Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T12:57:01.497Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Serological evidence of coronavirus infections in native hamadryas baboons (Papio hamadryas hamadryas) of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 May 2017

A.O. OLARINMOYE
Affiliation:
Engineer Abdullah Bugshan Research Chair for Growth Factors and Bone Regeneration (GFBR), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia Department of Agriculture and Industrial Technology (Animal Science Unit), Faculty of Science and Technology, Babcock University, Ilisan-Remo, Ogun State, Nigeria Department of Veterinary Public Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria
B.O. OLUGASA
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Public Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria Centre for Control and Prevention of Zoonosis, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria
H. NIPHUIS
Affiliation:
Department of Virology, Biomedical Primate Research Centre, Rijswijk, The Netherlands
R.V. HERWIJNEN
Affiliation:
B.V. European Veterinary Laboratory, Woerden, The Netherlands
E. VERSCHOOR
Affiliation:
Department of Virology, Biomedical Primate Research Centre, Rijswijk, The Netherlands
A. BOUG
Affiliation:
Prince Saud al-Faisal Wildlife Research Centre, Ta'if, Saudi Arabia
O.O. ISHOLA
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Public Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria Centre for Control and Prevention of Zoonosis, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria
H. BUITENDIJK
Affiliation:
Department of Virology, Biomedical Primate Research Centre, Rijswijk, The Netherlands
Z. FAGROUCH
Affiliation:
Department of Virology, Biomedical Primate Research Centre, Rijswijk, The Netherlands
K. AL-HEZAIMI*
Affiliation:
Engineer Abdullah Bugshan Research Chair for Growth Factors and Bone Regeneration (GFBR), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
*
*Author for correspondence: K. Al-Hezaimi, Growth Factors and Bone Regeneration (GFBR), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. (Email: [email protected], [email protected])
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The hamadryas baboon (Papio hamadryas hamadryas) is the only indigenous species of non-human primates (NHP) found in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA). There are no peer-reviewed publications on viral infections of the baboons of KSA. Apart from camels, other animals are likely sources of the novel Middle East Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus (MERSCoV) for humans. We investigated evidence of highly pathogenic coronavirus infections including MERSCoV in a large group of commensal baboons accompanied by feral dogs, on the outskirts of Ta'if city, KSA, in February 2013. Fifty baboons (16 juveniles and 34 adults) were screened for serum antibodies to human coronaviruses (HCoV-043/-NL63/-229) and canine coronaviruses (CCoV-1-3) using direct Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) technique and for MERSCoV antibodies using Serum Neutralization Test (SNT). Of the 50 sampled baboons, 22% (n = 11) were seropositive to HCoVs, 10% (n = 5) were seropositive to CCoVs, while none had detectable MERSCoV antibodies. These findings bear potentially significant implications for public health, canine health and baboon conservation efforts, necessitating follow-up investigations and preventive measures at locations where baboons frequent human habitations, or are regarded as tourist attractions, in KSA.

Type
Original Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Key Findings

  • Across the southwestern region of the kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA), large groups of free-living hamadryas baboons exist in a commensal state, side-by-side with human communities.

  • There is no data available on the viral infections of these baboons, or their potential role in the transmission cycle of novel zoonotic viruses such as the Middle East Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus (MERSCoV).

  • We found evidence of seropositivity to coronaviruses of human and canine origin, but not to MERSCoV, in commensal baboons coexisting with feral dogs around the city of Ta'if, KSA.

INTRODUCTION

The Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) is the most important emerging infectious disease (EID) of zoonotic and public health importance, in the Middle East and North Africa. The disease is caused by the MERS Coronavirus or MERSCoV, a positive-sense single-stranded RNA virus, initially referred to as HCoV-EMC/2012 or Human Coronavirus Erasmus Medical Centre/2012. The MERS virus is a lineage C betacoronavirus that causes pneumonia, renal failure and death in 30–40% of human patients [1] and much higher mortalities in people with concurrent diseases such as diabetes, hypertension, chronic cardiac disease and chronic renal disease [Reference Assiri2]. More than in any other country, a higher number of MERS-related human morbidities and deaths have occurred in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA), with 1582 out of the 1917 (82·52%) laboratory confirmed cases of the disease and 659 out of the 684 (96·35%) associated case fatalities [3, 4]. It is believed that MERS originated as a zoonosis and that dromedaries are the main source of the primary human infection [Reference Memish5]. However, there is growing evidence that other animals apart from camels may have a role to play in human MERS infections. Coronaviruses have the inherent ability to infect more than one host species [Reference Woo6] and MERSCoV sequences have been detected in faecal pellets of a Taphosus perforatus bat in KSA [Reference Memish7]. The receptor dipeptidyl peptidase 4 or DPP4 that confers susceptibility to MERSCoV has been identified not only in human beings, camels and bats, but also in non-human primates (NHP) such as baboons, rhesus macaques and marmosets [Reference Peck8].

The hamadryas baboon (Papio hamadryas hamadryas) is the only species of NHP that is indigenous and endemic to KSA and the rest of the Arabian Peninsula [Reference Kummer9]. In the southwest region of the country, these animals exist in the wild state and as commensals along major highways and around big cities such as Abha and Ta'if, locations where primary outbreaks of human MERS have occurred. Unlike wild baboons, commensal baboons frequently mingle with people, aggregate in large groups and survive mainly on provisioned food and edible wastes scavenged from household refuse bins and communal refuse dumps [Reference Biquand10]. As previously observed, frequent exposure or contact between human beings, NHP and other animals may create avenues for cross-species transmissions of pathogens and introduction of new epidemics [Reference Gillespie, Nunn and Leendertz11]. Non-human primates are susceptible to autologous as well as human coronaviruses (HCoVs) and such infections may be inapparent, or manifest as enterocolitis and diarrhoea, or pneumonia [Reference Goncharuk12, Reference Goncharuk13]. The spectrum of clinical signs observed in human MERS victims [14], is similar to those observed in NHPs that are infected with coronaviruses [Reference Goncharuk12, Reference Goncharuk13]. Whereas, similar genera of intestinal parasites have been identified in stool samples of baboons and people in locations where commensal baboons thrive in the southwestern region of KSA [Reference Alqumber15], no peer-reviewed data are available on the viral pathogens of the baboons of KSA, or the veterinary and public health implications of such infections.

The commensal baboons at Ta'if share feeding, watering and sleeping sites with feral dogs. We hypothesized that these commensal baboons harbour infections caused by pathogenic coronaviruses originating from human beings (anthroponoses) and dogs, and that the baboons are reservoirs of MERS zoonosis. To obtain baseline information about the exposure of the baboons to pathogenic human and animal coronaviruses, we screened them for serum antibodies to the human coronaviruses HCoV-043, HCoV-NL063 and HCoV-229E, canine coronavirus genotypes 1–3 (CCoV 1-3) and to MERSCoV.

METHODS

Ethical approval

The research protocol was approved by the Research Ethics Review Committee of the Engineer Abdullah Bugshan Research Chair for Growth Factors and Bone Regeneration (GFBR), King Saud University, Riyadh, KSA. The protocol conformed to national and institutional methods and safety guidelines for the use of wildlife mammals in research. The fieldwork was conducted with the support of the Saudi Wildlife Authority (SWA), Riyadh, KSA and the Prince Saud al-Faisal Wildlife Research Centre (formerly NWRC: National Wildlife Research Centre) in Ta'if.

Study location

The study site was an abandoned dam located on Latitude 21°13′46·6″ North and Longitude 40°26′40·9″ East of the Greenwich Meridian, 1672 m above sea level and approximately 7 kms southeast of the city of Ta'if. The mean daily temperature, annual precipitation and average humidity at Ta'if are 22·38 °C, 119 mm and 41·1%, respectively [16]. The location is surrounded by hills, the slopes of which served as sleeping sites for baboons and feral dogs. At the time of this study in mid-February 2013, the vegetation of the area was dominated by thorny Acacia trees, perennial shrubs (mainly Solanum incanum and Ochradenus baccatus),and herbs such as Aerva javanica, Argemone ochroleuca and Pennisetum setaceum. The year-round presence of large numbers of hamadryas baboons at the study site can be attributed to the availability in the area of many shady Acacia trees, several watering holes and an abundant, year-round supply of provisioned food and edible wastes from open rubbish heaps.

Collection of diagnostic samples

Sample collection was based on opportunistic capture and release of experimental animals. This method was appropriate because the study was not set up for exhaustive statistical analysis. It was rather exploratory and aimed at getting a first glance at what coronavirus infections exist in native baboons of KSA that coexist with feral dogs, at a location where several primary human MERS cases have been recorded. Infant baboons were exempted from the study because the aim was to detect immunity that was active or based on exposure rather than passive (i.e. transplacental or transcolostral). Non-stratified power analysis indicated that a sample of 50 baboons would provide >95% confidence of detecting infections if they were present at a prevalence of ⩾1%.

The animals were lured with fruits and nuts into a purpose-built steel wire mesh cage and were anesthetized with ketamine hydrochloride intramuscular injections. The anaesthetic was administered at 10 mg/kg body weight using gas-propelled darts (Telinject Veterinaer Spezialgeraete, Germany). The subjects were identified to species level as previously described [Reference Jolly, Kimble and Martin17]. Each baboon was weighed with a hanging Salter scale, sexed by visual inspection of the external genitalia, age classified and examined physically for presence or absence of ectoparasites and signs or lesions of diseases. The subjects were age classified based on age-related changes in body weights and other physical traits of free-living hamadryas baboons as previously described [Reference Sigg18]. The reproductive status of the adult females was determined by abdominal palpation and examination of the mammary glands for evidence of pregnancy and lactation, respectively. To prevent repeated sampling, each baboon was assigned a unique identification code and tagged with indelible ink. Between 5 and 8 ml of blood was collected from each baboon by aseptic venipuncture of the long saphenous vein and immediately transferred into labelled, sterile, plastic Vacutainer® tubes without anticoagulant. The blood collection tubes were placed on ice packs to facilitate clot formation. A piece of dry gauze was placed on the venipuncture site and digital pressure applied to control bleeding. Anesthetized baboons were monitored to full recovery and allowed to rejoin their groups.

Handling and storage of diagnostic samples

The blood samples were centrifuged at 2500 rpm for 15 min. Serum was transferred from each tube with a sterile disposable micropipette into labelled Eppendorf® cryovials, leaving behind the blood pellets. The serum samples and blood pellets were stored at −70 °C until the time of analyses.

Laboratory investigations

Direct enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs)

The procedure used is as previously described [Reference Warren19], but with some modifications. Ultracentrifuged whole-virus lysates were used as antigens in ELISAs, to screen for antibodies reactive or cross-reactive to CCoV mix (genotypes 1–3) and HCoV mix (HCoV 043/-NL63/-229), (Source: EVL, Woerden, the Netherlands). Virus lysate solution (1·0 m virus/ml Tris–NaC1–EDTA buffer and 0·25% Triton X-100), was added to each well of ELISA plates (675061, Half area, 96 well, Greiner Bio-One, Germany), at a concentration of 2 µg/ml in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and incubated overnight at room temperature (RT). The plates were washed (5×) with PBS, 0·1% Tween 20) and blocked for 1 h at RT with a mixture comprising 1·0% casein (SC5890, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) in PBS. Serum samples, heat inactivated for 30 min at 56 °C were diluted 1 : l00 in PBS, 1% casein, 0·1% cell lysate of uninfected cells, and 0·1% Tween 20 and added to the wells and incubated for 1 h at 20 °C. Wells were washed (5×) and conjugate solution comprising 1/1000 Protein G (539305, Calbiochem, San Diego, USA) was added followed by incubation for 1 h at RT. Plates were washed again and the substrate, BluePhos Phosphatase substrate (50-88-05/-6, KPL, Gaithersburg, MD, USA), was added to the wells. The reaction was stopped with 2 N NaOH and the plates read at 595 nm wavelength on a Bio-Rad model iMARK microplate absorbance reader (Hercules, CA, USA). Blank values were subtracted by the pre-programed microplate reader from all optical density (OD) values. OD values greater than four times the mean of the negative controls were considered positive. Values less than two times the mean of the negative controls were considered negative. All values in-between were regarded as intermediate or equivocal responses.

Serum neutralization test (SNT) for MERSCoV

The test was performed using Vero B4 (MERSCoV) cells as previously described [Reference Reusken20], with recent modifications [Reference Meyer21]. Neutralization tests were performed in a 96-well format to reduce the required volumes of sera. Reactions contained 50 PFUs of MERSCoV (EMC/2012 strain) in 25 µl of medium mixed 1:1 with baboon serum diluted in 25 µl serum-free Dulbecco minimum essential medium. The starting dilution was 1:40. After incubation for 1 h at 37 °C, each well was infected for 1 h at 37 °C with a 50 µl virus–serum mixture. Supernatants were removed and fresh complete Dulbecco minimum essential medium was added. Assays were terminated by fixation with 8% paraformaldehyde for 30 min and stained with crystal violet after 3 days. Neutralization titres were defined as serum dilutions reducing cytopathic effects in two parallel wells.

Statistical analyses

Results were tabulated using Microsoft Excel 2013 software and analysed using IBM Statistical Package for the Social Sciences Version 20 program (SPSS v.20). Descriptive statistics of the body weights of the different age classes of baboons were summarized as means ± s.d., while that of positive, negative and equivocal sera were expressed as percentages, calculated according to the age class and sex of the baboons. To estimate the variation in prevalence of HCoV, CCoV and MERSCoV antibodies in the sampled baboons, two explanatory variables (age class and sex) were tested for statistically significant associations with serological status of the animals, using χ 2 test or Fishers exact test. The P-value for statistical significance was set at <0·05.

RESULTS

Age and sex attributes of commensal baboons sampled at Ta'if, KSA

The sexes, age estimates and body weights of the subjects are presented in Table 1. A total of 50 hamadryas baboons were sampled and these included 22 males (16 Juveniles and 6 adults) and 28 adult females. Of the six adult males, four were group leaders or alpha-males. None of the female baboons was perceptibly pregnant, but two were lactating while four showed oestrus signs such as vulval swelling and reddening.

Table 1. Characteristics of commensal hamadryas baboons (n = 50) sampled at Ta'if in February 2013

* Age-related morphological changes observed in free-living Hamadryas baboons (Jolly [Reference Jolly, Kimble and Martin17]; Sigg et al. [Reference Sigg18]).

Calculated from values recorded during the fieldwork in Ta'if, KSA.

Prevalence of HCoVs, CCoVs and MERSCoV in commensal baboons of Ta'if

Of the 50 hamadryas baboons, 22% (n = 11) were seropositive to HCoVs (Types -043/-NL63/-229) and 10% (n = 5) to CCoV mix (Types -1/-2/-3). None of the subjects was found to be positive for MERSCoV neutralizing antibodies (Table 2). There was no significant association between age class and seropositivity of the baboons to HCoVs (Fisher's test: P = 1·0) or CCoVs (P = 0·163). There was also no significant association between sex and seropositivity of baboons to HCoVs (Fisher's test: P = 0·734) or CCoVs (Fisher's test: P = 0·059), although the ELISA results appeared to suggest a higher predisposition of female baboons to CCoV infections (Table 3).

Table 2. Coronavirus infections detected in commensal hamadryas baboons (n  =  50) sampled at Ta'if, Saudi Arabia, in February 2013

ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; SNT, Serum Neutralization Test; CCoV 1–3, canine coronavirus genotypes 1–3; HCoV 043/NL63/229, Human Coronaviruses 043, NL63 and 229; MERSCoV, Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus

* European Veterinary Laboratories (EVL), Woerden, the Netherlands.

Table 3. Distribution of selected coronaviral infections in commensal hamadryas baboons (n = 50) sampled at Ta'if, Saudi Arabia, in February 2013

JM-2, juvenile 2 male; JM-3, juvenile 3 male; ADM, adult male; ADF, adult female; CCoV 1–3, canine coronavirus type 1–3; HCoV 043/NL63/229, human coronavirus strain 043, 063 and 229; MERSCoV, Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus; %, number of seropositive baboons belonging to the group expressed as a percentage of the total number of baboons sampled.

DISCUSSION

This study was designed to generate baseline information about the exposure of hamadryas baboons in Taif, Saudi Arabia to pathogenic human and animal coronaviruses. A sample of 50 baboons was screened for serum antibodies to the human coronaviruses HCoV-043, HCoV-NL063 and HCoV-229E, canine coronavirus genotypes 1–3 (CCoV 1–3) and to MERSCoV. We found serological evidence of coronavirus activity in the baboon population in the study area. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of naturally-occurring coronavirus infections of the indigenous baboons of KSA. The subjects were drawn from a large group of commensal baboons that mingled freely with feral dogs at the vicinity of a dam that served as a tourist site in Ta'if. This environment might have allowed exposure of the baboons to pathogenic coronaviruses of human beings and dogs and also MERSCoV.

The adoption of opportunistic sample collection in this study was consistent with disease surveys in free-living wildlife, when there is insufficient data to guide the use of systematic sampling methods [Reference Sulzner22]. We used specially designed immunoassays that could detect antibody to more than one pathotype of HCoV or CCoV in NHP sera. To confirm MERSCoV exposures in the baboons, the specific and confirmatory MERSCoV-SNT assay [Reference Reusken20, Reference Meyer21] was used. The results constitute baseline health assessment data on pathogenic coronavirus infections of commensal hamadryas baboons that are indigenous to KSA and justify the need for a comprehensive survey to evaluate the health risk to baboons, human beings and dogs where the habitats of all three groups meet and overlap.

Transmission dynamics of coronavirus infections in commensal baboons cohabiting with human beings and dogs at Ta'if, KSA

The susceptibility of macaques and baboons to infections caused by autologous coronaviruses and the antigenically related human coronavirus HCoV-043 (anthroponosis) was reported [Reference Goncharuk12, Reference Goncharuk13]. The high degree of genetic, anatomical and physiological similarities that exist between baboons and human beings predispose to cross-transmission of pathogens between the two groups [Reference Brent, VandeBerg, Williams-Blangero and Tardif23]. We detected serum antibodies to HCoVs in 22% of the free-ranging commensal baboons sampled at Ta'if (Table 2). However, a previous study [Reference Kummer9] reported a much higher HCoV seroprevalence (about 50%) in caged macaques and baboons concluding that close and prolonged exposure or contact between the infected and non-infected members held together in confinement can trigger higher transmission rates of coronavirus infections. HCoVs are spread efficiently by the respiratory route [Reference Atmar, McMillan, Feigin, DeAngelis and Jones24]. Therefore close exposure to humans rather than direct contact may sufficiently predispose NHP to anthroponotic HCoV infection. In contrast, animal coronaviruses are spread more efficiently by direct contact and the faecal-oral route [Reference Pensaert, Yeo, Straw, Zimmerman, D'Allaire and Taylor25]. We detected serum antibodies to CCoVs only in adult female baboons (Table 3). No juvenile females were sampled throughout the duration of the fieldwork at Ta'if. Female baboons at Ta'if were observed to be more directly involved in the adoption and grooming of puppies that were kidnapped by errant baboons, usually the alpha males. It has been reported that young puppies <2 months of age are particularly prone to CCoV infections [Reference Pensaert, Yeo, Straw, Zimmerman, D'Allaire and Taylor25] and that female baboons, especially paternal or maternal relatives rather than unrelated females, tend to groom one another more closely than their male counterparts [Reference Alberts26]. These reports [Reference Pensaert, Yeo, Straw, Zimmerman, D'Allaire and Taylor25, Reference Alberts26] may explain the high frequency of CCoV infections we detected in female baboons.

Significance of the findings for baboon conservation, public health and canine health

Although the baboons that we screened had no overt clinical signs or lesions of disease, the results of this study imply health risks to susceptible human beings and domestic dogs that are exposed to or come in direct contact with the baboons. In children, the elderly and immunocompromized individuals, HCoV-043, HCoV-NL63 and HCoV-229 can cause severe upper and lower respiratory tract disease [Reference Atmar, McMillan, Feigin, DeAngelis and Jones24, Reference McIntosh27]. According to surveys, between 5% and 30% of all human respiratory tract infections are caused by HCoV-NL63 and HCoV-229 [Reference McIntosh27, Reference Suwannakarn28]. Clinical and in vitro studies have revealed that HCoVs may represent an important aetiologic factor in the pathogenesis of demyelinating disease such as multiple sclerosis and acute disseminated encephalomyelitis in humans [Reference Yeh29, Reference Bonavia30].

Phylogenetic analysis of the spike (S) gene sequence of group 2 coronaviruses such as CCoV-3 point to a common ancestry of these viruses and multiple host-species shifts, some zoonotic [Reference Vijgen31]. However, there is currently no evidence that immunocompetent human adults are at risk of contracting CCoV infections [Reference Krueger, Heil and Gray32]. Canine coronaviruses are enzootic in dog populations across the world and dogs of all age groups and breeds are susceptible. Dogs infected with CCoV-1 or CCoV-2 (group 1 or alphacoronaviruses) may develop clinical signs including anorexia, diarrhoea, emesis and dehydration. Although CCoV-1 is typically self-limiting and results in few mortalities in dogs, in conjunction with CCoV-2, it runs a severe and rapidly fatal course in young puppies <2 months of age [Reference Buonavoglia33] and for older dogs with concurrent Canine distemper virus and Canine parvovirus type 2 infections [Reference Decaro34, Reference Decaro35]. Canine coronavirus genotype 3 (CCoV-3) alone or in conjunction with parainfluenza virus, adenovirus, distemper virus, herpesvirus, influenza virus, Bordetella bronchiseptica, Mycoplasma spp. and Streptococcus zooepidemicus, can cause an acute respiratory tract infection and pneumonia of dogs [Reference Decaro36]. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to report specific antibodies against CCoVs in free-living baboons. Because the subjects were apparently healthy, further investigations are required to demonstrate the status of infection of CCoVs in NHP and to determine if CCoVs evoke clinical illness or mortalities in NHP, or if infected primates shed the viable virus.

Although baboons have the DPP4 receptor that confers susceptibility to this MERSCoV as previously reported [Reference Peck8, Reference Van Doremalen and Munster37], we found no evidence of MERSCoV infection in the baboons that we screened. This might not be unconnected with the sample size and limited geographical area covered in this exploratory study.

CONCLUSIONS

As a follow-up to this study, we recommend further screenings of the baboons in KSA and detailed molecular characterization of their viral pathogens. To safeguard human health in communities that are contiguous with the habitats of commensal baboons in KSA, it is imperative to educate members of the public on the health risks associated with human exposure or contact with baboons and renew efforts at enforcement of extant legislations aimed at reducing baboon provisioning and commensalism. In places such as Ta'if, homes should be adequately fortified to prevent incursions by commensal baboons and dog owners should be encouraged to vaccinate their pets against canine distemper, canine parvovirus enteritis and canine infectious hepatitis, since CCoV infections are usually more severe in dogs that already harbour these diseases.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The authors wish to thank HH Prince Bandar bin Saud Bin Mohammed Al Saud (Secretary General, National Commission for Wildlife Conservation and Development, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia) for approval of the project.

FINANCIAL SUPPORT

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

None.

Footnotes

All the authors contributed equally to this work.

References

REFERENCES

1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. About Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (http://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/mers/about/). Accessed 16 March 2017, 2017.Google Scholar
2. Assiri, A, et al. Epidemiological, demographic, and clinical characteristics of 47 cases of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus disease from Saudi Arabia: a descriptive study. Lancet Infectious Diseases 2013; 13(9): 752761.Google Scholar
3. Ministry of Health of Saudi Arabia. Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) statistics update. (http://www.moh.gov.sa/en/CCC/PressReleases/Pages/statistics-2017-03-28-001.aspx). Accessed 28 March 2017, 2017.Google Scholar
4. World Health Organization. Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) summary and risk assessment. (http://www.who.int/emergencies/mers-cov/en/). Accessed 28 March 2017, 2017.Google Scholar
5. Memish, ZA, et al. Human infection with MERS coronavirus after exposure to infected camels, Saudi Arabia. Emerging Infectious Diseases 2013; 20(6): 10121015.Google Scholar
6. Woo, PC, et al. Coronavirus diversity, phylogeny and interspecies jumping. Experimental Biology and Medicine 2009; 234(10): 11171127.Google Scholar
7. Memish, ZA, et al. Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus in bats, Saudi Arabia. Emerging Infectious Diseases 2013; 19(11): 1819.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Peck, KM, et al. Coronavirus host range expansion and Middle East Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus emergence: biochemical mechanisms and evolutionary perspectives. Annual Review of Virology 2015; 2: 95117.Google Scholar
9. Kummer, H, et al. Mammals of Saudi Arabia: a survey of hamadryas baboons in Saudi Arabia. Fauna of Saudi Arabia 1981; 3: 441471.Google Scholar
10. Biquand, S, et al. Management of commensal baboons in Saudi Arabia. Revue D Ecologie-La Terre Et La Vie 1994; 49(3): 213222.Google Scholar
11. Gillespie, TR, Nunn, CL, Leendertz, FH. Integrative approaches to the study of primate infectious disease: implications for biodiversity conservation and global health. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 2008; 137(Suppl. 47): 5369.Google Scholar
12. Goncharuk, EI, et al. The experimental coronavirus infection of monkeys. Mikrobiolohichnyı̆ zhurnal 1993; 56(3): 6571.Google Scholar
13. Goncharuk, EI, et al. Spontaneous coronavirus infection in monkeys. Zhurnal Mikrobiologii Epidemiologii I Immunobiologii 1993; 109114.Google Scholar
14. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. MERS clinical features. Updated February 4, 2016 (http://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/mers/clinical-features.html). Accessed 16 March 2017.Google Scholar
15. Alqumber, MA. Association between Papio hamadryas populations and human gastrointestinal infectious diseases in southwestern Saudi Arabia. Annals of Saudi Medicine 2013; 34(4): 297301.Google Scholar
16. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Normals data and climate variables for Ta'if, Saudi Arabia 1961 to 1990 (ftp://ftp.atdd.noaa.gov/pub/GCOS/WMO-Normals/RA-II/SD/41036.TXT). Accessed 16 March 2017.Google Scholar
17. Jolly, CJ. Species, subspecies, and baboon systematics. In: Kimble, WH, Martin, LB, eds. Species, Species Concepts and Primate Evolution. New York: Plenum Press, 1993, pp. 67107.Google Scholar
18. Sigg, H, et al. Life history of hamadryas baboons: physical development, infant mortality, reproductive parameters and family relationships. Primates 1982; 23(4): 473487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Warren, KS, et al. Seroprevalence of specific viral infections in confiscated orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus). Journal of Medical Primatology 1998; 27(1): 3337.Google Scholar
20. Reusken, CB, et al. Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus neutralizing serum antibodies in dromedary camels: a comparative serological study. Lancet Infectious Diseases 2013; 13(10): 859866.Google Scholar
21. Meyer, B, et al. Antibodies against MERS coronavirus in dromedary camels, United Arab Emirates, 2003 and 2013. Emerging Infectious Diseases 2014; 20(4): 552559.Google Scholar
22. Sulzner, K, et al. Health assessment and seroepidemiologic survey of potential pathogens in wild Antillean manatees (Trichechus manatus manatus). PLoS ONE 2012; 7(9): e44517.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23. Brent, L. The study of captive baboon behavior. In VandeBerg, JL, Williams-Blangero, S, Tardif, SD, eds. The baboon in biomedical research. Verlag, New York: Springer, 2009, pp. 2234.Google Scholar
24. Atmar, R. Coronaviruses. In: McMillan, JA, Feigin, RD, DeAngelis, C, Jones, MD, eds. Oski's Pediatrics: Principle and Practice. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2006, pp. 12061208.Google Scholar
25. Pensaert, MB, Yeo, S. Porcine epidemic diarrhoea. In: Straw, BE, Zimmerman, JJ, D'Allaire, S, Taylor, DJ, eds. Diseases of Swine. New Jersey: Wiley, 2006, pp. 367372.Google Scholar
26. Alberts, SC. Thirteen MHC-DQA1 alleles from two populations of baboons. Immunogenetics 1999; 49: 825827.Google Scholar
27. McIntosh, K, et al. Coronavirus infection in acute lower respiratory tract disease of infants. Journal of Infectious Diseases 2004; 190(5): 10361041.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28. Suwannakarn, KT, et al. Prevalence and genetic characterization of human coronaviruses in southern Thailand from July 2009 to January 2011. Southeast Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine and Public Health 2014; 45(2): 326336.Google ScholarPubMed
29. Yeh, EA, et al. Detection of coronavirus in the central nervous system of a child with acute disseminated encephalomyelitis. Pediatrics 2004; 113(1): e73e76.Google Scholar
30. Bonavia, A, et al. Infection of primary cultures of human neural cells by human coronaviruses 229E and OC43. Journal of Virology 1997; 71(1): 800806.Google Scholar
31. Vijgen, L, et al. Evolutionary history of the closely related group 2 coronaviruses: porcine hemagglutinating encephalomyelitis virus, bovine coronavirus, and human coronavirus OC43. Journal of Virology 2006; 80(14): 72707274.Google Scholar
32. Krueger, WS, Heil, GL, Gray, GC. No serologic evidence for zoonotic canine respiratory coronavirus infections among immunocompetent adults. Zoonoses and Public Health 2013; 60(5): 349354.Google Scholar
33. Buonavoglia, CN, et al. Canine coronavirus highly pathogenic for dogs. Emerging Infectious Diseases 2006; 12(3): 492494.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
34. Decaro, N, et al. Canine distemper and related diseases: report of a severe outbreak in a kennel. New Microbiologica 2004; 27(2): 177181.Google Scholar
35. Decaro, N, et al. First detection of canine parvovirus type 2c in pups with haemorrhagic enteritis in Spain. Journal of Veterinary Medicine Series B 2006; 53(10): 468472.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
36. Decaro, N, et al. Infectious canine hepatitis: an “old” disease reemerging in Italy. Research in Veterinary Science 2007; 83(2), 269273.Google Scholar
37. Van Doremalen, N, Munster, VJ. Animal models of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection. Antiviral Research 2015; 122: 2838.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Characteristics of commensal hamadryas baboons (n = 50) sampled at Ta'if in February 2013

Figure 1

Table 2. Coronavirus infections detected in commensal hamadryas baboons (n  =  50) sampled at Ta'if, Saudi Arabia, in February 2013

Figure 2

Table 3. Distribution of selected coronaviral infections in commensal hamadryas baboons (n = 50) sampled at Ta'if, Saudi Arabia, in February 2013