Occult HIV infection in a large sample of health-care users in Lombardy, Italy in 2014–2015: implications for control strategies

Summary

We estimated the number of people unaware of their human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection in our province, Pavia (population 540 000) in Lombardy, Italy, by means of anonymous unlinked testing of 10 044 serum/plasma samples residual from clinical analyses at the outpatient clinic of Policlinico San Matteo in 2014 and 2015. Ethical and legal approval was obtained prior to study start. Samples were irreversibly anonymised, only retaining gender and 5-year age class. Five sample pools were tested for HIV using LIAISON^® XL MUREX HIV Ab/Ag (DiaSorin, Saluggia, Italy). If the pool tested positive, individual samples underwent confirmatory tests, Innotest HIV Antigen mAb (Fujirebio Europe, Gent, Belgium) and HIV BLOT 2·2 (MP Diagnostics, Singapore). Among the 10 044 samples processed, eight were confirmed positive (0·08%, 95% confidence interval 0·03–0·16%), all were males and age was >50 in 3 (37·5%). If projected to the entire population of the Pavia province, this would result in approximately 1000 people unaware of their HIV infection, with age older than expected. In Italy, HIV testing is voluntary, universally free-of-charge and (upon request) anonymous. Nevertheless, this study demonstrates that it is suboptimally employed, and that new strategies and population-level actions will be needed to achieve better implementation of HIV testing and HIV control in our province.

INTRODUCTION

Estimates of number and proportion of people with undiagnosed human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) are important for implementing public health strategies. In particular, persons unaware of their HIV infection do not benefit from early treatment and can contribute up to 50–90% of new HIV infections, mainly (but not only) in the acute phase [1–3].

In 2008, the Italian Ministry of Health instituted a surveillance system, adding HIV infection (acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) surveillance started on 1987) to the list of Class III infections to be notified [4]. In 2007, incidence of new HIV type 1 (HIV-1) diagnoses in Italy was estimated 7·1 per 100 000 population, and remained stable thereafter, and in 2013, it was 6·0 per 100 000 [5].

According to the UNAIDS guidelines, notification of new HIV cases should be paralleled by unlinked HIV prevalence monitoring through HIV testing of serum from blood drawn for reasons other than HIV testing [6]. In 2006, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommended screening patients aged 13–64 years for HIV infection in health-care settings that have a prevalence of undiagnosed HIV infection of >0·1% [7].

The overall aim of the study was to estimate the (unknown) HIV seroprevalence in the general population of Pavia province of Italy. The primary outcome was the estimate of occult nosocomial seroprevalence (ONS), using anonymous and unlinked blood samples among residents accessing health services.

METHODS

A survey, by means of anonymous and unlinked HIV testing of serum samples drawn for reasons other than HIV testing, was designed and performed from January 2014 to December 2015. Approval of the Institutional Review of Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Policlinic San Matteo Foundation Board was obtained prior to study start. The detailed study protocol is available upon request.

Setting

Pavia is a small (population ca. 70 000) university town, 30 km south of Milan, with a large teaching and research hospital and a very ancient university with medical school. The province of Pavia has a population of ca. 550 000 inhabitants and an area of 2968·64 km². It is located in the Lombardy region, the most densely populated region in Italy, with 10 million inhabitants [8], accounting for 17% of the total Italian population.

As of 31/12/2012, there were 29 508 people living with HIV/AIDS (PLWH) in the Lombardy region (prevalence 328/100 000); almost 45% are females [9] (Table 1). In 2013, new HIV diagnoses in Lombardy have been 931 (incidence 10·5/100 000), of which 84% were males, 18% of foreign origin and only 5% were intravenous drug users (IVDUs); 55% were late presenters (CD4+ cell count <350/mmc); and 2/3 of these were in advanced stage of HIV infection (CD4+ <200/mmc). New AIDS cases were 284 (with a downward trend parallel to the national incidence) [5, 10, 11]. In 2015, new HIV diagnoses in Lombardy were 815 (8·1 per 100 000) [10].

Table 1. Selected epidemiological characteristics of HIV infection and AIDS in Lombardy region and Pavia province, Italy

HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; AIDS, acquired immunodeficiency syndrome; PLWH, people living with HIV/AIDS.

In Pavia province, as of 31/12/2015, there were 1276 PLWH (prevalence 215/100 000); males are 70·4%. New diagnoses of HIV infection in 2008 have been 116 (21·5/100 000, around three times higher than the national average); in 2013, 51 (40 males and 11 females); in 2014, 47 (35 males and 12 females); and in 2015, 26 (21 males and 5 females) (data from the Pavia Local Health Authority).

The surveillance system of blood donors (a population at very low risk of HIV) in 2008 detected, among the 21 777 donors in Lombardy, three HIV-infected subjects (1·4/10 000). One of these was resident in Pavia (1/8575 Pavia donors, 1·2/10 000).

Eligibility criteria

All residual serum or plasma samples following processing for diagnostic purposes were collected at the Laboratorio Analisi Chimico-Cliniche of the IRCCS Policlinic San Matteo Foundation during the study period and included in the study. Duplicate samples from patients accessing the hospital within 6 months were excluded from the study.

Only samples from patients residing in the city of Pavia or in Pavia province were considered in the study.

Of note, at Policlinico San Matteo, HIV patients perform routine blood tests at the outpatient clinic of the Infectious Diseases Institute or of the Division of Tropical Diseases during routine periodic workup. Therefore, no mix-up of samples from patients with known HIV infection with those from patients with potentially undiagnosed HIV infection could have occurred since they were collected at different outpatient clinics.

Study procedures

Samples were collected weekly at the Virology Unit after checking for duplicates within the previous 6 months and were irreversibly anonymised (the only information retained was gender, 5-year age group and calendar month of sampling). The residual plasma or serum was aliquoted into two to three vials, and stored at +4 °C. To reduce time and cost, samples were pooled in five-patient pools and tested together. In case of pool positivity at screening tests, the five individual samples were tested individually by confirmatory tests.

Pools were tested for HIV using LIAISON^® XL MUREX HIV Ab/Ag (DiaSorin, Saluggia, Italy). The LIAISON^® XL MUREX HIV Ab/Ag assay uses chemiluminescence immunoassay technology for the combined qualitative determination of p24 antigen of HIV-1 and specific antibodies to both HIV-1 (groups M and O) and/or HIV type 2 in human serum or plasma samples. Confirmatory tests were Innotest HIV Antigen mAb (Fujirebio Europe, Gent, Belgium) and HIV BLOT 2·2 (MP Diagnostics, Singapore).

All positive samples were also tested with real-time PCR assay to investigate the presence of RNA virus. The real-time reverse transcriptase test was performed adopting the protocol established by the Working Group for HIV quantification (AC11) of the French National Agency for AIDS Research (ANRS). The test was conducted with the Generic HIV charge viral kit (Biocentric, Bandol, France).

All the tests were performed according to manufacturers’ instructions.

Sample size

The working hypothesis for sample size calculation was ONS 100/100 000; to estimate it with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) between 48 and 183/100 000, we planned to test at least 10 000 samples.

Ethical issues

In Italy, HIV testing is voluntary, universally free-of-charge and, upon request, anonymous. An ethical issue would arise for HIV-positive samples to which no linking back to original individual can occur; therefore, all patients undergoing blood sampling at the Fondazione have been reminded that upon request, HIV testing can be performed, with pre- and post-counselling, any day of the week at the Clinic of Infectious Diseases of the Fondazione.

Anonymous unlinked HIV testing for surveillance purposes has been used from the beginning of the epidemic in several countries, and is still used [12–20]. The World Health Organisation (WHO) included it into its second-generation surveillance tools [6, 21]. Ethical issues have been reviewed by the WHO [22, 23].

Briefly, the guidance provided by the WHO is that, in the case of blood drawn for other purposes, communities should be broadly notified that blood collected for one purpose may be anonymously tested for HIV. Fully informed consent is not required, but the individual who wishes to opt out of such surveillance should be respected where possible. If the numbers of individuals opting out threaten the validity of surveillance efforts, ethics review committees will have to determine whether the public health significance of the studies warrants over-ride the right to refuse to participate [22].

In Italy in 2009, the specific Authority ‘Garante per la Protezione dei Dati Personali’ issued a regulation, which waives the need for informed consent in two situations: (a) the person ignores his condition, for example, research in which the information note on the study would result in the disclosure of information concerning the conduct of the study, which could cause material damage or psychological problems to those concerned; (b) logistical or organisational issues, such that excluding those patients who were not contacted for consent would introduce a bias in the study results [24].

Statistics

Descriptive statistics were obtained for the study variables. ONS (sample prevalence) was defined as number of confirmed positive HIV/number of tests at the clinical biochemistry laboratory in the study period, overall and by age and gender, with 95% CIs.

Projected estimated prevalence was calculated, by age and gender, on the population of Pavia province. Population data at 1 January 2014 and 1 January 2015 were obtained from the Italian National Statistical Institute (ISTAT) [25]. Projections were made for the point estimate and the lower and upper 95% confidence limits (CI) of sample prevalence.

Stata computer software version 14·0 (Stata Corporation, 4905 Lakeway Drive, College Station, Texas 77845, USA) was used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

In the study period, 10 044 samples were collected. The number of samples positive at screening test was 18, and eight (44%) were confirmed positive, for an overall ONS 79/100 000 (95% CI 34–156). The positive samples all belonged to males, three in age group 30–35 years, one in age group 40–45, 45–50, 50–55, 60–65, 80–85 years each; six were detected in 2014 and two in 2015.

Projected estimates on the entire Pavia population (Table 2) indicate that the potential number of people unaware of their HIV infection is 1000 (95% CI 134–12 511) in 2014, and 287 (95% CI 35–7088) in 2015 (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1. Pavia population (by gender and age group) and projected estimates of people unaware of their HIV infections, in 2014 and 2015. HIV, human immunodeficiency virus.

Table 2. Description of samples, positive samples, Pavia population and estimates of HIV prevalence, by gender and age group

HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval.

The positive predictive value in this context was 44% (95% CI 21–69), despite the high sensitivity and specificity of the test.

All eight positive samples at confirmatory test resulted negative at the PCR test.

DISCUSSION

In Italy, a total of 123 000 individuals aged 15 or more (prevalence 0·28%) were estimated to be living with HIV/AIDS in Italy at the end of 2012, with males outnumbering females by almost 10-fold [26]. These estimates were obtained with input from (among other sources) serosurveys among injecting drug users, men who have sex with men (MSM) and female sex workers [27], but none in a sample of the general population. Our study provides such an estimate.

Main results

Our project aimed at obtaining an estimate on HIV seroprevalence in the province of Pavia, based on persons accessing health-care services for reasons other than HIV, via anonymous and unlinked HIV testing. We found a prevalence of HIV occult infection of approximately 0·1%; this direct measurement confirms estimates recently obtained by estimation methods in Italy [28]. We also estimate that the number of people unaware of their HIV infection is close to 50% of the known prevalence, and therefore that about one-third of PLWH in Pavia province is unaware of the infection. Considering the selection bias implicit in the anonymous unlinked testing of residual blood samples from a population accessing health care, this result agrees with the known new HIV diagnoses in Pavia province (51 in 2014 and 26 in 2015).

The socio-demographic picture of our province is similar to the whole of Lombardy [8], a region that contributes to the majority of HIV infection in Italy with a prevalence of diagnosed HIV cases of 0·3% [9]. Its proximity to Milan metropolitan area (population 3 millions) must also be taken into account in interpreting these findings.

Research in context

Almost 10 years ago, the estimated proportion of unknown HIV prevalence for Italy was 25% [29], but our current results are in line with more recent estimates in other European contexts. In the Netherlands in 2012, the estimate was 34·2% (with 95% CI 21·6–48·8) [30]. In Madrid, Spain, a serosurvey conducted in 2008–2009 found an unknown HIV prevalence of 0·35% among 3695 subjects who agreed to participate. Of note, in that study, 31% of the subjects opted out of participation [31]. On the other hand, in the USA (a very different setting), recent estimated percentages of persons living with HIV who had received a diagnosis of HIV by the end of 2012 ranged from 77% in Louisiana to ⩾90% in Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii and New York [32].

It is therefore evident that in our province and in the whole Lombardy, more efforts are needed to better implement a Test and Treat strategy, as supported by the WHO and UNAIDS several years ago [33].

Consequences of unawareness of HIV infection and late testing are well known: in 2013 in Italy, 68·2% of AIDS diagnoses were made in patients never tested for HIV previously, the proportion of late presenters (CD4+ cell count <350/mmc) was 57·6% and those in advanced stage of HIV infection (CD4+ <200/mmc) was 37·6% [5].

This implies that most patients with AIDS were not aware of their HIV status, were not offered highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) and could not be counselled to modify their risk behaviour. Another fraction of this population is composed of persons who, having completely neglected the issue, did not return for HIV testing results or did not accept the therapeutic consequences of a positive HIV test, for fear of paying a social cost or for lack of information of efficacy of HIV treatment.

Surveillance of new HIV diagnoses in Italy has been implemented since 2008, in addition to that for AIDS cases which started on 1987 [4]. In Italy, all health costs of HIV patients are entirely (even for conditions not linked to HIV) covered by the National Health System; 87·6% of the 94 146 persons living with HIV-1 were on antiretroviral therapy in 2012 [9]. However, epidemiological data show that the HIV epidemic in Italy has not slowed down.

The successes of HAART therapy make both mandatory and urgent strategies of active HIV testing which, without forgetting the inalienable right of the individual to refuse diagnostic or therapeutic procedures, would allow to eradicate those situations where HAART is not offered because of unawareness or lack of adequate counselling. It is worth noting that the social stigma that the disease has always carried with itself still accompanies persons living with HIV/AIDS and constitutes the main determinant of delay in diagnosing HIV infection. WHO guidelines on self-HIV testing are expected in 2016 [34].

The age of people unaware of their HIV infection, often outside the traditional ‘risk categories’ (young men, either IVDUs or MSM), suggest that the traditional prevention strategies based exclusively on the awareness of belonging to a risk category or of having a risk behaviour are obsolete, despite recent WHO guidelines [35].

Positive samples were only found among males, despite the higher number of samples from females. This might be due to chance variation, considering the small numbers involved, or might reflect a lower prevalence among women of HIV infection in our province.

It is important to note that in our context, the positive predictive value of HIV Ab-testing was low, underscoring the need for correct pre- and post-test counselling to limit excessive anxiety at the screening test.

Limitations

Limitations of anonymous unlinked testing are well known: besides ethical issues [23], selection bias and lack of data on behaviour are the most important. In fact, in any community, the population accessing health care is not representative of the entire population; however, it is a convenient and low-cost sample [36]. Irreversible anonymisation prevents collection of important clinical and epidemiological information. However, especially in relatively small communities like Pavia province, from just a few data, it would be in theory possible to infer the personal identity of involved patients; we therefore choose to protect privacy over more detailed scientific information.

Because of anonymisation, patients with known HIV infection might have been included; however, to limit this bias, we excluded all samples taken from patients at the Infectious Disease Units.

Furthermore, some individuals might have been included twice in the sample: for negative samples, this would dilute the prevalence, and for positive, the opposite would be true; to counterbalance this, prior to anonymisation we excluded samples from the same patient within the previous 6 months.

We have not been able to quantify the HIV viral load in the positive samples; this is most likely due to the logistics of our study: we used plasma or serum samples discarded (and therefore used for our study) a week after the clinical use, a long time that does not allow the correct preservation of HIV-RNA.

Finally, we could not determine the CD4 cell count of positive samples, since testing was made on serum or plasma; it would have been interesting to assess the presumptive duration of HIV infection in these people.

CONCLUSIONS

Once obtained data on HIV prevalence in the general population, specific actions can be taken to inform, educate and counsel individuals on risk behaviours, HIV testing, antiretroviral therapy and preventative measures. We are now in the position to inform a wider public health programme.

While free and informed consent of each individual being tested is crucial, we believe that it is time to proceed from a strategy of HIV testing ‘on demand’ (such it is now) to one of active HIV-testing proposal by health-care workers.

Epidemiological data and sociological considerations demonstrate the evident need for developing new strategies for a wider and more accepted HIV testing in the general population.