Customary International Law and Its Interpretation by International Courts Theories, Methods and Interactions
Book contents
- Customary International Law and Its Interpretation by International Courts
- The Rules of Interpretation of Customary International Law
- Customary International Law and Its Interpretation by International Courts
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Abbreviations
- Table of Cases
- Table of Treaties and International Documents
- Part I Theoretical Approaches to CIL and Its Interpretation
- Part II Methods of CIL Interpretation in International Courts
- Part III CIL and Its Interpretation in the Normative Universe
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 November 2024
Book contents
- Customary International Law and Its Interpretation by International Courts
- The Rules of Interpretation of Customary International Law
- Customary International Law and Its Interpretation by International Courts
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Abbreviations
- Table of Cases
- Table of Treaties and International Documents
- Part I Theoretical Approaches to CIL and Its Interpretation
- Part II Methods of CIL Interpretation in International Courts
- Part III CIL and Its Interpretation in the Normative Universe
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Customary International Law and Its Interpretation by International CourtsTheories, Methods and Interactions, pp. 326 - 352Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2024
- Creative Commons
This content is Open Access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/cclicenses/
References
Primary Sources
Aarnio, A, The Rational as Reasonable: A Treatise on Legal Justification (D Reidel Publishing 1987)Google Scholar
Alexy, R, A Theory of Legal Argumentation (R Adler and N MacCormick trs, Oxford University Press 2011)Google Scholar
Allard, J and Van den Eynde, L, ‘Le dialogue des jurisprudences comme source du droit: Arguments entre idéalisation et scepticisme’ in Hachez, I (ed), Les sources du droit revisitées, vol 3: Normativités concurrentes (Anthemis 2013) 285Google Scholar
Alter, KJ, ‘The Multiplication of International Courts and Tribunals after the End of the Cold War’ in Romano, CPR, Alter, KJ and Shany, Y (eds), The Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication (Oxford University Press 2014) 63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alter, KJ, Helfer, LR and Madsen, MR (eds), International Court Authority (Oxford University Press 2018)Google Scholar
Amaya, A, The Tapestry of Reason: An Inquiry into the Nature of Coherence and Its Role in Legal Argument (Hart 2015)Google Scholar
Ammann, O, ‘The Court of Justice of the European Union and the Interpretation of International Legal Norms: To Be or Not to Be a “Domestic” Court?’ in Besson, S and Levrat, N (eds), L’Union européenne et le droit international – The European Union and International Law (Schulthess 2015) 153Google Scholar
Ammann, O, Domestic Courts and the Interpretation of International Law: Methods and Reasoning Based on the Swiss Example (Brill 2020)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andenas, M, Fitzmaurice, M, Tanzi, A and Wouters, J (eds), General Principles and the Coherence of International Law (Brill 2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arajärvi, N, The Changing Nature of Customary International Law: Methods of Interpreting the Concept of Custom in International Criminal Tribunals (Routledge 2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arend, AC, ‘Toward Understanding of International Legal Rules’ in Beck, RJ, Arend, AC and Vander Lugt, RD, International Rules: Approaches from International Law and International Relations (Oxford University Press 1996) 289Google Scholar
Ayoub, L, Judicial Activism and Restraint in the Creation of the International Judicial Function: How Have Activism and Restraint Shaped the International Courts? (Ridderprint 2021)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, FMM, ‘International Investment Law and State-Owned Entities: Recurrent Key Issues and Future Directions’ in Sachs, LE, Johnson, L and Coleman, J (eds), Yearbook on International Investment Law & Policy 2018 (Oxford University Press 2019) 432Google Scholar
Bartels, L and Paddeu, F (eds), Exceptions in International Law (Cambridge University Press 2020)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentivoglio, LM, Interpretazione del diritto e diritto internazionale (Pavia University Press 1953)Google Scholar
Benvenisti, E, ‘Customary International Law as a Judicial Tool for Promoting Efficiency’ in Benvenisti, E and Hirsch, M (eds), The Impact of International Law on International Cooperation: Theoretical Perspectives (Cambridge University Press 2004) 85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besson, S, ‘Legal Philosophical Issues of International Adjudication: Getting Over the amour impossible between International Law and Adjudication’ in Romano, CPR, Alter, KJ and Shany, Y (eds), The Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication (Oxford University Press 2013) 413Google Scholar
Besson, S and Gächter-Alge, ML, ‘L’interprétation en droit européen: Quelques remarques introductives’ in Besson, S, Levrat, N and Clerc, E (eds), Interprétation en droit européen – Interpretation in European Law (Schulthess 2011) 153Google Scholar
Bianchi, A, ‘Textual Interpretation and (International) Law Reading: The Myth of (In)determinacy and the Genealogy of Meaning’ in Bekker, PHF, Dolzer, R and Waibel, M (eds), Making Transnational Law Work in the Global Economy: Essays in Honour of Detlev Vagts (Cambridge University Press 2010) 34Google Scholar
Bianchi, A, Peat, D and Windsor, M (eds), Interpretation in International Law (Oxford University Press 2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boas, G, Public International Law: Contemporary Principles and Perspectives (Edward Elgar 2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodansky, D, ‘Prologue to a Theory of Non-Treaty Norms’ in Arsanjani, MH, Cogan, J, Sloane, R and Wiessner, S (eds), Looking to the Future: Essays on International Law in Honor of W. Michael Reisman (Brill 2010) 119Google Scholar
Boon, M and Knuuttila, T, ‘Models as Epistemic Tools in Engineering Sciences’ in Meijers, AWM (ed), Philosophy of Technology and Engineering Sciences (Elsevier 2009) 695Google Scholar
Borelli, S, ‘The (Mis-)Use of General Principles of Law: Lex Specialis and the Relationship between International Human Rights Law and the Laws of Armed Conflict’ in Pineschi, L (ed), General Principles of Law: The Role of the Judiciary (Springer 2015) 265Google Scholar
Bradley, CA, ‘Customary International Law Adjudication as Common Law Adjudication’ in Bradley, CA (ed), Custom’s Future: International Law in a Changing World (Cambridge University Press 2016) 34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandom, R, Making It Explicit: Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment (Harvard University Press 1994)Google Scholar
Brink, DO, ‘Originalism and Constructive Interpretation’ in Waluchow, W and Sciaraffa, S (eds), The Legacy of Ronald Dworkin (Oxford University Press 2016) 273Google Scholar
Broude, T and Shany, Y (eds), Multi-Sourced Equivalent Norms in International Law (Hart 2011)Google Scholar
Brown, C, ‘Inherent Powers in International Adjudication’ in Romano, CPR, Alter, KJ and Shany, Y (eds), The Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication (Oxford University Press 2013) 828Google Scholar
Brunnée, J and Toope, SJ, Legitimacy and Legality in International Law: An Interactional Account (Cambridge University Press 2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burchard, C, ‘Judicial Dialogue in Light of Comparative Criminal Law and Justice’ in Lobba, P and Mariniello, T (eds), Judicial Dialogue on Human Rights: The Practice of International Criminal Tribunals (Brill 2015) 56Google Scholar
Cassese, A and Weiler, JHH (eds), Change and Stability in International Law-Making (De Gruyter 1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chayes, A and Chayes, AH, The New Sovereignty: Compliance with International Regulatory Agreements (Harvard University Press 1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, B, General Principles of Law as Applied by International Courts and Tribunals (Stevens & Sons 1953)Google Scholar
Cheng, B, General Principles of Law as Applied by International Courts and Tribunals (Cambridge University Press 1994)Google Scholar
Cheng, B, General Principles of Law as Applied by International Courts and Tribunals (Cambridge University Press 2006)Google Scholar
Choi, S and Gulati, M, ‘Customary International Law: How Do Courts Do It?’ in Bradley, CA (ed), Custom’s Future: International Law in a Changing World (Cambridge University Press 2016) 117Google Scholar
Cocan, S, Le dialogue entre juridictions et quasi-juridictions internationales de protection des droits de la personne: L’exemple de la prohibition de la torture et autres peines ou traitements cruels, inhumains ou dégradants (LGDJ 2020)Google Scholar
Cohen, HG, ‘International Precedent and the Practice of International Law’ in Helfand, MA (ed), Negotiating State and Non-State Law: The Challenge of Global and Local Legal Pluralism (Cambridge University Press 2015) 185Google Scholar
Cohen, HG, ‘Theorizing Precedent in International Law’ in Bianchi, A, Peat, D and Windsor, M (eds), Interpretation in International Law (Oxford University Press 2015) 268Google Scholar
Cohen, HG, ‘Culture Clash: The Sociology of WTO Precedent’ in Frese, A and Schumann, J (eds), Precedent as Rules and Practice: New Approaches and Methodologies in Studies of Legal Precedents (CH Beck/Hart/Nomos 2021) 112Google Scholar
Corten, O, The Law Against War: The Prohibition on the Use of Force in Contemporary International Law (2nd edn, Hart 2021)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corten, O and others, A Critical Introduction to International Law (Éditions de l’Université de Bruxelles 2019)Google Scholar
D’Amato, A, The Concept of Custom in International Law (Cornell University Press 1971)Google Scholar
D’Aspremont, J, ‘The Multidimensional Process of Interpretation: Content-determination and Law-ascertainment Distinguished’ in Bianchi, A, Peat, D and Windsor, M (eds), Interpretation in International Law (Oxford University Press 2015) 111Google Scholar
D’Aspremont, J, ‘Canonical Cross-Referencing in the Making of the Law of International Responsibility’ in Forlati, S, Mbengue, M and McGarry, BK (eds), The Gabčíkovo-Nagymaros Judgment and Its Contribution to the Development of International Law (Brill 2020) 22Google Scholar
D’Aspremont, J, The Discourse on Customary International Law (Oxford University Press 2021)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Beaugrande, RA and Dressler, WU, Introduction to Text Linguistics (Longman 1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Visscher, C, Problèmes d’interprétation judiciaire en droit international public (Pedone 1963)Google Scholar
De Visscher, C, Théories et réalités en droit international public (4th edn, Pedone 1970)Google Scholar
Derrida, J, Specters of Marx: The State of Debt, the Work of Mourning and the New International (Routledge 1994)Google Scholar
Descombes, V, Le raisonnement de l’ours: Et autres essais de philosophie pratique (Seuil 2007)Google Scholar
Dewey, J, How We Think: A Restatement of the Relation of Reflective Thinking to the Educative Process (2nd edn, DC Heath 1933)Google Scholar
Di Marco, R, ‘Customary International Law: Identification versus Interpretation’ in Merkouris, P, Kammerhofer, J and Arajärvi, N (eds), The Theory, Practice, and Interpretation of Customary International Law (Cambridge University Press 2022) 416Google Scholar
Diehl, P and Ku, C, The Dynamics of International Law (Cambridge University Press 2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolzer, R and Schreuer, C, Principles of International Investment Law (Oxford University Press 2012)Google Scholar
Dordeska, M, General Principles of Law Recognized by Civilized Nations (1922-2018): The Evolution of the Third Source of International Law through the Jurisprudence of the Permanent Court of International Justice and the International Court of Justice (Brill 2020) 54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, Z, ‘Other Specific Regimes of Responsibility: Investment Treaty Arbitration and ICSID’ in Crawford, J, Pellet, A and Olleson, S (eds), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford University Press 2010) 297Google Scholar
Droubi, S and d’Aspremont, J (eds), International Organisations, Non-State Actors, and the Formation of Customary International Law (Manchester University Press 2020)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eggett, C, ‘General Principles as Systemic Elements of International Law’ (PhD thesis, Maastricht University 2021)Google Scholar
Ehrlich, E, Fundamental Principles of the Sociology of Law, with an Introduction by Roscoe Pound (Walter L Moll tr, first published 1936, Routledge 2017)Google Scholar
Farias, AM and Lazzarini, SG, Reinventing State Capitalism: Leviathan in Business, Brazil and Beyond (Harvard University Press 2014)Google Scholar
Fiore, P, International Law Codified and Its Legal Sanction (Edwin M Borchard tr, Baker Voorhis 1918)Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, M, ‘The Practical Working of the Law of Treaties’ in Evans, M, International Law (5th edn, Oxford University Press 2018) 138Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, M and Merkouris, P, Treaties in Motion: The Evolution of Treaties from Formation to Termination (Cambridge University Press 2020)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fortuna, M, ‘Different Strings of the Same Harp: Interpretation of Rules of Customary International Law, Their Identification and Treaty Interpretation’ in Merkouris, P, Kammerhofer, J and Arajärvi, N (eds), The Theory, Practice, and Interpretation of Customary International Law (Cambridge University Press 2022) 393Google Scholar
Fortuna, M, ‘Interpretation of Customary International Law in International Courts’ (PhD thesis, University of Groningen 2023)Google Scholar
Frydman, B, ‘Conclusion: Le dialogue des juges et la perspective idéale d’une justice universelle’ in Le dialogue des juges : Actes du colloque organisé le 28 avril 2006 à l’Université Libre de Bruxelles (Bruylant 2007)Google Scholar
Gaeta, P, ‘Inherent Powers of International Courts and Tribunals’ in Vohrah, LC (ed), Man’s Inhumanity to Man: Essays on International Law in Honour of Antonio Cassese (Kluwer Law International 2003) 353Google Scholar
Giannakopoulos, C, Manifestations of Coherence and Investor–State Arbitration (Cambridge University Press 2022)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldsmith, JL and Posner, EA, The Limits of International Law (Oxford University Press 2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorobets, K, ‘Peaks and Valleys: Contemplating the Authority of International Law’ in Gorobets, K, Hadjigeorgiou, A and Westerman, P (eds), Conceptual (Re)Constructions of International Law (Edward Elgar 2022) 171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorobets, K, ‘Practical Reasoning and Interpretation of Customary International Law’ in Merkouris, P, Kammerhofer, J and Arajärvi, N (eds), The Theory, Practice, and Interpretation of Customary International Law (Cambridge University Press 2022)Google Scholar
Groppi, T and Ponthoreau, MC, The Use of Foreign Precedents by Constitutional Judges (Hart 2013)Google Scholar
Grossman, N, ‘Solomonic Judgments and the Legitimacy of the International Court of Justice’ in Cohen, HG and others (eds), Legitimacy and International Courts (Cambridge University Press 2018) 43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gruber, M, Alfred Tarski and the ‘Concept of Truth in Formalized Languages’ (Springer 2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hage, JC, Reasoning with Rules: An Essay on Legal Reasoning and Its Underlying Logic (Springer 1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hage, J, ‘Construction or Reconstruction? On the Function of Argumentation in the Law’ in Dahlman, C and Feteris, E (eds), Legal Argumentation Theory: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives (Springer 2012) 125Google Scholar
Hage, J, Foundations and Building Blocks of Law (Eleven International Publishing 2018)Google Scholar
Hage, J, ‘Are the Cognitive Sciences Relevant for Law?’ in Brożek, B, Hage, J and Vincent, N (eds), Law and Mind: A Survey of Law and the Cognitive Sciences (Cambridge University Press 2021) 17Google Scholar
Hage, J and Waltermann, A, ‘Logical Techniques for International Law’ in Krimphove, D and Lentner, G (eds), Law and Logic: Contemporary Issues (Duncker und Humblot 2017) 125Google Scholar
Hage, J, Waltermann, A and Arosemena Solorzano, G, ‘Exceptions in International Law’ in Bartels, L and Paddeu, F (eds), Exceptions and Defences in International Law (Oxford University Press 2018) 11Google Scholar
Hanson, NR, Perception and Discovery: An Introduction to Scientific Inquiry (MD Lund ed, Springer 2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansson, SO, ‘The Varieties of Permission’ in Gabbay, DM and others (eds), Handbook of Deontic Logic and Normative Systems (College Publications 2013) 204Google Scholar
Hart, HLA, ‘Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals’, Essays in Jurisprudence and Philosophy (Oxford University Press 1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heilbronner, M and Martini, S, ‘The German Federal Constitutional Court’ in Jakab, A, Dyevre, A and Itzcovich, G (eds), Comparative Constitutional Reasoning (Cambridge University Press 2017) 356Google Scholar
Henckaerts, JM and Doswald-Beck, L (eds), Customary International Humanitarian Law (Cambridge University Press 2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hernández, GI, ‘Interpretative Authority and the International Judiciary’ in Bianchi, A, Peat, D and Windsor, M (eds), Interpretation in International Law (Oxford University Press 2015) 166Google Scholar
Hernández, GI, ‘Effectiveness’ in Aspremont, J and Singh, S, Concepts for International Law: Contributions to Disciplinary Thought (Edward Elgar 2019) 237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hesse, K, Grundzüge des Verfassungsrechts der Bundesrepublik Deutschland (20th edn, CF Müller 1999)Google Scholar
Higgins, R, Problems and Processes: International law and How We Use It (Clarendon Press 1995)Google Scholar
Hollis, DB, ‘Sources in Interpretation Theories: An Interdependent Relationship’ in Besson, S and Aspremont, J, The Oxford Handbook on the Sources of International Law (Oxford University Press 2017) 429Google Scholar
Howson, C, Hume’s Problem: Induction and the Justification of Belief (Oxford University Press 2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennings, R, ‘The Identification of International Law’ in Cheng, B (ed), International Law: Teaching and Practice (Stevens & Sons 1982)Google Scholar
Jeutner, V, Irresolvable Norm Conflicts in International Law: The Concept of a Legal Dilemma (Oxford University Press 2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jouannet, E, ‘La motivation ou le mystère de la boite noire’ in Ruiz Fabri, H and Sorel, JM (eds), La motivation des décisions des juridictions internationales (Pedone 2008) 267Google Scholar
Jovanovic, M, The Nature of International Law (Cambridge University Press 2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kammerhofer, J, Uncertainty in International Law: A Kelsenian Perspective (Taylor & Francis 2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, H and Sweet, AS (eds), A Europe of Rights: The Impact of the ECtHR on National Legal Systems (Oxford University Press 2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelsen, H, General Theory of Law and State (A Wedberg tr, Harvard University Press 1945)Google Scholar
King, G, Keohane, R and Verba, S, Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research (Princeton University Press 1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirby, M, Judicial Activism: Authority, Principle and Policy in Judicial Method (Sweet & Maxwell 2004)Google Scholar
Klenlein, T, ‘Customary International Law and General Principles: Rethinking Their Relationship’ in Lepard, B (ed), Reexamining Customary International Law (Cambridge University Press 2016) 133Google Scholar
Klingler, J, Parkhomenko, Y and Salonidis, C (eds), Between the Lines of the Vienna Convention? Canons and Other Principles of Interpretation in Public International Law (Kluwer Law International 2019)Google Scholar
Kochenov, D and Amtenbrink, F (eds), The European Union’s Shaping of the International Legal Order (Cambridge University Press 2014)Google Scholar
Kolb, R, Interprétation et création du droit international: Esquisse d’une herméneutique juridique moderne pour le droit international public (Bruylant 2006)Google Scholar
Kolb, R, ‘General Principles of Law, Jus Cogens and the Unity of the International Legal Order’ in Andenas, M and others (eds) General Principles and the Coherence of International Law (Brill 2019) 60Google Scholar
Kotuby, C, Jr and Sobota, L, General Principles of Law and International Due Process: Principles and Norms Applicable in Transnational Disputes (Oxford University Press 2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kratochwil, FV, Rules, Norms, and Decisions: On the Conditions of Practical and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Affairs (Cambridge University Press 1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kress, K, ‘Coherence’ in Patterson, D (ed), A Companion to Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory (2nd edn, Wiley-Blackwell 2010) 521Google Scholar
Kuhn, TS, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (2nd edn, University of Chicago Press 1970)Google Scholar
Kuijper, PJ, ‘“It Shall Contribute to … the Strict Observance and Development of International Law”: The Role of the Court of Justice’ in Rosas, A, Levits, E and Bot, Y (eds), The Court of Justice and the Construction of Europe: Analyses and Perspectives on Sixty Years of Case-Law – La Cour de Justice et la construction de l’Europe: Analyses et perspectives de soixante ans de jurisprudence (TMC Asser Press/Springer 2013) 589Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, H, ‘Some Observations on the Prohibition of “Non Liquet” and the Completeness of the Law’ in Symbolae Verzijl (Martinus Nijhoff 1958) 196Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, H, The Development of International Law by the International Court (Cambridge University Press 1982)Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, H, The Function of Law in the International Community (Oxford University Press 2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lepard, BD, Customary International Law: A New Theory with Practical Applications (Cambridge University Press 2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lepard, BD (ed), Reexamining Customary international Law (Cambridge University Press 2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lerche, P, Übermaß und Verfassungsrecht: Zur Bindung des Gesetzgebers an die Grundsätze der Verhältnismäßigkeit und der Erforderlichkeit (Heymann 1961)Google Scholar
Levi, I, Hard Choices: Decision Making under Unresolved Conflict (Cambridge University Press 1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine, DH, ‘The Chronological Paradox in Customary International Law (Or, the Virtue of Sloppy Timing in a Messy World)’ (PhD thesis, Georgetown University 2005)Google Scholar
Lindquist, S, ‘Identifying Judicial Activism’ in Lindquist, SA and Cross, FB, Measuring Judicial Activism (Oxford University Press 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Llewellyn, KN, The Bramble Bush: The Classic Lectures on the Law and Law School, with a New Introduction and Notes by Steve Sheppard (Oxford University Press 2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucy, W, ‘Adjudication’ in Coleman, JL, Himma, KE and Shapiro, SJ (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law (Oxford University Press 2004) 206Google Scholar
MacCormick, N and Weinberger, O (eds), Institutional Theory of Law: New Approaches to Legal Positivism (Springer 1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackenzie, R and others, Selecting International Judges: Principle, Process, and Politics (Oxford University Press 2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mangabeira Unger, R, Law in Modern Society: Toward a Criticism of Social Theory (Free Press 1976)Google Scholar
Marcos, H, ‘A Study on Defeasibility and Defeaters in International Law: Process or Procedure Distinction against the Non-Discrimination Rule’ in Menezes, W, Nunes Filho, A and Reis de Oliveira, PH (eds), Tribunais Internacionais e a Garantia dos Direitos Sociais (Academia Brasileira de Direito Internacional 2021) 199Google Scholar
Merkouris, P, Article 31(3)(c) VCLT and the Principle of Systemic Integration: Normative Shadows in Plato’s Cave (Brill 2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merkouris, P, Interpretation of Customary International Law: Of Methods and Limits (Brill Research Perspectives in International Legal Theory and Practice, Martinus Nijhoff/Brill 2022)Google Scholar
Merkouris, P, ‘Interpreting Customary International Law: You’ll Never Walk Alone’ in Merkouris, P, Kammerhofer, J and Arajärvi, N (eds), The Theory, Practice, and Interpretation of Customary International Law (Cambridge University Press 2022) 347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merkouris, P, Kammerhofer, J and Arajärvi, N (eds), The Theory, Practice, and Interpretation of Customary International Law (Cambridge University Press 2022)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Methymaki, E and Tzanakopoulos, A, ‘Freedom with Their Exception: Jurisdiction and Immunity as Rule and Exception’ in Bartels, L and Paddeu, F (eds), Exceptions in International Law (Cambridge University Press 2020) 240Google Scholar
Milano, E, ‘The 2013 Fisheries Protocol between the EU and Morocco: Fishing ‘too South’ Continues …’ in Balboni, M and Laschi, G (eds), The European Union Approach towards Western Sahara (Peter Lang 2017) 151Google Scholar
Milano, E, ‘General Principles Infra, Praeter, Contra Legem? The Role of Equity in Determining Reparation’ in Andenas, M and other (eds), General Principles and the Coherence of International Law (Brill/Nijhoff 2019) 65Google Scholar
Müllerson, R, ‘The Interplay of Objective and Subjective Elements in Customary Law’ in Wellens, K (ed), International Law, Theory and Practice (Kluwer 1998) 161Google Scholar
Neframi, E, ‘Customary International Law and the European Union from the Perspective of Article 3(5) TEU’ in Eeckhout, P and Lopez-Escuerdo, M (eds), The European Union’s External Action in Times of Crisis (Hart 2016) 217Google Scholar
Odermatt, J, ‘The European Union as a Global Actor and Its Impact on the International Legal Order’ (PhD thesis, University of Leuven Department of Law 2016)Google Scholar
Odermatt, J, International Law and the European Union (Cambridge University Press 2021)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odermatt, J, ‘The International Court of Justice and the Court of Justice of the European Union: Between Fragmentation and Universality of International Law’ in Skordas, A (ed), Research Handbook on the International Court of Justice (Edward Elgar 2022) 696Google Scholar
Orakhelashvili, A, The Interpretation of Acts and Rules in Public International Law (Oxford University Press 2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paparinskis, M, ‘Conclusions: General Principles and the Other Sources of International Law’ in Andenas, M and others (eds), General Principles and the Coherence of International Law (Brill/Nijhoff 2019) 117Google Scholar
Pascual-Vives, F, ‘The Identification of Customary International Law before the Court of Justice of the European Union: A Flexible Consensualism’ in Lusa Bordin, F, Müller, ATh and Pascual-Vives, F (eds), The European Union and Customary International Law (Cambridge University Press 2022) 123Google Scholar
Pauwelyn, J, Conflict of Norms in Public International Law: How WTO Law Relates to Other Rules of International Law (Cambridge University Press 2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauwelyn, J, Wessel, RA and Wouters, J, ‘Informal International Lawmaking: An Assessment and Template to Keep It Both Effective and Accountable’ in Pauwelyn, J, Wessel, RA and Wouters, J (eds), Informal International Lawmaking (Oxford University Press 2012) 508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peat, D, Comparative Reasoning in International Courts and Tribunals (Cambridge University Press 2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peczenik, A, Scientia Juris: Legal Doctrine as Knowledge of Law and as a Source of Law (Springer 2005)Google Scholar
Pellet, A, ‘Article 38’ in Zimmermann, A and others (eds), The Statute of the International Court of Justice: A Commentary (2nd edn, Oxford University Press 2012)Google Scholar
Pérez Bermejo, JM, ‘Coherence: An Outline in Six Metaphors and Four Rules’ in Araszkiewicz, M and Šavelka, J (eds), Coherence: Insights from Philosophy, Jurisprudence and Artificial Intelligence (Springer 2013)Google Scholar
Petersmann, EU, ‘“Constitutional Justice” Requires Judicial Cooperation and “Comity” in the Protection of “Rule of Law”’ in Fontanelli, F, Martinico, G and Carrozza, P (eds), Shaping Rule of Law Through Dialogue (Europa Law 2010)Google Scholar
Phoa, P, EU Law as a Creative Process: A Hermeneutic Approach for the EU Internal Market and Fundamental Rights Protection (Europa Law 2021)Google Scholar
Plumpton Ramsey, F, ‘Truth and Probability’ in Plumpton Ramsey, F and Braithwaite, RB (eds), The Foundations of Mathematics and Other Logical Essays (Martino Fine Books 1950)Google Scholar
Popper, K, ‘Science: Conjectures and Refutations’ in Curd, JA and Cover, M (eds) Philosophy of Science: The Central Issues (Norton 1998)Google Scholar
Porto Macedo Júnior, R, Do Xadrez à Cortesia: Dworkin e a Teoria do Direito Contemporânea (Saraiva 2013)Google Scholar
Postema, GJ, ‘Custom in International Law: A Normative Practice Account’ in Perreau-Saussine, A and Murphy, JB (eds), The Nature of Customary Law: Legal, Historical and Philosophical Perspectives (Cambridge University Press 2007)Google Scholar
Postema, GJ, Legal Philosophy in the Twentieth Century: The Common Law World (Springer 2011)Google Scholar
Proctor, RW and Capaldi, EJ, Psychology of Science: Implicit and Explicit Processes (Oxford University Press 2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radi, Y, ‘Coherence’ in d’Aspremont, J and Singh, S (eds), Concepts for International Law: Contributions to Disciplinary Thought (Edward Elgar 2019) 105Google Scholar
Rasmussen, H, On Law and Policy in the European Court of Justice: A Comparative Study in Judicial Policymaking (Martinus Nijhoff 1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, J, Justice as Fairness: A Restatement (E Kelly ed, Harvard University Press 2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redgwell, C, ‘General Principles of International Law’ in Vogenauer, S and Weatherill, S, General Principles of Law: European and Comparative Perspectives (Hart 2017)Google Scholar
Ricoeur, P, Hermeneutics and the Human Sciences: Essays on Language, Action, and Interpretation (Thompson, JB ed, Cambridge University Press 2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rioul, O, ‘This Is IT: A Primer on Shannon’s Entropy and Information’ in Duplantier, B and Rivasseau, V (eds), Information Theory (Progress in Mathematical Physics vol 78, Springer 2021)Google Scholar
Rosas, A, ‘The European Court of Justice and Public International Law’ in Wouters, J, Nollkaemper, A and Wet, E (eds), The Europeanisation of International Law: The Status of International Law in the EU and Its Member States (TMC Asser Press 2008)Google Scholar
Rosenne, S, The Law and Practice of the International Court, 1920–2005 (Brill 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, B, Our Knowledge of the External World: As a Field for Scientific Method in Philosophy (Routledge 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salacuse, JW, The Law of Investment Treaties (3rd edn, Oxford University Press 2021)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saunders, I General Principles as a Source of International Law: Article 38(1)(c) of the Statute of the International Court of Justice (Hart 2021)Google Scholar
Schabas, WA, The International Criminal Court: A Commentary on the Rome Statute (2nd edn, Oxford University Press 2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schabas, WA, The Customary International Law of Human Rights (Oxford University Press 2021)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schauer, F, Playing by the Rules: A Philosophical Examination of Rule-Based Decision-Making in Law and in Life (Oxford University Press 1991)Google Scholar
Schauer, F, ‘Pitfalls in the Interpretation of Customary Law’ in Perreau-Saussine, A and Murphy, JB (eds), The Nature of Customary Law: Legal, Historical and Philosophical Perspectives (Cambridge University Press 2007)Google Scholar
Schlütter, B, Developments in Customary International Law: Theory and the Practice of the International Court of Justice and the International ad hoc Criminal Tribunals for Rwanda and Yugoslavia (Brill 2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmalenbach, K, ‘Article 26’ in Dörr, O and Schmalenbach, K (eds), Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary (2nd edn, Springer 2018)Google Scholar
Schmitt, M (ed), Tallinn Manual 2.0 on the International Law Applicable to Cyber Operations (2nd edn, Cambridge University Press 2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schön, DA, The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action (Basic Books 1983)Google Scholar
Schreuer, C, ‘Diversity and Harmonization of Treaty Interpretation in Investment Arbitration’ in Fitzmaurice, M, Elias, O and Merkouris, P (eds), Treaty Interpretation and the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: 30 Years On (Martinus Nijhoff 2010)Google Scholar
Schreuer, C, ‘Coherence and Consistency in International Investment Law’ in Echandi, R and Sauvé, P (eds), Prospects in International Investment Law and Policy (Cambridge University Press 2013)Google Scholar
Schreuer, C and others, The ICSID Convention: A Commentary (Cambridge University Press 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schreuer, C and Weiniger, M, ‘A Doctrine of Precedent?’ in Muchlinski, PT, Ortino, F and Schreuer, C (eds), The Oxford Handbook of International Investment Law (Oxford University Press 2008)Google Scholar
Schrijver, NJ, ‘Fifty Years Permanent Sovereignty over Natural Resources: The 1962 UN Declaration as the Opinio Iuris Communis’ in Bungenberg, M and Stephan, H (eds), Permanent Sovereignty over Natural Resources (Springer 2015)Google Scholar
Schultz, T, ‘Against Consistency in Investment Arbitration’ in Douglas, Z, Pauwelyn, J and Viñuales, JE (eds), The Foundations of International Investment Law: Bringing Theory into Practice (Oxford University Press 2014)Google Scholar
Searle, J, Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts (Cambridge University Press 1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, J, ‘The Background of Meaning’ in Searle, J, Kiefer, F and Bierwisch, M (eds), Speech Act Theory and Pragmatics (D Reidel Publishing 1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, J, Mind, Language, and Society: Philosophy in the Real World (Basic Books 1999)Google Scholar
Searle, J, Making the Social World: The Structure of Human Civilization (Oxford University Press 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sethna, J, ‘What Is Statistical Mechanics’ in Statistical Mechanics: Entropy, Order Parameters and Complexity (2nd edn, Oxford University Press 2021)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shany, Y, Assessing the Effectiveness of International Courts (Oxford University Press 2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, B, ‘John Searle: From Speech Acts to Social Reality’ in Smith, B (ed), John Searle (Cambridge University Press 2003) 19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stahn, C, A Critical Introduction to International Criminal Law (Cambridge University Press 2019)Google Scholar
Staubach, PG, The Rule of Unwritten International Law. Customary Law, General Principles and World Order (Routledge 2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Streck, LL, Hermenêutica Jurídica e(m) Crise: Uma Exploração Hermenêutica da Construção do Direito (Livraria do Advogado 2018)Google Scholar
Sureda, AR, ‘Precedent in Investment Treaty Arbitration’ in Binder, C and others (eds), International Investment Law for the 21st Century: Essays in Honour of Christoph Schreuer (Oxford University Press 2009) 830Google Scholar
Tan, Y, The Rome Statute as Evidence of Customary International Law (Brill Nijhoff 2021)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tasioulas, J, ‘Customary International Law and the Quest for Global Justice’ in Perreau-Saussine, A and Murphy, JB (eds), The Nature of Customary Law (Cambridge University Press 2007) 307Google Scholar
Terris, D, Romano, CPR and Swigart, L, The International Judge: An Introduction to the Men and Women Who Decide the World’s Cases (Brandeis University Press 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thirlway, H, International Customary Law and Codification: An Examination of the Continuing Role of Custom in the Present Period of Codification of International Law (Brill 1972)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thirlway, H, ‘Judicial Activism and the International Court of Justice’ in McWhinney, E, Ando, N and Wolfrum, R (eds), Liber Amicorum Judge Shigeru Oda (Kluwer Law International 2002) 75Google Scholar
Thirlway, H, The Law and Procedure of the International Court of Justice: Fifty Years of Jurisprudence (Oxford University Press 2013)Google Scholar
Thomas, EW, The Judicial Process: Realism, Pragmatism, Practical Reasoning and Principles (Cambridge University Press 2008)Google Scholar
Tomuschat, C, ‘General International Law: A New Source of International Law?’ in Pisillo Mazzeschi, R and De Sena, P, Global Justice, Human Rights and the Modernization of International Law (Springer 2018) 185Google Scholar
Ulfstein, G, ‘Towards an International Human Rights Judiciary?’ in Ebbesson, J and others (eds), International Law and Changing Perceptions of Security: Liber Amicorum Said Mahmoudi (Brill 2014)Google Scholar
Van den Herik, L, ‘The Decline of Customary International Law as a Source of International Criminal Law’ in Bradley, C (ed), Custom’s Future: International Law in a Changing World (Cambridge University Press 2016) 230Google Scholar
Van Vooren, B, Blockmans, S and Wouters, J (eds), The EU’s Role in Global Governance: The Legal Dimension (Oxford University Press 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vandevelde, KJ, ‘The Liberal Vision of the International Law on Foreign Investment’ in Lim, CL (ed), Alternative Visions of the International Law on Foreign Investment: Essays in Honour of Muthucumaraswamy Sornarajah (Cambridge University Press 2016) 43Google Scholar
Villiger, M, Customary International Law and Treaties: A Manual on the Theory and Practice of the Interrelation of Sources (2nd edn, Brill 1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villiger, M, Commentary on the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (Brill 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viñuales, JE, The UN Friendly Relations Declaration at 50: An Assessment of the Fundamental Principles of International Law (Cambridge University Press 2020)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waltermann, A, ‘Why Non-Human Agency?’ in Waltermann, A (eds), Law, Science, Rationality (Eleven International 2020) 51Google Scholar
Westerman, P, ‘Open or Autonomous? The Debate on Legal Methodology as a Reflection of the Debate on Law’ in van Hoecke, M (ed), Methodologies of Legal Research: Which Kind of Method for What Kind of Discipline? (Hart 2011) 87Google Scholar
Westerman, P, ‘Opinio Juris: Test, Filter, Ideal or Map?’ in Gorobets, K, Hadjigeorgiou, A and Westerman, P (eds), Conceptual (Re)Constructions of International Law (Edward Elgar 2022) 127Google Scholar
Wheatley, S, The Idea of International Human Rights Law (Oxford University Press 2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittgenstein, L, Philosophical Investigations (GEM Anscombe tr, 3rd edn, Basil Blackwell 1986)Google Scholar
Wolfke, K, Custom in Present International Law (2nd revised edn, Martinus Nijhoff 1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wouters, J, Ryngaert, C, ‘The Impact on the Process of the Formation of Customary International Law’ in Kamminga, MT and Scheinin, M (eds), The Impact of Human Rights Law on General International Law (Oxford University Press 2009) 111Google Scholar
Yates, DS, Moore, DS, Starnes, DS, The Practice of Statistics (3rd edn, WH Freeman 2008)Google Scholar
Secondary Sources
Akande, D, ‘International Law Immunities and the International Criminal Court’ (2004) 98 AJIL 407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akande, D, ‘Introduction to the Symposium on Zachary Mollengarden & Noam Zamir “The Monetary Gold Principle: Back to Basics”’ (2021) 115 AJIL Unbound 140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akande, D and Shah, S, ‘Immunities of State Officials, International Crimes, and Foreign Domestic Courts’ (2010) 21 EJIL 815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexy, R and Peczenik, A, ‘The Concept of Coherence and Its Significance for Discursive Rationality’ (1990) 3 Ratio Juris 130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benvenisti, E, ‘The Future of International Law Scholarship in Germany: The Tension between Interpretation and Change’ (2007) 67 Heidelberg J Intl L 585Google Scholar
Bertea, S, ‘The Arguments from Coherence: Analysis and Evaluation’ (2005) 25 OJLS 369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bilder, RB and others, ‘Disentangling Treaty and Customary International Law: Remarks’ (1987) 81 ASIL Proc 157Google Scholar
Bleckmann, A, ‘Zur Feststellung und Auslegung von Völkergewohnheitsrecht’ (1977) 37 ZaöRV 505Google Scholar
Blutman, L, ‘Conceptual Confusion and Methodological Deficiencies: Some Ways That Theories on Customary International Law Fail’ (2014) 25 EJIL 529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodansky, D, ‘Customary (And Not So Customary) International Environmental Law’ (1995) 3(1) IJGLS 105Google Scholar
Bogdan, M, ‘General Principles of Law and the Problem of Lacunae in the Law of Nations’ (1977) 46 NJIL 37Google Scholar
Bogdandy, A von and Smrkolj, M, ‘European Union Law and International Law’ (2011) MPEPIL <https://opil.ouplaw.com/display/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e620>Google Scholar
Broches, A, ‘The Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States’ (1972) 136 RdC 331Google Scholar
Brown, C, ‘The Inherent Powers of International Courts and Tribunals’ (2006) 76 BYIL 195Google Scholar
Brunnée, J and Toope, S, ‘International Law and the Practice of Legality: Stability and Change’ (2018) 49 VUWLR 433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bufalini, A, ‘The Principle of Legality and the Role of CIL in the Interpretation of the ICC Statute’ (2015) 14 LPICT 233Google Scholar
Burgorgue-Larsen, L, ‘”Decompartmentalization”: The Key Technique for Interpreting Regional Human Rights Treaties’ (2018) 16 IJCL 187Google Scholar
Cappelletti, M, ‘The Law-Making Power of the Judge and Its Limits: A Comparative Analysis’ (1981) 8 Monash UL Rev 15Google Scholar
Cassese, A, ‘Remarks on Scelle’s Theory of “Role Splitting” (dedoublément fonctionnel) in International Law’ (1990) 1 EJIL 210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassese, A, ‘The Nicaragua and Tadić Test Revisited in Light of the ICJ Judgment on Genocide in Bosnia’ (2007) 4 EJIL 649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castellano, C, Fortunato, S and Loretto, V, ‘Statistical Physics on Social Dynamics’ (2009) 81 RMP 591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cattani, M and others, ‘Deterministic Chaos Theory: Some Basic Concepts’ (2017) 39 (1) Revista Brasileira de Ensino de Fisica e1309-1Google Scholar
Chasapis, Tassinis O, ‘Customary International Law: Interpretation from Beginning to End’ (2020) 31 EJIL 235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, B, ‘The Vienna Convention Reservations Regime and the Convention on Discrimination against Women’ (1991) 85 AJIL 281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corsi, JL, ‘An Argument for Strict Legality in International Criminal Law’ (2018) 49 GJIL 1321Google Scholar
Croquet, NAJ, ‘The Import of International Customary International Law into the EU Legal Order: The Adequacy of a Direct Effect Analysis’ (2013) 15 CYELS 47Google Scholar
Daniels, N, ‘Reflective Equilibrium’, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer edn, 2020) https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2020/entries/reflective-equilibrium/Google Scholar
D’Argent, P, ‘The Monetary Gold Principle: A Matter of Submissions’ (2021) 115 AJIL Unbound 149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daugirdas, K, ‘Reputation and the Responsibility of International Organizations’ (2014) 25 EJIL 991CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brabandere E, De and Baldini Miranda Da Cruz, P, ‘The Role of Proportionality in International Investment Law and Arbitration: A System-Specific Perspective’ (2020) 89 NJIL 471Google Scholar
De Brabandere, E, ‘(Re)calibration, Standard-Setting and the Shaping of Investment Law and Arbitration’ (2018) 59 BCLR 2607Google Scholar
De Wet, E, and Vidmar, J, ‘Conflicts between International Paradigms: Hierarchy versus Systemic Integration’ (2013) 2 GlobCon 196Google Scholar
Deeks, AS, ‘Unwilling or Unable: Toward a Normative Framework for Extraterritorial Self-Defense’ (2012) 52 VJIL 483Google Scholar
Delile, JF, ‘Les effets de la coutume internationale dans l’ordre juridique de l’Union européenne’ (2017) 53 CDE 177Google Scholar
Dinstein, Y, ‘The Interaction between Customary International Law and Treaties’ (2006) 322 RdC 243Google Scholar
Dworkin, R, ‘Objectivity and Truth: You’d Better Believe It’ (1996) 25 Philos Public Aff 87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eells, E and Fitelson, B, ‘Measuring Confirmation and Evidence’ (2000) 97 J Philos 663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eggett, C, ‘The Role of Principles and General Principles in the “Constitutional Processes” of International Law’ (2019) 66 NILR 197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrlich, I and Posner, RA, ‘An Economic Analysis of Legal Rulemaking’ (1974) 3 JLS 257Google Scholar
Elias, O, ‘The Nature of the Subjective Element in Customary International Law’ (1995) 44 ICLQ 501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Etkin, B, ‘The Changing Rivers of Customary International Law: The Interpretative Process as Flux’ (2022) ESIL Reflections 11(5) <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2020/entries/reflective-equilibrium/>>Google Scholar
Fan, M, ‘Custom, General Principles and the Great Architect Cassese’ (2012) 10 JICJ 1063Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, G, ‘The Law and Procedure of the International Court of Justice, 1954–9: General Principles and Sources of International Law’ (1959) 35 BYIL 183Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, G, ‘Vae Victis or Woe to the Negotiators: Your Treaty or Our ‘Interpretation’ of It?’ (1971) 65 AJIL 373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, LL and Winston, KI, ‘The Forms and Limits of Adjudication’ (1978) 92 Harv L Rev 353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaja, G, ‘General Principles of Law’ (2020) MPEPIL <https://opil.ouplaw.com/display/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e1410>Google Scholar
Gallant, KS, ‘International Criminal Courts and the Making of Public International Law: New Roles for International Organizations and Individuals’ (2010) 43 J Marshall L Rev 607Google Scholar
Gardbaum, S, ‘Human Rights as International Constitutional Rights’ (2008) 19 EJIL 749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gourgourinis, A, ‘The Distinction between Interpretation and Application of Norms in International Adjudication’ (2011) 2 JIDS 31Google Scholar
Guilfoyle, D, ‘Lacking Conviction: Is the International Criminal Court Broken? An Organisational Failure Analysis’ (2019) 20 Melb JIL 401Google Scholar
Guillaume, G, ‘The Use of Precedent by International Judges and Arbitrators’ (2011) 2 JIDS 5Google Scholar
Gümplová, P, ‘Restraining Permanent Sovereignty over Natural Resources’ (2014) 53 EQdF 96Google Scholar
Haack, S, ‘Coherence, Consistency, Cogency, Congruity, Cohesiveness, &c.: Remain Calm! Don’t Go Overboard!’ (2004) 35 NLH 167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hage, J and Verheij, B, ‘Reason‐Based Logic: A Logic for Reasoning with Rules and Reasons’ (1994) 3 ICTL 171Google Scholar
Haggenmacher, P, ‘La doctrine des deux éléments du droit coutumier dans la pratique de la Cour internationale’ (1986) 1 RGDIP 1Google Scholar
Hakimi, M, ‘Making Sense of Customary International Law’ (2020) 118 Mich L Rev 1487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, HLA, ‘Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals’ (1958) 71 Harv L Rev 607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hathaway, O, Johnson, L and Ní Aoláin, F, ‘An Introduction: Effectiveness in International Law’ (2014) 108 ASIL Proc 1Google Scholar
Helfer, LR and Slaughter, AM, ‘Why States Create International Tribunals: A Response to Professors Posner and Yoo’ (2005) 93 CLR 901Google Scholar
Helfer, L and Voeten, E, ‘International Courts as Agents of Legal Change: Evidence from LGBT Rights in Europe’ (2014) 68 IO 77Google Scholar
Heller, KJ, ‘The Law of Neutrality Does Not Apply to the Conflict with Al-Qaeda, and It’s a Good Thing, Too: A Response to Chang’ (2011) 47 TILJ 115Google Scholar
Heller, KJ, ‘Specially-Affected States and the Formation of Custom’ (2018) 112 AJIL 191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, C, ‘The UK Government’s Legal Opinion on Forcible Measures in Response to the Use of Chemical Weapons by the Syrian Government’ (2015) 64 ICLQ 179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higgins, R, ‘The ICJ, the ECJ and the Integrity of International Law’ (2002) 52 ICLQ 9Google Scholar
Hoffmann, PL, ‘The “Blank Stare Phenomenon”: Proving Customary International Law in U.S. Courts’ (1996) 25 GJICL 181Google Scholar
Jain, N, ‘Comparative International Law at the ICTY: The General Principles Experiment’ (2015) 109(3) AJIL 486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaynes, ET, ‘Information Theory and Statistical Mechanics’ (1957) 14 Phys Rev 620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, KA, ‘The Nature and Context of Rules and the Identification of Customary International Law’ (2021) 32 EJIL 1167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, A, ‘Judicial Cross-Referencing and the Identity of the International Criminal Court’ (2018) 43 NCJIL 72Google Scholar
Joyner, DH, ‘Why I Stopped Believing in Customary International Law’ (2019) 9 Asian JIL 31Google Scholar
Kammerhofer, J, ‘The Binding Nature of Provisional Measures of the International Court of Justice: The “Settlement” of the Issue in the LaGrand Case’ (2003) 16 LJIL 67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kammerhofer, J, ‘Uncertainty in the Formal Sources of International Law: Customary International Law and Some of Its Problems’ (2004) 15 EJIL 523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kassoti, E, ‘Between Sollen and Sein: The CJEU’s Reliance on International Law in the Interpretation of Economic Agreements Covering Occupied Territories’ (2020) 33 LJIL 381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klabbers, J, ‘How to Defeat a Treaty’s Object and Purpose Pending Entry into Force: Toward Manifest Intent’ (2001) 34 VJTL 318Google Scholar
Kolb, R, ‘Selected Problems in the Theory of Customary International Law’ (2003) 50 NILR 119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kooijmans, P, ‘The ICJ in the 21st Century: Judicial Restraint, Judicial Activism, or Proactive Judicial Policy’ (2007) 56 ICLQ 741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornobis-Romanowska, D, ‘Effects of International Customary Law in the Legal Order of the European Union’ (2018) 8 WRLAE 405Google Scholar
Koutsoyiannis, D and Sargentis, GF, ‘Entropy and Wealth’ (2021) 23 Entropy 1356CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kriebaum, U, ‘Evaluating Social Benefits and Costs of Investment Treaties: Depoliticization of Investment Disputes’ (2018) 33 ICSID Review 14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kwiecień, R, ‘General Principles of Law: The Gentle Guardians of Systemic Integration of International Law’ (2017) 37 PYIL 235Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, H, ‘Restrictive Interpretation and the Principle of Effectiveness in the Interpretation of Treaties’ (1949) 26 BYBIL 48Google Scholar
Lee, M, ‘The Interrelation between the Law of the Sea Convention and Customary International Law’ (2006) 7 SDILJ 405Google Scholar
Lefkowitz, D, ‘(Dis)Solving the Chronological Paradox in Customary International Law: A Hartian Approach’ (2008) 21 CJLJ 129Google Scholar
Levenbook, BB, ‘The Role of Coherence in Legal Reasoning’ (1984) 3 Law Philos 355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindquist, SA and Cross, FB, ‘Empirically Testing Dworkin’s Chain Novel Theory: Studying the Path of Precedent’ (2005) 80 NYUL Rev 1156Google Scholar
Lusa Bordin, F, ‘Reflections of Customary International Law: The Authority of Codification Conventions and ILC Draft Articles in International Law’ (2014) 63 ICLQ 535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macagno, F, Walton, D and Sartor, G, ‘Pragmatic Maxims and Presumptions in Legal Interpretation’ (2017) 37 Law Philos 69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacCormick, N, ‘Argumentation and Interpretation in Law’ (1993) 6 Ratio Juris 16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mac-Gregor, EF, ‘What Do We Mean When We Talk about Judicial Dialogue? Reflections of a Judge of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights’ (2017) 30 HHRJ 89Google Scholar
Maculan, E, ‘Judicial Definition of Torture as a Paradigm of Cross-Fertilisation: Combining Harmonisation and Expansion’ (2015) 84 NJIL 456Google Scholar
Madsen, MR, ‘Who Rules the World? The Educational Capital of the International Judiciary’ (2018) 3 UC Irvine J Intl Transl Comp L 97Google Scholar
Mahoney, P, ‘Judicial Activism and Judicial Self-Restraint in the European Court of Human Rights: Two Sides of the Same Coin’ (1990) 11 HRLJ 57Google Scholar
Malenovskŷ, J, ‘Le juge et la coutume internationale: Perspectives de l’Union européenne et de la Cour de justice’ (2013) 12 LPICT 225Google Scholar
McDougal, MS, ‘The Hydrogen Bomb Tests and the International Law of Sea’ (1955) 49 AJIL 356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIntyre, J, ‘Rules Are Rules: Reconceiving Monetary Gold as a Rule of Procedure’ (2021) 115 AJIL Unbound 144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLachlan, C, ‘The Principle of Systemic Integration and Article 31(3)(c) of the Vienna Convention’ (2005) 54 ICLQ 279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merkouris, P, ‘Interpreting the Customary Rules on Interpretation’ (2017) 19 ICLR 126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merkouris, P, ‘Principle of Systemic Integration’ (2020) MPEiPro, <https://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law-mpeipro/e2866.013.2866/law-mpeipro-e2866>Google Scholar
Merkouris, P and Mileva, N, ‘Introduction to the Series: Customary Law Interpretation as a Tool’ (2022) ESIL Reflections 11(2) <https://esil-sedi.eu/esilreflection-introduction-to-the-series-customary-law-interpretation-as-a-tool/>Google Scholar
Milano, E, ‘Front Polisario and the Exploitation of Natural Resources by the Administrative Power’ (2017) 2 EP 953Google Scholar
Mohamad, R, ‘Some Reflections on the International Law Commission Topic “Identification of Customary International Law”’ (2016) 15 Chinese JIL 41Google Scholar
Mollengarden, Z and Zamir, N, ‘The Monetary Gold Principle: Back to Basics’ (2021) 115 AJIL 41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moral Soriano, L, ‘A Modest Notion of Coherence in Legal Reasoning: A Model for the European Court of Justice’ (2003) 16 Ratio Juris 296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mudukuti, A, ‘Prosecutor v. Omar Hassan Ahmad Al-Bashir, Judgment in the Jordan Referral re Al-Bashir Appeal’ (2020) 114 AJIL 103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Connell, ME, ‘Remarks: The Resort to Drones under International Law’ (2011) 39 Denv J Intl L & Pol’y 585Google Scholar
Odermatt, J, ‘The Court of Justice of the European Union: International or Domestic Court?’ (2014) 3 CJICL 696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odermatt, J, ‘Council of the European Union v Front Populaire pour la Libération de la Saguia-El-Hamra et Du Rio de Oro (Front Polisario)’ (2017) 111 AJIL 736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pair, L, ‘Judicial Activism in the ICJ Charter Interpretation’ (2001–02) 8 ILSA J Intl Comp L 181Google Scholar
Pasqualucci, JM, ‘Interim Measures in International Human Rights: Evolution and Harmonization’ (2005) 38 VJTL 1Google Scholar
Pellet, A, ‘The Normative Dilemma: Will and Consent in International Law-Making’ (1989) 12 Aus YIL 3Google Scholar
Pereira, R, ‘Permanent Sovereignty over Natural Resources in the 21st Century: Natural Resource Governance and the Right to Self-Determination of Indigenous Peoples under International Law’ (2013) 14 Melb JIL 8Google Scholar
Perin Shecaira, F, ‘Sources of Law Are Not Legal Norms’ (2015) 28 Ratio Juris 15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perrez, FX, ‘The Relationship between “Permanent Sovereignty” and the Obligation Not to Cause Transboundary Environmental Damage’ (1996) 26 Envtl L 1187Google Scholar
Peters, A, ‘The Refinement of International Law: From Fragmentation to Regime Interaction and Politicization’ (2017) 15 IJCL 671Google Scholar
Pocar, F, ‘Symposium on the Rome Statute at Twenty: Transformation of Customary Law through ICC Practice’ (2018) 112 AJIL Unbound 182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pomson, O, ‘Does the Monetary Gold principle Apply to International Courts and Tribunals Generally?’ (2019) 10 JIDS 88Google Scholar
Posner, EA and Yoo, JC, ‘Judicial Independence in International Tribunals’ (2005) 93 CLR 1Google Scholar
Priest, G, ‘The Structure of the Paradoxes of Self-Reference’ (1994) 103 Mind 25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasmussen, H, ‘Between Self-Restraint and Activism: A Judicial Policy for the European Court’ (1988) 13 Eur L Rev 28Google Scholar
Rettler, B and Bailey, AM, ‘Object’, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter edn, 2017) https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/object/Google Scholar
Ridi, N, ‘United States: Anti-dumping Measures Applying Differential Pricing Methodology to Softwood Lumber from Canada’ (2020) 114 AJIL 735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, A, ‘Power and Persuasion in Investment Treaty Interpretation: The Dual Role of States’ (2010) 104 AJIL 179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, AE, ‘Traditional and Modern Approaches to Customary International Law: A Reconciliation’ (2001) 95 AJIL 757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romano, C, ‘Deciphering the Grammar of the International Jurisprudential Dialogue’ (2009) 41 NYUJILP 755Google Scholar
Rosenkrantz, RD, ‘Does the Philosophy of Induction Rest on a Mistake?’ (1982) 79 J Philos 78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudner, R, ‘The Scientist qua Scientist Makes Value Judgments’ (1953) 20 Philos Sci 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruys, T, ‘The Meaning of “Force” and the Boundaries of the Jus ad Bellum: Are “Minimal” Uses of Force Excluded from UN Charter Article 2(4)?’ (2014) 108 AJIL 159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryngaert, C and Hora Siccama, D, ‘Ascertaining Customary International Law: An Inquiry into the Methods Used by Domestic Courts’ (2018) 65 NILR 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saul, M, ‘The Normative Status of Self-Determination in International Law: A Formula for Uncertainty in the Scope and Content of the Right?’ (2011) 11 HRLR 628Google Scholar
Scharf, M, ‘Hugo Grotius and the Concept of Grotian Moments in International Law’ (2022) 54 CWR J Int Law 17Google Scholar
Schladebach, M, ‘Praktische Konkordanz als Verfassungsrechtliches Kollisionsprinzip: Eine Verteidigung’ (2014) 53 Der Staat 263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, MN, ‘Military Necessity and Humanity in International Humanitarian Law: Preserving the Delicate Balance’ (2010) 50(4) VJIL 795Google Scholar
Schwarzenberger, G, ‘The Inductive Approach to International Law’ (1947) 60 HLR 539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwitzgebel, E, ‘Belief’, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2021 edition) https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/belief/Google Scholar
Seidenfeld, T, ‘Direct Inference and Inverse Inference’ (1978) 75 J Philos 709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shany, Y, ‘Assessing the Effectiveness of International Courts: A Goal-Based Approach’ (2012) 106 AJIL 225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shao, X, ‘What We Talk about When We Talk about General Principles of Law’ (2021) 20 Chinese JIL 219Google Scholar
Solares, EJ, ‘Las normas internacionales convencionales de derechos humanos y su contribución al orden público internacional’ (2014) 14 RDUNED 325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sparks, T, ‘Reassessing State Consent to Jurisdiction: The Indispensable Third Party Principle before the ICJ’ (2022) 91 NJIL 216Google Scholar
Sparks, T and Somos, M, ‘Grotian Moments: An Introduction’ (2021) 42 Grotiana 179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talmon, S, ‘Determining Customary International Law: The ICJ’s Methodology between Induction, Deduction and Assertion’ (2015) 26 EJIL 417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomuschat, C, ‘Obligations Arising for States without or against Their Will’ (1993) 241 RdC 83Google Scholar
Treves, T, ‘Customary International Law’ (2006) MPEPIL <https://opil.ouplaw.com/display/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e1393>Google Scholar
Tunkin, G, ‘Is General International Law Customary International Law Only?’ (1993) 4 EJIL 534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuomela, R, ‘Collective Acceptance, Social Institutions, and Social Reality’ (2003) 62 AJES 123Google Scholar
Tzekvelos, V, ‘The Use of Article 31(3)(c) of the VCLT in the Case Law of the ECtHR: An Effective Anti-Fragmentation Tool or a Selective Loophole for the Reinforcement of Human Rights Teleology? Between Evolution and Systemic Integration’ (2010) 31 MJIL 621Google Scholar
Van, Aaken A, ‘Interests, Strategies and Veto Players: The Political Economy of Interpreting Customary International Law’ (2022) 19 ESIL Reflections 11(2) <https://esil-sedi.eu/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/ESIL-Reflection-Anne-van-Aaken_final-version.pdf>Google Scholar
Vandevelde, KJ, ‘Sustainable Liberalism and the International Investment Regime’ (1997) 19 MJIL 373Google Scholar
Vanhamme, J, ‘Formation and Enforcement of Customary International Law: The European Union’s Contribution’ (2008) 39 NYIL 127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verdier, PH and Versteeg, M, ‘International Law in National Legal Systems: An Empirical Investigation’ (2015) 109 AJIL 528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verdier, PH and Voeten, E, ‘Precedent, Compliance, and Change in Customary International Law: An Explanatory Theory’ (2014) 108 AJIL 389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verdross, A, ‘Les principes généraux du droit dans la jurisprudence internationale, 1935’ (1935) 52 RdC 193Google Scholar
Vickers, J, ‘The Problem of Induction’, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter edn 2022) http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/induction-problem/Google Scholar
Voyiakis, E, ‘International Law, Interpretative Fidelity and the Hermeneutics of Hans-Georg Gadamer’ (2011) 54 GYIL 385Google Scholar
Wallace, RJ, ‘Practical Reason’, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring edn, 2020) https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/practical-reason/Google Scholar
Weeramantry, CG, ‘The Function of the International Court of Justice in the Development of International Law’ (1997) 10 LJIL 309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weisburd, AM, ‘The International Court of Justice and the Concept of State Practice’ (2009) 31 UPJIL 330Google Scholar
White, JB, ‘Law as Language: Reading Law and Reading Literature’ (1982) 60 Tex L Rev 415Google Scholar
Wolfke, K, ‘Some Persistent Controversies Regarding Customary International Law’ (1993) 24 NYIL 1Google Scholar
Wood, M, ‘Customary International Law and the General Principles of Law Recognized by Civilized Nations’ (2019) 21 ICLR 307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Worster, W, ‘The Inductive and Deductive Methods in Customary International Law Analysis: Traditional and Modern Approaches’ (2014) 45 GJIL 445Google Scholar
Yee, S, ‘Sketching the Debate on Military Activities in the EEZ: An Editorial Comment’ (2010) 9 Chinese JIL 1Google Scholar
Yildiz, E and Yüksel, U, ‘Limits of Behavioral Approaches: Lessons from the Field of Maritime Boundary Making’ (2022) 23 GLJ 413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zamir, N, ‘The Applicability of the Monetary Gold Principle in International Arbitration’ (2017) 33 Arb Int’l 523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zarbiyev, F, ‘Judicial Activism in International Law: A Conceptual Framework for Analysis’ (2012) 3 JIDS 247Google Scholar
⸺‘equilibrium’, Encyclopedia Britannica (21 July 2022) <www.britannica.com/science/equilibrium-physics>>Google Scholar
Ammann, O, ‘On the Interpretability of Customary International Law: A Response to Nina Mileva and Marina Fortuna’ (Opinio Juris, 7 October 2019) <http://opiniojuris.org/2019/10/07/on-the-interpretability-of-customary-international-law-a-response-to-nina-mileva-and-marina-fortuna/>>Google Scholar
Bourcier, D and Mazzega, P, ‘Toward Measures of Complexity in Legal Systems’, ICAIL ’07: Proceedings of the11th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (June 2007) <https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/1276318.1276359>CrossRef>Google Scholar
Cohen, HG, ‘Methodology and Misdirection: Custom and the ICJ’ (EJIL: Talk!, 1 December 2015) <www.ejiltalk.org/methodology-and-misdirection-a-response-to-stefan-talmon-on-custom-and-the-icj/>>Google Scholar
D’Aspremont, J, ‘Bypassing the Authority of international law: The virtue of modern self-referentiality’ (21 September 2017; forthcoming in G Hernandez and G Jokubauskaite (eds), Constructing Authority in International Law) <https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3040975>>Google Scholar
D’Amato, A, ‘Legal Uncertainty’ (2010) Faculty Working Papers 108, <http://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/facultyworkingpapers/108>>Google Scholar
Di Marco, R, ‘Customary International Law: A Foreword to Identification v. Interpretation’, TRICI-Law Research Paper 009/2019 <www.academia.edu/43325436/Customary_International_Law_a_Foreword_to_Identification_v._Interpretation>>Google Scholar
Drake, GWF, ‘thermodynamics’ (Encyclopedia Britannica, 15 May 2023) <www.britannica.com/science/thermodynamics>>Google Scholar
Eur-Lex, ‘Treaties Currently in Force’ (EU, 2022) <http://ec.europa.eu/world/agreements/viewCollection.do>>Google Scholar
Fortuna, M, ‘Different Strings of the Same Harp: Interpretation of Customary International Rules, Their Identification and Treaty Interpretation’ (2020, revised 2021) University of Groningen Faculty of Law Research Paper 48/2020 <https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3798476>CrossRef>Google Scholar
German Federal Foreign Office, German Federal Ministry of Defence, and German Federal Ministry of the Interior, Building and Community, ‘On the Application of International Law in Cyberspace’ (Position paper, March 2021) <www.auswaertiges-amt.de/blob/2446304/32e7b2498e10b74fb17204c54665bdf0/on-the-application-of-international-law-in-cyberspace-data.pdf>>Google Scholar
Goodstein, D, ‘mechanics’, Encyclopedia Britannica (21 August 2020) <www.britannica.com/science/mechanics>>Google Scholar
Hosch, WL, ‘isomorphism’, Encyclopedia Britannica (15 July 2009) <www.britannica.com/science/isomorphism-mathematics>>Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Analytical Guide to the Work of the International Law Commission: General Principles of Law’ (UN, 2023) <https://legal.un.org/ilc/guide/1_15.shtml>>Google Scholar
Jeutner, V and Paddeu, F, ‘Three Paradoxes of Customary Law’ (The Logic of International Law Conference Maastricht University 2022)Google Scholar
Kades, E, ‘The Laws of Complexity and the Complexity of Laws: The Implications of Computational Complexity Theory for the Law’ (1997) Faculty Publications 646 <https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/facpubs/646>>Google Scholar
Kamensky, JM, ‘Managing the Complicated vs. the Complex’ (IBM Center for the Business of Government, Fall/Winter 2011) <www.businessofgovernment.org/sites/default/files/JohnKamensky.pdf>>Google Scholar
Marcos, H, Waltermann, A and Hage, J, ‘From Sovereignty to International Cooperation: Lessons from Legal Logic and Social Ontology’ (2021) Maastricht Faculty of Law Working Paper Series 2021/01 <https://cris.maastrichtuniversity.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/76750436/law_working_paper_series_2021_01_bezerra_marcos_waltermann_hage.pdf>CrossRef>Google Scholar
Martinich, AP and Stroll, A, ‘epistemology’, Encyclopedia Britannica (26 August 2022) <www.britannica.com/topic/epistemology>>Google Scholar
Mileva, N and Fortuna, M, ‘Emerging Voices: The Case for CIL Interpretation – An Argument from Theory and an Argument from Practice’ (Opinio Juris, 23 August 2019) <http://opiniojuris.org/2019/08/23/emerging-voices-the-case-for-cil-interpretation-an-argument-from-theory-and-an-argument-from-practice/>>Google Scholar
Siegenfeld, Y Bar-Yam, A, ‘An Introduction to Complex Systems Science and Its Applications’ [2020] Complexity <https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2020/6105872>>Google Scholar
Turner, C, ‘Interconstituted Legal Agents’ (2022) University of Georgia School of Law Research Paper 2022-07<https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4049942>CrossRef>Google Scholar
UK Government, ‘Chemical Weapon Use by Syrian Regime: UK Government Legal Position’ (Policy paper, 29 August 2013) <www.gov.uk/government/publications/chemical-weapon-use-by-syrian-regime-uk-government-legal-position/chemical-weapon-use-by-syrian-regime-uk-government-legal-position-html-version>>Google Scholar
You have
Access
Open access