Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T13:36:49.690Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Implementation of a surgical site infection prevention bundle: Patient adherence and experience

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 December 2021

Stacey Hockett Sherlock*
Affiliation:
Iowa City VA Health Care System, Iowa City, Iowa Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa
Daniel Suh
Affiliation:
Iowa City VA Health Care System, Iowa City, Iowa
Eli Perencevich
Affiliation:
Iowa City VA Health Care System, Iowa City, Iowa Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa
Heather Schacht Reisinger
Affiliation:
Iowa City VA Health Care System, Iowa City, Iowa Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa
Judy Streit
Affiliation:
Iowa City VA Health Care System, Iowa City, Iowa
Amy Frank
Affiliation:
Iowa City VA Health Care System, Iowa City, Iowa
Gosia Clore
Affiliation:
Iowa City VA Health Care System, Iowa City, Iowa Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa
Madeline Ohl
Affiliation:
Iowa City VA Health Care System, Iowa City, Iowa
Dina Speicher
Affiliation:
Iowa City VA Health Care System, Iowa City, Iowa
Loreen Herwaldt
Affiliation:
Iowa City VA Health Care System, Iowa City, Iowa Department of Epidemiology, University of Iowa College of Public Health, Iowa City, Iowa
Marin L. Schweizer
Affiliation:
Iowa City VA Health Care System, Iowa City, Iowa Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa
*
Author for correspondence: Stacey Hockett Sherlock, Iowa City VA Medical Center, 601 Highway 6 West, Iowa City, IA52246. E-mail: [email protected]

Narrative abstract

We evaluated barriers and facilitators to patient adherence with a bundled intervention including chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) bathing and decolonizing Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriers in a real-world setting. Survey data identified 85.5% adherence with home use of CHG as directed and 52.9% adherence with home use of mupirocin as directed.

Type
Concise Communication
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original article is properly cited.
This is a work of the US Government and is not subject to copyright protection within the United States. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America.
Copyright
© Iowa City Veterans Affairs Health Care System, 2021.

Prior studies have demonstrated that chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) bathing and decolonizing Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriers prevents surgical site infection (SSI) after total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Reference Schweizer, Chiang and Septimus1,Reference Schweizer, Perencevich and McDanel2 However, one study reported that the effect was only beneficial among patients who were fully adherent with these interventions. Reference Schweizer, Chiang and Septimus1 We assessed patient adherence with mupirocin and CHG and characterized factors associated with improved patient adherence.

Methods

In April 2012, our hospital implemented a bundled approach to prevent S. aureus SSI among patients undergoing TJA as the standard of care. Patients were tested for S. aureus nasal carriage during their preoperative clinic visits within 30 days before scheduled TJA. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR, Cepheid XPert SA Nasal Complete) was used to identify both methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant S. aureus. Results were reported to the preoperative clinic on the same day as the visit. Nurses educated patients on use of CHG and mupirocin. Patients who were S. aureus carriers were prescribed 2% nasal mupirocin ointment to self-apply twice daily and CHG soap (Hibiclens 4%, Hibiclens, Norcross, GA) to use daily for the 5 days before surgery. Patients who were not S. aureus carriers were prescribed CHG soap to use the day before and the morning of surgery. Prescriptions were sent to the outpatient pharmacy for the patient to obtain before leaving the hospital.

On the morning after TJA, a researcher obtained verbal consent from the patient and their nurse to administer an oral survey. Surveys consisted of 31 items including patient demographics and use of mupirocin and CHG. Surveys were administered between July 2018 to January 2020. Patients were categorized as S. aureus carriers if they recalled receiving mupirocin prescriptions, and this was confirmed through chart review. The VA Central Institutional Review Board and the Iowa City Research and Development Committee approved this study.

Study data were managed using Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) tools. The Fisher exact test was used to compare categorial variables, and the Wilcoxon 2-sample test was used to compare continuous variables. For the statistical analyses, we used SAS Enterprise Guide version 8.2 software (SAS Institute, Carey, NC).

Results

Overall, 286 TJA were performed, and 77 patients (26.9%) completed the survey. In total, 17 patients (22.1%) were categorized as S. aureus carriers; of these, 2 had a previous positive carrier result and reported using mupirocin. Furthermore, 60 patients (77.9%) reported full adherence based on their S. aureus carriage status.

All but 1 patient recalled receiving CHG soap (98.7%). Among the 76 patients who recalled receiving CHG soap, 65 patients (85.5%) used CHG as prescribed (Fig. 1). Also, 59 patients who were not S. aureus carriers recalled receiving CHG soap, and 53 (89.8%) used CHG for 2 days as prescribed. Among the 17 patients who were S. aureus carriers, 12 (70.5%) were fully adherent with the 5-day regimen. In total, 94.7% recalled receiving instructions on CHG use. Patients who received CHG from the hospital pharmacy were significantly more likely to be fully adherent with CHG bathing compared with patients who received CHG through the mail or a different method. Patients who stated that they did not have a barrier to using CHG were also more likely to be fully adherent with CHG (Table 1). Barriers to patient adherence with CHG bathing included forgetfulness (n = 2), difficulty with daily bathing (n = 2), having a side effect (n = 1), and not having enough product for days needed (n = 1). Also, 8 patients (10.5%) reported CHG side effects, including burning (n = 3) or tight, itchy, or dry skin (n = 4) or allergic reaction (n = 1). Furthermore, 75 (98.6%) patients stated that they were willing to use CHG before a future surgery.

Fig. 1. Adherence with chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) bathing and mupirocin by methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) carrier status.

Table 1. Characteristics of Surveyed Patients by Chlorhexidine Gluconate (CHG) and Mupirocin Adherence

Note. IQR, interquartile range.

a 1 person preferred not to answer in mupirocin analysis; 3 people preferred not to answer in CHG analysis.

Of the 17 patients who recalled receiving a mupirocin prescription, 9 (52.9%) used mupirocin twice a day for 5 days. All 17 patients remembered receiving instructions on how to use mupirocin. Younger patients and patients with incomes >$25,000 per year were significantly more likely to be fully adherent with mupirocin (Table 1). Reported side effects associated with mupirocin were stinging, itching or dryness (n = 2), unpleasant taste (n = 2), runny or stuffy nose (n = 3), and other side effect (n = 1). Forgetfulness was the only reported barrier to mupirocin use (n = 1). All patients who used mupirocin stated they were willing to use mupirocin before a future surgery.

Facilitators of patient adherence with mupirocin and CHG included high facility adherence with S. aureus screening (98.7% patients reported) and access to prescribed medications (98.7% patients received). Patients who had someone to help them with personal care or remind them to use medications were significantly more likely to be adherent with CHG.

Patients were asked whether they would prefer to have a nurse in hospital apply a liquid medication (eg, povidone iodine) to their nares on the day of surgery or self-apply an ointment to their own nares for 5 days before surgery at home (as they did if using mupirocin). Among the 17 patients who received a mupirocin prescription, 14 (82.4%) preferred to self-apply ointment and 3 (17.7%) had no preference.

Discussion

This evidence-based intervention is recommended by the World Health Organization 3 and was standard of care at this hospital for 6 years before our survey. In our study, patients remembered being educated about how to use mupirocin and CHG, and most stated willingness to use these products for a future surgery. However, 86% of patients were fully adherent with CHG bathing and only 53% were fully adherent with mupirocin. A previous survey of a decolonization bundle (mupirocin, CHG, and mouthwash) revealed that 71% of patients reported good compliance. Reference Nicolas, Carricajo and Morel4 Thus, hospitals implementing a decolonization bundle should consider interventions to overcome barriers to adherence.

Factors associated with full adherence included younger age and receiving the products through the hospital pharmacy. To improve adherence, hospitals may need to adapt instructions for older adults and for patients receiving their medications by mail. Strategies for adhering to short-term medication regimens have not been well studied. Reference Stawarz, Rodriguez, Cox and Blandford5 Forgetfulness was a barrier that may be remedied by a patient reminder in the week before surgery Reference Ariyo, Zayed and Riese6,Reference Ide, Bondar and Hockett Sherlock7 or by instructing patients to use contextual cues. Reference Stawarz, Rodriguez, Cox and Blandford5

To understand patient preferences, we asked patients if they would prefer to self-apply at home for 5 days (as they did if mupirocin was used), or for a nurse to apply on day of surgery (eg, povidone iodine). Every patient who received mupirocin either preferred self-application or had no preference, and none preferred nurse application. Mupirocin adherence was low, but patients reported few barriers, suggesting that the patients believed that they used mupirocin correctly and that their nonadherence was unintended. Reference Barber, Safdar and Franklin8 Thus, hospitals need to assist patients in using the medication correctly, or replace mupirocin with a day-of-surgery decolonizing agent Reference Maslow, Hutzler, Cuff, Rosenberg, Phillips and Bosco9 that does not rely on patient adherence.

This study had several limitations. All data were self-reported, and we had a small sample size of S. aureus carriers. We did not assess whether adherence reduced the SSI rate. However, our prior study found a significant association between adherence with these interventions and a reduction in S. aureus SSIs. Reference Schweizer, Chiang and Septimus1

In this study, we evaluated the real-world acceptability and adherence with interventions in which the preoperative orthopedic clinic nurses, laboratory, and pharmacy worked together to ensure successful implementation. These results may not be generalizable to patients having emergent surgery, patients not seen in preoperative clinics, and lower-resource settings. Reference Branch-Elliman and Schweizer10 Future studies should evaluate interventions such as patient reminders or simplifying the process with other intranasal decolonizing agents, to increase patient adherence.

Acknowledgments

Financial support

This study was funded by Veterans’ Affairs Health Services Research and Development Service (HSR&D) Collaborative Research to Enhance and Advance Transformation and Excellence (CREATE) (grant no. CRE 12-291 to primary investigator Perencevich).

Conflicts of interest

Dr. Schweizer reports grant and donated product from PDI Healthcare for a different study. Dr. Schweizer reports honoraria for creating educational module on SSIs and honoraria for presenting at conference on SSIs. All other authors report no conflicts of interest relevant to this article.

Footnotes

PREVIOUS PRESENTATION: These data were presented in poster form (ID:907563) at the IDWeek 2020 Conference on October 21–25, 2020, which was held virtually.

References

Schweizer, ML, Chiang, HY, Septimus, E, et al. Association of a bundled intervention with surgical site infections among patients undergoing cardiac, hip, or knee surgery. JAMA 2015;313:21622171.10.1001/jama.2015.5387CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schweizer, M, Perencevich, E, McDanel, J, et al. Effectiveness of a bundled intervention of decolonization and prophylaxis to decrease gram-positive surgical site infections after cardiac or orthopedic surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2013;346:f2743.10.1136/bmj.f2743CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Global guidelines on the prevention of surgical site infection. World Health Organization website. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/global-guidelines-for-the-prevention-of-surgical-site-infection-2nd-ed. Published 2018. Accessed August 23, 2021.Google Scholar
Nicolas, R, Carricajo, A, Morel, J, et al. Evaluation of effectiveness and compliance with the mupirocin nasal ointment part of Staphylococcus aureus decolonization in real life using UPLC-MS/MS mupirocin quantification. J Antimicrob Chemother 2020;75:16231630.10.1093/jac/dkaa025CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stawarz, K, Rodriguez, MD, Cox, AL, Blandford, A. Understanding the use of contextual cues: design implications for medication adherence technologies that support remembering. Digit Health 2016;2. doi: 10.1177/2055207616678707.Google ScholarPubMed
Ariyo, P, Zayed, B, Riese, V, et al. Implementation strategies to reduce surgical site infections: a systematic review. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2019;40:287300.10.1017/ice.2018.355CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ide, E, Bondar, S, Hockett Sherlock, S, et al. A multidisciplinary evaluation of Staphylococcus aureus screening, decolonization and patient adherence to preoperative decolonization procedures. Open Forum Infect Dis 2017;4:S641S642.10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, N, Safdar, A, Franklin, BD. Can human error theory explain non-adherence? Pharm World Sci 2005;27:300304.10.1007/s11096-005-0355-7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maslow, J, Hutzler, L, Cuff, G, Rosenberg, A, Phillips, M, Bosco, J. Patient experience with mupirocin or povidone-iodine nasal decolonization. Orthopedics 2014;37:e576e581.10.3928/01477447-20140528-59CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Branch-Elliman, W, Schweizer, M. Real-world challenges in infection prevention: Differential implementation between stable and unstable patients may influence clinical effectiveness of interventions. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2019;40:736737.10.1017/ice.2019.87CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Adherence with chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) bathing and mupirocin by methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) carrier status.

Figure 1

Table 1. Characteristics of Surveyed Patients by Chlorhexidine Gluconate (CHG) and Mupirocin Adherence