attributed to oxidation upon exposure of the Be powder in air during the storage and measurement.

5 Conclusions

The Be-based materials, such as Be–Cu capsule, $\text{Be}_{2}\text{C}$ , and high-purity Be material, have been investigated. The Be–Cu capsule with 1.2 mm diameter, RMS roughness 85 nm, average deviation of wall thickness $\pm 1.5~\unicode[STIX]{x03BC}\text{m}$ , the Cu dopant in the concentration range of 0.6 at.%–0.96 at.% and total shell thickness of 80  $\unicode[STIX]{x03BC}\text{m}$ has been fabricated. For strong anisotropic Be coating, a new active hydrogen reaction method can refine the Be grain size to 45 nm. $\text{Be}_{2}\text{C}$ films were first deposited by DC reactive sputtering with a high deposition rate of $300~\text{nm}~\text{h}^{-1}$ . The compositions of the films mainly affected by the $\text{CH}_{4}$ –Ar ratios and sputtering power, and substrate temperature influenced the crystallinity. The properties of the pure polycrystalline $\text{Be}_{2}\text{C}$ films were characterized, which showed uniform microstructure, smooth surface, high density and good optical transparency. In addition, a particular purification technology for Be materials by pyrolysis of di-t-butylberyllium etherate has been reported in our work. The total content of metal impurities was 61 ppm by ICP-MS determination, including the two major impurities, the Al of 34.7 ppm and Fe of 23.8 ppm. The total C and O contents determined by LECO were 2.22 at.% and 0.82 at.%, respectively.

Acknowledgements

This project was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (11204280) and Laboratory of Precision Manufacturing Technology, CAEP (ZZ15011). The authors are grateful to Mr. Zhan-Wen Zhang, Mrs Su-Fen Chen for their PAMS mandrel, Mr Xiao-Jun Ma, Qi Wang, Yong Zeng for their measurement work, and Professor Yi Pan, Dr. Jian-Lin Han (Nanjing University) for their high-purity organometallic Be materials.

References

Wilson, D. C. Simakov, A. N. Yi, S. Kline, J. L. Salmonson, J. Clark, D. Milovich, J. Marinak, M. and Callahan, D. in Conference: Ignition Strategic Review LA-UR-13-25977 (2013).Google Scholar
Simaov, A. N. Wilson, D. C. Yi, S. A. Kline, J. L. Clark, D. S. Milovich, J. L. Salmonson, J. D. and Batha, S. H. Phys. Plasmas 21, 022701 (2014).Google Scholar
Moreno, K. A. Xu, H. W. Nikroo, A. Huang, H. Fong, J. Knipping, J. E. Kaae, J. L. and Giraldez, E. M. Fusion Sci. Technol. 51, 581 (2007).Google Scholar
Marinak, M. M. Glendinning, S. G. Wallac, R. J. E. Remington, B. A. Weber, S. V. Hann, S. W. and Collins, G. W. Phys. Plasmas 9, 3567 (2002).Google Scholar
Guerrero, C. L. and Perlado, J. M. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 688, 012022 (2016).Google Scholar
Wang, C. Li, Z. Li, D.-F. and Ping, Z. Phys. Plasmas 22, 102702 (2015).Google Scholar
Mehine, M. Björkas, C. Vörtler, K. Nordlund, K. and Airilaet, M. I. J. Nucl. Mater. 414, 1 (2011).Google Scholar
Mateus, R. Carvalho, P. A. Franco, N. Alves, L. C. Fonseca, M. Porosnicu, C. and Alves, E. J. Nucl. Mater. 442, S320 (2013).Google Scholar
Xu, H. Nikroo, A. Wall, J. R. Doerner, R. Baldwin, M. and Yu, J. H. Fusion Sci. Technol. 49, 778 (2007).Google Scholar
Xu, H. Alford, C. Chason, E. Detor, A. J. Fuller, T. Hamza, A. V. Hayes, J. Moreno, K. A. Nikroo, A. van Buuren, T. Wang, Y. Wu, J. Wilkens, H. and Youngblood, K. P. J. Mater. Res. 378, 1 (2011).Google Scholar
Wilson, D. C. Bradley, P. A. Hoffman, N. M. Swenson, F. J. Smitherman, D. P. Chrien, R. E. Margevicius, R. W. Thoma, D. J. Foreman, L. R. Hoffer, J. K. Goldman, S. R. Caldwell, S. E. Dittrich, T. R. Haan, S. W. Marinak, M. M. Pollaine, S. M. and Sanchez, J. J. Phys. Plasmas 5, 1953 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luo, B. C. Li, K. Kang, X. L. Zhang, J. Q. He, Y. D. Luo, J. S. Wu, W. D. and Tang, Y. J. Chin. Phys. B 23, 066804 (2014).Google Scholar
Luo, B. C. Li, K. Tan, X. L. Zhang, J. Q. Luo, J. S. Jiang, X. D. Wu, W. D. and Tang, Y. J. J. Alloys Compd. 607, 150 (2014).Google Scholar
Luo, B. C. Li, K. Zhang, J. Q. Luo, J. S. Wu, W. D. and Tang, Y. J. J. Korean Phys. Soc. 68, 557 (2016).Google Scholar
Luo, B. C. Luo, J. S. Li, K. Zhang, J. Q. Wu, W. D. and Tang, Y. J. Rare Metal Mater. Eng. 41, 1684 (2012).Google Scholar
Brusasco, R. Letts, S. Miller, P. Saculla, M. and Cook, R. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 14, 1019 (1996).Google Scholar
Shih, W. S. Stephens, R. B. and James, W. J. Fusion Sci. Technol. 37, 24 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laref, S. and Laref, A. Comput. Mater. Sci. 44, 664 (2008).Google Scholar
Mallett, M. W. Durbin, E. A. Udy, M. C. Vaughan, D. A. and Center, E. J. J. Electrochem. Soc. 101, 298 (1954).Google Scholar
Xie, Y. X. Stephens, R. B. Morosoff, N. C. and James, W. J. J. Fusion Energy 17, 259 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shih, W. S. Barr, N. E. James, W. J. Morosoff, N. C. and Stephens, R. B. Fusion Sci. Technol. 31, 442 (1997).Google Scholar
Xie, Y. X. Plasma Deposition of Beryllium Carbide via Magnetron Sputtering (University of Missouri, 1998).Google Scholar
He, Y. D. Luo, J. S. Li, J. Meng, L. B. Luo, B. C. Zhang, J. Q. Zeng, Y. and Wu, W. D. Fusion Eng. Des. 103, 118 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
He, Y. D. Luo, J. S. Li, K. Luo, B. C. Zhang, J. Q. Yin, H. B. and Wu, W. D. RSC Adv. 6, 39444 (2016).Google Scholar
Haan, S. W. Amendt, P. A. and Callahan, D. A. Fusion Sci. Technol. 51, 509 (2007).Google Scholar
Haan, S. W. Salmonson, J. D. Clark, D. S. Ho, D. D. Hammel, B. A. Callahan, D. A. Cerjan, C. J. Edwards, M. J. Hatchett, S. P. Landen, O. L. Lindl, J. D. MacGowan, B. J. Marinak, M. M. Munro, D. H. Robey, H. F. Spears, B. K. Suter, L. J. Town, R. P. Weber, S. V. and Wilson, D. C. Fusion Sci. Technol. 59, 1 (2011).Google Scholar
Goods, S. H. and Dombrowski, D. E. in Conference: 3. IEA International Workshop on Beryllium Technology for Fusion AC04-94AL85000 (1997).Google Scholar
Creutz, E. G. and Gurinsky, D. Met. Progr. 62, 82 (1952).Google Scholar
Kaufmann, A. R. Grodon, P. and Lillie, D. W. Trans. Am. Soc. Met. 42, 786 (1950).Google Scholar
Haan, S. W. Herrmann, M. C. and Amendt, P. A. Fusion Sci. Technol. 49, 553 (2006).Google Scholar
Tanner, L. E. and Okamoto, H. Bulletin Alloy Phase Diagrams 9, 563 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McElfresh, M. Gunther, J. Alford, C. Fought, E. and Cook, R. Fusion Sci. Technol. 49, 786 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montgomery, D. S. Nobile, A. and Walsh, P. J. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 75, 3986 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davydov, D. A. Kholopova, O. V. and Kolbasov, B. N. J. Nucl. Mater. 367, 1079 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swift, D. C. Tierney, T. E. Luo, S. N. Paisley, D. L. Kyrala, G. A. Hauer, A. Greenfield, S. R. Koskelo, A. C. Mcclellan, K. J. Lorenzana, H. E. Kalant, D. Remington, B. A. Peralta, P. and Loomis, E. Phys. Plasmas 12, 056308 (2005).Google Scholar
Kádas, K. Vitos, L. Johansson, B. and Kollar, J. Phys. Rev. B 75, 035132 (2007).Google Scholar
Nikroo, A. Chen, K. C. Hoppe, M. L. Huang, H. Wall, J. R. Xu., H. McElfresh, M. W. Alford, C. S. Cook, R. C. Cooley, J. C. Fields, R. Hackenberg, R. Doerner, R. P. and Baldwin, M. Phys. Plasmas 13, 056302 (2006).Google Scholar
Zhang, J. Q. Luo, J. S. Luo, B. C. and Wu, W. D. High Power Laser Part. Beams 23, 1277 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, J. Q. Luo, J. S. Luo, B. C. and Wu, W. D. Rare Metal Mater. Eng. 41, 1483 (2012).Google Scholar
Powder Diffraction File (PCPDFWIN v.2.02), (JCPDS International Centre for Diffraction Data, 33–0191, 1999).Google Scholar
Baker, R. Brendel, G. Lowrance, B. Mangham, J. Marlett, E. and Shepherd, L. J. Organomet. Chem. 159, 123 (1978).Google Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1. Be–Cu capsule. (a) Optical microscope image, (b) SEM image, (c) micro-CT image, (d) polished cross-section morphology, (e) cross-section morphology, (f) Cu dopant distribution at cross-section.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Be coating morphologies. (a), (b) and (c) surface microstructure, cross-section microstructure and XRD pattern of Be coating prepared by thermal evaporation, (d), (e) and (f) surface microstructure, cross-section microstructure and XRD pattern of Be coating prepared by reactive evaporation.

Figure 2

Figure 3. XPS spectra for films prepared at different $\text{CH}_{4}$–Ar ratios after 30 min $\text{Ar}^{+}$ etching survey spectrum (a), deconvolution of Be1s peaks (b) and deconvolution of C1s peaks (c).

Figure 3

Figure 4. (a) High-resolution TEM image and corresponding FFT pattern (inset upper right) for film deposited at room temperature, (b) typical XRD pattern of films with in situ annealing.

Figure 4

Figure 5. Typical surface and cross-sectional morphologies of $\text{Be}_{2}\text{C}$ films with different thickness: (a) and (b) surface morphologies by AFM, (a1) and (b1) cross-sectional morphologies by SEM.

Figure 5

Figure 6. Typical optical transmittance spectra of the $\text{Be}_{2}\text{C}$ films and corresponding photograph (inset).

Figure 6

Figure 7. SEM micrograph of compressed Be powders.

Figure 7

Table 1. The content of impurities in Be powder.