Hostname: page-component-6587cd75c8-67gbf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-24T03:47:08.583Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Replies to Critics of The Fiery Test of Critique

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 April 2024

Ian Proops
Ian Proops*
Affiliation:
University of Texas, Austin, TX, USA
*
Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

I reply to criticisms of my book The Fiery Test of Critique: A Reading of Kant’s Dialectic from Béatrice Longuenesse and Patricia Kitcher on the paralogisms, Allen Wood on the third antinomy and freedom, Des Hogan on the resolution of the antinomies, and Anja Jauernig on the ontological argument.

Keywords

paralogismfreedomantinomyGodontological argument
Type
Author Meets Critic
Information
Kantian Review , Volume 29 , Issue 2 , June 2024 , pp. 317 - 329
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Kantian Review

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Mendelssohn, M. (2011) Morning Hours: Lectures on God’s Existence. Trans. Dahlstrom, D. O. and Dyck, C.. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Proops, I. (2021) The Fiery Test of Critique: A Reading of Kant’s Dialectic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Proops, I. and Sorensen, R. (2023) ‘De-stigmatizing the Exegetical Attribution of Lies: The Case of Kant’. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 104(4), 746–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar