Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T02:24:59.445Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An audit of post-insertion fasting times following placement of a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2011

A. McHugh
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Nutrition, St. James's Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland
C. Browne
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Nutrition, St. James's Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland
S. Brady
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Nutrition, St. James's Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland
Y. Lydon
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Nutrition, St. James's Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland
D. Mc Cormack
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Nutrition, St. James's Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland
J. Willow
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Nutrition, St. James's Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2011

Placement of PEG tubes for nutrition support is an established practice. In recent years, recommendations have been published on when enteral feeding should commence following PEG tube placement (see below).

St James's Hospital is the largest academic teaching hospital in Ireland and a designated centre of excellence for cancer care. The objective of this audit was to review current practice in our institution and compare to published recommendations. Ethical approval was obtained prior to commencement of the audit.

Data were collected prospectively over an eight-month period. Primary PEG tube placements were carried out in endoscopy or theatre. Information collected included patient demographics, diagnosis and need for total or supplementary enteral tube feeding. Post-insertion instructions provided by the service placing the tube on when to commence feed were recorded and also details on when enteral feed actually commenced.

During the period audited, a total of 50 primary PEG tubes were placed. Sixty percent (n 30) of the patients were male and the mean age was 74 years (range 32–92 years). Indications for PEG tube placement included cerebrovascular accident CVA 38% (n 19), malnutrition 22% (n 11), neurological 14% (n 7), upper-GI cancer 12% (n 6) and head and neck cancer 10% (n 5). The PEG tube was the sole source of nutrition support in 62% (n 31) of cases. Post-insertion fasting instructions were given by the medical team in 86% (n 43) of the cases (see below).

Delay in commencing enteral feed for patients where specific post-insertion instructions were provided occurred in 16% (n 7) of cases. Documented delays were up to 24 h. Feeding was delayed appropriately in three of these cases due to medical reasons.

The findings from this audit show variation in instructions for fasting times post PEG tube placement across the institution. Enteral feeding was not commenced earlier than advised for any patient. In all cases fasting times were longer than international recommendations stated above. Further delays occurred in a number of cases. Delays in starting PEG feeding following insertion of a PEG tube may result in unnecessary prolongation of hospital stay and costs(2). It is anticipated that collaboration between all stakeholders will enable development and implementation of an evidence-based protocol on fasting times post PEG placement in this hospital in the near future.

References

1.Bankhead, R, Boullata, J, Brantley, S et al. (2009) Enteral nutrition practice recommendations. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 33, 122167.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.National Collaborating Centre for Acute Care (2006) Nutrition Support in Adults: Oral Nutrition Support, Enteral Tube Feeding and Parenteral Nutrition. London: National Collaborating Centre for Acute Care, pp. 86–87.Google Scholar