The Great Reconfiguration A Socio-Technical Analysis of Low-Carbon Transitions in UK Electricity, Heat, and Mobility Systems
References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 April 2022
Summary
A summary is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Great ReconfigurationA Socio-Technical Analysis of Low-Carbon Transitions in UK Electricity, Heat, and Mobility Systems, pp. 339 - 376Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022
- Creative Commons
This content is Open Access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/cclicenses/
References
Abbott, A., 2004. Methods of Discovery: Heuristics for the Social Sciences. W. W. Norton, New York.Google Scholar
Abbott, A., 2001. Time Matters: On Theory and Method. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Acemoglu, D., Akcigit, U., Hanley, D., and Kerr, W., 2016. Transition to clean technology. Journal of Political Economy 124, 52–104.Google Scholar
ADBA, 2020. Biomethane: The Pathway to 2030. Anaerobic Digestion and Bioresources Association, London.Google Scholar
Adelle, C. and Russel, D., 2013. Climate policy integration: A case of déjà vu? Environmental Policy and Governance 23, 1–12.Google Scholar
AEA, 2012. RHI Phase II – Technology assumptions: Key technical assumptions for selected technologies. Report for DECC, AEA/R/ED57097, Issue 3.Google Scholar
AECOM, 2011. Study on public transport smartcard. Final report for DG Move at the European Commission.Google Scholar
Akyelken, N., Banister, D., and Givoni, M., 2018. The sustainability of shared mobility in London: The dilemma for governance. Sustainability 10, 420.Google Scholar
Alcott, B., 2007. The sufficiency strategy: Would rich-world frugality lower environmental impact? Ecological Economics 64, 770–786.Google Scholar
Aldred, R., 2012. Governing transport from welfare state to hollow state: The case of cycling in the UK. Transport Policy 23, 95–102.Google Scholar
Aldred, R. and Jungnickel, K., 2014. Why culture matters for transport policy: The case of cycling in the UK. Journal of Transport Geography 34, 78–87.Google Scholar
Alexander, B., Dijst, M., and Ettema, D., 2010. Working from 9 to 6? An analysis of in-home and out-of-home working schedules. Transportation 37, 505–523.Google Scholar
Alexander, J. C., 2003. The Meanings of Social Life: A Cultural Sociology. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Aman, M. M., Jasmon, G. B., Mokhlis, H., and Bakar, A. H. A., 2013. Analysis of the performance of domestic lighting lamps. Energy Policy 52, 482–500.Google Scholar
Ambrose, J. and Vinter, R., 2021. Nissan sets out plans for £1bn electric car hub in Sunderland. The Guardian. www.theguardian.com/business/2021/jul/01/nissan-sets-out-plans-for-1bn-electric-car-hub-in-sunderlandGoogle Scholar
Ambrosio-Albalá, P., Upham, P., and Bale, C. S. E., 2019. Purely ornamental? Public perceptions of distributed energy storage in the United Kingdom. Energy Research & Social Science 48, 139–150.Google Scholar
AMDEA, 2014. Promoting Highly Efficient Electrical Appliances. Association of Manufacturers of Domestic Appliances, London.Google Scholar
Aminzade, R., 1992. Historical sociology and time. Sociological Methods and Research 20, 456–480.Google Scholar
Andersen, A. D., 2014. No transition without transmission: HVDC electricity infrastructure as an enabler for renewable energy? Environmental Innovation and Societal Transition 13, 75–95.Google Scholar
Andersen, A. D., Steen, M., Mäkitie, T., Hanson, J., Thune, T. M., and Soppe, B., 2020. The role of inter-sectoral dynamics in sustainability transitions: A comment on the transitions research agenda. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 34, 348–351.Google Scholar
Anderson, P. and Tushman, M. L., 1990. Technological discontinuities and dominant designs: A cyclical model of technological change. Administrative Science Quarterly 35, 604–633.Google Scholar
Arapostathis, S., Carlsson-Hyslop, A., Pearson, P. J. G., Thornton, J., Gradillas, M., Laczay, S., et al., 2013. Governing transitions: Cases and insights from two periods in the history of the UK gas industry. Energy Policy 52, 25–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.08.016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arapostathis, S., Pearson, P. J. G., and Foxon, T. J., 2014. UK natural gas system integration in the making, 1960–2010: Complexity, transitional uncertainties and uncertain transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 11, 87–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2014.01.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arbib, J. and Sebat, T., 2017. Rethinking Transportation 2020–2030: The Disruption of Transportation and the Collapse of the Internal Combustion Vehicle and Oil Industries. RethinkX.Google Scholar
Archer, T. and Cole, I., 2014. Still not plannable? Housing supply and the changing structure of the housebuilding industry in the UK in ‘austere’ times. People, Place and Policy 8, 97–112. https://doi.org/10.3351/ppp.0008.0002.0002Google Scholar
Arthur, W. B., 1989. Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events. The Economic Journal 99, 116–131.Google Scholar
Arthur, W. B., 1988. Competing technologies: An overview, in: Dosi, G., Freeman, C., Nelson, R., Silverberg, G., and Soete, L. (Eds.), Technical Change and Economic Theory. Pinter, London, pp. 590–607.Google Scholar
Audenaert, A., De Clyn, S. H., and Vankerckhove, B., 2008. Economic analysis of passive houses and low-energy house compared with standard houses. Energy Policy 36, 47–55.Google Scholar
Bailey, I., 2007. Market environmentalism, new environmental policy instruments, and climate change policy in the United Kingdom and Germany. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 97, 530–550.Google Scholar
Balcombe, P., Rigby, D., and Azapagic, A., 2014. Investigating the importance of motivations and barriers related to microgeneration uptake in the UK. Applied Energy 130, 403–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, C. Y. and Clark, K. B., 1997. Managing in an age of modularity. Harvard Business Review, September, pp. 84–93. https://hbr.org/1997/09/managing-in-an-age-of-modularityGoogle Scholar
Barlow, J., 1999. From craft production to mass customisation: Innovation requirements for the UK housebuilding industry. Housing Studies 14, 23–42.Google Scholar
Barnes, W., Gartland, M., and Stack, M., 2004. Old habits die hard: Path dependency and behavioral lock-in. Journal of Economic Issues 38, 371–377.Google Scholar
Barney, J. B., 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management 17, 99–120.Google Scholar
Barnham, K., 2014. The Burning Answer: A User’s Guide to the Solar Revolution. Orion Publishing Group, London.Google Scholar
Bastian, A., Börjesson, M., and Eliasson, J., 2017. Response to Wadud and Baierl: ‘Explaining “peak car” with economic variables: An observation’. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 95, 386–389.Google Scholar
Bastian, A., Börjesson, M., and Eliasson, J., 2016. Explaining ‘peak car’ with economic variables. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 88, 236–250.Google Scholar
Batel, S., 2018. A critical discussion of research on the social acceptance of renewable energy generation and associated infrastructures and an agenda for the future. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning 20, 356–369.Google Scholar
BBC, 2019. Smart meter roll-out delayed for four years. www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-49721436Google Scholar
BEIS, 2020a. Digest of UK Energy Statistics (DUKES). Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, London.Google Scholar
BEIS, 2020b. Future Support for Low Carbon Heat: Impact Assessment. Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, London.Google Scholar
BEIS, 2020c. Future Support for Low Carbon Heat: Consultation. Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, London.Google Scholar
BEIS, 2020d. Heat Networks: Building a Market Framework. Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy, London.Google Scholar
BEIS, 2019. Energy Consumption in the UK. Department of Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, London.Google Scholar
BEIS, 2018a. Clean Growth: Transforming Heating. Department of Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, London.Google Scholar
BEIS, 2018b. Digest of UK Energy Statistics (DUKES). Department of Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, London.Google Scholar
BEIS, 2017a. The Clean Growth Strategy: Leading the Way to a Low Carbon Future. Department of Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, London.Google Scholar
BEIS, 2017b. Energy Consumption in the UK. Department of Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, London.Google Scholar
Benford, R. D. and Snow, D. A., 2000. Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology 26, 611–639.Google Scholar
Bergek, A., Berggren, C., Magnusson, T., and Hobday, M., 2013. Technological discontinuities and the challenge for incumbent firms: Destruction, disruption or creative accumulation? Research Policy 42, 1210–1224.Google Scholar
Berggren, C., Magnusson, T., and Sushandoyo, D., 2015. Transition pathways revisited: Established firms as multi-level actors in the heavy vehicle industry. Research Policy 44, 1017–1028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.11.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergman, N., Schwanen, T., and Sovacool, B. K., 2017. Imagined people, behaviour and future mobility: Insights from visions of electric vehicles and car clubs in the United Kingdom. Transport Policy 59, 165–173.Google Scholar
Berkers, E. and Geels, F. W., 2011. System innovation through stepwise reconfiguration: The case of technological transitions in Dutch greenhouse horticulture (1930–1980). Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 23, 227–247.Google Scholar
Berkhout, F., Smith, A., and Stirling, A., 2004. Socio-technological regimes and transition contexts, in: Elzen, B., Geels, F. W., and Green, K. (Eds.), System Innovation and the Transition to Sustainability: Theory, Evidence and Policy. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp. 48–75.Google Scholar
BERR, 2007. Appraisal of Costs & Benefits of Smart Meter Roll Out Options. Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform, Brighton.Google Scholar
Beynon, H., Cam, S., Fairbrother, P., and Nichols, T., 2003. The Rise and Transformation of the UK Domestic Appliances Industry. Cardiff University School of Social Sciences, Working Paper 42.Google Scholar
Bidmon, C. M. and Knab, S. F., 2018. The three roles of business models in societal transitions: New linkages between business model and transition research. Journal of Cleaner Production 178, 903–916.Google Scholar
Blythe, P., 2004. Improving public transport ticketing through smart cards. Municipal Engineer 157, 47–54.Google Scholar
Boardman, B., 2007. Home Truths: A Low-Carbon Strategy to Reduce UK Housing Emissions by 80% by 2015. Environmental Change Institute, Oxford.Google Scholar
Boardman, B., 2004. Achieving energy efficiency through product policy: The UK experience. Environmental Science and Policy 7, 165–176.Google Scholar
Bobrova, Y., 2020. The adoption process of low-carbon home retrofits among UK homeowners: A socio-technical perspective and system dynamics model. University College London.Google Scholar
Bohnsack, R., Kolk, A., Pinkse, J., and Bidmon, C., 2020. Driving the electric bandwagon: The dynamics of incumbents’ sustainable product innovation. Business Strategy and the Environment 29, 727–743.Google Scholar
Boltanski, L. and Thévenot, L., 2006. On Justification: Economies of Worth. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Bolton, R. and Foxon, T. J., 2015. Infrastructure transformation as a socio-technical process: Implications for the governance of energy distribution networks in the UK. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 90, 538–550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.02.017Google Scholar
Bonfield, P., 2016. Each Home Counts: An Independent Review of Consumer Advice, Protection, Standards and Enforcement for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy and the Department for Communities and Local Government, London.Google Scholar
Borup, M., Brown, N., Konrad, K., and van Lente, H., 2006. The sociology of expectations in science and technology. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 18, 285–298.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P., 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge University Press, London.Google Scholar
Bowman, A., Folkman, P., Froud, J., Johal, S., Law, J., Leaver, A., et al., 2013. The Great Train Robbery: The Economic and Political Consequences of Rail Privatisation, Public Interest Report. Centre for Research on Socio-Cultural Change, Manchester University.Google Scholar
Bradshaw, M., Bridge, G., Bouzarovski, S., Watson, J., and Dutton, J., 2014. The UK’s Global Gas Challenge. Research Report. London.Google Scholar
Brand, C., Anable, J., Ketsopoulou, I., and Watson, J., 2020. Road to zero or road to nowhere? Disrupting transport and energy in a zero carbon world. Energy Policy 139, 111334.Google Scholar
Brand, C., Anable, J., and Tran, M., 2013. Accelerating the transformation to a low carbon passenger transport system: The role of car purchase taxes, feebates, road taxes and scrappage incentives in the UK. Transportation Research Part A 49, 132–148.Google Scholar
Broad, O., Hawker, G., and Dodds, P. E., 2020. Decarbonising the UK residential sector: The dependence of national abatement on flexible and local views of the future. Energy Policy 140, 111321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111321Google Scholar
Brown, D., 2018. Whole-house retrofit: The role of new business models, finance mechanisms, and their implications for policy. University of Sussex.Google Scholar
Brown, D., Kivimaa, P., and Sorrell, S., 2019. An energy leap? Business model innovation and intermediation in the ‘Energiesprong’ retrofit initiative. Energy Research and Social Science 58, 101253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.101253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, S., 2021. Uber drivers entitled to workers’ rights, UK supreme court rules. The Guardian. www.theguardian.com/technology/2021/feb/19/uber-drivers-workers-uk-supreme-court-rules-rightsGoogle Scholar
Caird, S., Roy, R., and Potter, S., 2012. Domestic heat pumps in the UK: User behaviour, satisfaction and performance. Energy Efficiency 5, 283–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053–012-9146-xGoogle Scholar
Campbell, P. and Inagaki, K., 2021. UK carmakers after Brexit: A race to attract battery production. Financial Times.Google Scholar
Campbell, P., Pfeifer, S., and Pooler, M., 2019. How the UK is falling behind in the global electric car race. Financial Times. www.ft.com/content/0e097085-5b80-4bc1-8c34-ec5df5be0accGoogle Scholar
Carter, N. and Jacobs, M., 2014. Explaining radical policy change: The case of climate change and energy policy under the British Labour Government 2006–10. Public Administration 92, 125–141.Google Scholar
Cary, R., 2010. Future Proof: An Electricity Network for the 21st Century. Green Alliance, London.Google Scholar
Cary, R. and Benton, D., 2012. Creating a Market for Electricity Savings: Paying for Energy Efficiency through the Energy Bill. Green Alliance, London.Google Scholar
CCC, 2021. Progress in Reducing Emissions: 2021 Report to Parliament. Committee on Climate Change, London.Google Scholar
CCC, 2020. Reducing UK Emissions: 2020 Progress Report to Parliament. Committee on Climate Change, London.Google Scholar
CCC, 2019a. Reducing UK Emissions: 2019 Progress Report to Parliament. Committee on Climate Change, London.Google Scholar
CCC, 2019b. Net Zero: The UK’s Contribution to Stopping Global Warming. Committee on Climate Change, London.Google Scholar
CCC, 2018a. Reducing UK Emissions 2018: Progress Report to Parliament. Committee on Climate Change, London.Google Scholar
CCC, 2015. Meeting Carbon Budgets: Progress in Reducing the UK’s Emissions 2015 Report to Parliament. Committee on Climate Change, London.Google Scholar
CCC, 2013. Meeting Carbon Budgets: 2013 Progress Report to Parliament. Committee on Climate Change, London.Google Scholar
CCC, 2010. The Fourth Carbon Budget: Reducing Emissions through the 2020s. Committee on Climate Change, London.Google Scholar
Chandler, A. D., 2001. Inventing the Electronic Century: The Epic Story of the Consumer Electronics and Computer Industries. The Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
Chappells, H. and Shove, E., 2005. Debating the future of comfort: Environmental sustainability, energy consumption and the indoor environment. Building Research and Information 33, 32–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/0961321042000322762Google Scholar
Chaudry, M., Abeysekera, M., Hosseini, S. H. R., Jenkins, N., and Wu, J., 2015. Uncertainties in decarbonising heat in the UK. Energy Policy 87, 623–640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.07.019Google Scholar
Chenari, B., Dias Carrilho, J., and Gameiro da Silva, M., 2016. Towards sustainable, energy-efficient and healthy ventilation strategies in buildings: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 59, 1426–1447.Google Scholar
Cherp, A., Vinichenko, V., Jewell, J., Brutschin, E., and Sovacool, B., 2018. Integrating techno-economic, socio-technical and political perspectives on national energy transitions: A meta-theoretical framework. Energy Research and Social Science 37, 175–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.09.015Google Scholar
Christensen, C., 1997. The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Harvard Business School Press, Boston.Google Scholar
Christensen, C. M., Kaufman, S. P., and Shih, W. C., 2008. Innovation killers: How financial tools destroy our capacity to do new things. Harvard Business Review 86, 98–105.Google Scholar
Christoff, P., 1996. Ecological modernisation, ecological modernities. Environmental Politics 5, 476–500.Google Scholar
Ciplet, D. and Harrison, J. L., 2020. Transition tensions: Mapping conflicts in movements for a just and sustainable transition. Environmental Politics 29, 435–456.Google Scholar
CIVITAS, 2016. Mobility-as-a-Service: A New Transport Model. Civitas: The Institute for the Study of Civil Society, London.Google Scholar
Coenen, L., Benneworth, P., and Truffer, B., 2012. Toward a spatial perspective on sustainability transitions. Research Policy 41, 968–979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.014Google Scholar
Cohen-Blankshtain, G. and Rotem-Mindali, O., 2016. Key research themes on ICT and sustainable urban mobility. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation 10, 9–17.Google Scholar
Colli, E., 2020. Towards a mobility transition? Understanding the environmental impact of Millennials and Baby Boomers in Europe. Travel Behaviour and Society 20, 273–289.Google Scholar
Conebi, 2017. European Bicycle Market. Confederation of the European Bicycle Industry. Brussels. https://issuu.com/conebi/docs/20170713_european_bicyle_industry_aGoogle Scholar
Connor, P. M., Axon, C. J., Xenias, N., and Balta-Ozkan, N., 2018. Sources of risk and uncertainty in UK smart grid deployment: An expert stakeholder analysis. Energy 161, 1–9.Google Scholar
Connor, P. M., Xie, L., Lowes, R., Britton, J., and Richardson, T., 2015. The development of renewable heating policy in the United Kingdom. Renewable Energy 75, 733–744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2014.10.056Google Scholar
Cotton, M. and Devine-Wright, P., 2013. Putting pylons into place: A UK case study of public perspectives on the impacts of high voltage overhead transmission lines. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 56, 1225–1245.Google Scholar
Cotton, M. and Devine-Wright, P., 2012. Making electricity networks ‘visible’: Industry actor representations of ‘publics’ and public engagement in infrastructure planning. Public Understanding of Science 21, 17–35.Google Scholar
Cowie, J., 2002. Acquisition, efficiency and scale economies: An analysis of the British bus industry. Transport Reviews 22, 147–157.Google Scholar
Cramer, J. and Krueger, A. B., 2016. Disruptive change in the taxi business: The case of Uber. American Economic Review 106, 177–182.Google Scholar
Crosbie, T., 2008. Household energy consumption and consumer electronics: The case of television. Energy Policy 36, 2191–2199.Google Scholar
Cullen, J. M. and Allwood, J. M., 2010. The efficient use of energy: Tracing the global flow of energy from fuel to service. Energy Policy 38, 75–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.08.054Google Scholar
Currie, G. and Wallis, I., 2008. Effective ways to grow urban bus markets: A synthesis of evidence. Journal of Transport Geography 16, 419–429.Google Scholar
Cyert, R. and March, J., 1963. A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
Dangerman, A. J. and Schellnhuber, H. J., 2013. Energy systems transformation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110, 549–558.Google Scholar
Darby, S., 2006. The effectiveness of feedback on energy consumption: A review for DEFRA of the literature on metering, billing and direct displays. Oxford.Google Scholar
Darby, S. J. and McKenna, E., 2012. Social implications of residential demand response in cool temperate climates. Energy Policy 49, 759–769.Google Scholar
Darnhofer, I., D’Amico, S., and Fouilleux, E., 2019. A relational perspective on the dynamics of the organic sector in Austria, Italy, and France. Journal of Rural Studies. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2018.12.002Google Scholar
Daunton, M. J., 1987. A Property-Owning Democracy? Housing in Britain. Faber & Faber, London.Google Scholar
Davis, G. F. and Marquis, D., 2005. Prospects for organization theory in the early twenty-first century: Institutional fields and mechanisms. Organization Science 16, 332–343.Google Scholar
DCLG, 2017. Fixing our Broken Housing Market. Department for Communities and Local Government, London.Google Scholar
De Boer, M. A. H. and Caprotti, F., 2017. Getting Londoners on two wheels: A comparative approach analysing London’s potential pathways to a cycling transition. Sustainable Cities and Society 32, 613–626.Google Scholar
DECC, 2016. Energy Consumption in the UK. Department of Energy and Climate Change, London.Google Scholar
DECC, 2014a. Delivering UK Energy Investment. Department of Energy and Climate Change, London.Google Scholar
DECC, 2014b. Life Cycle Impacts of Biomass Electricity in 2020. Department of Energy and Climate Change, London.Google Scholar
DECC, 2014c. UK Solar PV Strategy Part 2: Delivering a Brighter Future. Department of Energy and Climate Change, London.Google Scholar
DECC, 2014d. Impact Assessment of Smart Meter Roll-Out for the Domestic and Small and Medium Non-Domestic Sectors. Department of Energy and Climate Change, London.Google Scholar
DECC, 2014e. Community Energy Strategy: People Powering Change. Department of Energy and Climate Change, London.Google Scholar
DECC, 2013a. UK Solar PV Strategy Part 1: Roadmap to a Brighter Future. Department of Energy and Climate Change, London.Google Scholar
DECC, 2013b. The Future of Heating: Meeting the Challenge. Department of Energy and Climate Change, London.Google Scholar
DECC, 2013c. United Kingdom Housing Energy Fact File. Department of Energy and Climate Change, London.Google Scholar
DECC, 2013d. Summary Evidence on District Heating Networks in the UK. Department of Energy and Climate Change, London.Google Scholar
DECC, 2013e. Research into Barriers to Deployment of District Heating Networks. Department of Energy and Climate Change, London.Google Scholar
DECC, 2012a. The Energy Efficiency Strategy: The Energy Efficiency Opportunity in the UK: Strategy and Annexes. Department of Energy and Climate Change, London.Google Scholar
DECC, 2012c. United Kingdom Housing Energy Fact File. Department of Energy and Climate Change, London.Google Scholar
DECC, 2012d. The Future of Heating: A Strategic Framework for Low Carbon Heat in the UK. Department of Energy and Climate Change, London.Google Scholar
DECC, 2011a. UK Renewable Energy Roadmap. Department of Energy and Climate Change, London.Google Scholar
DECC, 2009. The UK Low Carbon Transition Plan: National Strategy for Climate and Energy. Department of Energy and Climate Change, London.Google Scholar
DEFRA, 2020. Crops Grown for Bioenergy in the UK: 2019. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, London.Google Scholar
DEFRA, 2009. Saving Energy through Better Products and Appliances: A Report on Analysis, Aims and Indicative Standards for Energy Efficient Products 2009–2030. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, London.Google Scholar
Delbosc, A., 2016. Delay or forgo? A closer look at youth driver licensing trends in the United States and Australia. Transportation 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116–016-9685-7Google Scholar
DfT, 2021a. Decarbonising Transport: A Better, Greener Britain. Department for Transport, London.Google Scholar
DfT, 2021b. Great British Railways: Williams-Shapps Plan for Rail. Department for Transport, London.Google Scholar
DfT, 2021c. Bus Back Better: National Bus Strategy for England. Department for Transport, London.Google Scholar
DfT, 2021d. Road Traffic Estimates Great Britain 2020. Department for Transport, London.Google Scholar
DfT, 2020a. Decarbonising Transport: Setting the Challenge. Department for Transport, London.Google Scholar
DfT, 2020b. Gear Change: A Bold Vision for Cycling and Walking. Department for Transport, London.Google Scholar
DfT, 2020c. Reported Road Casualties in Great Britain: 2019 Annual Report. Department for Transport, London.Google Scholar
DfT, 2020d. Renewable Fuel Statistics 2019 Final Report. Department for Transport, London.Google Scholar
DfT, 2019b. Code of Practice: Automated Vehicle Trialing. Department for Transport, London.Google Scholar
DfT, 2019c. Transport Statistics Great Britain 2019: Moving Britain Ahead. Department for Transport, London.Google Scholar
DfT, 2018a. Analyses from the National Travel Survey. Department for Transport, London.Google Scholar
DfT, 2018b. The Road to Zero: Next Steps towards Cleaner Road Transport and Delivering Our Industrial Strategy. Department for Transport, London.Google Scholar
DfT, 2015a. The Pathway to Driverless Cars: Summary Report and Action Plan. Department for Transport, London.Google Scholar
DfT, 2015b. The Pathway to Driverless Cars: A Code of Practice for Testing. Department for Transport, London.Google Scholar
DfT, 2013. Door to Door: A Strategy for Improving Sustainable Transport Integration. Department for Transport, London.Google Scholar
Di Gregorio, M., Nurrochmat, D. R., Paavola, J., Sari, I. M., Fatorelli, L., Pramova, E., et al., 2017. Climate policy integration in the land use sector: Mitigation, adaptation and sustainable development linkages. Environmental Science & Policy 67, 35–43.Google Scholar
Diercks, G., 2018. Lost in translation: How legacy limits the OECD in promoting new policy mixes for sustainability transitions. Research Policy 48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.09.002Google Scholar
Dijk, M., Orsato, R. J., and Kemp, R., 2013. The emergence of an electric mobility trajectory. Energy Policy 52, 135–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.04.024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dijk, M., Wells, P., and Kemp, R., 2016. Will the momentum of the electric car last? Testing an hypothesis on disruptive innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 105, 77–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.01.013Google Scholar
Dosi, G., 1982. Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Research Policy 11, 147–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(82)90016-6Google Scholar
Doty, D. H., Glick, W. H., and Huber, G. P., 1993. Fit, equifinality, and organizational effectiveness: A test of two configurational theories. Academy of Management Journal 36, 1196–1250.Google Scholar
Dowson, M., Poole, A., Harrison, D., and Susman, G., 2012. Domestic UK retrofit challenge: Barriers, incentives and current performance leading into the Green Deal. Energy Policy 50, 294–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.07.019Google Scholar
Dubois, G., Sovacool, B., Aall, C., Nilsson, M., Barbier, C., Herrmann, A., et al., 2019. It starts at home? Climate policies targeting household consumption and behavioral decisions are key to low-carbon futures. Energy Research and Social Science 52, 144–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.02.001Google Scholar
Dupont, C., 2016. Climate Policy Integration into EU Energy Policy: Progress and Prospects. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Eadson, W., 2016. State enrolment and energy-carbon transitions: Syndromic experimentation and atomisation in England. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 34, 1612–1631.Google Scholar
EC, 2019. The European Green Deal, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, COM(2019) 640 final, Brussels, 11.12.2019.Google Scholar
EC, 2018. A Clean Planet for all: A European strategic long-term vision for a prosperous, modern, competitive and climate neutral economy, COM(2018) 773 final. Brussels.Google Scholar
Ecofys, 2014. Overview of UK Biofuel Producers: Input to Post-Implementation Review, Report for Department for Transport.Google Scholar
Edmondson, D. L., Rogge, K. S., and Kern, F., 2020. Zero carbon homes in the UK? Analysing the co-evolution of policy mix and socio-technical system. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 35, 135–161.Google Scholar
EEA, 2019a. Sustainability Transitions: Policy and Practice. European Environment Agency, Copenhagen. https://doi.org/10.2800/641030Google Scholar
EEA, 2019b. The European Environment – State and Outlook 2020: Knowledge for Transition to a Sustainable Europe. European Environment Agency, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
EEA, 2018. Perspectives on Transitions to Sustainability, EEA Report 25/2017. European Environment Agency, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
EEA, 2017. Food in a Green Light: A Systems Approach to Sustainable Food. European Environment Agency, Copenhagen. https://doi.org/10.2800/884986Google Scholar
EEA, 2016. Sustainability Transitions: Now for the Long Term. European Environment Agency, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
EHPA, 2018. Heat pumps: Integrating technologies to decarbonise heating and cooling. European Heat Pump Association.Google Scholar
Ellis, G., Cowell, R., Warren, C., Strachan, P., and Szarka, J., 2009. Expanding wind power: A problem of planning, or of perception? Planning Theory & Practice 10, 521–547.Google Scholar
Elzen, B., Geels, F. W., and Green, K., 2004. System Innovation and the Transition to Sustainability: Theory, Evidence and Policy. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.Google Scholar
ENA, 2020a. Gas Goes Green: Delivering the Pathway to Net Zero. Energy Networks Association.Google Scholar
ENA, 2020b. Gas Goes Green: Britain’s Hydrogen Network Plan. Energy Networks Association.Google Scholar
ENA, 2018. Secure, affordable, low carbon: Gas in our future energy system. Energy Networks Association.Google Scholar
Energy Transitions Commission, 2017. Better Energy, Greater Prosperity: Achievable Pathways to Low-Carbon Energy Systems.Google Scholar
Energy Transitions Commission, 2016. Shaping Energy Transitions: Position Paper of the Energy Transitions Commission.Google Scholar
ENSG, 2012. Our Electricity Transmission Network: A Vision for 2020. Electricity Networks Strategy Group, London.Google Scholar
Environmental Audit Committee, 2021. Energy Efficiency of Existing Homes, Fourth Report of Session 2019–2021. House of Commons Environmental Audit Committee.Google Scholar
EST, 2011. The Elephant in the Living Room: How Our Appliances and Gadgets Are Trampling the Green Dream. Energy Saving Trust, London.Google Scholar
Evans, D. M. and Mylan, J., 2019. Market coordination and the making of conventions: Qualities, consumption and sustainability in the agro-food industry. Economy and Society 48, 426–449.Google Scholar
Eyre, N. and Baruah, P., 2015. Uncertainties in future energy demand in UK residential heating. Energy Policy, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.12.030Google Scholar
Fagella, D., 2020. Self-driving car timeline from 11 top automakers [WWW Document]. VentureBeat website. URL https://emerj.com/ai-adoption-timelines/self-driving-car-timeline-themselves-top-11-automakers/ (accessed 14 March 2020).Google Scholar
Fagnant, D. J. and Kockelman, K., 2015. Preparing a nation for autonomous vehicles: Opportunities, barriers and policy recommendations. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 77, 167–181.Google Scholar
Fairclough, N., 1995. Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. Longman, London.Google Scholar
Faisal, A., Yigitcanlar, T., Kamruzzaman, M., and Currie, G., 2019. Understanding autonomous vehicles: A systematic literature review on capability, impact, planning and policy. Journal of Transport and Land Use 12, 45–72.Google Scholar
Falleti, T. G., 2016. Process tracing of extensive and intensive processes. New Political Economy 21, 455–462. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2015.1135550Google Scholar
Felstead, A., 2012. Rapid change or slow evolution? Changing places of work and their consequences in the UK. Journal of Transport Geography 21, 31–38.Google Scholar
Feola, G., 2015. Societal transformation in response to global environmental change: A review of emerging concepts. Ambio 44, 376–390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280–014-0582-zGoogle Scholar
Feola, G. and Nunes, R., 2014. Success and failure of grassroots innovations for addressing climate change: The case of the transition movement. Global Environmental Change 24, 232–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.11.011Google Scholar
Finnish Transport Agency, 2015. Maas Services and business opportunities, Research report of the Finnish Transport Agency 56/2015. Helsinki.Google Scholar
Fiorentini, M., 2013. Solar Thermal UK 2013 A Multi-Client Study. BSRIA Limited Consultancy, Preston.Google Scholar
Firestone, J., Bates, A. W., and Prefer, A., 2018. Power transmission: Where the offshore wind energy comes home. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 29, 90–99.Google Scholar
Fiss, P. C., Marx, A., and Cambre, B. (Eds.), 2013. Configurational Theory and Methods in Organizational Research. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley.Google Scholar
Fligstein, N. and McAdam, D., 2012. A Theory of Fields. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Flynn, R., Bellaby, P., and Ricci, M., 2009. The ‘value-action gap’ in public attitudes towards sustainable energy: The case of hydrogen energy. The Sociological Review 57, 159–180.Google Scholar
Fontaras, G., Zacharof, N.-G., and Ciuffo, B., 2017. Fuel consumption and CO2 emissions from passenger cars in Europe Laboratory versus real-world emissions. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science 60, 97–131.Google Scholar
Foxon, T. J. and Pearson, P. J. G., 2007. Towards improved policy processes for promoting innovation in renewable electricity technologies in the UK. Energy Policy 35, 1539–1550.Google Scholar
Franceschini, S. and Alkemade, F., 2016. Non-disruptive regime changes: The case of competing energy efficient lighting trajectories. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 21, 56–68.Google Scholar
Franceschini, S., Borup, M., and Rosales-Carreón, J., 2018. Future indoor light and associated energy consumption based on professionals’ visions: A practice- and network-oriented analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 129, 1–11.Google Scholar
Fridahl, M. and Lehtveer, M., 2018. Bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS): Global potential, investment preferences, and deployment barriers. Energy Research & Social Science 42, 155–165.Google Scholar
Fu, M., Kelly, J. A., Clinch, J. P., and King, F., 2012. Environmental policy implications of working from home: Modelling the impacts of land-use, infrastructure and socio-demographics. Energy Policy 47, 416–423.Google Scholar
Fuchs, D. and Lorek, S., 2005. Sustainable consumption governance: A history of promises and failures. Journal of Consumer Policy 28, 261–288.Google Scholar
Fuenfschilling, L. and Truffer, B., 2014. The structuration of socio-technical regimes: Conceptual foundations from institutional theory. Research Policy 43, 772–791.Google Scholar
Gardiner, D., Schmidt, O., Heptonstall, P., Gross, R., and Staffel, I., 2020. Quantifying the impact of policy on the investment case for residential electricity storage in the UK. Journal of Energy Storage 27, 101140.Google Scholar
Garikapati, V. M., Pendyala, R. M., Morris, E. A., and Mokhtarian, P. L., 2016. Activity patterns, time use, and travel of millennials: A generation in transition? Transport Reviews 36, 558–584.Google Scholar
Gas Safe Register, 2017. The decade review: The UK gas industry considers its past, present and future.Google Scholar
Gavetti, G., 2005. Cognition and hierarchy: Rethinking the microfoundations of capabilities’ development. Organization Science 16, 599–617.Google Scholar
Gavetti, G. and Rivkin, J. W., 2007. On the origin of strategy: Action and cognition over time. Organization Science 18, 420–439.Google Scholar
Geels, F. W., 2021. From leadership to followership: A suggestion for interdisciplinary theorising of mainstream actor reorientation in sustainability transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 41, 45–48.Google Scholar
Geels, F. W., 2020a. Transformative innovation and socio-technical transitions to address grand challenges, in: Science, Research and Innovation Performance of the EU 2020: A Fair, Green and Digital Europe. DG Research and Innovation. European Commission, Brussels, pp. 572–607.Google Scholar
Geels, F. W., 2020b. Micro-foundations of the Multi-Level Perspective on socio-technical transitions: Developing a multi-dimensional model of agency through crossovers between social constructivism, evolutionary economics and neo-institutional theory. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 152.Google Scholar
Geels, F. W., 2019. Socio-technical transitions to sustainability: A review of criticisms and elaborations of the Multi-Level Perspective. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 39, 187–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2019.06.009Google Scholar
Geels, F. W., 2018a. Disruption and low-carbon system transformation: Progress and new challenges in socio-technical transitions research and the Multi-Level Perspective. Energy Research and Social Science 37, 224–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.10.010Google Scholar
Geels, F. W., 2018b. Low-carbon transition via system reconfiguration? A socio-technical whole system analysis of passenger mobility in Great Britain (1990–2016). Energy Research and Social Science 46, 86–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.07.008Google Scholar
Geels, F. W., 2014. Regime resistance against low-carbon transitions: Introducing politics and power into the Multi-Level Perspective. Theory, Culture & Society 31, 21–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276414531627Google Scholar
Geels, F. W., 2012. A socio-technical analysis of low-carbon transitions: Introducing the multi-level perspective into transport studies. Journal of Transport Geography 24, 471–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.01.021Google Scholar
Geels, F. W., 2007a. Analysing the breakthrough of rock ‘n’ roll (1930–1970): Multi-regime interaction and reconfiguration in the multi-level perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 74, 1411–1431.Google Scholar
Geels, F. W., 2007b. Transformations of large technical systems: A multi-level analysis of the Dutch highway system (1950–2000). Science Technology & Human Values 32, 123–149.Google Scholar
Geels, F. W., 2005. Technological Transitions and System Innovations: A Co-evolutionary and Socio-Technical Analysis. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.Google Scholar
Geels, F. W., 2004. From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory. Research Policy 33, 897–920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.01.015Google Scholar
Geels, F. W., 2002. Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy 31, 1257–1274. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048–7333(02)00062-8Google Scholar
Geels, F. W., Berkhout, F., and van Vuuren, D. P., 2016a. Bridging analytical approaches for low-carbon transitions. Nature Climate Change 6, 576–583. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2980Google Scholar
Geels, F. W., and Deuten, J. J., 2006. Local and global dynamics in technological development: A socio-cognitive perspective on knowledge flows and lessons from reinforced concrete. Science and Public Policy 33, 265–275.Google Scholar
Geels, F. W., Kern, F., Fuchs, G., Hinderer, N., Kungl, G., Mylan, J., et al., 2016b. The enactment of socio-technical transition pathways: A reformulated typology and a comparative multi-level analysis of the German and UK low-carbon electricity transitions (1990–2014). Research Policy 45, 896–913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.01.015Google Scholar
Geels, F. W., McMeekin, A., Mylan, J., and Southerton, D., 2015. A critical appraisal of Sustainable Consumption and Production research: The reformist, revolutionary and reconfiguration positions. Global Environmental Change 34, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.04.013Google Scholar
Geels, F. W. and Penna, C. C. R., 2015. Societal problems and industry reorientation: Elaborating the Dialectic Issue LifeCycle (DILC) model and a case study of car safety in the USA (1900–1995). Research Policy 44, 67–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.09.006Google Scholar
Geels, F. W., Pieters, T., and Snelders, S., 2007. Cultural enthusiasm, resistance and the societal embedding of new technologies: Psychotropic drugs in the 20th century. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 19, 145–165.Google Scholar
Geels, F. W., Sareen, S., Hook, A., and Sovacool, B. K., 2021. Navigating implementation dilemmas in technology-forcing policies: Insights from a comparative analysis of accelerated smart meter diffusion in the Netherlands, UK, Norway, and Portugal (2000–2019). Research Policy 50, 104–272.Google Scholar
Geels, F. W. and Schot, J., 2007. Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Research Policy 36, 399–417.Google Scholar
Geels, F. W. and Schot, J. W., 2010. Reflections: Process theory, causality and narrative explanation, in: Grin, J., Rotmans, J., Schot, J., Geels, F. W., and Loorbach, D. (Eds.), Transitions to Sustainable Development: New Directions in the Study of Long Term Transformative Change. Routledge, pp. 93–102.Google Scholar
Geels, F. W. and Smit, W. A., 2000. Failed technology futures: Pitfalls and lessons from a historical survey. Futures 32, 867–885.Google Scholar
Geels, F. W., Sovacool, B. K., Schwanen, T., and Sorrell, S., 2017. Sociotechnical transitions for deep decarbonization. Science 357, 1242–1244.Google Scholar
Geels, F. W. and Verhees, B., 2011. Cultural legitimacy and framing struggles in innovation journeys: A cultural-performative perspective and a case study of Dutch nuclear energy (1945–1986). Technological Forecasting and Social Change 78, 910–930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2010.12.004Google Scholar
George, A. L. and Bennett, A., 2004. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Gibbs, D. and O’Neill, K., 2015. Building a green economy? Sustainability transitions in the UK building sector. Geoforum 59, 133–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.12.004Google Scholar
Gillard, R., 2016. Unravelling the United Kingdom’s climate policy consensus: The power of ideas, discourse and institutions. Global Environmental Change 40, 26–36.Google Scholar
Global Alliance for the Future of Food, 2019. Beacons of Hope: Accelerating Transformations to Sustainable Food Systems.Google Scholar
Godoe, H., 2000. Innovation regimes, R&D and radical innovations in telecommunications. Research Policy 29, 1033–1046.Google Scholar
Goodwin, P. and van Dender, K., 2013. Peak car: Themes and issues. Transport Reviews 33, 243–254.Google Scholar
Göpel, M., 2016. The Great Mindshift: How a New Economic Paradigm and Sustainability Transformations go Hand in Hand. Springer, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gough, I., 2010. Economic crisis, climate change and the future of the welfare state. Twenty-First Century Society 5, 51–64.Google Scholar
Goulden, M., Ryley, T., and Dingwall, R., 2014. Beyond ‘predict and provide’: UK transport, the growth paradigm and climate change. Transport Policy 32, 139–147.Google Scholar
Government Office for Science, 2018. Mobility as a Service (MaaS) in the UK: Change and its implications, Report commissioned as part of the UK government’s Foresight Future of Mobility project. London.Google Scholar
Greening, B. and Azapagic, A., 2014. Domestic solar thermal water heating: A sustainable option for the UK? Renewable Energy 63, 23–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2013.07.048Google Scholar
Greening, B. and Azapagic, A., 2012. Domestic heat pumps: Life cycle environmental impacts and potential implications for the UK. Energy 39, 205–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2012.01.028Google Scholar
Greenwood, R. and Hinings, C. R., 1996. Understanding radical organizational change: Bringing together the old and the new institutionalism. The Academy of Management Review 21, 1022–1054.Google Scholar
Greenwood, R. and Hinings, C. R., 1993. Understanding strategic change: The contribution of archetypes. Academy of Management Journal 36, 1052–1081.Google Scholar
Gross, R. and Hanna, R., 2019. Path dependency in provision of domestic heating. Nature Energy 4, 358–364. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560–019-0383-5Google Scholar
Gross, R., Heptonstall, P., Greenacre, P., Candelise, C., Jones, F., and Castillo, A. C., 2013. Presenting the Future: An assessment of future costs estimation methodologies in the electricity generation sector, UKERC report. UK Energy Research Centre.Google Scholar
Grubb, M., 2014. Planetary Economics: Energy, Climate Change and the Three Domains of Sustainable Development. Routledge, Oxford.Google Scholar
Grubler, A., Wilson, C., and Nemet, G., 2016. Apples, oranges, and consistent comparisons of the temporal dynamics of energy transitions. Energy Research & Social Science 22, 18–25.Google Scholar
Grünewald, P. and Torriti, J., 2013. Demand response from the non-domestic sector: Early UK experiences and future opportunities. Energy Policy 61, 423–429.Google Scholar
Haddad, H., Lyons, G., and Chatterjee, K., 2009. An examination of determinants influencing the desire for and frequency of part-day and whole-day homeworking. Journal of Transport Geography 17, 124–133.Google Scholar
Hajer, M. and Versteeg, W., 2005. A decade of discourse analysis of environmental politics: Achievements, challenges, perspectives. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning 7, 175–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/15239080500339646Google Scholar
Hall, P., 2003. Aligning ontology and methodology in comparative research, in: Mahoney, J. and Rueschemeyer, D. (Eds.), Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 373–404.Google Scholar
Hall, P. A., 1993. Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: The case of economic policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics, 275–296.Google Scholar
Hall, P. A. and Soskice, D. (Eds.), 2001. Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Hand, M. and Shove, E., 2007. Condensing practices: Ways of living with a freezer. Journal of Consumer Culture 7, 79–104.Google Scholar
Hanmer, C. and Abram, S., 2017. Actors, networks, and translation hubs: Gas central heating as a rapid socio-technical transition in the United Kingdom. Energy Research & Social Science 34, 176–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.03.017Google Scholar
Hanna, R., Leach, M., and Torriti, J., 2018. Microgeneration: The installer perspective. Renewable Energy 116, 458–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.09.023Google Scholar
Hannon, M. J., 2015. Raising the temperature of the UK heat pump market: Learning lessons from Finland. Energy Policy 85, 369–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.06.016Google Scholar
Hardt, L., Barrett, J., Brockway, P., Foxon, T. J., Heun, M. K., Owen, A., et al., 2017. Outsourcing or efficiency? Investigating the decline in final energy consumption in the UK productive sectors. Energy Procedia 142, 2409–2414.Google Scholar
Hardt, L., Owen, A., Brockway, P., Heun, M. K., Barrett, J., Taylor, P. G., et al., 2018. Untangling the drivers of energy reduction in the UK productive sectors: Efficiency or offshoring? Applied Energy 223, 124–133.Google Scholar
Hargreaves, T., Hielscher, S., Seyfang, G., and Smith, A., 2013. Grassroots innovations in community energy: The role of intermediaries in niche development. Global Environmental Change 23, 868–880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.02.008Google Scholar
Hargreaves, T., Longhurst, N., and Seyfang, G., 2013. Up, down, round and round: Connecting regimes and practices in innovation for sustainability. Environment and Planning A 45, 402–420.Google Scholar
Harvey, M. and Pilgrim, S., 2013. Rudderless in a sea of yellow: The European political economy impasse for renewable transport energy. New Political Economy 18, 364–390.Google Scholar
Haubrich, D., 2001. UK rail privatisation five years down the line: An evaluation of nine policy objectives. Policy & Politics 29, 317–336.Google Scholar
Hawken, P., 2017. Drawdown: The Most Comprehensive Plan Ever Proposed to Reverse Global Warming. Tantor Media Inc.Google Scholar
Hawkey, D. and Webb, J., 2014. District energy development in liberalised markets: Situating UK heat network development in comparison with Dutch and Norwegian case studies. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 26, 1228–1241.Google Scholar
Haywood, R., 2007. Britain’s national railway network: Fit for purpose in the 21st century? Journal of Transport Geography 15, 198–216.Google Scholar
HBF, 2018. The Economic Footprint of House Building in England and Wales. Home Builders Federation.Google Scholar
Heat Pump Association, 2019. Delivering net zero: A roadmap for the role of heat pumps.Google Scholar
Heffernan, E., Pan, W., Liang, X., and de Wilde, P., 2015. Zero carbon homes: Perceptions from the UK construction industry. Energy Policy 79, 23–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.01.005Google Scholar
Henderson, R. M. and Clark, K. B., 1990. Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative Science Quarterly 35, 9–30.Google Scholar
Heptonstall, P., Gross, R., Greenacre, P., and Cockerill, T., 2012. The cost of offshore wind: Understanding the past and projecting the future. Energy Policy 4, 815–821.Google Scholar
Heracleous, L. and Marshak, R. J., 2004. Conceptualizing organizational discourse as situated symbolic action. Human Relations 57, 1285–1312.Google Scholar
Héretier, A., 2008. Causal explanation, in: Della Porta, D. M. and Keating, M. (Eds.), Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences: A Pluralist Perspective. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 61–79.Google Scholar
Hermwille, L., 2016. The role of narratives in socio-technical transitions: Fukushima and the energy regimes of Japan, Germany, and the United Kingdom. Energy Research and Social Science 11, 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2015.11.001Google Scholar
Hess, D.J., 2014. Sustainability transitions: A political coalition perspective. Research Policy 43, 278–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.10.008Google Scholar
Hewlett, J. G., 2005. De-regulated electric power markets and operating nuclear power plants: The case of British energy. Energy Policy 33, 2293–2297.Google Scholar
Hielscher, S. and Sovacool, B., 2018. Contested smart and low-carbon energy futures: Media discourses of smart meters in the United Kingdom. Journal of Cleaner Production 195, 978–990.Google Scholar
Hirsch, P. M. and Lounsbury, M., 1997. Ending the family quarrel: Toward a reconciliation of “old” and “new” institutionalisms. American Behavioral Scientist 40, 406–418.Google Scholar
Hirschhorn, F., Paulsson, A., Sorensen, C. H., and Veeneman, W., 2019. Public transport regimes and mobility as a service: Governance approaches in Amsterdam, Birmingham, and Helsinki. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 130, 178–191.Google Scholar
Hiteva, R. and Watson, K., 2019. Governance of interactions between infrastructure sectors: The making of smart grids in the UK. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 32, 140–152.Google Scholar
HM Government, 2018. Growing the Bioeconomy. Improving lives and strengthening our economy: A national bioeconomy strategy to 2030.Google Scholar
Hoffman, A. J., 1999. Institutional evolution and change: Environmentalism and the US chemical industry. Academy of Management Journal 42, 351–371.Google Scholar
Holden, E., Banister, D., Gössling, S., Gilpin, G., and Linnerud, K., 2020. Grand Narratives for sustainable mobility: A conceptual review. Energy Research & Social Science 65, 10145.Google Scholar
Hommels, A., 2005. Studying obduracy in the city: Toward a productive fusion between technology studies and urban studies. Science Technology and Human Values 30, 323–351. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243904271759Google Scholar
HoP, 2017. Decarbonising the Gas Network. POSTNote N°565. Houses of Parliament Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology.Google Scholar
Hope, A., Roberts, T., and Walker, I., 2018. Consumer engagement in low-carbon home energy in the United Kingdom: Implications for future energy system decentralization. Energy Research & Social Science 44, 362–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.05.032Google Scholar
Hopkins, D. and Schwanen, T., 2018. Automated mobility transitions: Governing processes in the UK. Sustainability 10, 956.Google Scholar
House of Lords Science and Technology Select Committee, 2017. Connected and Autonomous Vehicles: The Future? 2nd Report of Sessions 2016–17. HM Government, London.Google Scholar
Howarth, N. A. A. and Rosenow, J., 2014. Decision-making, institutional evolution and the phased ban of incandescent light bulbs. Energy Policy 67, 737–746.Google Scholar
Howlett, M. and Rayner, J., 2013. Patching vs packaging in policy formulation: Assessing policy portfolio design. Politics and Governance 1, 170–182.Google Scholar
Hughes, T. P., 1994. Technological momentum, in: Smith, M. R. and Marx, L. (Eds.), Does Technology Drive History? The Dilemma of Technological Determinism. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 101–113.Google Scholar
Hynes, M., 2016. Developing (tele)work? A multi-level sociotechnical perspective of telework in Ireland. Research in Transportation Economics 57, 21–31.Google Scholar
IEA, IRENA, 2017. Perspectives for the Energy Transition: Investment Needs for a Low-Carbon Energy System. International Energy Agency and International Renewable Energy Agency.Google Scholar
Institute for Government, 2021. Decarbonising heating at home: Learning from past successes and failures to improve energy policy making.Google Scholar
IoD, 2015. Not Too Clever: Will Smart Meters Be the Next Government IT Disaster? IoD policy document, Institute of Directors, London.Google Scholar
IPCC, 2021. Climate Change 2021 The Physical Science Basis: Working Group 1 Contribution to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.Google Scholar
IPCC, 2018. Global warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.Google Scholar
IPPR, 2013. Sustainable Consumption in the UK: A Selection of Case Studies. Institute for Public Policy Research, London.Google Scholar
IRENA, 2021. Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2020. International Renewable Energy Agency, Abu Dhabi.Google Scholar
Isoaho, K. and Markard, J., 2020. The politics of technology decline: Discursive struggles over coal phase-out in the UK. Review of Policy Research 37, 342–368. https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12370Google Scholar
Jackson, T. and Victor, P., 2011. Productivity and work in the ‘green economy’: Some theoretical reflections and empirical tests. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 1, 101–108.Google Scholar
Jamasb, T. and Pollitt, M., 2008. Liberalisation and R&D in network industries: The case of the electricity industry. Research Policy 37, 995–1008.Google Scholar
Jamasb, T. and Pollitt, M., 2007. Incentive regulation of electricity distribution networks: Lessons of experience from Britain. Energy Policy 35, 6163–6187.Google Scholar
Jamasb, T. and Pollitt, M. G., 2015. Why and how to subsidise energy R+D: Lessons from the collapse and recovery of electricity innovation in the UK. Energy Policy 83, 197–205.Google Scholar
Jenkins, N., Long, C., and Wu, J., 2015. An overview of the smart grid in Great Britain. Engineering 1, 413–421.Google Scholar
Jeswani, H. K., Whiting, A., and Azapagic, A., 2019. Environmental and Economic Sustainability of Biomass Heat in the UK. Energy Technology 1901044. https://doi.org/10.1002/ente.201901044Google Scholar
Johnstone, P. and Stirling, A., 2020. Comparing nuclear trajectories in Germany and the United Kingdom: From regimes to democracies in sociotechnical transitions and discontinuities. Energy Research and Social Science 59, 101–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.101245Google Scholar
Jolly, J., 2021a. UK slashes grants for electric car buyers while retaining petrol vehicle support. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/mar/18/uk-slashes-grants-for-electric-car-buyers-while-increasing-petrol-vehicle-supportGoogle Scholar
Jolly, J., 2021b. JLR to make Jaguar brand electric-only by 2025. The Guardian. www.theguardian.com/business/2021/feb/15/jlr-to-make-jaguar-brand-electric-only-by-2025Google Scholar
Jolly, J., 2020a. Polluting vehicles could be pulled from UK sale, say carmakers. The Guardian. www.theguardian.com/business/2020/jan/13/polluting-vehicles-could-be-pulled-from-uk-sale-say-carmakers#:~:text=Under%20new%20EU%20rules%2C%20average,designed%20to%20meet%20the%20goalGoogle Scholar
Jolly, J., 2020b. Electric cars “as cheap to manufacture” as regular models by 2024. The Guardian. www.theguardian.com/environment/2020/oct/21/electric-cars-as-cheap-to-manufacture-as-regular-models-by-2024Google Scholar
Jolly, J., 2020c. Toyota will not invest in electric cars in UK until after 2027. The Guardian. www.theguardian.com/business/2020/dec/07/toyota-will-not-invest-in-electric-cars-in-uk-until-at-least-2034Google Scholar
Jolly, S., Spodniak, P., and Raven, R. P. J. M., 2016. Institutional entrepreneurship in transforming energy systems towards sustainability: Wind energy in Finland and India. Energy Research and Social Science 17, 102–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2016.04.002Google Scholar
Jordan, A. and Lenschow, A., 2010. Environmental policy integration: A state of the art review. Environmental Policy and Governance 20, 147–158.Google Scholar
Jørgensen, U., 2012. Mapping and navigating transitions: The multi-level perspective compared with arenas of development. Research Policy 41, 996–1010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.001Google Scholar
JRC, 2020. Projecting Opportunities for INdustrial Transitions (POINT): Concepts, Rationales and Methodological Guidelines for Territorial Reviews of Industrial Transition. Joint Research Centre, European Commission, Ispra, Italy.Google Scholar
JRC, 2017. Smart Grid Projects Outlook 2017: Facts, Figures and Trends in Europe, EUR 28614 EN. Joint Research Centre, European Commission, Brussels.Google Scholar
Judson, E., Bell, S., Bulkeley, H., Powells, G., and Lyon, S., 2015. The co-construction of energy provision and everyday practice: Integrating heat pumps in social housing in England. Science and Technology Studies 28, 26–53.Google Scholar
Jupe, R., 2013. New development: Going off the rails? Rail franchising after the cancellation of the West Coast franchise competition. Public Money & Management 33, 337–341.Google Scholar
Kamargianni, M., Li, W., Matyas, M., and Schafer, A., 2016. A critical review of new mobility services for urban transport. Transportation Research Procedia 14, 3294–3303.Google Scholar
Kanger, L., Geels, F. W., Sovacool, B., and Schot, J., 2019. Technological diffusion as a process of societal embedding: Lessons from historical automobile transitions for future electric mobility. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 71, 47–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2018.11.012Google Scholar
Kannan, R. and Strachan, N., 2009. Modelling the UK residential energy sector under longterm decarbonisation scenarios: Comparison between energy systems and sectoral modelling approaches. Applied Energy 86, 416–428.Google Scholar
Karlsson, I. C. M., Mukhtar-Landgren, D., Smith, G., Koglin, T., Kronsell, A., Lund, E., et al., 2020. Development and implementation of Mobility-as-a-Service: A qualitative study of barriers and enabling factors. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 131, 283–295.Google Scholar
Karvonen, A. and Guy, S., 2018. Urban energy landscapes and the rise of heat networks in the United Kingdom. Journal of Urban Technology 25, 19–38.Google Scholar
Kay, D., Hill, N., and Newman, D., 2013. Powering Ahead: The Future of Low-Carbon Cars and Fuels. RAC Foundation.Google Scholar
Keay, M., 2016. UK energy policy: Stuck in ideological limbo? Energy Policy 94, 247–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.04.022Google Scholar
Kemp, R. and Van Lente, H., 2011. The dual challenge of sustainability transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 1, 121–124.Google Scholar
Kemp, R., Schot, J., and Hoogma, R., 1998. Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation: The approach of strategic niche management. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 10, 175–198.Google Scholar
Kern, F., 2011. Ideas, institutions, and interests: Explaining policy divergence in fostering “system innovations” towards sustainability. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 29, 1116–1134. https://doi.org/10.1068/c1142Google Scholar
Kern, F., Gaede, J., Meadowcroft, J., and Watson, J., 2016. The political economy of carbon capture and storage: An analysis of two demonstration projects. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 102, 250–260.Google Scholar
Kern, F. and Howlett, M., 2009. Implementing transition management as policy reforms: A case study of the Dutch energy sector. Policy Sciences 42, 391–408.Google Scholar
Kern, F., Kivimaa, P., and Martiskainen, M., 2017. Policy packaging or policy patching? The development of complex energy efficiency policy mixes. Energy Research & Social Science 23, 11–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2016.11.002Google Scholar
Kern, F., Kuzemko, C., and Mitchell, C., 2014a. Measuring and explaining policy paradigm change: The case of UK energy policy. Policy & Politics 42, 513–530.Google Scholar
Kern, F., Rogge, K. S., and Howlett, M., 2019. Policy mixes for sustainability transitions: New approaches and insights through bridging innovation and policy studies. Research Policy 48, 103832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.103832Google Scholar
Kern, F., Smith, A., Shaw, C., Raven, R., and Verhees, B., 2014b. From laggard to leader: Explaining offshore wind developments in the UK. Energy Policy 69, 635–646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.02.031Google Scholar
Kern, F., Verhees, B., Raven, R., and Smith, A., 2015. Empowering sustainable niches: Comparing UK and Dutch offshore wind developments. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 100, 344–355.Google Scholar
Kerr, N. and Winskel, M., 2020. Household investment in home energy retrofit: A review of the evidence on effective public policy design for privately owned homes. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 123, 109778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.109778Google Scholar
Ketchen, D. J., Thomas, J. B., and Snow, C. C., 1993. Organizational configurations and performance: A comparison of theoretical approaches. Academy of Management Journal 36, 1278–1313.Google Scholar
Khan, N. and Abas, N., 2011. Comparative study of energy saving light sources. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15, 296–309.Google Scholar
Kivimaa, P. and Martiskainen, M., 2018. Dynamics of policy change and intermediation: The arduous transition towards low-energy homes in the United Kingdom. Energy Research and Social Science 44, 83–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.04.032Google Scholar
Knowles, R. and Abrantes, P., 2008. Buses and light rail: Stalled en route?, in: Docherty, I. and Shaw, J. (Eds.), Traffic Jam: Ten Years of Sustainable Transport in the UK. Policy Press, Bristol, pp. 97–116.Google Scholar
Köhler, J., Geels, F. W., Kern, F., Markard, J., Wieczorek, A., Alkemade, F., et al., 2019. An agenda for sustainability transitions research: State of the art and future directions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 31, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.01.004Google Scholar
Kolk, A. and Pinkse, J., 2007. Multinationals’ political activities on climate change. Business & Society 46, 201–228.Google Scholar
Konrad, K., Truffer, B., and Voss, J., 2008. Multi-regime dynamics in the analysis of sectoral transformation potentials: Evidence from German utility sectors. Journal of Cleaner Production 16, 1190–1202.Google Scholar
Kopp, S. D., 2015. The UK Gas Market, in: Politics, Markets and EU Gas Supply Security. Case Studies of the UK and Germany. Springer VS, Wiesbaden, pp. 91–180.Google Scholar
KPMG, 2016. 2050 Energy Scenarios: The UK Gas Networks role in a 2050 whole energy system, for Energy Networks Association.Google Scholar
Kuzemko, C., 2016. Energy depoliticisation in the UK: Depoliticisation destroying political energy in the UK. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 18, 107–124. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-856X.12068Google Scholar
Kuzemko, C., 2014. Politicising UK energy: What “speaking energy security” can do. Policy & Politics 42, 259–274. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557312X655990Google Scholar
Laganakou, G., 2019. What feasible macro-scale interventions could stimulate a sustainable growth in the UK housing retrofit industry? An examination of the potential impact from supply-chain innovations on low energy retrofit of pre-1919 housing. University of Northampton.Google Scholar
Laker, L., 2021. Big rise in UK weekend cycling amid calls for more investment. The Guardian. www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2021/jul/22/big-rise-in-uk-weekend-cycling-amid-calls-for-more-investmentGoogle Scholar
Laker, L., 2020. Are the Tories really serious about supporting cycling? The Guardian. www.theguardian.com/environment/bike-blog/2020/may/11/this-could-be-the-time-to-usher-in-a-golden-age-for-cycling-in-britain#comment-140570965Google Scholar
Langendahl, P.-A., Roy, H., Potter, S., and Cook, M., 2019. Smoothing peaks and troughs: Intermediary practices to promote demand side response in smart grids. Energy Research & Social Science 58, 101277.Google Scholar
Langley, A., 1999. Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review 24, 691–710.Google Scholar
Langley, A., Smallman, C., Tsoukas, H., and van de Ven, A. H., 2013. Process studies of change in organization and management: Unveiling temporality, activity, and flow. Academy of Management Journal 56, 1–13.Google Scholar
Langridge, R. and Sealey, R., 2000. The demand for public transport: The effects of fares, quality of service, income and car ownership. Transport Policy 7, 105–115.Google Scholar
Lauber, V. and Jacobsson, S., 2016. The politics and economics of constructing, contesting and restricting socio-political space for renewables: The German Renewable Energy Act. Environmental Innovations and Societal Transitions 18, 147–163.Google Scholar
Laville, S., 2021. Less than 5% of green homes grant budget paid out, Labour reveals. The Guardian. www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/feb/06/government-green-homes-grant-budget-labourGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, T. B. and Phillips, N., 2004. From Moby Dick to Free Willy: Macro-cultural discourse and institutional entrepreneurship in emerging institutional fields. Organization 11, 689–711.Google Scholar
Le Quéré, C., Korsbakken, J. I., Wilson, C., Tosun, J., Andrew, R., Andres, R. J., et al., 2019. Drivers of declining CO2 emissions in 18 developed economies. Nature Climate Change 9, 213–217. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558–019-0419-7Google Scholar
Leadbeater, C. and Winhall, J., 2020. Building Better Systems: A Green Paper on System Innovation. Rockwool Foundation, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Lees, T. and Sexton, M., 2014. An evolutionary innovation perspective on the selection of low and zero-carbon technologies in new housing. Building Research and Information 42, 276–287.Google Scholar
Leveque, F. and Robertson, A., 2014. Future Heat Series. Part 1. Pathways for Heat: Low Carbon Heat for Buildings, A report by Carbon Connect.Google Scholar
Levinthal, D. A., 1998. The slow pace of rapid technological change: Gradualism and punctuation in technological change. Industrial and Corporate Change 7, 217–247.Google Scholar
Li, F. G. N. and Pye, S., 2018. Uncertainty, politics, and technology: Expert perceptions on energy transitions in the United Kingdom. Energy Research and Social Science 37, 122–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.10.003Google Scholar
Lie, M. and Sørensen, K. H. (Eds.), 1996. Making Technology Our Own: Domesticating Technology into Everyday Life. Scandinavian University Press, Oslo.Google Scholar
Lijphart, A., 2012. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
Lindblom, C. E., 1979. Still muddling, not yet through. Public Administration Review 39, 517–526.Google Scholar
Little, D., 2016. New Directions in the Philosophy of Social Science. Rowman & Littlefield International, Lanham, MD.Google Scholar
Lockwood, M., 2017. The Development of the Capacity Market for Electricity in Great Britain. EPG Working Paper 1702.Google Scholar
Lockwood, M., 2016. Creating protective space for innovation in electricity distribution networks in Great Britain: The politics of institutional change. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 18, 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2015.05.007Google Scholar
Lockwood, M., 2013. The political sustainability of climate policy: The case of the UK Climate Change Act. Global Environmental Change 23, 1339–1348.Google Scholar
Lockwood, M., Kuzemko, C., Mitchell, C., and Hoggett, R., 2017. Historical institutionalism and the politics of sustainable energy transitions: A research agenda. Environment and Planning C 35, 312–333.Google Scholar
Lockwood, M., Mitchell, C., and Hoggett, R., 2020. Incumbent lobbying as a barrier to forward-looking regulation: The case of demand-side response in the GB capacity market for electricity. Energy Policy 140, 111426.Google Scholar
Lovell, H., 2008. Discourse and innovation journeys: The case of low energy housing in the UK. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 20, 613–632.Google Scholar
Lovio, R. and Kivimaa, P., 2012. Comparing alternative path creation frameworks in the context of emerging biofuel fields in the Netherlands, Sweden and Finland. European Planning Studies 20, 773–790. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.667925Google Scholar
Lowes, R. and Woodman, B., 2020. Disruptive and uncertain: Policy makers’ perceptions on UK heat decarbonisation. Energy Policy 142, 111494.Google Scholar
Lowes, R., Woodman, B., and Clark, M., 2018. A transformation to sustainable heating in the UK : Risks and opportunities for UK heat sector businesses. Exeter.Google Scholar
Lowes, R., Woodman, B., and Fitch-Roy, O., 2019. Policy change, power and the development of Great Britain’s Renewable Heat Incentive. Energy Policy 131, 410–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.04.041Google Scholar
Lowes, R., Woodman, B., and Speirs, J., 2020. Heating in Great Britain: An incumbent discourse coalition resists an electrifying future. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 37, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2020.07.007Google Scholar
Lynch, H., 2014. Passivhaus in the UK: The challenges of an emerging market. A case study of innovation using mixed methods research. University College London.Google Scholar
Mahoney, J., 2000. Path dependence in historical sociology. Theory and Society 29, 507–548. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007113830879Google Scholar
Mallaburn, P. S. and Eyre, N., 2014. Lessons from energy efficiency policy and programmes in the UK from 1973 to 2013. Energy Efficiency 7, 23–41.Google Scholar
Maréchal, K., 2010. Not irrational but habitual: The importance of “behavioural lock-in” in energy consumption. Ecological Economics 69, 1104–1114.Google Scholar
Markard, J., 2018. The next phase of the energy transition and its implications for research and policy. Nature Energy. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560–018-0171-7Google Scholar
Markard, J. and Hoffmann, V. H., 2016. Analysis of complementarities: Framework and examples from the energy transition. Technological Forecasting & Social Change 111, 63–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.06.008Google Scholar
Markard, J., Suter, M., and Ingold, K., 2016. Socio-technical transitions and policy change: Advocacy coalitions in Swiss energy policy. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 18, 215–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2015.05.003Google Scholar
Markard, J., Wirth, S., and Truffer, B., 2016. Institutional dynamics and technology legitimacy: A framework and a case study on biogas technology. Research Policy 45, 330–344.Google Scholar
Marletto, G., 2014. Car and the city: Socio-technical transition pathways to 2030. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 87, 164–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.12.013Google Scholar
Marsden, G., Ferreira, A., Bache, I., Flinders, M., and Bartle, I., 2014. Muddling through with climate change targets: A multi-level governance perspective on the transport sector. Climate Policy 14, 617–636.Google Scholar
Martínez Arranz, A., 2017. Lessons from the past for sustainability transitions? A meta-analysis of socio-technical studies. Global Environmental Change 44, 125–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.03.007Google Scholar
Martinot, E. and Borg, N., 1998. Energy-efficient lighting programs: Experience and lessons from eight countries. Energy Policy 26, 1071–1081.Google Scholar
Martiskainen, M. and Kivimaa, P., 2019. Role of knowledge and policies as drivers for low-energy housing: Case studies from the United Kingdom. Journal of Cleaner Production 215, 1402–1414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.104Google Scholar
Martiskainen, M. and Kivimaa, P., 2018. Creating innovative zero carbon homes in the United Kingdom: Intermediaries and champions in building projects. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 26, 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2017.08.002Google Scholar
Mayer, A., 2018. A just transition for coal miners? Accountability frames, community economic identity, and just transition policy support among local policy actors. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transition 28, 1–13.Google Scholar
Mayntz, R., 2004. Mechanisms in the analysis of social macro-phenomena. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 34, 237–259.Google Scholar
Mazur, C., Contestabile, M., Offer, G. J., and Brandon, N. P., 2015. Assessing and comparing German and UK transition policies for electric mobility. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 14, 84–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2014.04.005Google Scholar
Mazur, C., Offer, G. J., Contestabile, M., and Brandon, N. B., 2018. Comparing the effects of vehicle automation, policy-making and changed user preferences on the uptake of electric cars and emissions from transport. Sustainability (Switzerland) 10, 4–6. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030676Google Scholar
McAdam, D. and Scott, W. R., 2005. Organizations and movements, in: Davis, G. F., McAdam, D., Scott, W. R., and Zald, M. N. (Eds.), Social Movements and Organization Theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 4–40.Google Scholar
McCann, P., 2016. The UK Regional (and National) Economic Problem: Geography, Globalisation and Governance. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
McDonald, R. C., 2015. Are millennials really the “Go-Nowhere” generation? Journal of the American Planning Association 81, 90–103.Google Scholar
McGee, M. C., 1980. The ‘ideograph’: A link between rhetoric and ideology. The Quarterly Journal of Speech 66, 1–16.Google Scholar
McGlade, C., Pye, S., Ekins, P., Bradshaw, M., and Watson, J., 2018. The future role of natural gas in the UK: A bridge to nowhere? Energy Policy 113, 454–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.11.022Google Scholar
McKinsey Global Institute, 2013. Disruptive technologies: Advances that will transform life, Business and the Global Economy. McKinsey Global Institute, New York.Google Scholar
McMeekin, A., Geels, F. W., and Hodson, M., 2019. Mapping the winds of whole system reconfiguration: Analysing low-carbon transformations across production, distribution and consumption in the UK electricity system (1990–2016). Research Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.12.007Google Scholar
McTigue, C., Monios, J., and Rye, T., 2018. Identifying barriers to implementation of local transport policy: An analysis of bus policy in Great Britain. Utilities Policy 50, 133–143.Google Scholar
McVeigh, K., 2017. Solar thermal in the UK: Opportunities and developments. Energy World, 30–31.Google Scholar
Meadowcroft, J., 2009. What about the politics? Sustainable development, transition management, and long term energy transitions. Policy Sciences 42, 323–340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077–009-9097-zGoogle Scholar
Meadowcroft, K., Stephens, J. C., Wilson, E. J., and Rowlands, I. H., 2018. Social dimensions of smart grid: Regional analysis in Canada and the United States. Introduction to special issue. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 82, 1909–1912.Google Scholar
Meadows, 2018. More than one million smart meters currently in “dumb” mode. The Telegraph. www.telegraph.co.uk/bills-and-utilities/gas-electric/one-million-smart-meters-currently-dumb-mode/Google Scholar
Meckling, J. and Allan, B. B., 2020. The evolution of ideas in global climate policy. Nature Climate Change 10, 434–438.Google Scholar
Meckling, J., Kelsey, N., Biber, E., and Zysman, J., 2015. Winning coalitions for climate policy. Science 349, 1170–1171.Google Scholar
Meckling, J., Sterner, T., and Wagner, G., 2017. Policy sequencing toward decarbonization. Nature Energy 2, 918–922.Google Scholar
Menanteau, P. and Lefebvre, H., 2000. Competing technologies and the diffusion of innovations: The emergence of energy-efficient lamps in the residential sector. Research Policy 29, 375–389.Google Scholar
Metz, D., 2013. Peak car and beyond: The fourth era of travel. Transport Reviews 33, 255–270.Google Scholar
Meyer, A. D., Tsui, A., and Hinings, C., 1993. Configurational approaches to organizational analysis. Academy of Management Journal 36, 1175–1195.Google Scholar
Decorte, M., Tessens, S., Francisco, F., Repullo, D., McCarthy, P., Oriordan, B., et al., 2020. D6.1: Mapping the state of play of renewable gases in Europe. REGATRACE project.Google Scholar
Millar, M.-A., Burnside, N. M., and Yu, Z., 2019. District heating challenges for the UK. Energies 12, 310.Google Scholar
Millard-Ball, A. and Schipper, L., 2011. Are we reaching peak travel? Trends in passenger transport in eight industrialized countries. Transport Reviews 31, 357–378.Google Scholar
Miller, D., 1990. Organizational configurations: Cohesion, change and prediction. Human Relations 43, 771–789.Google Scholar
Miller, J., 2019. Global car market shrinking at fastest rate since financial crisis. Financial Times. www.ft.com/content/b38adcac-169f-11ea-9ee4-11f260415385Google Scholar
Milovanoff, A., Posen, I. D., and MacLean, H. L., 2020. Electrification of light-duty vehicle fleet alone will not meet mitigation targets. Nature Climate Change 10, 1102–1107.Google Scholar
Mirzania, P., Ford, A., Andrews, D., Ofori, G., and Maidment, G., 2019. The impact of policy changes: The opportunities of Community Renewable Energy projects in the UK and the barriers they face. Energy Policy 129, 1282–1296.Google Scholar
Mitchell, C. and Connor, P. M., 2004. Renewable energy policy in the UK 1990–2003. Energy Policy 32, 1935–1947.Google Scholar
Mladenović, M. N., Stead, D., Milakis, D., Pangbourne, K., and Givoni, M., 2020. Governance cultures and sociotechnical imaginaries of self-driving vehicle technology: Comparative analysis of Finland, UK and Germany. Advances in Transport Policy and Planning 5, 235–262.Google Scholar
Mlecnik, , 2013. Innovation Development for Highly Energy-Efficient Housing: Opportunities and Challenges Related to the Adoption of Passive Houses. Delft University Press, Delft.Google Scholar
Monreal, A. C., McMeekin, A., and Southerton, D., 2016. Beyond acquisition: Exploring energy consumption through the appreciation and appropriation of domestic lighting in the UK. Sustainable Production and Consumption 7, 37–48.Google Scholar
Mora, L., Wu, X., and Panori, A., 2020. Mind the gap: Developments in autonomous driving research and the sustainability challenge. Journal of Cleaner Production 275, 124087.Google Scholar
Moran, M., 2003. The British Regulatory State: High Modernism and Hyper-Innovation. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Murray, J., 2021. Zero-carbon hydrogen injected into gas grid for first time in groundbreaking UK trial. The Guardian. www.theguardian.com/environment/2020/jan/24/hydrogen-uk-gas-grid-keele-universityGoogle Scholar
Mylan, J., 2017. The business of ‘behaviour change’: Analysing the consumer-oriented corporate sustainability journey of low-temperature laundry. Organization & Environment 30, 283–303.Google Scholar
Mylan, J., 2016. The directionality of desire in the economy of qualities: The case of retailers, refrigeration and re-constituted orange juice, in: Bulkeley, H., Paterson, M., and Stripple, J. (Eds.), Towards a Cultural Politics of Climate Change: Devices, Desires and Dissent. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 142–159.Google Scholar
Mylan, J., Geels, F. W., McMeekin, A., Gee, S., and Foster, C., 2015. Eco-innovation and retailers in UK milk, beef and bread chains: Enriching environmental supply chain management with insights from innovation studies. Journal of Cleaner Production 107, 20–30.Google Scholar
Mylan, J., Morris, C., Beech, E., and Geels, F. W., 2019. Rage against the regime: Niche-regime interactions in the societal embedding of plant-based milk. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 31, 233–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2018.11.001Google Scholar
Mylan, J. and Southerton, D., 2018. The social ordering of an everyday practice: The case of laundry. Sociology 52, 1134–1151.Google Scholar
NAO, 2018. Low-carbon heating of homes and businesses and the Renewable Heat Incentive.Google Scholar
Nelson, R. R. and Winter, S. G., 1982. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA; London.Google Scholar
Nemet, G., 2019. How Solar Energy Became Cheap: A Model for Low Carbon Innovation. Earthscan.Google Scholar
NESTA, 2013. Systems Innovation. National Endowment for Science, Technology and the Arts, London.Google Scholar
Newell, P., 2021. Power Shift: The Global Political Economy of Energy Transitions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Newell, P. and Paterson, M., 1998. Climate for business: Global warming, the State, and capital. Review of International Political Economy 5, 679–704.Google Scholar
Newman, P. and Kenworthy, J., 2011. ‘Peak car use’: Understanding the demise of automobile dependence. World Transport Policy and Practice 17, 31–42.Google Scholar
Newson, C. and Sloman, L., 2018. The Value of the Cycling Sector to the British Economy: A Scoping Study, Transport for Quality of Life.Google Scholar
NIC, 2020. Rail Needs Assessments for the Midlands and the North: Final Report. National Infrastructure Commission, London.Google Scholar
Nilsson, M. and Nykvist, B., 2016. Governing the electric vehicle transition: Near term interventions to support a green energy economy. Applied Energy 179, 1360–1371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.03.056Google Scholar
Nilsson, M. and Persson, A., 2017. Policy note: Lessons from environmental policy integration for the implementation of the 2030 Agenda. Environmental Science and Policy 78, 36–39.Google Scholar
North, D. C., 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Nykvist, B., Sprei, F., and Nilsson, M., 2019. Assessing the progress toward lower priced long range battery electric vehicles. Energy Policy 124, 144–155.Google Scholar
Nykvist, B. and Whitmarsh, L., 2008. A multi-level analysis of sustainable mobility transitions: Niche development in the UK and Sweden. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 75, 1373–1387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2008.05.006Google Scholar
O’Brien, K. and Signa, L., 2018. Transformations in socio-ecological systems, in: EEA (Ed.), Perspectives on Transitions to Sustainability, EEA Report 25/2017. European Environment Agency, Copenhagen, pp. 29–45.Google Scholar
O’Neill, K. and Gibbs, D., 2020. Sustainability transitions and policy dismantling: Zero carbon housing in the UK. Geoforum 108, 119–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.11.011Google Scholar
O’Neill, K. and Gibbs, D., 2014. Towards a sustainable economy? Socio-technical transitions in the green building sector. Local Environment 19, 572–590.Google Scholar
OECD, 2018. Financing Climate Futures: Rethinking Infrastructure. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris.Google Scholar
Ofgem, 2020. Domestic RHI tariffs table (Q1 – 2021/22). Office of Gas and Electricity Markets.Google Scholar
Ofgem, 2019. State of the Energy Market 2019. Office of Gas and Electricity Markets, London.Google Scholar
Ofgem, 2017. Update on Extending Competition in Transmission, Letter to interested parties. Office of Gas and Electricity Markets, London.Google Scholar
Ofgem, 2013. Strategy Decision for the RIIO-ED1 Electricity Distribution Price Control. Office of Gas and Electricity Markets, London.Google Scholar
OLEV, 2020. Electric Vehicle Homecharge Scheme: Guidance for Consumers. Office for Low Emission Vehicles.Google Scholar
Olleros, F.-J., 1986. Emerging industries and the burnout of pioneers. Journal of Product Innovation Management 3, 5–18.Google Scholar
Ornetzeder, M. and Rohracher, H., 2013. Of solar collectors, wind power, and car sharing: Comparing and understanding successful cases of grassroots innovations. Global Environmental Change 23, 856–867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.12.007Google Scholar
Owaineh, A., Leach, M., Guest, P., and Wehrmeyer, W., 2015. Policy, niches and diffusion in UK smart grid innovation. Centre for Environmental Strategy Working Paper 01/15, University of Surrey.Google Scholar
Owens, S., 1995. From ‘predict and provide’ to ‘predict and prevent’? Pricing and planning in transport policy. Transport Policy 2, 43–49.Google Scholar
Pangbourne, K., Mladenovic, M. N., Stead, D., and Milakis, D., 2020. Questioning mobility as a service: Unanticipated implications for society and governance. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 131, 35–49.Google Scholar
Papachristos, G., Sofianos, A., and Adamides, E., 2013. System interactions in socio-technical transitions: Extending the multi-level perspective. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 7, 53–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2013.03.002Google Scholar
Park, W. P., Phadke, A., Shah, N., and Letschert, V., 2013. Efficiency improvement opportunities in TVs: Implications for market transformation programs. Energy Policy 59, 361–372.Google Scholar
Parkhurst, G. and Lyons, G., 2018. The many assumptions about self‐driving cars – Where are we heading and who is in the driving seat? Paper presented at 16th Annual Transport Practitioners’ Meeting, 5–6 July 2018.Google Scholar
Parrish, B., Gross, R., and Heptonstall, P., 2019. On demand: Can demand response live up to expectations in managing electricity systems? Energy Research & Social Science 51, 107–118.Google Scholar
Paterson, M. and P-Laberge, X., 2018. Political economies of climate change. WIRES Climate Change 9, e506.Google Scholar
Pearson, P. and Watson, J., 2012. UK Energy Policy 1980–2010: A History and Lessons to be Learnt. London.Google Scholar
Pearson, P. J. G. and Arapostathis, S., 2017. Two centuries of innovation, transformation and transition in the UK gas industry: Where next? Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part A: Journal of Power and Energy 231, 478–497. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957650917693482Google Scholar
Penna, C. C. R. and Geels, F. W., 2015. Climate change and the slow reorientation of the American car industry (1979–2012): An application and extension of the Dialectic Issue LifeCycle (DILC) model. Research Policy 44, 1029–1048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.11.010Google Scholar
Perry, M. and Rosillo-Calle, F., 2008. Recent trends and future opportunities in UK bioenergy: Maximising biomass penetration in a centralised energy system. Biomass and Bioenergy 32, 688–701.Google Scholar
Persson, A. and Runhaar, H., 2018. Conclusion: Drawing lessons for environmental policy integration and prospects for future research. Environmental Science and Policy 85, 141–145.Google Scholar
PHE, 2019. Review of Interventions to Improve Outdoor Air Quality and Public Health. Public Health England.Google Scholar
Phillips, M. E., 1994. Industry mindsets: Exploring the cultures of two macro-organizational settings. Organization Science 5, 384–402.Google Scholar
Pierson, P., 2004. Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Pierson, P., 2000. Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. The American Political Science Review 94, 251–267.Google Scholar
Pinkse, J. and Van den Buuse, D., 2012. The development and commercialization of solar PV technology in the oil industry. Energy Policy 40, 11–20.Google Scholar
Pitts, A., 2017. Passive house and low energy buildings: Barriers and opportunities for future development within UK practice. Sustainability 9, 272.Google Scholar
Polanyi, K., 2001. The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time [1944]. Beacon Press, Boston.Google Scholar
Poole, M. S., Van de Ven, A. H., Dooley, K., and Holmes, M. E., 2000. Organizational Change and Innovation Processes: Theory and Methods for Research. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Pooley, C., Horton, D., Scheldeman, G., Tight, M., Jones, T., Chisholm, A., et al., 2011. Household decision-making for everyday travel: A case study of walking and cycling in Lancaster (UK). Journal of Transport Geography 19, 1601–1607.Google Scholar
Powell, W. and DiMaggio, P. (Eds.), 1991. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Pucher, J. and Buehler, R., 2008. Making cycling irresistible: Lessons from The Netherlands, Denmark and Germany. Transport Reviews 28, 495–528. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441640701806612Google Scholar
RAC, 2012. On the Move: Making Sense of Car and Train Travel Trends in Britain. Royal Automobile Club Foundation, London.Google Scholar
Ragin, C., 2008. Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and beyond. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Raman, S. and Shove, E., 2000. The business of building regulation, in: Fineman, S. (Ed.), The Business of Greening. Routledge, London, pp. 134–150.Google Scholar
Raskin, P., 2016. Journey to Earthland: The Great Transition to Planetary Civilization. Tellus Institute, Boston.Google Scholar
Raven, R., 2007. Niche accumulation and hybridisation strategies in transition processes towards a sustainable energy system: An assessment of differences and pitfalls. Energy Policy 35, 2390–2400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2006.09.003Google Scholar
Raven, R., Heiskanen, E., Lovio, R., Hodson, M., and Brohmann, B., 2008. The contribution of local experiments and negotiation processes to field-level learning in emerging (niche) technologies: Meta-analysis of 27 new energy projects in Europe. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 28, 464–477. https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467608317523Google Scholar
Raven, R., Kern, F., Verhees, B., and Smith, A., 2016. Niche construction and empowerment through socio-political work: A meta-analysis of six low-carbon technology cases. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 18, 164–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2015.02.002Google Scholar
Raven, R., Schot, J., and Berkhout, F., 2012. Space and scale in socio-Technical transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 4, 63–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2012.08.001Google Scholar
Raven, R. and Verbong, G., 2007. Multi-regime interactions in the Dutch energy sector: The case of combined heat and power technologies in the Netherlands 1970–2000. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 19, 491–507. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320701403441Google Scholar
Richards, S. J. and Al Zaili, J., 2020. Contribution of encouraging the future use of biomethane to resolving sustainability and energy security challenges: The case of the UK. Energy for Sustainable Development 55, 48–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2019.12.003Google Scholar
Rip, A. and Kemp, R., 1998. Technological change, in: Rayner, S. and Malone, L. (Eds.), Human Choice and Climate Change, Vol 2 Resources and Technology. Batelle Press, Washington, DC, pp. 327–399.Google Scholar
Roberts, C. and Geels, F. W., 2019a. Conditions for politically accelerated transitions: Historical institutionalism, the multi-level perspective, and two historical case studies in transport and agriculture. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 140, 221–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.11.019Google Scholar
Roberts, C. and Geels, F. W., 2019b. Conditions and intervention strategies for the deliberate acceleration of socio-technical transitions: Lessons from a comparative multi-level analysis of two historical case studies in Dutch and Danish heating. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 31, 1081–1103.Google Scholar
Roberts, C. and Geels, F. W., 2018. Public storylines in the British transition from rail to road transport (1896–2000): Discursive struggles in the multi-level perspective. Science as Culture 27, 513–542. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2018.1519532Google Scholar
Roberts, E., 2020. Warming with wood: Exploring the everyday heating practices of rural off-gas households in Wales. Energy Policy 142, 111451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111451Google Scholar
Roberts, J. C. D., 2017. Discursive destabilisation of socio-technical regimes: Negative storylines and the discursive vulnerability of historical American railroads. Energy Research and Social Science 31, 86–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.05.031Google Scholar
Robertson, P. L., 1992. Networks and innovation in a modular system: Lessons from the microcomputer and stereo component industries. Research Policy 21, 297–313.Google Scholar
Rockström, J., Gaffney, O., Rogelj, J., Meinshausen, M., Nakicenovic, N., and Schellnhuber, H. J., 2017. A roadmap for rapid decarbonisation. Science 355, 1269–1271.Google Scholar
Rogge, K. S. and Reichardt, K., 2016. Policy mixes for sustainability transitions: An extended concept and framework for analysis. Research Policy 45, 1620–1635.Google Scholar
Røpke, I., Christensen, T. H., and Jensen, J. O., 2010. Information and communication technologies: A new round of household electrification. Energy Policy 38, 1764–1773.Google Scholar
Rosenbloom, D., 2020. Engaging with multi-system interactions in sustainability transitions: A comment on the transitions research agenda. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 34, 336–340.Google Scholar
Rosenbloom, D., 2017. Pathways: An emerging concept for the theory and governance of low-carbon transitions. Global Environmental Change 43, 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.12.011Google Scholar
Rosenbloom, D., Berton, H., and Meadowcroft, J., 2016. Framing the sun: A discursive approach to understanding multi-dimensional interactions within socio-technical transitions through the case of solar electricity in Ontario, Canada. Research Policy 45, 1275–1290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.03.012Google Scholar
Rosenbloom, D., Markard, J., Geels, F. W., and Fuenfschilling, L., 2020. Why carbon pricing is not sufficient – and how a “sustainability transition policy” can help mitigate climate change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 117, 8664–8668.Google Scholar
Rosenow, J., 2012. Energy savings obligations in the UK: A history of change. Energy Policy 49, 373–382.Google Scholar
Rosenow, J. and Eyre, N., 2016. A post mortem of the Green Deal: Austerity, energy efficiency, and failure in British energy policy. Energy Research & Social Science 21, 141–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2016.07.005Google Scholar
Rosenow, J., Guertler, P., Sorrell, S., and Eyre, N., 2018. The remaining potential for energy savings in UK households. Energy Policy 121, 542–552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.06.033Google Scholar
Rosenow, J., Kern, F., and Rogge, K. S., 2017. The need for comprehensive and well targeted instrument mixes to stimulate energy transitions: The case of energy efficiency policy. Energy Research & Social Science 33, 95–104.Google Scholar
Rosenow, J. and Thomas, S., 2020. Net zero is nowhere in sight for UK clean heat policy, Green Alliance blog. https://greenallianceblog.org.uk/2020/05/13/net-zero-is-nowhere-in-sight-for-uk-clean-heat-policy/.Google Scholar
Ryan-Collins, J., Lloyd, T., and Macfarlane, L., 2017. Rethinking the Economics of Land and Housing. Zed Books, London.Google Scholar
Rycroft, R. W. and Kash, D. E., 2002. Path dependence in the innovation of complex technologies. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 14, 21–35.Google Scholar
Ryghaug, M. and Toftaker, M., 2014. A transformative practice? Meaning, competence, and material aspects of driving electric cars in Norway. Nature and Culture 9, 146–163.Google Scholar
SAE, 2016. Taxonomy and definitions for terms related to driving automation systems for on-road motor vehicles. Society of Automotive Engineers.Google Scholar
Sandén, B. A. and Hillman, K. M., 2011. A framework for analysis of multi-mode interaction among technologies with examples from the history of alternative transport fuels in Sweden. Research Policy 40, 403–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.12.005Google Scholar
Sanderson, S. W. and Simons, K. L., 2014. Light emitting diodes and the lighting revolution: The emergence of a solid-state lighting industry. Research Policy 43, 1730–1746.Google Scholar
Schmidt, N. M. and Fleig, A., 2018. Global patterns of national climate policies: Analyzing 171 country portfolios on climate policy integration. Environmental Science & Policy 84, 177–185.Google Scholar
Schmidt, T. S., Matsuo, T., and Michaelowa, A., 2017. Renewable energy policy as an enabler of fossil fuel subsidy reform? Applying a socio-technical perspective to the cases of South Africa and Tunisia. Global Environmental Change 45, 99–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.05.004Google Scholar
Schmidt, T. S. and Sewerin, S., 2019. Measuring the temporal dynamics of policy mixes: An empirical analysis of renewable energy policy mixes’ balance and design features in nine countries. Research Policy 48, 103557.Google Scholar
Schnaiberg, A., 1980. The Environment: From Surplus to Scarcity. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Schor, J. B., 2014. Climate discourse and economic downturns: The case of the United States, 2008–2013. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 13, 6–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2014.04.006Google Scholar
Schot, J. and Geels, F. W., 2008. Strategic niche management and sustainable innovation journeys: Theory, findings, research agenda, and policy. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 20, 537–554. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320802292651Google Scholar
Schot, J. and Steinmueller, W. E., 2018. Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innovation and transformative change. Research Policy 47, 1554–1567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.08.011Google Scholar
Schot, J. W. and Geels, F. W., 2007. Niches in evolutionary theories of technical change: A critical survey of the literature. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 17, 605–622.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. A., 1927. The explanation of the business cycle. Economica 21, 286–311.Google Scholar
Schwanen, T., 2015. The bumpy road toward low-energy urban mobility: Case studies from two UK cities. Sustainability 7, 7086–7111.Google Scholar
Scott, W. R., 2008. Approaching adulthood: The maturing of institutional theory. Theory and Society 37, 427–442.Google Scholar
Scott, W. R., 1995. Institutions and Organizations. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.Google Scholar
Scott, W. R., Ruef, M., Mendel, P. J., and Caronna, C., 2000. Institutional Change and Healthcare Organizations: From Professional Dominance to Managed Care. Chicago University Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Shaheen, S. and Chan, N., 2016. Mobility and the sharing economy: Potential to facilitate the first- and last-mile public transit connections. Built Environment 42, 573–588.Google Scholar
Shaw, R., Attree, M., and Jackson, T., 2010. Developing electricity distribution networks and their regulation to support sustainable energy. Energy Policy 38, 5927–5937.Google Scholar
Sheller, M., 2012. The emergence of new cultures of mobility: Stability, openings and prospects, in: Geels, F. W., Kemp, R., Dudley, G., and Lyons, G. (Eds.), Automobility in Transition? A Socio-Technical Analysis of Sustainable Transport. Routledge, New York, pp. 180–202.Google Scholar
Sheller, M., 2004. Automotive emotions: Feeling the car. Theory, Culture & Society 21, 221–242.Google Scholar
Shipworth, D., Fell, M. J., and Elam, S., 2019. Response to “Vulnerability and resistance in the United Kingdom’s smart meter transition”. Energy Policy 124, 418–420.Google Scholar
Shove, E., 2003. Comfort, Cleanliness and Convenience: The Social Organization of Normality. Berg, Oxford.Google Scholar
Shove, E., Pantzar, M., and Watson, M., 2012. The Dynamics of Social Practice: Everyday Life and How It Changes. Sage, London.Google Scholar
Shove, E. and Walker, G., 2014. What is energy for? Social practice and energy demand. Theory, Culture & Society 31, 41–58.Google Scholar
Shove, E. and Walker, G., 2010. Governing transitions in the sustainability of everyday life. Research Policy 39, 471–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.019Google Scholar
Simon, H. A., 1973. The organization of complex systems, in: Pattee, H. (Ed.), Hierarchy Theory: The Challenge of Complex Systems. George Braziller, New York, pp. 1–27.Google Scholar
Skea, J., van Diemen, R., Hannon, M., Gazis, E., and Rhodes, A., 2019. Energy Innovation for the Twenty-First Century: Accelerating the Energy Revolution. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.Google Scholar
Skeete, J.-P., 2019. Concentration of power: A UK case study examining the dominance of incumbent automakers and suppliers in automotive sociotechnical transitions. Global Transitions 1, 93–103.Google Scholar
Skjølsvold, T. M. and Coenen, L., 2021. Are rapid and inclusive energy and climate transitions oxymorons? Towards principles of responsible acceleration. Energy Research & Social Science 79.Google Scholar
Slavin, T., 2014. How to build a transport system that works for the whole of the UK? The Guardian. www.theguardian.com/public-leaders-network/2014/sep/18/transport-infrastructure-uk-futureGoogle Scholar
Sminia, H., 2009. Process research in strategy formation: Theory, methodology and relevance. International Journal of Management Reviews 11, 97–125.Google Scholar
Smink, M., Negro, S. O., Niesten, E., and Hekkert, M. P., 2015. How mismatching institutional logics hinder niche-regime interaction and how boundary spanners intervene. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 100, 225–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.07.004Google Scholar
Smith, A., 2007. Translating sustainabilities between green niches and socio-technical regimes. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 19, 427–450. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320701403334Google Scholar
Smith, A., Fressoli, M., and Thomas, H., 2014. Grassroots innovation movements: Challenges and contributions. Journal of Cleaner Production 64, 114–124.Google Scholar
Smith, A., Kern, F., Raven, R., and Verhees, B., 2013. Spaces for sustainable innovation: Solar photovoltaic electricity in the UK. Technological Forecasting & Social Change 81, 115–130.Google Scholar
Smith, A. and Raven, R., 2012. What is protective space? Reconsidering niches in transitions to sustainability. Research Policy 41, 1025–1036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.12.012Google Scholar
Smith, A. and Seyfang, G., 2013. Constructing grassroots innovations for sustainability. Global Environmental Change 23, 827–829.Google Scholar
Smith, A., Stirling, A., and Berkhout, F., 2005. The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions. Research Policy 34, 1491–1510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.07.005Google Scholar
Smith, G. and Hensher, D. A., 2020. Towards a framework for mobility-as-a-service policies. Transport Policy 89, 54–65.Google Scholar
Smith, G., Sochor, J., and Karlsson, M. A., 2020. Intermediary MaaS Integrators: A case study on hopes and fears. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 131, 163–177.Google Scholar
SMMT, 2020. Motor Car Industry Facts 2020. Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders, London.Google Scholar
SMMT, 2016. Ultra Low Emission Vehicles Guide, 2016. Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders, London.Google Scholar
Sørensen, C. and Gudmundsson, H., 2010. The impact of governance modes on sustainable transport – the case of bus transport in Greater Manchester, UK. World Review of Intermodal Transportation Research 3.Google Scholar
Soteropoulos, A., Berger, M., and Ciari, F., 2019. Impacts of automated vehicles on travel behaviour and land use: An international review of modelling studies. Transport Reviews 39, 29–49.Google Scholar
Sovacool, B. and Griffiths, S., 2020. Culture and low-carbon energy transitions. Nature Sustainability 3, 685–693.Google Scholar
Sovacool, B. K., 2019. Visions of Energy Futures: Imagining and Innovating Low-Carbon Transitions. Routledge, New York.Google Scholar
Sovacool, B. K., 2017. Experts, theories, and electric mobility transitions: Toward an integrated conceptual framework for the adoption of electric vehicles. Energy Research and Social Science 27, 78–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.02.014Google Scholar
Sovacool, B. K., 2016. How long will it take? Conceptualizing the temporal dynamics of energy transitions. Energy Research and Social Science 13, 202–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2015.12.020Google Scholar
Sovacool, B. K., Kivimaa, P., Hielscher, S., and Jenkins, K., 2017. Vulnerability and resistance in the United Kingdom’s smart meter transition. Energy Policy 109, 767–781.Google Scholar
Sovacool, B. K., Kivimaa, P., Hielscher, S., and Jenkins, K. E., 2019. Further reflections on vulnerability and resistance in the United Kingdom’s smart meter transition. Energy Policy 124, 411–417.Google Scholar
Spaargaren, G. and Cohen, M., 2009. Greening lifecycles and lifestyles: Sociotechnical innovations in consumption and production as core concerns of ecological modernization theory, in: Mol, A., Sonnenfeld, D., and Spaargaren, G. (Eds.), The Ecological Modernization Reader: Environmental Reform in Theory and Practice. Routledge, New York, pp. 257–275.Google Scholar
Speirs, J., Balcombe, P., Johnson, E., Martin, J., Brandon, N., and Hawkes, A., 2018. A greener gas grid: What are the options? Energy Policy 118, 291–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.03.069Google Scholar
Sperling, D., 2018. Three Revolutions: Steering Automated, Shared, and Electric Vehicles to a Better Future. Island Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Sprei, F., 2018. Disrupting mobility. Energy Research and Social Science 37, 238–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.10.029Google Scholar
Staffell, I., 2017. Measuring the progress and impacts of decarbonising British electricity. Energy Policy 102, 463–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.12.037Google Scholar
Steer Davies Gleave, 2019a. Car Club Annual Survey for London 2017/18. Collaborative Mobility UK, Leeds.Google Scholar
Steer Davies Gleave, 2019b. England & Wales Car Club Annual Survey 2017/18 (Excluding London). Collaborative Mobility UK, Leeds.Google Scholar
Steer Davies Gleave, 2019c. Car Club Annual Survey for Scotland 2018/19. Collaborative Mobility UK, Leeds.Google Scholar
Steer Davies Gleave, 2016. Carplus Annual Survey of Car Clubs 2015/16: England & Wales (Excluding London). Carplus, London.Google Scholar
Steer Davies Gleave, 2012. Carplus Annual Survey of Car Clubs 2011/2012: London. Carplus, London.Google Scholar
Steer Davies Gleave, 2011. Carplus Annual Survey of Car Clubs 2010/2011. Carplus, London.Google Scholar
Steer Davies Gleave, 2010. Carplus Annual Survey of Car Clubs 2009/10. Carplus, London.Google Scholar
Stehlin, J., Hodson, M., and McMeekin, A., 2020. Platform mobilities and the production of urban space: Toward a typology of platformization trajectories. Environment and Planning A 52, 1250–1268.Google Scholar
Stephens, J. C., Wilson, E., Peterson, T. R., and Meadowcroft, J., 2013. Getting smart: Climate change and the electric grid. Challenges 4, 201–216.Google Scholar
Steward, F., 2018. Action-oriented perspectives on transitions and system innovation, in: EEA (Ed.), Perspectives on Transitions to Sustainability. Copenhagen, pp. 97–119.Google Scholar
Stewart, H. and Walker, P., 2020. HS2 poised to get go-ahead as £5bn pledged for bus funding. The Guardian. www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/feb/10/johnson-plans-5bn-boost-for-bus-services-and-cycle-routesGoogle Scholar
Stiglitz, J. E., Stern, N., Duan, M., Edenhofer, O., Giraud, G., Heal, G. M., et al., 2017. Report of the High-Level Commission on Carbon Prices. World Bank, Washington DC.Google Scholar
Stilgoe, J., 2018. Machine learning, social learning and the governance of self-driving cars. Social Studies of Science 48, 25–56.Google Scholar
Strachan, N., Pye, S., and Kannan, R., 2009. The iterative contribution and relevance of modelling to UK energy policy. Energy Policy 37, 850–860.Google Scholar
Strachan, P. A., Cowell, R., Ellis, G., Sherry-Brennan, F., and Toke, D., 2015. Promoting community renewable energy in a corporate energy world. Sustainable Development 23, 96–109.Google Scholar
Stradling, S., Carreno, M., Rye, T., and Noble, A., 2007. Passenger perceptions and the ideal urban bus journey experience. Transport Policy 14, 283–292.Google Scholar
Svensson, O. and Nikoleris, A., 2018. Structure reconsidered: Towards new foundations of explanatory transitions theory. Research Policy 47, 462–473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.12.007Google Scholar
Taylor, I. and Sloman, L., 2013. Reunifying Britain’s railways: Obstacles and opportunities. Public Money & Management 33, 329–336.Google Scholar
TCPA/CHPA, 2008. Community Energy: Urban Planning for a Low Carbon Future. Town and Country Planning Association (TCPA) and Combined Heat and Power Association (CHPA), London.Google Scholar
Thelen, K., 1999. Historical institutionalism in comparative politics. Annual Review of Political Science 2, 369–404.Google Scholar
Thelen, K. and Mahoney, J., 2015. Comparative-historical analysis in contemporary political science, in: Mahoney, J. and Thelen, K. (Eds.), Advances in Comparative-Historical Analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 3–36.Google Scholar
Thielemans, S., Di Zenobio, D., Touhafi, A., Lataire, P., and Steenhaut, K., 2017. DC grids for smart LED-based lighting: The EDISON solution. Energies 10, 1454.Google Scholar
Thomas, S., 2016. The Hinkley Point decision: An analysis of the policy process. Energy Policy 96, 421–431.Google Scholar
Thornton, P., Occasio, W., and Lounsbury, M., 2012. The Institutional Logics Perspective: A New Approach to Culture, Structure and Process. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Toke, D., 2011. The UK offshore wind power programme: A sea-change in UK energy policy? Energy Policy 39, 526–534.Google Scholar
Toke, D., 2005. Are green electricity certificates the way forward for renewable energy? An evaluation of the UK’s renewables obligation in the context of international comparisons. Environment and Planning C 23, 361–375.Google Scholar
Toke, D., 2000. Policy network creation: The case of energy efficiency. Public Administration 78, 835–854.Google Scholar
Toke, D. and Lauber, V., 2007. Anglo Saxon and German approaches to neo-liberalism and environmental policy: The case of financing renewable energy. Geoforum 38, 677–687.Google Scholar
Topham, G., 2021. “Peak hype”: Why the driverless car revolution has stalled. The Guardian. www.theguardian.com/technology/2021/jan/03/peak-hype-driverless-car-revolution-uber-robotaxis-autonomous-vehicleGoogle Scholar
Transport Systems Catapult, 2016. Mobility as a Service: Exploring the opportunity for mobility as a service in the UK. Birmingham.Google Scholar
Truffer, B., 2003. User-led innovation processes: The development of professional carsharing by environmentally concerned citizens. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research 16, 139–154.Google Scholar
TSC, 2017. Market Forecast for Connected and Autonomous Vehicles. Transport Systems Catapult, Milton Keynes.Google Scholar
Turley, J., 2019. Self-Driving Cars: What the Engineers Think. Electronic Engineering Journal 24 April, 5–11.Google Scholar
Turnheim, B., 2012. The destabilisation of existing regimes in socio-technical transitions: Theoretical explorations and in-depth case studies of the British coal industry (1880–2011). University of Sussex.Google Scholar
Turnheim, B., Asquith, M., and Geels, F. W., 2020. Making sustainability transitions research policy-relevant: Challenges at the science-policy interface. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 34, 116–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.12.009Google Scholar
Turnheim, B., Berkhout, F., Geels, F. W., Hof, A., McMeekin, A., Nykvist, B., et al., 2015. Evaluating sustainability transitions pathways: Bridging analytical approaches to address governance challenges. Global Environmental Change 35, 239–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.08.010Google Scholar
Turnheim, B. and Geels, F. W., 2019. Incumbent actors, guided search paths, and landmark projects in infra-system transitions: Re-thinking Strategic Niche Management with a case study of French tramway diffusion (1971–2016). Research Policy 48, 1412–1428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.02.002Google Scholar
Turnheim, B. and Geels, F.W., 2013. The destabilisation of existing regimes: Confronting a multi-dimensional framework with a case study of the British coal industry (1913–1967). Research Policy 42, 1749–1767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.04.009Google Scholar
Turnheim, B. and Geels, F.W., 2012. Regime destabilisation as the flipside of energy transitions: Lessons from the history of the British coal industry (1913–1997). Energy Policy 50, 35–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.04.060Google Scholar
Turnheim, B. and Nykvist, B., 2019. Opening up the feasibility of sustainability transitions pathways (STPs): Representations, potentials, and conditions. Research Policy 48, 775–788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.12.002Google Scholar
Turnheim, B. and Sovacool, B. K., 2020. Forever stuck in old ways? Pluralising incumbencies in sustainability transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 35, 180–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.10.012Google Scholar
Tushman, M. L. and Romanelli, E., 1985. Organizational evolution: A metamorphosis model of convergence and reorientation. Research in Organizational Behavior 7, 171–222.Google Scholar
UKGBC, 2021. The Retrofit Playbook: Driving retrofit of existing homes – a resource for local and combined authorities. UK Green Building Council.Google Scholar
Upham, P., Dütschke, E., Schneider, U., Oltra, C., Sala, R., Lores, M., et al., 2018. Agency and structure in a sociotechnical transition: Hydrogen fuel cells, conjunctural knowledge and structuration in Europe. Energy Research and Social Science 37, 163–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.09.040Google Scholar
Upham, P., Kivimaa, P., and Virkamäki, V., 2013. Path dependence and technological expectations in transport policy: The case of Finland and the UK. Journal of Transport Geography 32, 12–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2013.08.004Google Scholar
Upreti, B. R. and Van der Horst, D., 2004. National renewable energy policy and local opposition in the UK: The failed development of a biomass electricity plant. Biomass and Bioenergy 26, 61–69.Google Scholar
Urry, J., 2004. The “system” of automobility. Theory, Culture & Society 21, 25–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276404046059Google Scholar
Van Buskirk, R., Kantner, C., Gerke, B., and Chu, S., 2014. A retrospective investigation of energy efficiency standards: Policies may have accelerated long-term declines in appliance costs. Environment Research Letters, 9.Google Scholar
Van De Poel, I., 2000. On the role of outsiders in technical development. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 12, 383–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320050130615Google Scholar
van de Ven, A. H., 2007. Engaged Scholarship: A Guide for Organizational and Social Research. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Van Driel, H. and Schot, J., 2005. Radical innovation as a multi-level process: Introducing floating grain elevators in the port of Rotterdam. Technology and Culture 46, 51–76.Google Scholar
van Lente, H., Spitters, C., and Peine, A., 2013. Comparing technological hype cycles: Towards a theory. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 80, 1615–1628.Google Scholar
Van Mierlo, B., 2019. Users empowered in smart grid development? Assumptions and up-to-date knowledge. Applied Sciences 9, 815.Google Scholar
Van Waes, A., Farla, J., Frenken, K., De Jong, J. P. J., and Raven, R., 2018. Business model innovation and socio-technical transitions. A new prospective framework with an application to bike sharing. Journal of Cleaner Production 195, 1300–1312.Google Scholar
Verbong, G. P. J., Beemsterboer, S., and Sengers, F., 2013. Smart grids or smart users? Involving users in developing a low carbon electricity economy. Energy Policy 52, 117–125.Google Scholar
Verbong, G. P. J., Geels, F. W., and Raven, R. P. J. M., 2008. Multi-niche analysis of dynamics and policies in Dutch renewable energy innovation journeys (1970–2006): Hype-cycles, closed networks and technology-focused learning. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 20, 555–573.Google Scholar
Vergragt, P. J., 2013. A possible way out of the combined economic-sustainability crisis. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 6, 123–125.Google Scholar
Verhees, B., 2012. Cultural legitimacy and innovation journeys: A new perspective applied to Dutch and British nuclear power. Eindhoven University of Technology.Google Scholar
Victor, D., Geels, F. W., and Sharpe, S., 2019. Accelerating the Low Carbon Transition: The Case for Stronger, More Targeted and Coordinated International Action. Commissioned by the UK Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy; Supported by the Energy Transitions Commission.Google Scholar
Vögele, S., Kunz, P., Rübbelke, D., and Stahlke, T., 2018. Transformation pathways of phasing out coal-fired power plants in Germany. Energy, Sustainability and Society 8, 1–18.Google Scholar
Wade, F., Hitchings, R., and Shipworth, M., 2016. Understanding the missing middlemen of domestic heating: Installers as a community of professional practice in the United Kingdom. Energy Research & Social Science 19, 39–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2016.05.007Google Scholar
Wadud, Z. and Baierl, M., 2017. Explaining “peak car” with economic variables: A comment. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 95, 381–385.Google Scholar
Wadud, Z., MacKenzie, D., and Leiby, P., 2016. Help or hindrance? The travel, energy and carbon impacts of highly automated vehicles. Transportation Research Part A 86, 1–18.Google Scholar
Walker, G. P. and Devine-Wright, P., 2008. Community renewable energy: What should it mean? Energy Policy 36, 497–500.Google Scholar
Walker, P., 2021. Hastily abandoned low-traffic schemes could cost councils funding. The Guardian. www.theguardian.com/uk-news/bike-blog/2021/jul/30/hastily-abandoned-low-traffic-schemes-could-cost-councils-fundingGoogle Scholar
Walker, W., 2000. Entrapment in large technology systems: Institutional commitments and power relations. Research Policy 29, 833–846.Google Scholar
Wall, R. and Crosbie, T., 2009. Potential for reducing electricity demand for lighting in households: An exploratory socio-technical study. Energy Policy 37, 1021–1031.Google Scholar
Warde, A., 2005. Consumption and theories of practice. Journal of Consumer Culture 5, 131–153.Google Scholar
Watson, J., Gross, R., Ketsopoulou, I., and Winskel, M., 2014. UK Energy Strategies Under Uncertainty, UKERC report.Google Scholar
Watson, S. D., Lomas, K. J., and Buswell, R. A., 2019. Decarbonising domestic heating: What is the peak GB demand? Energy Policy 126, 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.11.001Google Scholar
Webb, J. and Hawkey, D., 2017. On (not) assembling a market for sustainable energy: Heat network infrastructure and British cities. Journal of Cultural Economy 10, 8–20.Google Scholar
Weiss, A. and Woodhouse, E., 1992. Reframing incrementalism: A constructive response to the critics. Policy Sciences 25, 255–273.Google Scholar
White, P., 2010. The conflict between competition policy and the wider role of the local bus industry in Britain. Research in Transportation Economics 29, 152–158.Google Scholar
Wieser, H., 2017. Ever-faster, ever-shorter? Replacement cycles of durable goods in historical perspective, in: Bakker, C. A. and Mugge, R. (Eds.), Volume 9: PLATE: Product Lifetimes and The Environment. Delft University of Technology, IOS Press, pp. 426–431.Google Scholar
Wieser, H. and Tröger, N., 2018. Exploring the inner loops of the circular economy: Replacement, repair, and reuse of mobile phones in Austria. Journal of Cleaner Production 172, 3042–3055.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, J., 2011. Convention theory and consumption, in: Southerton, D. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Consumer Culture. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 358–362.Google Scholar
Williams, L. and Sovacool, B. K., 2019. The discursive politics of ‘fracking’: Frames, storylines, and the anticipatory contestation of shale gas development in the United Kingdom. Global Environmental Change, 58.Google Scholar
Wilson, C., 2012. Up-scaling, formative phases, and learning in the historical diffusion of energy technologies. Energy Policy 50, 81–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.04.077Google Scholar
Wilson, C., Crane, L., and Chryssochoidis, G., 2015. Why do homeowners renovate energy efficiently? Contrasting perspectives and implications for policy. Energy Research and Social Science 7, 12–22.Google Scholar
Wilson, C. and Grubler, A., 2011. Lessons from the history of technological change for clean energy scenarios and policies. Natural Resources Forum 35, 165–184. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-8947.2011.01386.xGoogle Scholar
Wilson, I. A. and Staffell, I., 2018. Rapid fuel switching from coal to natural gas through effective carbon pricing. Nature Energy 3, 365–372.Google Scholar
Winskel, M., 2018. Energy innovation and systems change: Narratives of disruption and continuity. Energy Research & Social Science 37, 232–237.Google Scholar
Winskel, M., 2016. From optimisation to diversity: Changing scenarios of heating for buildings in the UK, in: Hawkey, D., Webb, J., Lovell, H., McCrone, D., Tingey, M., and Winskel, M. (Eds.), Sustainable Urban Energy Policy: Heat and the City. Routledge, London, pp. 68–90.Google Scholar
Wiseman, J., Edwards, T., and Luckins, K., 2013. Post carbon pathways: A meta-analysis of 18 large-scale post carbon economy transition strategies. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 8, 76–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2013.04.001Google Scholar
Wolmar, C., 2018. Driverless Cars: On a Road to Nowhere. London Publishing Partnership.Google Scholar
Wolmar, C., 2016. Are Trams Socialist? Why Britain Has No Transport Policy. London Publishing Partnership.Google Scholar
Wood, G. and Dow, S., 2011. What lessons have been learned in reforming the Renewables Obligation? An analysis of internal and external failures in UK renewable energy policy. Energy Policy 39, 2228–2244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.11.012Google Scholar
Woodman, B. and Mitchell, C., 2011. Learning from experience? The development of the Renewables Obligation in England and Wales 2002–2010. Energy Policy 39, 3914–3921.Google Scholar
World Bank, 2015. Decarbonizing Development: Three Steps to a Zero-Carbon Future, Climate change and development series. Washington DC.Google Scholar
Wulf, C., Linßen, J., and Zapp, P., 2018. Review of power-to-gas projects in Europe. Energy Procedia 155, 367–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2018.11.041Google Scholar
Yeatts, D. E., Auden, D., Cooksey, C., and Chen, C. F., 2017. A systematic review of strategies for overcoming the barriers to energy-efficient technologies in buildings. Energy Research and Social Science 32, 76–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.03.010Google Scholar
Zero Carbon Hub, 2013. Zero Carbon Strategies for Tomorrow’s New Homes. Milton Keynes.Google Scholar
You have
Access
Open access