No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Interpersonal Relationships, Bipartisanship, and January 6th
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 November 2024
Abstract
For a member of Congress to be a successful lawmaker, they must work collaboratively with their colleagues. Previous work has found that interpersonal relationships among lawmakers are a key predictor of legislative collaboration—particularly among members from opposing parties. In the wake of the events of January 6, 2021, many Democratic lawmakers claimed that their relationships with some of their Republican colleagues were irretrievably broken and they would be unable to continue collaborating with members who voted against certifying electoral votes from the 2020 presidential election. Using data on original cosponsorship and legislative effectiveness from the 115th to 117th Congresses (2017–22) we find that Republican lawmakers who voted against the certification of electoral votes lost bipartisan collaborators and saw a drastic decrease in their legislative effectiveness in the 117th Congress.
- Type
- Brief Report
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of American Political Science Association
References
REFERENCES
Alducin, Alexander, Parker, David, and Theriault, Sean M.. 2017. “Leaving on a Jet Plane: Polarization, Foreign Travel, and Comity in Congress.” Congress & the Presidency 44 (4): 179–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alducin, Alexander, Kelly, Sean Q., Parker, David, and Theriault, Sean M.. 2014. “Foreign Junkets or Learning to Legislate? Generational Changes in the International Travel Patterns of House Members, 1977–2012.” The Forum 12 (3): 563–77.Google Scholar
Ann Caldwell, Leigh. 2021. “House Democrats Draw the Line: No Bipartisan Cooperation with Republicans Who Questioned the Election.” NBC News, March 14.Google Scholar
Barber, Michael, and McCarty, Nolan. 2015. “Causes and Consequences of Polarization.” In Solutions to Political Polarization in America, ed. Persily, Nathaniel, 15–58. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calefati, Jessica. 2021. “Connor Lamb Isn’t Sure He Can Work with ‘Morally Blind’ Republicans Who Tried to Overturn the Election.” Philadelphia Inquirer, January 13.Google Scholar
Chergosky, Anthony J., and Roberts, Jason M.. 2018. “The De-institutionalization of Congress.” Political Science Quarterly 133 (3): 475–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, Alison W. 2023. The Collaborative Congress: Reaching Common Ground in a Polarized House. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curry, James M. 2015. Legislating in the Dark: Information and Power in the House of Representatives. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curry, James M., and Lee, Frances E.. 2020. The Limits of Party: Congress and Lawmaking in a Polarized Era. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curry, James M., and Roberts, Jason M.. 2023. “Interpersonal Relationships and Legislative Collaboration in Congress.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 48 (2): 333–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curry, James M. and Jason, M. Roberts. 2024. “Replication Data for: Interpersonal Relationships, Bipartisanship, and January 6th.” Harvard Dataverse. Dataset. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/CUWUYR.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desiderio, Andrew. 2022. “The Lore of ‘CODELs’: How Foreign Travel Helps Congress at Home.” Politico, July 5.Google Scholar
Ferris, Sarah, and Zanona, Melanie. 2021. “‘I’m Just Furious’: Relations in Congress Crack after Attack.” Politico, January 29.Google Scholar
Fong, Christian. 2020. “Expertise, Networks, and Interpersonal Influence in Congress.” Journal of Politics 82 (1): 269–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fong, Christian. 2023. “The Preference for Reciprocity in Congress.” American Journal of Political Science 67 (4): 1026–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelman, Jeremy. 2017. “Rewarding Dysfunction: Interest Groups and Intended Legislative Failure.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 42 (4): 661–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harbridge, Laurel. 2015. Is Bipartisanship Dead?: Policy Agreement and Agenda-Setting in the House of Representatives. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkland, Justin, and Kroeger, Mary. 2018. “Companion Bills and Cross-Chamber Collaboration in the U.S. Congress.” American Politics Research 46 (4): 629–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krehbiel, Keith. 2010. Pivotal Politics: A Theory of US Lawmaking. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lee, Frances E. 2015. “How Party Polarization Affects Governance.” Annual Review of Political Science 18: 261–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Frances E. 2016. Insecure Majorities: Congress and the Perpetual Campaign. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malzahn, Janet, and Hall, Andrew B.. 2024. “Election-Denying Republican Candidates Underperformed in the 2022 Midterms.” American Political Science Review, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055424001084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayhew, David R. 2005. Divided We Govern: Party Control, Lawmaking and Investigations, 1946–2002. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Papp, Justin. 2023. “‘Still Raw’: Democrats Mark January 6 as Republicans Feud over House Speaker.” Roll Call, January 6.Google Scholar
Theriault, Sean M. 2008. Party Polarization in Congress. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomsen, Danielle M. 2017. Opting Out of Congress: Partisan Polarization and the Decline of Moderate Candidates. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treul, Sarah A. 2017. Agenda Crossover: The Influence of State Delegations in Congress. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volden, Craig, and Wiseman, Alan E.. 2014. Legislative Effectiveness in the United States Congress: The Lawmakers. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curry and Roberts supplementary material
Curry and Roberts supplementary material
File
176.4 KB
Comments
No Comments have been published for this article.