Hostname: page-component-669899f699-vbsjw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-27T12:26:06.051Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Growth analysis of cassava genotypes planted under irrigation management practices during the early growth phase

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 December 2024

Chanissara Ruangyos ,
Poramate Banterng Open the ORCID record for Poramate Banterng [Opens in a new window] ,
Nimitr Vorasoot ,
Sanun Jogloy ,
Piyada Theerakulpisut ,
Kochaphan Vongcharoen  and
Gerrit Hoogenboom Open the ORCID record for Gerrit Hoogenboom [Opens in a new window]
Chanissara Ruangyos
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand
Poramate Banterng*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand Plant Breeding Research Center for Sustainable Agriculture, Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand
Nimitr Vorasoot
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand
Sanun Jogloy
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand Plant Breeding Research Center for Sustainable Agriculture, Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand
Piyada Theerakulpisut
Affiliation:
Faculty of Science, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand
Kochaphan Vongcharoen
Affiliation:
Faculty of Science and Health Technology, Kalasin University, Kalasin, Thailand
Gerrit Hoogenboom
Affiliation:
Global Food Systems Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
*
Corresponding author: Poramate Banterng; Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

New information on the growth analysis for different cassava genotypes grown under different irrigation managements during the early growth phase could support decision-making to improve crop productivity. This study aimed to determine the performance of 20 cassava genotypes grown under different irrigation management practices during the early growth phase. A strip-plot design with four replications was used during two growing seasons (2019/2020 and 2020/2021). Three levels of irrigation from 30 to 180 days after planting (DAP) were assigned as factor A (W1 = 100%, W2 = 60% and W3 = 20% of the crop water requirement), whereas 20 cassava genotypes were assigned as factor B. Crop data were recorded on SPAD chlorophyll meter reading (SCMR), specific leaf area (SLA) and leaf area index (LAI) at 180 and 330 DAP, relative growth rate (RGR) from 180 to 330 DAP and harvest index (HI) at 330 DAP. The genotypes CMR36-31-381 and Huay Bong 90 had high values of HI, indicating a good partitioning of photosynthate to the storage root. These two genotypes also showed superior performances in terms of SCMR, SLA and RGR inW2 and W3 treatments when compared to the other genotypes. They also had LAI values within the optimum range during the period of maximum canopy size. Therefore, the genotypes CMR36-31-381 and Huay Bong 90 could be used as genetic resources to improve cassava productivity under different irrigation levels.

Keywords

cultivar selectiongrowth rateleaf areaphysiologywater requirements
Type
Crops and Soils Research Paper
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 162 , Issue 6 , December 2024 , pp. 596 - 606
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abid, M, Tian, Z, Ata-Ul-Karim, ST, Wang, F, Liu, Y, Zahoor, R, Jiang, D and Dai, T (2016) Adaptation to and recovery from drought stress at vegetative stages in wheat (Triticum aestivum) cultivars. Functional Plant Biology 43, 1159–1169.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alves, AAC (2002) Cassava botany and physiology. In Hillocks, RJ, Thresh, JM and Bellotti, AC (eds), Cassava Biology, Production, and Utilization. Cassava Biology, Production, and Utilization. Wallingford, UK: CABI Publishing, pp. 67–89.Google Scholar
Awal, MA and Ikeda, T (2002) Recovery strategy following the imposition of episodic soil moisture deficit in stands of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 188, 185–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banterng, P, Patanothai, A, Pannangpetch, K, Jogloy, S and Hoogenboom, G (2003) Seasonal variation in the dynamic growth and development traits of peanut lines. Journal of Agricultural Science 141, 51–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cock, JH, Franklin, D, Sandoval, G and Juri, P (1979) The ideal cassava plant for maximum yield. Crop Science 19, 271–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connor, DJ, Cock, JH and Parra, GE (1981) Response of cassava to water shortage I. Growth and yield. Field Crops Research 4, 181–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Department of Agriculture (2008) Good Agricultural Practices for Cassava. Bangkok, Thailand: National Bureau of Agricultural Commodity and Food Standards Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives.Google Scholar
De Tafur, SM, El-Sharkawy, MA and Calle, F (1997) Photosynthesis and yield performance of cassava in seasonally dry and semiarid environments. Photosynthetica 33, 249–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doorenbos, J and Pruitt, WO (1992) Crop Water Requirements. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.Google Scholar
El-Sharkawy, MA and Cadavid, LF (2002) Response of cassava to prolonged water stress imposed at different stages of growth. Experimental Agriculture 33, 333–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El-Sharkawy, MA, Hernandez, ADP and Hershey, C (1992) Yield stability of cassava during prolonged mid-season water stress. Experimental Agriculture 28, 165–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, GC (1972) The Quantitative Analysis of Plant Growth. CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Freed, RD and Nissen, O (1992) MSTAT-C Version 1.42. East Lansing, MI, USA: Michigan State University.Google Scholar
Gomez, KA and Gomez, AA (1984) Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Hanks, RJ, Keller, J, Rasmussen, VP and Wilson, GD (1976) Line source sprinkler for continuous variable-crop production studies. Soil Science Society of America Journal 40, 426–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howeler, RH (2002) Cassava mineral nutrition and fertilization. In Hillocks, RJ, Thresh, JM and Bellotti, AC (eds), Cassava: Biology, Production and Utilization. UK: CABI, pp. 115–136.Google Scholar
Janket, A, Vorasoot, N, Toomsan, B, Kaewpradit, W, Jogloy, S, Theerakulpisut, P, Holbrook, CC, Kvien, CK and Banterng, P (2020) Starch accumulation and granule size distribution of cassava cv. Rayong 9 grown under irrigated and rainfed conditions using different growing seasons. Journal of Agronomy 10, 412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kawano, K (1990) Harvest index and evolution of major food crop cultivars in the tropics. Euphytica 46, 195–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khonghintaisong, J, Songsri, P and Jongrungklang, N (2023) Understanding growth rate patterns among different drought resistant sugarcane cultivars during plant and ratoon crops encountered water deficit at early growth stage under natural field conditions. Agronomy 11, 2083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koutroubas, SD, Papakosta, DK and Doitsinis, A (2009) Phenotypic variation in physiological determinants of yield in spring sown safflower under Mediterranean conditions. Field Crops Research 112, 199–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenis, J, Calle, F, Jaramillo, G, Perez, J, Ceballos, H and Cock, J (2006) Leaf retention and cassava productivity. Field Crops Research 95, 126–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahakosee, S, Jogloy, S, Vorasoot, N, Theerakulpisut, P, Banterng, P, Kesmala, T, Holbrook, C and Kvien, C (2019) Seasonal variations in canopy size and yield of Rayong 9 cassava genotype under rainfed and irrigated conditions. Journal of Agronomy 9, 362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahakosee, S, Jogloy, S, Vorasoot, N, Theerakulpisut, P, Holbrook, CC, Kvien, CK and Banterng, P (2020) Seasonal variation in canopy size, light penetration and photosynthesis of three cassava genotypes with different canopy. Journal of Agronomy 10, 1554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NaanDanJain Irrigation Ltd (2013) Sugar Cane. Technical Report. Post Naan, Israel: NaanDanJain Irrigation Ltd.Google Scholar
Orek, C, Gruissem, W, Ferguson, M and Vanderschuren, H (2020) Morpho-physiological and molecular evaluation of drought tolerance in cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz). Field Crops Research 255, 107861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oyetunji, OJ, Ekanayake, IJ and Osonubi, O (2007) Chlorophyll fluorescence analysis for assessing water deficit and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) inoculation in cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz). Advances in Biological Research 1, 108–117.Google Scholar
Pellet, D and El-Sharkawy, MA (1993) Cassava varietal response to phosphorus fertilization. I. yield, biomass and gas exchange. Field Crops Research 35, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pellet, D and El-Sharkawy, MA (1994) Sink-source relations in cassava: effects of reciprocal grafting on yield and leaf photosynthesis. Experimental Agriculture 30, 359–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phoncharoen, P, Banterng, P, Vorasoot, N, Jogloy, S, Theerakulpisut, P and Hoogenboom, G (2019) Growth rates and yields of cassava at different planting dates in a tropical savanna climate. Scientia Agricola 76, 376–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phuntupan, K and Banterng, P (2017) Physiological determinants of storage root yield in three cassava genotypes under different nitrogen supply. Journal of Agricultural Science 155, 978–992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puangbut, D, Jogloy, S and Vorasoot, N (2017) Association of photosynthetic traits with water use efficiency and SPAD chlorophyll meter reading of Jerusalem artichoke under drought conditions. Agricultural Water Management 188, 29–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puangbut, D, Jogloy, S, Vorasoot, N and Songsri, P (2022) Photosynthetic and physiological responses to drought of Jerusalem artichoke genotypes differing in drought resistance. Agricultural Water Management 259, 107252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruangyos, C, Banterng, P, Vorasoot, N, Jogloy, S, Threerakulpisut, P, Vongcharoen, K and Hoogenboom, G (2023). Variation in biomass of cassava genotypes grown under different irrigation levels during the early growth phase. Crop Science 64, 482–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruttanaprasert, R, Jogloy, S, Vorasoot, N, Kesmala, T, Kanwar, RS, Holbrook, CC and Patanothai, A (2012) Relationship between chlorophyll density and SPAD chlorophyll meter reading for Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.). Sabrao Journal of Breeding and Genetics 44, 149–162.Google Scholar
Sanket, JM, Ravi, V, Saravanan, R and Suresh, KJ (2020) The quest for high yielding drought-tolerant cassava variety. International Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemical Research 6, 433–439.Google Scholar
Santisopasri, V, Kuroljanawong, K, Chontineeranat, S, Piyachomkwan, K, Sriroth, K and Oates, CG (2001) Impact of water stress yield and quality of cassava starch. Industrial Crops and Products 13, 115–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sawatraksa, N, Banterng, P, Jogloy, S, Vorasoot, N and Hoogenboom, G (2019) Cassava growth analysis of production during the off-season of paddy rice. Crop science 59, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Srihawong, W, Kongsil, P, Petchpoung, K and Sarobol, E (2015) Effect of genotype, age and soil moisture on cyanogenic glycoside content and root yield in cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz.). Witthayasan Kasetsat 49, 844–855.Google Scholar
Statistix10 (2013) Statistix10: Analytical Software User's Manual. FL: Tallahassee.Google Scholar
Vandegeer, R, Rebecca, E, Bain, M, Roslyn, M and Timothy, R (2013) Drought adversely affects tuber development and nutritional quality of the staple crop cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz). Functional Plant Biology 40, 195–200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Win, SK, Zamora, OB and Thein, S (2014) Determination of the water requirement and Kc values of sugarcane at different crop growth stages by lysimetric method. Sugar Tech: An International Journal of Sugar Crops & Related Industries 16, 286–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wongnoi, S, Banterng, P, Vorasoot, N, Jogloy, S and Theerakulpisut, P (2020) Physiology, growth and yield of different cassava genotypes planted in upland with dry environment during high storage root accumulation stage. Agronomy 10, 576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhu, XG, Long, SP and Ort, DR (2010) Improving photosynthetic efficiency for greater yield. Annual Review of Plant Biology 61, 235–261.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed