Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T17:47:16.491Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Changes in intestinal microbiota and humoral immune response following probiotic administration in brown trout (Salmo trutta)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2007

José Luis Balcázar*
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Fish PathologyUniversity of Zaragoza, c/. Miguel Servet 177, Zaragoza, 50013, Spain
Ignacio de Blas
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Fish PathologyUniversity of Zaragoza, c/. Miguel Servet 177, Zaragoza, 50013, Spain
Imanol Ruiz-Zarzuela
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Fish PathologyUniversity of Zaragoza, c/. Miguel Servet 177, Zaragoza, 50013, Spain
Daniel Vendrell
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Fish PathologyUniversity of Zaragoza, c/. Miguel Servet 177, Zaragoza, 50013, Spain
Ana Cristina Calvo
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Biochemical Genetics, University of Zaragoza, c/. Miguel Servet 177, Zaragoza, 50013, Spain
Isabel Márquez
Affiliation:
Laboratory for Animal Health, SERIDA. Travesía del Hospital 96, 33299 Gijón, Spain
Olivia Gironés
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Fish PathologyUniversity of Zaragoza, c/. Miguel Servet 177, Zaragoza, 50013, Spain
José Luis Muzquiz
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Fish PathologyUniversity of Zaragoza, c/. Miguel Servet 177, Zaragoza, 50013, Spain
*
*Corresponding author: Dr J. L. Balcázar, fax +34 976761612, email [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We studied the effect of several lactic acid bacteria (LAB) on the humoral response of brown trout (Salmo trutta). LAB groups (Lactococcus (Lc.) lactis ssp. lactis, Lactobacillus (Lb.) sakei and Leuconostoc (Leu.) mesenteroides) were administered orally at 106 colony-forming units/g feed to brown trout for 2 weeks, after which fish were switched to an unsupplemented feed. Blood and intestinal samples were taken from the onset of feeding supplemented diets at 1, 2, 3 and 4 weeks. During the LAB-feeding period, Lc. lactis ssp. lactis, Lb. sakei and Leu. mesenteroides persisted in the fish intestines, but the number of LAB slowly decreased in the intestines after changing to the unsupplemented diet. Only Lb. lactis ssp. lactis and Leu. mesenteroides were detected at levels above 1 × 102 colony-forming units/g at the end of the fourth week. In comparison to untreated control fish, the alternative complement activity in the serum was found to be significantly greater in all LAB groups at the end of the second week. Groups supplemented with Lc. lactis ssp. lactis and Leu. mesenteroides exhibited an elevated level of lysozyme activity at the end of the third week, but the group supplemented with Lb. sakei did not exhibit any significant change in lysozyme activity. Serum immunoglobulin levels were higher compared with the control group, but there was no significant difference between the LAB and control groups.

Type
Full Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2007

Probiotics have been defined as a viable microbial food supplement that beneficially influences the health of the host (Reid et al. Reference Reid, Sanders, Gaskins, Gibson, Mercenier, Rastall, Roberfroid, Rowland, Cherbut and Klaenhammer2003). Several studies on probiotics have been published over the past decade. The methodological and ethical limitations of animal studies, however, make it difficult to understand the mechanisms of action of probiotics, and only partial explanations are available. Nevertheless, some possible benefits linked to the administration of probiotics include: (1) the restoration of a normal intestinal microbiota; (2) a contribution to the elimination of pathogenic bacteria; (3) a source of nutrients and enzymatic contribution to digestion. Other benefits are still being investigated, for example reinforcement of the capacity of the intestinal barrier against exogenous antigens and enhancement of the immune response against pathogenic micro-organisms; as well as antiviral effects (Gatesoupe, Reference Gatesoupe1999; Verschuere et al. Reference Verschuere, Rombaut, Sorgeloos and Verstraete2000; Irianto & Austin, Reference Irianto and Austin2002; Balcázar et al. Reference Balcázar, de Blas, Ruiz-Zarzuela, Cunningham, Vendrell and Múzquiz2006a; Vine et al. Reference Vine, Leudes and Kaiser2006).

The lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are a group of Gram-positive rod- and coccus-shaped organisms that are non-spore-forming and non-motile; they produce lactic acid as their major end product during carbohydrate fermentation. The use of these potential probiotic cultures stimulates the growth of preferred micro-organisms that outcompete potentially harmful bacteria and reinforce the organism's natural defence mechanisms. The introduction of a selected bacterial strain such as LAB into the food chain or as a dietary supplement has been proposed as an alternative mode of improving the health of cultured organisms (Gildberg et al. Reference Gildberg, Mikkelsen, Sandaker and Ringo1997; Robertson et al. Reference Robertson, O'Dowd, Burrells, Williams and Austin2000; Nikoskelainen et al. Reference Nikoskelainen, Ouwehand, Bylund and Salminen2001).

The role of LAB in inducing overall immunity has been extensively investigated and reviewed in endothermic animals and humans (Schiffrin et al. Reference Schiffrin, Rochat, Link-Amster, Aeschlimann and Donnet-Hugues1995; Gill & Rutherfurd, Reference Gill and Rutherfurd2001; Shu & Gill, Reference Shu and Gill2002; Fooks & Gibson, Reference Fooks and Gibson2002). Few studies have, however, been directed at the immunological enhancement of fish defence mechanisms by probiotic bacteria.

Studies by our research group have recently demonstrated that Lactococcus (Lc.) lactis ssp. lactis CLFP 100, Leuconostoc (Leu.) mesenteroides CLFP 196 and Lactobacillus (Lb.) sakei CLFP 202 isolated from the intestines of healthy salmonids exhibit high adhesion to intestinal mucus, a competitive exclusion of fish pathogens and a high degree of resistance to pH 3·0 and 10 % fish bile under in vitro conditions (Balcázar, Reference Balcázar2006; Balcázar et al. Reference Balcázar, de Blas, Ruiz-Zarzuela, Vendrell, Evora and Múzquiz2006b). The aims of the current study were thus to investigate whether Lc. lactis ssp. lactis CLFP 100, Leu. mesenteroides CLFP 196 and L. sakei CLFP 202 could stimulate the humoral immune response of brown trout (Salmo trutta), and to determine their capacity for binding intestinal mucus in these fish.

Materials and methods

Bacterial strains

Three bacterial strains, Lc. lactis ssp. lactis CLFP 100, Leu. mesenteroides CLFP 196 and Lb. sakei CLFP 202, isolated from salmonids and genetically identified by 16S rRNA gene sequencing, were selected from a pool of 246 strains obtained from the intestinal content of healthy salmonids, because their in vitro characteristics suggested that they could be considered as potential fish probiotics (Balcázar, Reference Balcázar2006; Balcázar et al. Reference Balcázar, de Blas, Ruiz-Zarzuela, Vendrell, Evora and Múzquiz2006b, Reference Balcázar, Vendrell, de Blas, Ruiz-Zarzuela, Gironés and Múzquizc). They were grown aerobically in de Man, Rogosa and Sharpe (MRS) broth (Pronadisa, Madrid, Spain) at 22°C. Stock cultures stored at − 80°C were prepared from overnight cultures grown in MRS to which 20 % (v/v) glycerol (Prolabo, Fontenay, France) was added just prior to freezing.

Preparation of the feed

The three selected strains were grown overnight in MRS broth in a shaking incubator at 22°C. After incubation, the cells were harvested by centrifugation (2000 g), washed twice with PBS (10 mm-Na3PO4, 150 mm-NaCl; pH 7·2) and resuspended in the same buffer. The absorbance at 600 nm was adjusted to 0·25 ± 0·05 in order to standardise the number of bacteria (107–108 colony-forming units (CFU)/ml). Dilution plating was used to verify the relationship between absorbance at 600 nm and CFU/ml.

Commercial feed (ProAqua Nutrition SA, Palencia, Spain) was taken as the basal diet to supplement the three selected strains. In order to reach a final concentration of 106 CFU/g feed, bacterial suspensions were slowly added to the feed, mixing bit by bit in a drum mixer. The amount of LAB in each feed was determined by plate counting on MRS agar. The LAB concentration at 106 CFU/g feed was selected because there is evidence that the best results in terms of preventing bacterial disease have been obtained using this concentration (Balcázar, Reference Balcázar2006; Balcázar et al. Reference Balcázar, Vendrell, de Blas, Ruiz-Zarzuela, Gironés and Múzquiz2006c).

Fish and experimental conditions

Brown trout (S. trutta) were obtained from a commercial fish farm. The fish were fed with a standard commercial feed at a rate of 1·5 % of the biomass per day. The fish had not been vaccinated or exposed to fish diseases and were deemed pathogen-free by standard microbiological techniques and by a previously described multiplex PCR technique for the simultaneous detection of Aeromonas salmonicida, Flavobacterium psychrophilum and Yersinia ruckeri (Del Cerro et al. Reference Del Cerro, Marquez and Guijarro2002). The fish were acclimated for 1 week in tanks before the start of the trial. After the acclimation period, the average weight of the fish was 70 g, and the fish were divided into four 500-litre tanks, each containing 100 fish. All the fish were maintained in static aerated fresh water at 14 ± 1°C with a 25 % water change every day and a 12 h dark/12 h light photoperiod during the entire trial period.

One group served as the control and was fed unsupplemented feed for the whole trial. The other three groups were fed with feed containing different LAB for 2 weeks (first and second weeks). The first group was fed a diet supplemented with 106 CFU/g Lc. lactis ssp. lactis; the second group one supplemented with 106 CFU/g Lb. sakei and the last group a diet supplemented with 106 CFU/g Leu. mesenteroides. The feed rate was 0·7 % and 1 % of the biomass during the first and second weeks, respectively. After 2 weeks of LAB-feeding, the feeds were changed to unsupplemented feed (third and fourth weeks), and the feed rate was kept at 1 % of the biomass until the end of the trial.

Blood samples

Blood samples were taken from ten fish from each group at the end of weeks 1, 2, 3 and 4. The fish were killed by immersion in a tank containing tricaine methanesulfonate (MS-222; Syndel Laboratories Ltd, Vancouver, Canada) at a concentration of 150 mg/l water for 15 min. Blood was drawn from the caudal vein of the individual fish. The plasma and serum samples were separated using standard procedures. All samples were stored separately at − 80°C prior to analysis. The plasma samples were used for total immunoglobulin analysis, and the serum samples for determining lysozyme and alternative complement activity.

Bacterial counts and specific identification of the lactic acid bacteria

The microbial analyses were carried out at five time points: before the trial and at the end of weeks 1, 2, 3 and 4. The fish were killed as described before and opened aseptically, and the whole intestine was removed. The intestine was dissected, and the contents were collected by carefully scraping with a rubber spatula; these were then weighed. The microbial analyses were performed by spreading appropriate dilutions in PBS from 10− 1 to 10− 6 on a selective medium for LAB: MRS agar (De Man et al. Reference De Man, Rogosa and Sharpe1960). The plates were incubated aerobically at 22°C for 2 days.

Specific identification through random amplification of polymorphic DNA was carried out by amplifying 20–30 colonies randomly selected from the MRS plates of 30–300 colonies. Bacterial cultures (1·0 ml) were homogenised in 200 μl Tris-EDTA buffer (pH 8·0; 10 mm-Tris, 1 mm-EDTA) and centrifuged at 12 000 g for 1 min, pellets being extracted with InstaGene Matrix (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA) following the manufacturer's instructions. DNA yield and purity were determined spectrophotometrically by measuring 260 nm:280 nm absorbance ratios (Gene Quant pro RNA/DNA Calculator; Amersham Pharmacia Biotec, Cambridge, UK).

The primers used for the random amplification of polymorphic DNA analysis of bacterial DNA have been previously described (Brousseau et al. Reference Brousseau, Saint-Onge, Prefontaine, Masson and Cabana1993; Johansson et al. Reference Johansson, Quednau, Molin and Ahrne1995; Barrangou et al. Reference Barrangou, Yoon, Breidt, Fleming and Klaenhammer2002). Nine-mers were randomly designed with a G+C content of 80 %. The primers used in this study were ED-01 (5′-ACGCGCCCT-3′) and ED-02 (5′-CCGAGTCCA-3′) (Sigma St. Louis, MO, USA). A total volume of 50 μl reaction mixture used for the random amplification of polymorphic DNA PCR analysis of probiotic bacteria contained 0·2 mm-dNTP, 2·5 mm-MgCl2, 1·0 μm of each primer, PCR buffer (10 mm-Tris-HCl [pH 8·3], 50 mm-KCl), 1 U Taq polymerase (Invitrogen Corp, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and 5 μl DNA template. Amplification of DNA was performed in a GeneAmp PCR System 2400 thermocycler (Perkin-Elmer Corp., Wellesley, MA, USA) with the following conditions: an initial denaturation of 10 min at 94°C; four cycles of 45 s at 94°C, 2 min at 30°C and 45 s at 72°C; 36 cycles of 15 s at 94°C, 30 s at 36°C and 45 s at 72°C; 10 min at 72°C. The DNA amplicons were separated on a 4 % (v/v) acrylamide gel and compared with a 1 kb ladder (Bio-Rad Laboratories).

Alternative complement activity

The complement activity (alternate pathway) was assayed following the procedure of Yano (Reference Yano, Stolen, Fletcher, Anderson, Hattari and Rowley1992) using rabbit erythrocytes. Briefly, the rabbit erythrocytes were washed and adjusted to 2 × 108 cell/ml in 0·01 m-ethylene glycol tetraacetic acid–Mg–gelatin veronal buffer. The 100 % lysis value was obtained by lysing 100 μl rabbit erythrocytes with 3·4 ml distilled water and measuring the optical density of haemolysate at 414 nm against distilled water. The test serum was appropriately diluted, and different volumes ranging from 0·1 to 0·25 ml were made up to 0·25 ml total volume before being allowed to react with 0·1 ml rabbit erythrocytes in test tubes. After incubating at 20°C for 90 min with occasional shaking, 3·15 ml saline solution was added to each tube, and these were centrifuged at 1600 g for 10 min at 4°C. The optical density of the supernatant was measured at 414 nm. A lysis curve was obtained by plotting the percentage of haemolysis against the volume of serum added. The volume yielding 50 % haemolysis was determined and in turn used for assaying the complement activity of the sample (ACH50 value = units/ml).

Lysozyme activity

The turbidometric assay method, originally described by Parry et al. (Reference Parry, Chandan and Shahani1965) and modified for microtitre assay by Demers & Bayne (Reference Demers and Bayne1997) was used. Serum (25 μl/well) was placed in triplicate in a ninety-six-well plate, and 175 μl of a suspension of Micrococcus lysodeikticus (75 mg/ml in 0·1 m-phosphate buffer with 0·09 % (v/v) NaCl, pH 5·8) was added. After the plate had been shaken, the decrease in absorbance at 450 nm was recorded for 5 min. Lysozyme activities were converted to lysozyme concentrations using hen egg white lysozyme as a standard.

Total immunoglobulin

Plasma total immunoglobulin was measured by the method of Siwicki & Anderson (Reference Siwicki and Anderson1993). Briefly, the total protein content in the plasma was determined by a microprotein determination method (C-690; Sigma), using bovine serum albumin (Sigma) as a standard. In addition, 500 μl of each plasma sample was mixed with an equal volume of 12 % (v/v) solution of polyethylene glycol (Sigma) at 4°C, and the protein content was determined as mentioned above. The difference between the protein values of the untreated and the polyethylene glycol-treated samples corresponded to the total immunoglobulin content and was expressed in mg/ml.

Statistical analysis

ANOVA and Duncan's multiple range tests were used to determine whether there were significant differences (P < 0·05) between treatments. All statistics were performed using SPSS for Windows version 11.5 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

Results

Microbiological observations

Before the trial, the fish had no detectable Lc. lactis ssp. lactis, Lb. sakei and Leu. mesenteroides in their intestines. The number of viable LAB increased rapidly in all LAB groups, ranging from 2·9 × 105 to 1·2 × 106 CFU/g at the end of the first week and from 2·4 × 106 to 4·9 × 107 CFU/g at the end of the second week (Fig. 1). Moreover, the microbiological analysis of the organs (liver, kidney, spleen) revealed that it was safe to administer LAB to the fish. Following replacement of the LAB feed with unsupplemented feed, the number of LAB decreased slowly in all LAB groups. Only Lc. lactis ssp. lactis and Leu. mesenteroides could be detected at levels above 1 × 102 CFU/g at the end of the fourth week. It is important to point out that the control group had a low number of LAB ( < 40 CFU/g), especially Carnobacterium maltaromaticum and Lactobacillus curvatus, at the end of the first week, but this amount fell to levels below the detection limit at the end of the second week.

Fig. 1 The lactic acid bacteria (LAB) content of fish intestine at different time points in brown trout fed diets supplemented or not supplemented with probiotics. LAB counts were performed by spreading dilutions on MRS agar, and species were identified through random amplification of polymorphic DNA analysis. Values are means with standard deviations represented by vertical bars for ten fish. Week 1 (■); week 2 (), week 3 (), week 4 (□).

Complement activity

The alternative complement activity (ACH 50) in the serum was significantly (P < 0·05) greater in all LAB groups at the end of the second week, but there was no significant difference (P>0·05) between the LAB groups (Fig. 2). The ACH 50 level of the LAB groups remained higher than that of the control group at the end of the third week, after the LAB groups had received the unsupplemented diet for a week, but the difference was no longer statistically significant (P>0·05). At the end of the fourth week, the ACH 50 value returned to the same level as in the control group.

Fig. 2 Serum alternative complement activity (ACH 50) in brown trout fed diets supplemented or not supplemented with probiotics. Values are means with standard deviations represented by vertical bars for ten fish. *Mean values were significantly different: P < 0·05. Week 1 (■); week 2 (), week 3 (), week 4 (□).

Lysozyme activity

The serum lysozyme activity was significantly higher (P < 0·05) in the Lc. lactis ssp. lactis and Leu. mesenteroides groups at the end of the third week compared with the control group. However, only the Lc. lactis ssp. lactis group showed a statistical difference at the end of the fourth week (Fig. 3). It is important to point out that the group supplemented with Lb. sakei during the first 2 weeks did not exhibit any significant change in lysozyme activity compared with the control group throughout the trial.

Fig. 3 Serum lysozyme activity in brown trout fed diets supplemented or not supplemented with probiotics. Values are means with standard deviations represented by vertical bars for ten fish.. *Mean values were significantly different: P < 0·05. Week 1 (■); week 2 (), week 3 (), week 4 (□).

Immunoglobulin level

The plasma total immunoglobulin level in the LAB groups was found to be higher than that of the control group, especially in the groups that received diets containing Lc. lactis ssp. lactis and Leu. mesenteroides (Fig. 4). There was, however, no significant difference (P>0·05) between the LAB and control groups.

Fig. 4 Plasma total immunoglobulin (Ig) in brown trout fed diets or not supplemented with probiotics. Values are means with standard deviations represented by vertical bars for ten fish. Mean values were not significantly different: P>0·05. Week 1 (■); week 2 (), week 3 (), week 4 (□).

Discussion

In the present study, we observed a correlation between colonisation with probiotic bacteria and non-specific humoral responses such as alternative complement pathway activity and lysozyme activity in brown trout. Previous studies comparing animals raised without exposure to any micro-organisms with animals that had been colonised with components of the microbiota have revealed a range of host functions affected by indigenous microbial communities. For example, the complex microbial ecology of the intestinal tract provides both nutritional benefit and protection against pathogens, and is vital in modulating interactions with the environment and the development of beneficial immune responses. This is because the microbiota directs the assembly of gut-associated lymphoid tissue (Cebra, Reference Cebra1999), helps to educate the immune system (Kelly et al. Reference Kelly, Campbell, King, Grant, Jansson, Coutts, Pettersson and Conway2004), affects the integrity of the intestinal mucosal barrier (Hooper et al. Reference Hooper, Stappenbeck, Hong and Gordon2003), modulates the proliferation and differentiation of its epithelial lineages (Bry et al. Reference Bry, Falk, Midtvedt and Gordon1996), regulates angiogenesis (Stappenbeck et al. Reference Stappenbeck, Hooper and Gordon2002), modifies the activity of the enteric nervous system (Husebye et al. Reference Husebye, Hellström and Midtvedt1994) and plays a key role in extracting and processing nutrients consumed in the diet (Hooper et al. Reference Hooper, Midtvedt and Gordon2002)

After 1 week of LAB-feeding in the present study, we were able to detect high amounts of LAB in the intestine, which demonstrates that Lc. lactis ssp. lactis, Lb. sakei and Leu. mesenteroides, isolated from the endogenous microbiota of salmonids, have a strong ability to adhere to and survive in the intestinal mucus. At the beginning of the study, we observed that all the fish were colonised with several Aeromonas species, particularly Aeromonas hydrophila, which constitutes a large component of the resident microbiota of freshwater fish (Gonzalez et al. Reference Gonzalez, Lopez-Diaz, Garcia-Lopez, Prieto and Otero1999). LAB supplementation, however, demonstrated an ability to antagonise the resident microbiota, since the increase in LAB observed was possibly the result of a fall in intestinal pH induced by lactic acid or other fermented products produced by LAB strains. After changing the LAB-containing feed to unsupplemented feed, the number of LAB decreased slowly in the intestine, and only Lc. lactis ssp. lactis and Leu. mesenteroides were detected at levels above 1 × 102 CFU/g at the end of the fourth week.

At the end of the study, we observed, using microbiological and biochemical methods, that the intestinal microbiota in all groups was represented by motile Gram-negative rods (Aeromonas species) and Gram-positive micro-organisms, including coryneforms, micrococci and bacilli. The probiotic culture must therefore be administered continuously to fish to obtain a balance between the probiotic micro-organisms and the resident microbiota in the digestive tract, and thereby to exert its beneficial health effect. This result is in agreement with those of previous studies. Nikoskelainen et al. (Reference Nikoskelainen, Ouwehand, Bylund, Salminen and Lilius2003) found that adding Lactobacillus rhamnosus ATCC 53 103 to the diet resulted in a high number of this strain in the intestines of rainbow trout, but the number decreased when the diet was changed to unsupplemented feed. Direct comparisons between these probiotics are, however, difficult because these strains are functionally different and may be differently affected by various factors such as genetics, nutrition and the environment.

The level of alternative complement pathway activity, which is antibody independent, is very high in fish serum compared with mammalian serum (Yano, 1996), suggesting that this pathway is more important in fish than in mammals. The complement proteins have multifunctional roles in the defence against micro-organisms, ranging from the opsonisation, lysis and killing of bacteria, to chemotaxis and anaphylaxis (Goldstein, Reference Goldstein, Gallin, Goldstein and Snyderman1988). In the present study, the activation of the alternative complement system pathway at the end of the second week in all LAB groups may be attributed to the supplemented probiotics, confirming the benefit for the non-specific humoral defence system. This result is in agreement with observations by Nikoskelainen et al. (Reference Nikoskelainen, Ouwehand, Bylund, Salminen and Lilius2003) that elevated levels of complement activity resulted from feeding Lb. rhamnosus to rainbow trout.

Lysozyme is a humoral non-specific defence protein widely distributed in nature, including fish (Lie et al. Reference Lie, Evensen, Sørensen and Frøysadal1989). Although its exact physiological role is not yet understood, there is a general acceptance that lysozyme is involved in the defence against micro-organisms. Lysozyme hydrolyses N-acetylmuramic acid and N-acetylglucosamine, which are constituents of the peptidoglycan layer of bacterial cell walls. Lysozyme activity in fish serum has been reported to increase after injecting a bacterial product (Chen et al. Reference Chen, Yoshida, Adams, Thompson and Richards1996), in response to bacterial infection (Møyner et al. Reference Møyner, Røed, Sevatdal and Heum1993) and after probiotic supplementation (Panigrahi et al. Reference Panigrahi, Kiron, Kobayashi, Puangkaew, Satoh and Sugita2004).

Panigrahi et al. (Reference Panigrahi, Kiron, Kobayashi, Puangkaew, Satoh and Sugita2004) showed significantly higher serum lysozyme activity in rainbow trout fed with Lb. rhamnosus JCM 1136 at 109 CFU/g feed for 30 d. In this study, the groups that had been supplemented with Lc. lactis ssp. lactis and Leu. mesenteroides during the first 2 weeks exhibited an elevated level of lysozyme activity at the end of the third week, but only the Lc. lactis ssp. lactis group maintained an increased activity level at the end of the fourth week. In contrast, the Lb. sakei group did not exhibit any significant change in lysozyme activity compared with the control during the trial. Variations in lysozyme activity appear to be related to the ability of probiotic strains to adhere to the intestinal mucus. We have previously shown that Lc. lactis ssp. lactis and Leu. mesenteroides can be recovered in higher numbers than Lb. sakei from the intestinal contents, suggesting that the bacteria can proliferate in the intestinal mucus, where they can interact with epithelial cells.

Immunoglobulins are well recognised to provide disease protection in animals and humans, and several studies have demonstrated the effect of LAB on enhancing immunoglobulin. The oral administration of LAB has been found to increase immunoglobulin A in the intestine and protect mice against Salmonella typhimurium (Perdigon et al. Reference Perdigon, Alvarez, Nader de Macias, Roux and Pesce de Ruiz Holgado1990). In addition, the administration of Lb. rhamnosus at 2·8 × 108 CFU/g into the diet of rainbow trout has been reported to increase the level of immunoglobulin after 1 week (Nikoskelainen et al. Reference Nikoskelainen, Ouwehand, Bylund, Salminen and Lilius2003). We did not examine the specific antibody response, but we observed that probiotic feeding resulted in higher total immunoglobulin levels in brown trout, although the differences were not statistically significant.

In conclusion, the ability of Lc. lactis ssp. lactis, Lb. sakei and Leu. mesenteroides to modify the intestinal microbiota and stimulate the humoral immune response as potential probiotic strains was elucidated in the present study. The selected probiotic strains of fish origin are safe and capable of surviving and temporarily colonising the fish intestinal mucus, as well as antagonising the resident microbiota. They could therefore be a useful alternative to chemotherapeutic treatment to promote fish health, since the high consumption of chemotherapeutic agents in aquaculture can alter the intestinal microbiota and induce resistant populations of bacteria, with unpredictable long-term effects on public health.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by a grant from the National Adviser Body of Continental Cultures (JACUCON). J. L. B. was supported by a fellowship from the Spanish International Cooperation Agency (AECI). We thank M. C. Uriel, J. Orós and R. Claver for skillful technical assistance, and Windsor Aguirre and Ignacio Moore for assistance and critical reading of the manuscript.

References

Balcázar, JL (2006) Selection and characterization of probiotic strains for the prevention of furunculosis in brown trout (Salmo trutta fario). PhD Thesis, University of Zaragoza.Google Scholar
Balcázar, JL, de Blas, I, Ruiz-Zarzuela, I, Cunningham, D, Vendrell, D & Múzquiz, JL (2006 a) The role of probiotics in aquaculture. Vet Microbiol 114, 173186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Balcázar, JL, de Blas, I, Ruiz-Zarzuela, I, Vendrell, D, Evora, MD & Múzquiz, JL (2006 b) Growth inhibition of Aeromonas species by lactic acid bacteria isolated from salmonids. Microb Ecol Health Dis 18, 6163.Google Scholar
Balcázar, JL, Vendrell, D, de Blas, I, Ruiz-Zarzuela, I, Gironés, O & Múzquiz, JL (2006 c) Immune modulation by probiotic strains: quantification of phagocytosis of Aeromonas salmonicida by leukocytes isolated from gut of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) using a radiolabelling assay. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis 29, 335343.Google Scholar
Barrangou, R, Yoon, SS, Breidt, F, Fleming, HP & Klaenhammer, TR (2002) Identification and characterization of Leuconostoc fallax strains isolated from an industrial sauerkraut fermentation. Appl Environ Microbiol 68, 28772884.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brousseau, R, Saint-Onge, A, Prefontaine, G, Masson, L & Cabana, J (1993) Arbitrary primer polymerase chain reaction, a powerful method to identify Bacillus thuringiensis serovars and strains. Appl Environ Microbiol 59, 114119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bry, L, Falk, PG, Midtvedt, T & Gordon, JI (1996) A model of host–microbial interactions in an open mammalian ecosystem. Science 273, 13801383.Google Scholar
Cebra, JJ (1999) Influences of microbiota on intestinal immune system development. Am J Clin Nutr 69, 1046S1051S.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, SC, Yoshida, T, Adams, A, Thompson, KD & Richards, RH (1996) Immune response of rainbow trout to extracellular products of Mycobacterium sp. J Aquat Anim Health 8, 216222.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Del Cerro, A, Marquez, I & Guijarro, JA (2002) Simultaneous detection of Aeromonas salmonicida, Flavobacterium psychrophilum, and Yersinia ruckeri, three major fish pathogens, by multiplex PCR. Appl Environ Microbiol 68, 51775180.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Man, JC, Rogosa, M & Sharpe, ME (1960) A medium for the cultivation of lactobacilli. J Appl Bacteriol 23, 130135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demers, NE & Bayne, CJ (1997) The immediate effects of stress on hormones and plasma lysozyme in rainbow trout. Dev Comp Immunol 21, 363373.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fooks, LJ & Gibson, GR (2002) Probiotics as modulators of the gut flora. Br J Nutr 88, S39S49.Google Scholar
Gatesoupe, FJ (1999) The use of probiotics in aquaculture. Aquaculture 180, 147165.Google Scholar
Gildberg, A, Mikkelsen, H, Sandaker, E & Ringo, E (1997) Probiotic effect of lactic acid bacteria in the feed on growth and survival of fry and Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua). Hydrobiologia 352, 279285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, HS & Rutherfurd, KJ (2001) Viability and dose response effects of the immunoenhancing lactic acid bacterium Lactobacillus rhamnosus HN001 in mice. Br J Nutr 86, 285289.Google Scholar
Goldstein, IM (1988) Complement: Biologically active products. In Inflammation: Basic Principles and Clinical Correlates, pp. 5574 [Gallin, JI, Goldstein, IM and Snyderman, R, editors]. New York: Raven Press.Google Scholar
Gonzalez, CJ, Lopez-Diaz, TM, Garcia-Lopez, ML, Prieto, M & Otero, A (1999) Bacterial microflora of wild brown trout (Salmo trutta), wild pike (Esox lucius), and aquacultured rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). J Food Prot 62, 12701277.Google Scholar
Hooper, LV, Midtvedt, T & Gordon, JI (2002) How host–microbial interactions shape the nutrient environment of the mammalian intestine. Annu Rev Nutr 22, 283307.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hooper, LV, Stappenbeck, TS, Hong, CV & Gordon, JI (2003) Angiogenins: a new class of microbicidal proteins involved in innate immunity. Nat Immunol 4, 269273.Google Scholar
Husebye, E, Hellström, PM & Midtvedt, T (1994) Intestinal microflora stimulates myoelectric activity of rat small intestine by promoting cyclic initiation and aboral propagation of migrating myoelectric complex. Dig Dis Sci 39, 946956.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Irianto, A & Austin, B (2002) Probiotics in aquaculture. J Fish Dis 25, 633642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johansson, ML, Quednau, M, Molin, G & Ahrne, S (1995) Randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) for rapid typing of Lactobacillus plantarum strains. Lett Appl Microbiol 21, 155159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kelly, D, Campbell, JI, King, TP, Grant, G, Jansson, EA, Coutts, AG, Pettersson, S & Conway, S (2004) Commensal anaerobic gut bacteria attenuate inflammation by regulating nuclear-cytoplasmic shuttling of PPAR-γ and RelA. Nat Immunol 5, 104112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lie, Ø, Evensen, Ø, Sørensen, A & Frøysadal, E (1989) Study on lysozyme activity in some fish species. Dis Aquat Org 6, 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Møyner, K, Røed, KH, Sevatdal, S & Heum, M (1993) Changes in non-specific immune parameters in Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L., induced by Aeromonas salmonicida infection. Fish Shellfish Immunol 3, 253265.Google Scholar
Nikoskelainen, S, Ouwehand, A, Bylund, G & Salminen, S (2001) Protection of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) from furunculosis by Lactobacillus rhamnosus. Aquaculture 198, 229236.Google Scholar
Nikoskelainen, S, Ouwehand, A, Bylund, G, Salminen, S & Lilius, EM (2003) Immune enhancement in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) by potential probiotic bacteria (Lactobacillus rhamnosus). Fish Shellfish Immunol 15, 443452.Google Scholar
Panigrahi, A, Kiron, V, Kobayashi, T, Puangkaew, J, Satoh, S & Sugita, H (2004) Immune responses in rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss induced by a potential probiotic bacteria Lactobacillus rhamnosus JCM 1136. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 102, 379388.Google Scholar
Parry, RM, Chandan, RC & Shahani, KM (1965) A rapid and sensitive assay of muramidase. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 119, 384386.Google Scholar
Perdigon, G, Alvarez, S, Nader de Macias, ME, Roux, ME & Pesce de Ruiz Holgado, A (1990) The oral administration of lactic acid bacteria increases the mucosal intestinal immunity in response to enteropathogens. J Food Protect 53, 404410.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reid, G, Sanders, ME, Gaskins, HR, Gibson, GR, Mercenier, A, Rastall, RA, Roberfroid, MB, Rowland, I, Cherbut, C & Klaenhammer, TR (2003) New scientific paradigms for probiotics and prebiotics. J Clin Gastroenterol 37, 105118.Google Scholar
Robertson, P, O'Dowd, C, Burrells, C, Williams, P & Austin, B (2000) Use of Carnobacterium sp. as a probiotic for Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) and rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss, Walbaum). Aquaculture 185, 235243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, E, Rochat, F, Link-Amster, H, Aeschlimann, J & Donnet-Hugues, A (1995) Immunomodulation of blood cells following the ingestion of lactic acid bacteria. J Dairy Sci 78, 491497.Google Scholar
Shu, Q & Gill, HS (2002) Immune protection mediated by the probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus HN001 (DR20) against Escherichia coli O157:H7 infection in mice. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 34, 5964.Google Scholar
Siwicki, AK & Anderson, DP (1993) Nonspecific defense mechanisms assay in fish. In Disease Diagnosis and Prevention Methods, pp. 105112. IFI Olsztyn, Poland: FAO-project GCP/INT/JPA.Google Scholar
Stappenbeck, TS, Hooper, LV & Gordon, JI (2002) Regulation of intestinal vasculogenesis by indigenous microbes via Paneth cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99, 1545115455.Google Scholar
Verschuere, L, Rombaut, G, Sorgeloos, P & Verstraete, W (2000) Probiotic bacteria as biological control agents in aquaculture. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 64, 655671.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vine, NG, Leudes, WD & Kaiser, H (2006) Probiotics in marine larviculture. FEMS Microbiol Rev 30, 404427.Google Scholar
Yano, T (1992) Assay of hemolytic complement activity. In Techniques in Fish Immunology, pp. 131141 [Stolen, JS, Fletcher, TC, Anderson, DP, Hattari, SL and Rowley, AF, editors]. FairHaven, NJ: SOS Publications.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1 The lactic acid bacteria (LAB) content of fish intestine at different time points in brown trout fed diets supplemented or not supplemented with probiotics. LAB counts were performed by spreading dilutions on MRS agar, and species were identified through random amplification of polymorphic DNA analysis. Values are means with standard deviations represented by vertical bars for ten fish. Week 1 (■); week 2 (), week 3 (), week 4 (□).

Figure 1

Fig. 2 Serum alternative complement activity (ACH 50) in brown trout fed diets supplemented or not supplemented with probiotics. Values are means with standard deviations represented by vertical bars for ten fish. *Mean values were significantly different: P < 0·05. Week 1 (■); week 2 (), week 3 (), week 4 (□).

Figure 2

Fig. 3 Serum lysozyme activity in brown trout fed diets supplemented or not supplemented with probiotics. Values are means with standard deviations represented by vertical bars for ten fish.. *Mean values were significantly different: P < 0·05. Week 1 (■); week 2 (), week 3 (), week 4 (□).

Figure 3

Fig. 4 Plasma total immunoglobulin (Ig) in brown trout fed diets or not supplemented with probiotics. Values are means with standard deviations represented by vertical bars for ten fish. Mean values were not significantly different: P>0·05. Week 1 (■); week 2 (), week 3 (), week 4 (□).