Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T21:24:08.686Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An examination of environmental correlates with childhood height-for-age in Ghana

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2012

Ebenezer Nikoi*
Affiliation:
Department of Geography, University of Minnesota, 414 Social Sciences Building, 267 19th Avenue South, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
Peter Anthamatten
Affiliation:
Department of Geography and Environmental Sciences, Auraria Campus, Denver, CO, USA
*
*Corresponding author: Email [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective

The relationship between a child's environment and nutritional status is difficult to examine yet could offer an important guide to policy. The objective of the present work was to examine individual and environmental correlates with childhood height-for-age in Ghana.

Design

Data were derived from the 2008 MEASURE Demographic and Health Survey in Ghana, the 2000 Ghana Population and Housing Census, and the World Wide Fund for Nature's eco-regions database. A generalized linear mixed regression model was used to estimate the effects of individual and environmental correlates on height-for-age.

Subjects

The study examined 2225 Ghanaian children aged 0–59 months.

Setting

The setting was all districts in Ghana for the year 2008.

Results

After accounting for individual characteristics of children, mothers and households, height-for-age was significantly associated with population density. Other significantly associated variables in the final model were the age of the child, vaccination status, the size of the child at birth, months of breast-feeding, mother's BMI, whether the child's mother had health insurance and wealth quintile.

Conclusions

In addition to a number of characteristics of the children and their households, the social milieu is important to understanding differences in height-for-age among children in Ghana. The biophysical environment was not associated with height-for-age.

Type
Epidemiology
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2012

Malnutrition, defined here as ‘a cellular imbalance between the supply of nutrients and energy and the demand for them to ensure growth, maintenance, activity, and specific functions’(Reference Pradilla1), continues to be a significant challenge for children in low-income countries, particularly in Africa. Undernutrition remains one of Africa's most fundamental challenges for improving human development. UNICEF defines ‘undernutrition’ as(2):

the outcome of insufficient food intake and repeated infectious diseases. It includes being underweight for one's age, short for one's age (stunted), thin for one's height (wasted) and deficient in vitamins and minerals (micronutrient malnutrition).

Because the time and capacities of caregivers are limited, many children on the continent are unable to access or effectively utilize the food and health services they need for a healthy life(Reference Benson and Shekar3). According to UNICEF estimates, nearly one-third of all sub-Saharan African children under 5 years of age are underweight(4); that is, below −2 standard deviations from the median weight-for-height in a global reference population.

Ghana ratified the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC) in 1990 and demonstrated its commitment by launching a 10-year National Program of Action in 1992. This programme translated the UNCRC document into six major Ghanaian languages, reformed laws related to children, initiated compulsory and universal basic education, and created the Ministry for Women and Children. These initiatives contributed to increased school enrolment (particularly for girls) and improved immunization rates. Results from five Ghana Demographic and Health Surveys (GDHS) document subsequent improvements in infant and childhood mortality rates(5).

Many national governments do not have the financial resources necessary to achieve the nutrition goals prescribed by the UNCRC. Sadly, many also lack the appropriate knowledge and political will to ensure progress in implementing measures that are financially feasible. Providing specific information at different scales can enable more cost-effective and efficient ways to address child nutritional deficits. Research is not necessary to demonstrate that impoverished children who lack quality shelter, diet, education and health care are especially vulnerable to malnutrition. Research can however identify the people and places with the greatest need, enhance our understanding of the variables that best explain children's failure to thrive in particular situations and guide interventions that could improve children's well-being.

Some scholarship, particularly by climatologists, biologists, ecologists and soil scientists, focuses on the biophysical environment, but few make the connection to nutritional well-being(Reference Materechera6, Reference Stepniewski, Horn and Martyniuk7). Work that examines this connection shows that the biophysical environment has important implications for children's nutritional outcomes, through its impact on the potential for agricultural sustainability and food production, but evidence is inconclusive. Factors such as rainfall and soil type are among the biophysical environmental conditions that impact the quantity, quality and diversity of food produced. Poor nutritional status has been linked to the altitudes at which children reside in Tibet(Reference Dang, Yan and Yamamoto8) for example, and the influence of ecology on nutrition and body composition measures has been cited as a reason for significant group differences among pre-school children in coastal, Himalayan and desert ecology regions in India(Reference Ghosh and Kshatriya9). In West Africa, the most serious child malnutrition occurs in more arid regions, where drought-resistant crops dominate, while the least malnourished children are in the more humid areas where root crops are dominant(Reference Legg10). The nature of large-scale measurements such as biophysical environment makes them highly susceptible to error that requires careful examination of the links between these contexts and children's nutritional outcome. Several studies have found household variables to explain more variation in child hunger in the developing world context than environmental factors(Reference Balk, Storeygard and Levy11, Reference Anthamatten12).

Dickinson et al.(Reference Dickinson, Macpherson and Hursthouse13) propose that environmental factors be combined with social factors to help rural communities confront the barriers to improving their intake of micronutrients, such as Fe and Zn. The current research assessed factors associated with children's differential nutritional status, as indicated by height-for-age, in Ghana. Two related questions of both scholarly and practical significance are addressed in the analysis reported here:

  1. 1. What characteristics of children, mothers and households are associated with height-for-age among children in Ghana?

  2. 2. After accounting for associated factors for children, mothers and households, do the socio-economic and biophysical characteristics of the place where children reside provide additional explanation for observed differences in height-for-age?

The goal of the work was to examine individual and environmental correlates with difference in childhood height-for-age in Ghana.

Methods

Data sources

The MEASURE Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) are recognized as an accurate source of nationally representative information about the demographic and health status of low-income countries, with an emphasis on young children and their mothers. Selection of the DHS stratified sample for every survey entails two stages. Enumeration areas(Reference Prost, Jahn and Floyd14), or population clusters, based on the national census, are randomly selected with probability proportional to the number of households. After the list of households in each of the selected enumeration areas has been updated, households are randomly selected with equal probability for interview(15). Standardized modules are used to construct questionnaires for each national survey. More detailed information about the specifics of the DHS sampling and data collection methods can be found at its website (http://www.measuredhs.com/).

What is remarkable about DHS data – in contrast to national census data, for example – is that variables are reported for individuals and their households. This enables multivariate analysis at the level of the individual child. The individual child is the most logical unit of analysis for research on childhood malnutrition, since it is he or she who consumes food, experiences infectious diseases and exhibits a particular nutritional status.

In the most recent GDHS conducted in 2008, 412 enumeration areas were randomly selected from a list based on the 2000 Ghana Population and Housing Census (PHC). Interviews were conducted in 11 778 households, yielding a response rate of 97 % for women and 96 % for men(5). These samples are representative for Ghana as a whole, for urban and rural areas, and for the country's ten official regions.

The present study also uses data from the 2000 Ghana PHC. In 2000, the Ghana PHC collected census information on both population and housing for the first time. The census was carried out by the Ghana Statistical Service and covered all persons in households and all living quarters in Ghana at midnight of Census Night (26 March 2000). Ecological zone classifications are derived from the World Wide Fund for Nature's classification system(16), built from careful research designed to represent natural conditions without human intervention(Reference Olson, Dinerstein and Wikramanayake17). According to this regionalization, Ghana straddles three major habitat biomes that are subdivided into five ecological zones. These are Eastern Guinea Forest, West Sudanian Savannah, Guinea Forest–Savannah Mosaic, Central African Mangroves and Guinea Mangroves. These zones are not congruent with districts or regional boundaries in Ghana.

Outcome variable

Height-for-age refers to the expected height of a healthy child, given a child's age. This measure can be used as a measure of long-term adequacy of consumption of nutrients, especially protein. An individual child's stature may result from genetic characteristics, low birth weight (also the result of a complex interaction of numerous variables) or infectious disease. Low height-for-age, often called stunting, can be interpreted as an indication of poor nutritional status, a common practice in public health and nutrition research(Reference Fotso18Reference Hong and Mishra21).

Height-for-age data for Ghana were captured by the GDHS, with children ranging from 5·68 standard deviations below the population mean (−5·68 sd) to 5·96 standard deviations above the mean (+5·96 sd). Traditionally, stunting and wasting were defined in relation to a comparison population in a high-income country in the same region, based on the assumption that ethnically similar populations are also genetically similar, manifested in characteristics such as height and weight(Reference Victora22). More recently, the WHO has argued that, under optimal conditions, growth is the same for all populations(23). It has therefore issued standards that can be applied to young children worldwide. The use of National Center for Health Statistics/WHO reference standards makes the findings from the present study comparable to previous studies in Ghana and elsewhere. Additional information about international growth standards is available at the WHO website (http://www.who.int/childgrowth/en/).

Exposure variables

Scholarly research has shown that a large number of variables are associated with child nutritional outcomes(Reference Balk, Storeygard and Levy11, Reference Fotso18Reference Hong and Mishra21, Reference Fotso and Kuate-Defo24, Reference Van de Poel, Hosseinpoor and Jehu-Appiah25). We surveyed the literature to determine the variables to include in our analysis. The variables selected included characteristics of the child, including age of the child(Reference Khatib and Elmadfa26, Reference Wamani, Astrom and Peterson27), sex of the child(Reference Hong20, Reference Wamani, Astrom and Peterson28), vaccination status(Reference Bloss, Wainaina and Bailey29), size of the child at birth(Reference Hong20) and months of breast-feeding(Reference Faruque, Ahmed and Ahmed30). Additionally, facets of the child's mother and household are related to a child's risk for malnutrition; these included mother's education(Reference Frost, Forste and Haas19, Reference Wachs, Creed-Kanashiro and Cueto31), mother's age at first childbirth(Reference Hong and Mishra21), mother's BMI(Reference Singh, Nair and Grubesic32), whether the mother has insurance, size of the household(Reference Bronte-Tinkew and DeJong33), ethnicity and poverty(34Reference Uthman, Moradi and Lawoko36).

Poverty is often regarded as the single most important determinant of health(34). Poverty is frequently estimated from household income figures. Unfortunately, these figures are often misleading measures of wealth because the data are often unreliable or of poor quality. Additionally, many families engage in informal economic activities that do not register with standard income data – a common phenomenon in Ghana – which can serve to render traditional measures of poverty invalid. In response to these problems, the DHS began collecting data for a ‘wealth score’ in 2004. This index:(37)

is a composite measure of the cumulative living standard of a household. It is calculated using easy-to-collect data on a household's ownership of selected assets, such as televisions and bicycles, materials used for housing construction, and types of water access and sanitation facilities. Generated with… principal components analysis, the wealth score places individual households on a continuous scale of relative wealth… Even in countries that collect [income] data, the DHS wealth index has outperformed the traditional indicators.

The wealth score is provided in the form of a continuous value as well as a categorical variable (‘wealth index’) that roughly divides the population into quintiles. The categorized value was employed in the present study.

Contextual variables included in the analysis were population density, poverty index (P0), district-level literacy, proximity to health and school facilities, urbanization, percentage of the population who are migrants and ecological zone. Administrative districts were used in the present study to indicate context because they are the basic spatial units for most socio-economic, political and developmental decisions in Ghana and are the basic spatial units for the national census data and the GDHS 2008 population clusters. Regional and district codes embedded in the GDHS 2008 were used to determine the district of residence for each child in the sample. Data for population density (the population per square kilometre), the percentage urban, percentage migrant, percentage illiterate and the level of urbanization for each district were derived from the 2000 PHC. The P0 measures the proportion of the population in a given district that is poor and is intended to represent the general wealth of the district. Although this measure is widely used because of its ease of interpretation, it does not indicate the degree of poverty(Reference Coulombe38). The GDHS 2008 child data were joined to ecological zones data in a geographical information system database using ArcGIS 9·3 software. The database join serves to assign each child in the study to an ecological zone based on their location.

Analysis

Data analysis was performed using the SPSS 20·0 for Windows statistical software package. All children aged 0–59 months with valid anthropometric measures were included, constituting a total of 2225 children. Since standard analysis of fixed-effects covariates for height-for-age neglects the correlation structure and dependence in the hierarchically structured GDHS data, a two-level generalized linear mixed-modelling approach was employed, with level-1 represented by individual child characteristics and level-2 represented by the characteristics of the district in which children reside. The height-for-age outcome of a child is therefore assessed as a function of child-level and district-level characteristics. This reduces the tendency to underestimate standard errors of fixed effects at the child level which inflates apparent significance of estimates.

A model that assesses the effects of only level-1 variables was first estimated for height-for-age (individual model). A separate model with only level-2 variables was then estimated (district model) before a final full model with both level-1 and level-2 variables was estimated. The coefficients of both fixed and random effects along with confidence intervals for P < 0·05 as well as model summaries are reported.

The full model is specified by the general notation:

$$ Y\, = \,X\beta \, + \,Zu\, + \,{\epsilon}, \eqno\rm$$

where Y represents the height-for-age for an individual child, the fixed-effect regressors and parameters, Zu the regressors and random effects, and ε the errors.

Results

Sample characteristics

The present study analysed the height measurements of 2225 children, 49·6 % of whom were female and 50·4 % male. The average age of a child in the sample was 29 months and more than 95 % of all children had received part or all of the recommended vaccinations for their age. Children were breast-fed for an average of 16 months and 23 % had height-for-age <−2 sd. Most children lived in rural areas (67 %) and in the forest ecological zone (44 %).

Child-level characteristics and height-for-age

An individual-level model was estimated to examine their effects on the outcome. The results showed that the overall model (F = 23·738; P < 0·001) and seven variables including the age of the child (F = 48·204; P < 0·001), vaccination status (F = 5·643; P = 0·004), the size of the child at birth (F = 11·660; P < 0·001), months of breast-feeding (F = 58·292; P < 0·001), mother's BMI (F = 31·937; P < 0·001) and possession of health insurance (F = 4·557; P = 0·033) were statistically significantly associated with height-for-age. Many child-level characteristics did not achieve statistical significance in any of the models. These included the sex of the child, mother's education, size of the household and ethnicity. The results of the individual model are presented in Table 1.

Table 1 Results of the individual model: individual-level correlates with height-for-age in Ghanaian children aged 0–59 months (n 2225), 2008

ref., reference category; AIC, Akaike information criterion; BIC, Bayesian information criterion.

*P < 0·05.

Although the wealth status of the child's household did not appear significant in the traditional test of fixed effects for the overall model and individual effects, the poorest and poorer categories showed a statistically significant association with height-for-age in the parameter estimates for the overall model and individual effects. All other things being equal, we can expect the height-for-age of children from the poorest households to be 0·433 sd (P = 0·009) lower than the height-for-age of a child from the richest household. Similarly, the height-for-age of a child from a household in the poorer wealth quintile is 0·385 sd (P = 0·006) lower than the height-for-age of a child from the richest household.

District-level characteristics and height-for-age

A separate model including only district-level variables was estimated for height-for-age to examine the relationship between contextual variables and children's nutritional outcome. None of the eleven variables included in the model was significantly associated with the height-for-age outcome for children in Ghana (Table 2), even though the overall model intercept (F = 3·814; P < 0·001) was significant.

Table 2 Results of the district model: district-level correlates with height-for-age in Ghanaian children aged 0–59 months (n 2225), 2008

ref., reference category; AIC, Akaike information criterion; BIC, Bayesian information criterion.

*P < 0·05.

Full model for height-for-age in Ghana

The full model analysed both child-level and district-level variables simultaneously, uncovering some differences from the first two models. Notably, in the full model, population density showed a statistically significant association with height-for-age outcome among children in Ghana. The fixed-and random-effect estimates for height-for-age are presented in Table 3.

Table 3 Results of the full model: correlates with height-for-age in Ghanaian children aged 0–59 months (n 2225), 2008

ref., reference category; AIC, Akaike information criterion; BIC, Bayesian information criterion.

*P < 0·05.

Discussion

Consistent with other studies(Reference Bomela35, Reference Colecraft, Marquis and Bartolucci39), the present study observed that children's age was significantly associated with lower height-for-age values. As ample previous research has shown, this finding could be attributed to the challenges of transitioning from breast-feeding to more solid foods and drinking water. Another factor may be older children's ability to explore their environment, giving them more exposure to infections that compromise their nutritional status(Reference Hong20).

Curiously, children who were not vaccinated were more likely to have a higher height-for-age status, contradicting previous work which suggests that vaccination, which should protect children against infectious disease, serves to improve nutritional outcomes(Reference Bloss, Wainaina and Bailey29). Additional investigation might uncover some explanation for this finding.

Children's weight at birth, in both the individual and full models, emerged as one of the strongest predictors of early growth. Birth weight is often used to estimate the quality of prenatal care. Previous work has demonstrated that good prenatal care is essential for survival among very young children in poor contexts(Reference Hong40), and this may be viewed as evidence that prenatal care may similarly have an impact on nutritional status later in life.

Studies also show that an initial period of exclusive breast-feeding is essential to lower the risk of nutritional deficiency and infectious disease, after which supplementary foods should be gradually introduced. The present study found prolonged breast-feeding to be associated with poorer nutritional status. The negative association of lengthy breast-feeding with children's nutritional status probably reflects failure of optimal complementary feeding. This may in turn indicate the inability of households to provide supplemental foods(Reference Van de Poel, Hosseinpoor and Jehu-Appiah25) and inappropriate child-feeding practices that could be addressed through education.

The present work found that the 40 % of children living in households with some form of health insurance had a better height-for-age outcome. Other work has found that forms of protection, such as social capital, can serve to protect families against economic shocks, ultimately benefiting nutritional status(Reference Carter and Maluccio41). Health insurance may similarly serve to protect poor families from such shocks.

Household wealth was also related to height-for-age. Poverty often results in inadequate diet, poor sanitation and greater exposure to pathogens, and low access to vaccinations and basic medical care. Forty-five per cent of Ghanaians live on less than $US 1 per day and while the highest fifth of households receive nearly half of all income, the poorest two-fifths receive only 16 % of the total income(42). Improving children's health and nutritional status may ultimately require addressing economic inequalities and making services more accessible to the poor.

Population density, a contextual variable modelled at the district level, was significantly associated with more favourable nutritional outcomes after accounting for individual wealth and other contextual variables, such as district-wide poverty and urbanization, suggesting that processes related to settlement patterns are related to nutrition. It is possible that a tight population network, large nearby neighbourhoods or communities, can enable the kind of social capital that serves to provide families and their children with a more consistent source of nutrition and nutritional information(Reference Carter and Maluccio41, Reference Alderman, Hentschel and Sabates43). Apart from population density, none of the socio-economic or biophysical contextual variables bore a significant relationship with childhood height-for-age in the final model, suggesting that the most critical scale at which mechanisms behind malnutrition are played out is at the individual and household levels.

As with any analysis of secondary data, some limitations should be noted with the present work. The study was based on diverse sources of secondary data which were not specifically designed for examining the relationships analysed here. In spite of these limitations, the large size and representativeness of the secondary data used in the study made possible the kinds of statistical analyses conducted here. The study findings can potentially assist stakeholders by providing a better understanding of the diverse array of factors that influence children's nutritional outcome in Ghana.

Future work

The study of children's nutrition has been limited, to a degree, by division into diverse disciplines, with many social scientists focused on individual- and household-level factors, nutritionists concerned with hereditary and gender differences, and soil and climate scientists fixated on the potential impact of climate and soil on agricultural sustainability and food production. While these fields of enquiry are conceptually linked by, for instance, the UNICEF framework, few studies systematically assess this variety of factors simultaneously. Although the present study attempts to close this gap, constructing dynamic and engaged interdisciplinary research that involves diverse spheres of knowledge would not be an insignificant future undertaking for work on children's well-being. Such interdisciplinary research might pave the way for more focused interventions in children's nutrition in developing countries.

Consideration should also be given to the strategies that children, households and communities utilize to solve socio-economic problems that impact children's nutritional outcomes. Children's families and communities are often required to make creative choices to guarantee favourable nutritional outcomes. Understanding the challenges and coping mechanisms that children, their households and communities use can provide important insights into how policy should be oriented.

Future research should also address the mechanisms through which childhood nutrition and different types of environments are connected. Understanding these mechanisms is crucial to the design of district-based interventions because these processes are more amenable to change than entrenched structural properties of communities (e.g. concentrated poverty). Although the present study does not investigate these mechanisms, the findings here provide limited evidence that area effects play a role in growth. Most of the contextual variables, however, did not achieve significance in the multivariate analyses discussed here, some of which have been widely reported to be associated with children's nutritional outcomes in different contexts. Future research could seek explanations for the lack of association with children's nutritional outcomes in the Ghanaian context.

Acknowledgements

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors. The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest with the publication of this work. This project was completed by the authors as part of their dissertation work. E.N. conducted the initial analytical work, P.A. drafted the initial version of the manuscript, and both authors contributed to the final version. The authors would like to acknowledge their dissertation advisor, Connie Weil, for guidance in this project.

References

1.Pradilla, A (1991) The geographic distribution of malnutrition. In Infant and Child Nutrition Worldwide: Issues and Perspectives, pp. 2130 [FT Falkner, editor]. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
3.Benson, T & Shekar, M (2006) Trends and issues in child undernutrition. In Disease and Mortality in Sub-Saharan Africa, 2nd ed., pp. 87106 [D Jamison, RG Feacham, MW Makgoba et al., editors]. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications.Google Scholar
4.UNICEF (2009) Global Child Mortality Continues to Fall. http://www.unicefusa.org/news/releases/global-child-mortality.html (accessed February 2011).Google Scholar
5.Ghana Statistical Service (2009) Ghana Demographic and Health Survey, 2008. Accra/Calverton, MD: Ghana Statistical Service/ICF Macro.Google Scholar
6.Materechera, SA (2010) Utilization and management practices of animal manure for replenishing soil fertility among smallscale crop farmers in semi-arid farming districts of the North West Province, South Africa. Nutr Cycl Agroecosys 87, 415428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Stepniewski, W, Horn, R & Martyniuk, S (2002) Managing soil biophysical properties for environmental protection. Agric Ecosyst Environ 88, 175181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Dang, S, Yan, H, Yamamoto, Set al. (2004) Poor nutritional status of younger Tibetan children living at high altitudes. Eur J Clin Nutr 58, 938946.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Ghosh, A & Kshatriya, GK (2009) Anthropometric and body composition characteristics among preschool children of Coastal, Himalayan and Desert Ecology in India. Anthropol Anz 67, 229236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Legg, C (2008) A Spatial Analysis of Child Nutrition in West Africa. ReSAKSS Working Paper no. 23. Ibadan, Nigeria: ReSAKSS-West Africa.Google Scholar
11.Balk, D, Storeygard, A, Levy, Met al. (2005) Child hunger in the developing world: an analysis of environmental and social correlates. Food Policy 30, 584611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Anthamatten, P (2007) Childhood malnutrition in Bolivia: an examination of associations with individual, household, and contextual variables. Dissertation, University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
13.Dickinson, N, Macpherson, G, Hursthouse, ASet al. (2009) Micronutrient deficiencies in maternity and child health: a review of environmental and social context and implications for Malawi. Environ Geochem Health 31, 253272.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Prost, M-A, Jahn, A, Floyd, Set al. (2008) Implication of new WHO growth standards on identification of risk factors and estimated prevalence of malnutrition in rural Malawian infants. PLoS ONE 3, e2684.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Measure DHS (2010) DHS methodology. http://www.measuredhs.com/aboutsurveys/dhs/methodology.cfm (accessed May 2010).Google Scholar
16.World Wildlife Fund (2001) Ecoregions – Terresrial Ecoregions. http://www.worldwildlife.org/science/ecoregions/item1267.html (accessed May 2010).Google Scholar
17.Olson, DM, Dinerstein, E, Wikramanayake, EDet al. (2001) Terrestrial ecoregions of the worlds: a new map of life on Earth. Bioscience 51, 933938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Fotso, JC (2007) Urban–rural differentials in child malnutrition: trends and socioeconomic correlates in sub-Saharan Africa. Health Place 13, 205223.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19.Frost, MB, Forste, R & Haas, DW (2005) Maternal education and child nutritional status in Bolivia: finding the links. Soc Sci Med 60, 395407.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20.Hong, R (2007) Effect of economic inequality on chronic childhood undernutrition in Ghana. Public Health Nutr 10, 371378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21.Hong, R & Mishra, V (2006) Effect of wealth inequality on chronic under-nutrition in Cambodian children. J Health Popul Nutr 24, 8999.Google ScholarPubMed
22.Victora, CG (1992) The association between wasting and stunting – an international perspective. J Nutr 122, 11051110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23.World Health Organization (2006) WHO Child Growth Standards: Length/Height-for-Age, Weight-for-Age, Weight-for-Length, Weight-for-Height and Body Mass Index-for-Age: Methods and Development. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
24.Fotso, JC & Kuate-Defo, B (2005) Socioeconomic inequalities in early childhood malnutrition and morbidity: modification of the household-level effects by the community SES. Health Place 11, 205225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25.Van de Poel, E, Hosseinpoor, AR, Jehu-Appiah, Cet al. (2007) Malnutrition and the disproportional burden on the poor: the case of Ghana. Int J Equity Health 6, 21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26.Khatib, IMD & Elmadfa, I (2009) Poor nutritional health of Bedouin preschool children in Jordan: the irony of urbanization. Ann Nutr Metab 54, 301309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27.Wamani, H, Astrom, AN, Peterson, Set al. (2006) Predictors of poor anthropometric status among children under 2 years of age in rural Uganda. Public Health Nutr 9, 320326.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28.Wamani, H, Astrom, AN, Peterson, Set al. (2007) Boys are more stunted than girls in sub-Saharan Africa: a meta-analysis of 16 demographic and health surveys. BMC Pediatr 7, 17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29.Bloss, E, Wainaina, F & Bailey, RC (2004) Prevalence and predictors of underweight, stunting, and wasting among children aged 5 and under in western Kenya. J Trop Pediatr 50, 260270.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
30.Faruque, ASG, Ahmed, AMS, Ahmed, Tet al. (2008) Nutrition: basis for healthy children and mothers in Bangladesh. J Health Popul Nutr 26, 325339.Google ScholarPubMed
31.Wachs, TD, Creed-Kanashiro, H, Cueto, Set al. (2005) Maternal education and intelligence predict offspring diet and nutritional status. J Nutr 135, 21792186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32.Singh, GCP, Nair, M, Grubesic, RBet al. (2009) Factors associated with underweight and stunting among children in rural terai of Eastern Nepal. Asia Pac J Public Health 21, 144152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33.Bronte-Tinkew, J & DeJong, G (2004) Children's nutrition in Jamaica: do household structure and household economic resources matter? Soc Sci Med 58, 499514.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
34.World Bank (2002) Poverty and Nutrition in Bolivia: A World Bank Country Study. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
35.Bomela, NJ (2009) Social, economic, health and environmental determinants of child nutritional status in three Central Asian Republics. Public Health Nutr 12, 18711877.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
36.Uthman, OA, Moradi, T & Lawoko, S (2009) The independent contribution of individual-, neighbourhood-, and country-level socioeconomic position on attitudes towards intimate partner violence against women in sub-Saharan Africa: a multilevel model of direct and moderating effects. Soc Sci Med 68, 18011809.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
37.Demographic and Health Surveys (2006) Description of the Demographic and Health Surveys Individual Recode Data File. http://www.measuredhs.com/zip/recodhs.zip (accessed April 2010).Google Scholar
38.Coulombe, H (2005) Ghana Census-based poverty map: district and sub-district level results 1. World July issue, 128.Google Scholar
39.Colecraft, EK, Marquis, GS, Bartolucci, AAet al. (2004) A longitudinal assessment of the diet and growth of malnourished children participating in nutrition rehabilitation centres in Accra, Ghana. Public Health Nutr 7, 487494.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
40.Hong, R (2006) Effect of multiple birth on infant mortality in Bangladesh. J Paediatr Child Health 42, 630635.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
41.Carter, MR & Maluccio, JA (2003) Social capital and coping with economic shocks: an analysis of stunting of South African children. World Dev 31, 11471163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
42.UNICEF (2006) At a Glance: Ghana. http://www.unicef.org/infobycountry/ghana.html (accessed February 2010).Google Scholar
43.Alderman, H, Hentschel, J & Sabates, R (2003) With the help of one's neighbors: externalities in the production of nutrition in Peru. Soc Sci Med 56, 20192031.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1 Results of the individual model: individual-level correlates with height-for-age in Ghanaian children aged 0–59 months (n 2225), 2008

Figure 1

Table 2 Results of the district model: district-level correlates with height-for-age in Ghanaian children aged 0–59 months (n 2225), 2008

Figure 2

Table 3 Results of the full model: correlates with height-for-age in Ghanaian children aged 0–59 months (n 2225), 2008