No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 January 2024
This note points out and ventures to explain the remarkable absence of both hortus, ‘garden’, and all forms of hortari, ‘urge’, in a poem that seeks to encourage the audience toward the Garden.
1 ‘Fields’, ‘small plot’, ‘garden’, ‘vineyard’, ‘grain field’, ‘tracts’.
2 Perhaps Lucretius wishes to avoid hortus since it can carry the sense of sexually receptive orifice, as in Priapea 5.4. Still, he employs agellus, a term used in an identically obscene way in Priapea 15.7. For other field and garden innuendo, see Adams, J.N., The Latin Sexual Vocabulary (Baltimore, 1982), 82–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
3 D. Marković, The Rhetoric of Explanation in Lucretius’ De rerum natura (Leiden, 2008), 147.
4 Maltby, R., A Lexicon of Ancient Latin Etymologies (Leeds, 1991)Google Scholar, s.v. hortus.
5 For similar types of wordplay and double entendre, see Snyder, M., Puns and Poetry in Lucretius’ De rerum natura (Amsterdam, 1980), 108–21Google Scholar.
6 Snyder (n. 5), 108.
7 Vaan, M. de, Etymological Dictionary of Latin and the other Italic Languages (Leiden, 2008)Google Scholar, s.v. horior.
8 See Schiesaro, A., ‘The palingenesis of De rerum natura’, PCPhS 40 (1994), 81–107Google Scholar, especially 92.
9 The only other near candidate is the neuter singular nominative exortum agreeing with genus at 1.4–5. Here too there is a sense of hortus near at hand with sunlight (lumina solis) and crop-bearing lands (terras frugiferentis, 1.3–5).