Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-01T17:58:20.777Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The continuing story of dhat syndrome

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

K. A. L. A. Kuruppuarachchi
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Kelaniya, Ragama, Sri Lanka
L. T. Wijeratne
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Kelaniya, Ragama, Sri Lanka
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Columns
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2004 

Sumathipala et al (Reference Sumathipala, Siribaddana and Bhugra2004) raise an important argument regarding culture-bound syndromes. We agree that dhat, although considered an exotic neurosis of the orient, is a symptom that has been observed world-wide. The use of the term ‘syndrome’ cannot be justified in this case. We see it more as a mere symptom of common disorders like depression, anxiety and somatisation. Mumford (Reference Mumford1996) argued that dhat should be primarily regarded not as the focus of a culture-bound syndrome but as a culturally determined symptom associated with depression.

It has been stated by Kuruppuarachchi & Williams (Reference Kuruppuarachchi and Williams2001) that in Sri Lanka somatic complaints override the more recognised presenting symptoms appearing in the diagnostic criteria for conditions such as depression. The language used facilitates this as the vocabulary does not promote expression of symptoms like low mood.

It is our belief that ‘semen loss anxiety’ too is a form of communicating distress seen in those with these conditions.

We would also like to highlight the fact that the current classification systems such as ICD–10 (World Health Organization, 1992) and DSM–IV (American Psychiatric Association, 1994) do not give clear operational guidelines to come to a proper diagnosis of culture-bound syndromes. As a result, many clinicians tend to make a diagnosis based on arbitrary guidelines.

In Sri Lanka clinicians come across many patients presenting with ‘dhat syndrome’. However, on further exploration one of the common neurotic and depressive disorders can be recognised as the cause.

The belief that seminal fluid is precious is still largely prevalent. It is considered by many lay people that 100 drops of blood make one drop of semen. Buddhism, while discouraging promiscuity, does not proscribe sexual activity. However, the erroneous belief that all sexual activity is sinful is widespread among Buddhists. The anxiety regarding loss of semen may be related to this belief.

Dhat is also promoted by practitioners of alternative and complementary medicine. This is obvious in many advertisements appearing in the newspapers boasting different forms of cures for loss of semen.

References

American Psychiatric Association (1994) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th edn) (DSM–IV). Washington, DC: APA.Google Scholar
Kuruppuarachchi, K. A. L. A. & Williams, S. S. (2001) Cross-cultural psychiatric interviews and research instruments (letter). British Journal of Psychiatry, 179, 461.Google Scholar
Mumford, D. B. (1996) The ‘Dhat syndrome’: a culturally determined symptom of depression? Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 94, 163167.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sumathipala, A., Siribaddana, S. H. & Bhugra, D. (2004) Culture-bound syndromes: the story of dhat syndrome. British Journal of Psychiatry, 184, 200209.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (1992) ICD–10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.