Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T05:22:09.106Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Two Dogmas of the Artistic-Ethical Interaction Debate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2019

Louise Hanson
Louise Hanson*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Durham University, Durham, UK
*
Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Can artworks be morally good or bad? Many philosophers have thought so. Does this moral goodness or badness bear on how good or bad a work is as art? This is very much a live debate. Autonomists argue that moral value is not relevant to artistic value; interactionists argue that it is. In this paper, I argue that the debate between interactionists and autonomists has been conducted unfairly: all parties to the debate have tacitly accepted a set of constraints which prejudices the issue against the interactionist. I identify two demands which are routinely placed on arguments seeking to establish interaction and argue that they are, in fact, mutually conflicting.

There are two upshots. First, in light of this, it is unsurprising that arguments for interaction have failed to meet with everybody’s satisfaction. The constraints are such that no argument can meet them. Second, recognizing this helps us uncover a new, promising, but hitherto overlooked strategy for establishing artistic-ethical interaction.

Keywords

Art and moralityartistic value
Type
Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Philosophy , Volume 50 , Issue 2 , February 2020 , pp. 209 - 222
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Canadian Journal of Philosophy

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, James, and Dean, Jeffrey. 1998. “Moderate Autonomism.” British Journal of Aesthetics 38: 150–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beardsley, Monroe. 1962. “Beauty and Aesthetic Value.” Journal of Philosophy 59 (21): 617–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Booth, Wayne. 1998. The Company We Keep. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Budd, Malcolm. 2002. The Aesthetic Appreciation of Nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Carroll, Noël. 1996. “Moderate Moralism.” British Journal of Aesthetics 36: 223–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, Noël. 1998a. “Moderate Moralism vs. Moderate Autonomism” British Journal of Aesthetics 38: 419–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, Noël. 1998b. “Art, Narrative, and Moral Understanding.” In Aesthetics and Ethics: Essays at the Intersection, edited by Levinson, J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 126–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, Noël. 2000. “Art and Ethical Criticism: An Overview of Recent Directions of Research.” Ethics 110 (2): 350–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conolly, Oliver. 2000. “Ethicism and Moderate Moralism.” British Journal of Aesthetics 40 (3): 302–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conolly, Oliver, and Haydar, Bashar. 2007. “Literature, Knowledge, and Value.” Philosophy and Literature 31 (1): 111–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, David. 2007. Aesthetics and Literature. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Devereaux, Mary. 1998. “Beauty and Evil: The Case of Leni Riefenstahl’s Triumph of the Will.” In Aesthetics and Ethics: Essays at the Intersection, edited Levinson, J., 227–56. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devereaux, Mary. 2004. “Moral Judgements and Works of Art: The Case of Narrative Literature.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 62 (1): 3–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickie, George. 2005. “The Triumph in Triumph of the Will.” British Journal of Aesthetics 45 (2): 151–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodd, J. 2014. “On a Proposed Test for Artistic Value.” British Journal of Aesthetics 54 (4): 395–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eaton, Anne. 2012. “Robust Immoralism.” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 70 (3): 289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eaton, Marcia. 2004. “Art and the Aesthetic.” In Blackwell Guide to Aesthetics, edited by Kivy, Peter, 63–77. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ellmann, Richard. 1987. Oscar Wilde. London: Hamish Hamilton.Google Scholar
Gaut, Berys. 1998. “The Ethical Criticism of Art.” In Aesthetics and Ethics: Essays at the Intersection, edited by Levinson, Jerrold, 182–203. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaut, Berys. 2001. “Art and Ethics.” In The Routledge Handbook of Aesthetics, edited by Gaut, Berys and Lopes, Dominic, 431–44. Oxford: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaut, Berys. 2007. Art, Emotion, and Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giovannelli, Alessandro. 2007. “The Ethical Criticism of Art: A New Mapping of the Territory.” Philosophia 35 (2): 117–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, Gordon. 2005. Philosophy of the Arts. Oxford: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanson, Louise. 2013. “The Reality of Artistic Value.” The Philosophical Quarterly 63 (252): 492–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanson, Louise. 2017. “Artistic Value is Attributive Goodness.” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 75 (4): 415–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harold, James. 2006. “On Judging the Moral Value of Narrative Artworks.” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 64 (2): 259–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harold, James. 2008. “Immoralism and the Valence Constraint.” British Journal of Aesthetics 48 (1): 45–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harold, James. 2011. “Autonomism Reconsidered.” British Journal of Aesthetics 51 (2): 137–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, A. 2012. “In Defense of Artistic Value” Philosophical Quarterly 62 (249): 705–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, Daniel. 1997. “In Praise of Immoral Art.” Philosophical Topics 25 (1): 155–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
John, Eileen. 2003. “Artistic Value and Opportunistic Moralism.” In Contemporary Debates in Aesthetics and the Philosophy of Art, edited by Kieran, Matthew, 332–41. Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kieran, Matthew. 1996. “Art, Imagination, and the Cultivation of Morals.” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 54 (4): 337–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kieran, Matthew. 2001. “In Defense of the Ethical Evaluation of Narrative Art.” British Journal of Aesthetics 41 (1): 26–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kieran, Matthew. 2002. “Forbidden Knowledge: The Challenge of Immoralism.” In Art and Morality, edited by Bermudez, Jose Luis and Gardner, Sebastian. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kieran, Matthew. 2005. Revealing Art. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kieran, Matthew. 2006. “Art, Morality, and Ethics.” Philosophy Compass 1 (2): 129–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kieran, Matthew. 2009. “Cognitive Value of Art.” In A Companion to Aesthetics, edited by Davies, Stephen, Higgins, Kathleen Marie, Hopkins, Robert, et al., 194–96. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lopes, Dominic. 2005. Sight and Sensibility: Evaluating Pictures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lopes, Dominic. 2011. “The Myth of (Non-Aesthetic) Artistic Value.” The Philosophical Quarterly 61 (244): 518–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha. 1990. “Finely Aware and Richly Responsible. In Love’s Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature, 148–67. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Osborne, Harold. 1979. “The Concept of Creativity in Art.” British Journal of Aesthetics 19 (3): 224–31.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard. 1997. “Against Ethical Criticism.” Philosophy and Literature 21 (1): 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smuts, Aaron. 2011. “Grounding Moralism: Moral Flaws and Aesthetic Properties.” Journal of Aesthetic Education 45(4): 34–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stecker, Robert. 2005. “The Interaction of Aesthetic and Ethical Value.” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 45: 138–50.Google Scholar
Stecker, Robert. 2010. Aesthetics and the Philosophy of Art: An Introduction. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Stecker, Robert. 2012. “Artistic Value Defended.” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 70 (4): 355–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vermazen, Bruce. 1991. “The Aesthetic Value of Originality.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 16 (1): 266–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walton, Kendall. 1994. “Morals in Fiction and Fictional Morality.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 68 (supp. vol.): 27–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zangwill, Nick. 1998. “Aesthetic/Sensory Dependence.” British Journal of Aesthetics 38: 66–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar