Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T08:41:42.473Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Epidemiology and outcome of Gram-negative bloodstream infection in children: a population-based study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2010

M. N. AL-HASAN*
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
W. C. HUSKINS
Affiliation:
Department of Paediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Division of Paediatric Infectious Diseases, College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
B. D. LAHR
Affiliation:
Department of Health Sciences Research, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
J. E. ECKEL-PASSOW
Affiliation:
Department of Health Sciences Research, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
L. M. BADDOUR
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
*
*Author for correspondence: M. N. Al-Hasan, MBBS, University of Kentucky Medical Center, 800 Rose Street, Room MN 672, Lexington, KY 40536, USA. (Email: [email protected])
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Population-based studies of Gram-negative bloodstream infection (BSI) in children are lacking. Therefore, we performed this population-based investigation in Olmsted County, Minnesota, to determine the incidence rate, site of acquisition, and outcome of Gram-negative BSI in children aged ⩽18 years. We used Kaplan–Meier method and Cox proportional hazard regression for mortality analysis. We identified 56 unique children with Gram-negative BSI during the past decade. The gender-adjusted incidence rate of Gram-negative BSI per 100 000 person-years was 129·7 [95% confidence interval (CI) 77·8–181·6]) in infants, with a sharp decline to 14·6 (95% CI 6·0–23·2) and 7·6 (95% CI 4·3–10·9) in children aged 1–4 and 5–18 years, respectively. The urinary tract was the most commonly identified source of infection (34%) and Escherichia coli was the most common pathogen isolated (38%). Over two-thirds (68%) of children had underlying medical conditions that predisposed to Gram-negative BSI. The overall 28-day and 1-year all-cause mortality rates were 11% (95% CI 3–18) and 18% (95% CI 8–28), respectively. Younger age and number of underlying medical conditions were associated with 28-day and 1-year mortality, respectively. Nosocomial or healthcare-associated acquisition was associated with both 28-day and 1-year mortality.

Type
Original Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

INTRODUCTION

Gram-negative bloodstream infections (BSI) are common in preterm infants and children with cancer and other immunocompromised states [Reference Cordero1Reference Armenian, Singh and Arrieta3]. Previous studies of the epidemiology and outcome of Gram-negative BSI in children were mostly derived from referral tertiary-care centres; many were strictly limited to nosocomial Gram-negative BSI [Reference Wisplinghoff4Reference Peltola7].

Population-based studies that specifically address Gram-negative BSI in children are lacking. Previous population-based studies of Gram-negative BSI were primarily focused on the adult population [Reference Uslan8, Reference Laupland9], restricted to a certain paediatric age group [Reference Gur10, Reference Hyde11], or strictly limited to one Gram-negative pathogen [Reference Al-Hasan12Reference Al-Hasan16]. To our knowledge, only one previous population-based study has evaluated BSI in all paediatric age groups [Reference Laupland17]. Since the main interest of that study was to examine for a change in the incidence rate of BSI due to Streptococcus pneumoniae and other Gram-positive pathogens, there was no particular emphasis on BSI due to Gram-negative bacilli that accounted for only 27% of BSI in that report. Therefore, we designed this population-based investigation to examine the incidence rate and site of acquisition of BSI due to Gram-negative bacilli in infants, children aged 1–4 and 5–18 years. Additionally, we discuss the underlying medical conditions of the cohort and factors associated with 28-day and 1-year all-cause mortality.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Setting

Olmsted County is located in southeastern Minnesota and has a population of 124 277 according to the 2000 census [18]. The population characteristics of Olmsted County residents have been described previously [Reference Melton19, Reference Steckelberg20]. The Rochester Epidemiology Project (REP) is a unique medical records-linkage system that encompasses care delivered to residents of Olmsted County, Minnesota. The microbiology laboratories at Mayo Medical Center and Olmsted Medical Center are the only two laboratories in Olmsted County. These two medical centres are geographically isolated from other urban centres as previously described [Reference Al-Hasan16, Reference Melton19, Reference Tleyjeh21]; therefore, local residents are able to obtain healthcare within the community, rather than seeking healthcare at a distant geographic location.

Case ascertainment

We used complete enumeration of Olmsted County paediatric population, aged ⩽18 years, from 1 January 1998 to 31 December 2007. Using the microbiology databases at the Mayo Medical Center, Rochester, and Olmsted Medical Center, we identified 56 unique children with first episodes of Gram-negative BSI.

Blood cultures were processed using standard microbiology techniques according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). The institutional review boards of both institutions approved the study. The detailed case ascertainment and blood culture methods used have been described previously [Reference Uslan8, Reference Al-Hasan16, Reference Al-Hasan, Eckel-Passow and Baddour22].

Case definition

Gram-negative BSI was defined as the growth of any aerobic Gram-negative bacillus in a blood culture. Monomicrobial Gram-negative BSI was defined as the growth of only one Gram-negative microorganism in a blood culture; and polymicrobial BSI was defined as the growth of more than one microorganism in a blood culture, excluding coagulase-negative staphylococci, Corynebacterium spp., and Propionibacterium spp. Cases were classified according to the site of acquisition into nosocomial, healthcare-associated, and community-acquired [Reference Friedman23]. The primary source of BSI was defined using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria [Reference Garner24].

Statistical analysis

The incidence rate, expressed as the number of new cases of BSI per 100 000 person-years, was calculated assuming that the entire paediatric population of Olmsted County was at risk of BSI. Gender-adjusted incidence rates were described for the following age groups (<1, 1–4, 5–18 years) and by site of acquisition. The 2000 Olmsted County census figures were used to compute the age, gender and time-specific person-years denominator assuming a projected population growth rate of 1·9% per year after 2000. The incidence rate was directly adjusted to the US 2000 white population [18]. Adjusted incidence rates and confidence intervals (CI) were calculated assuming the individual rates have Poisson error [Reference Bergstralh25].

The Kaplan–Meier method was used to estimate the 28-day and 1-year all-cause mortality rates. Patients were followed from the date of first episode of Gram-negative BSI until death or last healthcare encounter. Patients who were lost to follow-up were censored on the date of their last healthcare encounter. Ninety-five percent CIs were computed for the mortality rates using standard errors derived from the Greenwood formula. The log-rank test was used to compare survival rates between sites of acquisition (community-acquired vs. nosocomial or healthcare-associated).

Cox proportional hazard regression was used to identify univariate risk factors for 28-day and 1-year all-cause mortality. The following variables were evaluated as potential risk factors: age, number of underlying medical conditions, year of diagnosis, and gender.

The χ2 or Fisher's exact test, as appropriate, was used to assess for associations between categorical variables. All analyses were performed using JMP (version 8.0, SAS Institute Inc., USA). The level of significance for statistical testing was defined as P<0·05 (two-sided).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

We identified 56 unique children aged ⩽18 years with Gram-negative BSI during the study period. Infants had the highest incidence rate of Gram-negative BSI in all children with a gender-adjusted incidence rate of 129·7 (95% CI 77·8–181·6) per 100 000 person-years. Following the first year of life, the incidence rate of Gram-negative BSI fell by almost tenfold and 20-fold in children aged 1–4 and 5–18 years to 14·6 (95% CI 6·0–23·2) and 7·6 (95% CI 4·3–10·9) per 100 000 person-years, respectively. This decline was contrary to that in the adult population where the incidence rate of Gram-negative BSI increased with age [Reference Uslan8, Reference Al-Hasan, Eckel-Passow and Baddour22]. In infants, the incidence rate of Gram-negative BSI was higher in females than in males; there was no gender difference in the incidence rate in children aged 1–4 and 5–18 years (Table 1).

Table 1. Incidence rates of Gram-negative bloodstream infection in children by age group, gender, and site of acquisition, 1998–2007

HCA, Healthcare-associated.

Data are given as counts (incidence rates per 100 000 person-years) unless indicated otherwise.

* Incidence rates (95% confidence intervals) in this column are age-adjusted to the US white 2000 census.

Incidence rates in these rows are gender-adjusted to the US white 2000 census.

The site of acquisition differed in children with Gram-negative BSI by age group. Only 29% and 27% of Gram-negative BSI in infants and children aged 1–4 years were community-acquired, respectively. In contrast, over one-half (57%) of Gram-negative BSI in children aged 5–18 years were community-acquired which is similar to that in the adult population [Reference Al-Hasan, Eckel-Passow and Baddour22].

Most children in this investigation (68%) had underlying medical conditions predisposing to Gram-negative BSI, which is consistent with the results of previous reports [Reference Cordero1Reference Armenian, Singh and Arrieta3]. Children with nosocomial or healthcare-associated Gram-negative BSI were more likely to have an underlying medical condition compared to those with community-acquired BSI (91% vs. 32%, P<0·001).

In infants, the most common underlying conditions were: preterm delivery (38%), failure to thrive (21%), central nervous system (CNS) disorders such as hydrocephalus, meningomyelocele and seizure disorders (17%), cancer (8%), immunocompromised states including neutropenia, organ transplantation, and receipt of corticosteroids or other immunosuppressive medications (8%), congenital heart disease (4%), liver failure (4%), and necrotizing enterocolitis (4%).

In children aged 1–18 years, immunocompromised states (31%) and cancer (22%) were the most common underlying medical conditions. Other conditions included urological disorders such as kidney stones, vesicoureteral reflux and neurogenic bladder (9%), CNS disorders (9%), end-stage renal disease (3%), and cystic fibrosis (3%).

Forty-seven (84%) of 56 first episodes of Gram-negative BSIs were monomicrobial and nine (16%) were polymicrobial. Of monomicrobial Gram-negative bloodstream isolates, Escherichia coli was the most common microorganism (38%), followed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa (13%), Klebsiella spp. (9%), Enterobacter spp. (6%), Salmonella spp. (6%), Acinetobacter spp. (6%), Haemophilus spp. (4%), and others (17%).

The most common nosocomial or healthcare-associated Gram-negative bloodstream isolate was E. coli (30%), followed by P. aeruginosa (22%), Klebsiella spp. (15%), Enterobacter spp. (11%), and others (22%). E. coli was the isolate in half the cases of community-acquired Gram-negative BSI, followed by Salmonella spp. (15%), and others (35%).

The observation that E. coli was the most common cause of Gram-negative BSI in children in our survey was consistent with findings of the majority of hospital-based paediatric studies [Reference Roberts, Geere and Coldman6, Reference Peltola7] and population-based studies in children and adults [Reference Uslan8, Reference Laupland9, Reference Laupland17, Reference Al-Hasan, Eckel-Passow and Baddour22]. Comparing our results to those of a recent investigation of BSI in children in Calgary, Canada [Reference Laupland17], the distribution of Gram-negative bacilli causing BSI was relatively similar in the two paediatric populations. One notable exception was that P. aeruginosa was the second most common microorganism and accounted for 13% of monomicrobial Gram-negative BSI in children in our population, compared to only 7% of cases in Calgary, where it ranked sixth among Gram-negative bacilli.

The urinary tract was the most common known primary source of infection (34%), followed by the gastrointestinal tract (7%), the respiratory tract (7%), skin and soft tissue (5%), central venous catheter-related (4%), bone and joint (2%), and central nervous system (2%). Twenty-two children (39%) had Gram-negative BSI with unknown primary site of infection.

Community-acquired Gram-negative BSI were more likely to be of urinary source than nosocomial or healthcare-associated BSI (55% vs. 21%, P=0·009). On the other hand, children with nosocomial or healthcare-associated Gram-negative BSI were more likely to have BSI of unknown primary source compared to those with community-acquired BSI (50% vs. 23%, P=0·04).

The overall 28-day and 1-year all-cause mortality rates following Gram-negative BSI in this cohort were 11% (95% CI 3–18%) and 18% (95% CI 8–28%), respectively (Fig. 1). The 28-day mortality rate in our study was comparable to that of previous reports of Gram-negative BSI in children [Reference Wisplinghoff4, Reference Levy5]. This was also consistent with recently reported 28-day mortality rates following Gram-negative BSI in adults [Reference Al-Hasan, Eckel-Passow and Baddour22, Reference Al-Hasan26].

Fig. 1. Kaplan–Meier plot of (a) 28-day and (b) 1-year overall survival curves of children with Gram-negative bloodstream infection. Dotted lines indicate 95% confidence intervals.

The 28-day and 1-year all-cause mortality rates were lower in children with community-acquired compared to those with nosocomial or healthcare-associated Gram-negative BSI [0% vs. 18% (P=0·04), and 0% vs. 29% (P=0·006), respectively; Fig. 2]. Younger age was associated with 28-day all-cause mortality (Table 2) and number of underlying medical conditions was associated with 1-year all-cause mortality (Table 3).

Fig. 2. Kaplan–Meier plot of (a) 28-day and (b) 1-year survival of children with Gram-negative bloodstream infection by site of infection acquisition. P value denotes a difference in survival using log-rank test.

Table 2. Factors associated with 28-day all-cause mortality in children with Gram-negative bloodstream infection

HR, Hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; CA, community-acquired; HCA, healthcare-associated.

* Hazard ratio was not calculated for site of acquisition because there were no deaths in community-acquired bloodstream infections. Log-rank test was used to calculate P value for this variable.

Table 3. Factors associated with 1-year all-cause mortality in children with Gram-negative bloodstream infection

HR, Hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; CA, community-acquired; HCA, healthcare-associated.

* Hazard ratio was not calculated for site of acquisition because there were no deaths in community-acquired bloodstream infections. Log-rank test was used to calculate P value for this variable.

The strength of this study is its population-based design and, therefore, lack of referral bias. Contrary to previous hospital-based studies that have estimated the incidence rate of Gram-negative BSI per the number of admissions to a particular hospital, we determined the incidence rate by 100 000 person-years in a well-defined population.

Our study has limitations. First, our data are derived from one geographic area. Studies from multiple geographic locations may provide a more comprehensive view. Second, since the population of Olmsted County is fairly small, the number of children with Gram-negative BSI during the study period was also small. This limited the ability to perform a multivariable model to determine independent risk factors for mortality. Finally, the population of Olmsted County consists mainly of middle-class whites; therefore, our study results may be generalized only to communities with similar population characteristics.

In summary, this is the first population-based study to describe the incidence rate, site of acquisition, and short-, and long-term outcomes of Gram-negative BSI in infants and older children in the USA. We demonstrated that Gram-negative BSI is relatively common in infants and occurs much less frequently after the first year of life. Although children with community-acquired Gram-negative BSI had an excellent prognosis, nearly one-third of children with nosocomial or healthcare-associated Gram-negative BSI did not survive beyond 1 year, most likely due to underlying medical conditions that predisposed them to develop BSI.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors thank Emily Vetter and Mary Ann Butler for providing us with vital data from the microbiology laboratory databases at the Mayo Clinic, Rochester and Olmsted Medical Center. The authors also thank Susan Schrage, Susan Stotz, R.N., and all the staff at the Rochester Epidemiology Project for their administrative help and support.

The study received funding from the Small Grants Program and the Baddour Family Funds at the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. The funding source had no role in study design.

This work was made possible by research grant R01-AR30582 from the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (National Institutes of Health, U.S. Public Health Service) and by Grant Number 1 UL1 RR024150 from the National Center for Research Resources (NCRR), a component of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), and the NIH Roadmap for Medical Research. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official view of NCRR or NIH. Information on NCRR is available at http://www.ncrr.nih.gov/. Information on Reengineering the Clinical Research Enterprise can be obtained from http://nihroadmap.nih.gov.

DECLARATION OF INTEREST

None.

References

REFERENCES

1.Cordero, L, et al. Enteric gram-negative bacilli bloodstream infections: 17 years' experience in a neonatal intensive care unit. American Journal of Infection Control 2004; 32: 189195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Smith, TL, et al. Bloodstream infections in pediatric oncology outpatients: a new healthcare systems challenge. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology 2002; 23: 239243.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Armenian, SH, Singh, J, Arrieta, AC. Risk factors for mortality resulting from bloodstream infections in a pediatric intensive care unit. Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal 2005; 24: 309314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Wisplinghoff, H, et al. Nosocomial bloodstream infections in pediatric patients in United States hospitals: epidemiology, clinical features and susceptibilities. Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal 2003; 22: 686691.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Levy, I, et al. A prospective study of Gram-negative bacteremia in children. Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal 1996; 15: 117122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Roberts, FJ, Geere, IW, Coldman, A. A three-year study of positive blood cultures, with emphasis on prognosis. Reviews of Infectious Diseases 1991; 13: 3446.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Peltola, H, et al. Septicemia in a university pediatric hospital: a five-year analysis of the bacterial and fungal isolates and outcome of the infections. Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases 1987; 19: 277282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Uslan, DZ, et al. Age- and sex-associated trends in bloodstream infection: a population-based study in Olmsted County, Minnesota. Archives of Internal Medicine 2007; 167: 834839.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Laupland, KB, et al. Burden of community-onset bloodstream infection: a population-based assessment. Epidemiology and Infection 2007; 135: 10371042.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Gur, E, et al. Community-acquired bloodstream infections in children >one month old in southern Israel (1992–2001): epidemiological, clinical and microbiological aspects. Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases 2006; 38: 604612.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Hyde, TB, et al. Trends in incidence and antimicrobial resistance of early-onset sepsis: population-based surveillance in San Francisco and Atlanta. Pediatrics 2002; 110: 690695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Al-Hasan, MN, et al. Seasonal variation in Escherichia coli bloodstream infection: a population-based study. Clinical Microbiology and Infection 2009; 15: 947950.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Laupland, KB, et al. Incidence, risk factors and outcomes of Escherichia coli bloodstream infections in a large Canadian region. Clinical Microbiology and Infection 2008; 14: 10411047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Al-Hasan, MN, et al. Epidemiology and outcome of Klebsiella species bloodstream infection: a population-based study. Mayo Clinic Proceedings 2010; 85: 139144.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Meatherall, BL, et al. Incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteremia. American Journal of Medicine 2009; 122: 866873.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Al-Hasan, MN, et al. Incidence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia: a population-based study. American Journal of Medicine 2008; 121: 702708.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.Laupland, KB, et al. The changing burden of pediatric bloodstream infections in Calgary, Canada, 2000–2006. Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal 2009; 28: 114117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.US Census Bureau. Olmsted County QuickFacts (http://quickfacts.census.gov). Accessed 21 April 2008.Google Scholar
19.Melton, LJ 3rd. History of the Rochester Epidemiology Project. Mayo Clinic Proceedings 1996; 71: 266274.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20.Steckelberg, JM, et al. Influence of referral bias on the apparent clinical spectrum of infective endocarditis. American Journal of Medicine 1990; 88: 582588.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21.Tleyjeh, IM, et al. Temporal trends in infective endocarditis: a population-based study in Olmsted County, Minnesota. Journal of the American Medical Association 2005; 293: 30223028.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22.Al-Hasan, MN, Eckel-Passow, JE, Baddour, LM. Recurrent gram-negative bloodstream infection: a 10-year population-based cohort study. Journal of Infection 2010; 61: 2833.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23.Friedman, ND, et al. Health care-associated bloodstream infections in adults: a reason to change the accepted definition of community-acquired infections. Annuals of Internal Medicine 2002; 137: 791797.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24.Garner, JS, et al. CDC definitions for nosocomial infections, 1988. American Journal of Infection Control 1988; 16: 128140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25.Bergstralh, EJ, et al. Calculating incidence, prevalence and mortality rates in Olmsted County, Minnesota: an update. Technical Report Series No. 49, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, 1992 (http://mayoresearch.mayo.edu/biostat/upload/49.pdf).Google Scholar
26.Al-Hasan, MN, et al. Beta-lactam and fluoroquinolone combination antibiotic therapy for bacteremia caused by gram-negative bacilli. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 2009; 53: 13861394.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1. Incidence rates of Gram-negative bloodstream infection in children by age group, gender, and site of acquisition, 1998–2007

Figure 1

Fig. 1. Kaplan–Meier plot of (a) 28-day and (b) 1-year overall survival curves of children with Gram-negative bloodstream infection. Dotted lines indicate 95% confidence intervals.

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Kaplan–Meier plot of (a) 28-day and (b) 1-year survival of children with Gram-negative bloodstream infection by site of infection acquisition. P value denotes a difference in survival using log-rank test.

Figure 3

Table 2. Factors associated with 28-day all-cause mortality in children with Gram-negative bloodstream infection

Figure 4

Table 3. Factors associated with 1-year all-cause mortality in children with Gram-negative bloodstream infection