Hostname: page-component-669899f699-rg895 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-26T22:56:32.444Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bayesian-genome-wide association study and post-GWAS on reproductive traits of Holstein dairy cattle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2024

Jeyran Jabbari Tourchi
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran
Sadegh Alijani*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran
Seyed Abbas Rafat
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran
Mokhtar Ali Abbasi
Affiliation:
Animal Science Research Institute of Iran, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran
*
Corresponding author: Sadegh Alijani; Email: [email protected]

Abstract

Bayesian multiple regression models are often used for genomic selection, where all markers are adjusted simultaneously as random effects to reduce the false-discovery rate. The purpose of this research was to identify individual candidate genes for some reproductive traits in Holstein cattle through genome wide association studies (GWAS) using a Bayesian method in combination with post-GWAS analysis. Reproductive traits included: days open (DO), pregnancy rate (PR), calving interval (CI) and age at first calving (AFC). The animals were genotyped using single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) panels of different densities imputed to a 50 K SNP density. After quality control, we included 2400 genotyped animals. According to the Bayesian analysis, there were 19 windows with an explained additive genetic variance of >0.1 percent for CI, DO, AFC and PR in Holstein cattle, which were 3, 3, 6 and 7, respectively. Using Bayesian analysis, 79 genes were located within or nearby (250-kb) 19 significant SNPs/windows in the Bos taurus autosomes. Among these genes, we identified 25 candidate genes for reproductive traits, namely CHD7, CLVS1, EVX2, MAT2B, NUDCD2, GPR39, NCKAP5, LYPD1, HOXD13, SEMA5B, CCNG1, SEMA5A, BRF1, PSEN2, CACHD1, SUGTA, ELF1, SNORA70, AKT1, TM2D1, SLF1, MCTPA, PAB2A, MTRF1 and ADCY2. Additionally, another nine candidate genes (CLVS1, GPR39, CENPF, AMOT, ARF1, CCDC186, ADCY2, BDP1 and AMOTL1) were identified in the network cluster analysis as hub genes for reproductive traits. The results of gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) and pathway analysis, suggest that the most important gene ontology term involving cellular metabolic process was related to the AFC trait. To summarize, Bayesian methods were used to identify SNPs and candidate genes that could be useful in genomic selection to improve reproductive traits of Holstein dairy cattle.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Hannah Dairy Research Foundation

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Ali, I, Muhammad Suhail, S and Shafiq, M (2019) Heritability estimates and genetic correlations of various production and reproductive traits of different grades of dairy cattle reared under subtropical condition. Reproduction in Domestic Animals 54, 10261033.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Braz, CU, Rowan, TN, Schnabel, RD and Decker, JE (2021) Genome-wide association analyses identify genotype-by-environment interactions of growth traits in Simmental cattle. Scientific Reports 11, 13335.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Butler, ML, Bormann, JM, Weaber, RL, Grieger, DM and Rolf, MM (2020) Selection for bull fertility: a review. Translational Animal Science 4, 423441.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cai, Z, Guldbrandtsen, B, Lund, MS and Sahana, G (2019) Prioritizing candidate genes for fertility in dairy cows using gene-based analysis, functional annotation and differential gene expression. BMC Genomics 20, 19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, Q, Yang, M, Liu, X, Zhang, J, Mi, S, Wang, Y, Xiao, W and Yu, Y (2022) Blood transcriptome analysis and identification of genes associated with supernumerary teats in Chinese Holstein cows. Journal of Dairy Science 105, 98379852.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, K (2021) Paternal effects on pre-implantation embryo development in cattle. In Book Paternal effects on pre-implantation embryo development in cattle, Vol., pp. (Ed.^Eds. Editor). Series Paternal effects on pre-implantation embryo development in cattle. University of Missouri--Columbia.Google Scholar
Cole, J, Gaddis, KP, Null, D, Maltecca, C and Clay, J (2018) Genome-wide association study and gene network analysis of fertility, retained placenta, and metritis in US Holstein cattle. World (Oakland, Calif 1, 171.Google Scholar
Darang, E, Pezeshkian, Z, Mirhoseini, SZ and Ghovvati, S (2022) Identification of key genes and potential pathways associated with mastitis induced by E. coli. Biochemical Genetics 61, 202220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Lima, AO, Koltes, JE, Diniz, WJ, De Oliveira, PS, Cesar, AS, Tizioto, PC, Afonso, J, de Souza, MM, Petrini, J and Rocha, MI (2020) Potential biomarkers for feed efficiency-related traits in Nellore cattle identified by co-expression network and integrative genomics analyses. Frontiers in Genetics 11, 189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Do, D, Bissonnette, N, Lacasse, P, Miglior, F, Sargolzaei, M, Zhao, X and Ibeagha-Awemu, E (2017) Genome-wide association analysis and pathways enrichment for lactation persistency in Canadian Holstein cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 100, 19551970.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Faraji, AH, Aslaminejad, AA and Farhangfar, H (2011) Estimation of genetic parameters and trends for age at first calving and calving interval in Iranian Holstein cows.Google Scholar
Fernando, R, Nettleton, D, Southey, B, Dekkers, J, Rothschild, M and Soller, M (2004) Controlling the proportion of false positives in multiple dependent tests. Genetics 166, 611619.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fonseca, P, Id-Lahoucine, S, Reverter, A, Medrano, JF, Fortes, MS, Casellas, J, Miglior, F, Brito, L, Carvalho, MRS and Schenkel, FS (2018) Combining multi-OMICs information to identify key-regulator genes for pleiotropic effect on fertility and production traits in beef cattle. PLoS One 13, e0205295.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Han, Y and Peñagaricano, F (2016) Unravelling the genomic architecture of bull fertility in Holstein cattle. BMC Genetics 17, 111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoelker, M, Salilew-Wondim, D, Drillich, M, Christine, G-B, Ghanem, N, Goetze, L, Tesfaye, D, Schellander, K and Heuwieser, W (2012) Transcriptional response of the bovine endometrium and embryo to endometrial polymorphonuclear neutrophil infiltration as an indicator of subclinical inflammation of the uterine environment. Reproduction, Fertility and Development 24, 778793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiang, J, Ma, L, Prakapenka, D, VanRaden, PM, Cole, JB and Da, Y (2019) A large-scale genome-wide association study in US Holstein cattle. Frontiers in Genetics 10, 412.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kemper, KE, Reich, CM, Bowman, PJ, Vander Jagt, CJ, Chamberlain, AJ, Mason, BA, Hayes, BJ and Goddard, ME (2015) Improved precision of QTL mapping using a nonlinear Bayesian method in a multi-breed population leads to greater accuracy of across-breed genomic predictions. Genetics Selection Evolution 47, 117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Y, Yuan, J, Chen, F, Zhang, S, Zhao, Y, Chen, X, Lu, L, Zhou, L, Chu, CY and Sun, H (2020) Long noncoding RNA SAM promotes myoblast proliferation through stabilizing Sugt1 and facilitating kinetochore assembly. Nature Communications 11, 2725.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, S, Fang, L, Zhou, Y, Santos, DJ, Xiang, R, Daetwyler, HD, Chamberlain, AJ, Cole, JB, Li, C-J and Yu, Y (2019) Analyses of inter-individual variations of sperm DNA methylation and their potential implications in cattle. BMC Genomics 20, 114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Macaulay, AD, Gilbert, I, Scantland, S, Fournier, E, Ashkar, F, Bastien, A, Saadi, HAS, Gagné, D, Sirard, M-A and Khandjian, ÉW (2016) Cumulus cell transcripts transit to the bovine oocyte in preparation for maturation. Biology of Reproduction 94, 16, 11–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mariadassou, M, Ramayo-Caldas, Y, Charles, M, Féménia, M, Renand, G and Rocha, D (2020) Detection of selection signatures in Limousin cattle using whole-genome resequencing. Animal Genetics 51, 815819.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miglior, F, Fleming, A, Malchiodi, F, Brito, LF, Martin, P and Baes, CF (2017) A 100-year review: identification and genetic selection of economically important traits in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 100, 1025110271.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mohammadi, A, Alijani, S, Rafat, SA and Abdollahi-Arpanahi, R (2020) Estimation of genetic and phenotypic parameters and trends of female fertility traits of cows and sire conception rate in Iranian Holstein. Journal of Animal Science Research 30, 3753.Google Scholar
Mohammadi, A, Alijani, S, Rafat, S and Abdollahi-Arpanahi, R (2022) Single-step genome-wide association study and candidate genes networks affecting reproductive traits in Iranian Holstein cattle. Livestock Science 262, 104971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mota, R, Guimarães, S, Fortes, M, Hayes, B, Silva, F, Verardo, L, Kelly, M, de Campos, C, Guimarães, J and Wenceslau, R (2017) Genome-wide association study and annotating candidate gene networks affecting age at first calving in Nellore cattle. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 134, 484492.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pirlo, G, Miglior, F and Speroni, M (2000) Effect of age at first calving on production traits and on difference between milk yield returns and rearing costs in Italian Holsteins. Journal of Dairy Science Mar 83, 603608.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ren, X, Yang, G-L, Peng, W-F, Zhao, Y-X, Zhang, M, Chen, Z-H, Wu, F-A, Kantanen, J, Shen, M and Li, M-H (2016) A genome-wide association study identifies a genomic region for the polycerate phenotype in sheep (Ovis aries). Scientific Reports 6, 21111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reynolds, EG, Lopdell, T, Wang, Y, Tiplady, KM, Harland, CS, Johnson, TJ, Neeley, C, Carnie, K, Sherlock, RG and Couldrey, C (2022) Non-additive QTL mapping of lactation traits in 124,000 cattle reveals novel recessive loci. Genetics Selection Evolution 54, 5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ryu, J and Lee, C (2016) Genetic association of marbling score with intragenic nucleotide variants at selection signals of the bovine genome. Animal: An International Journal of Animal Bioscience 10, 566570.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Santana, M, Ventura, RV, Utsunomiya, YT, Neves, H, Alexandre, PA, Oliveira Junior, GA, Gomes, R, Bonin, M, Coutinho, LL and Garcia, JF (2015) A genomewide association mapping study using ultrasound-scanned information identifies potential genomic regions and candidate genes affecting carcass traits in Nellore cattle. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 132, 420427.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Segura, V, Vilhjálmsson, BJ, Platt, A, Korte, A, Seren, Ü, Long, Q and Nordborg, M (2012) An efficient multi-locus mixed-model approach for genome-wide association studies in structured populations. Nature Genetics 44, 825830.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silva, DB, Fonseca, LF, Pinheiro, DG, Magalhães, AF, Muniz, MM, Ferro, JA, Baldi, F, Chardulo, LA, Schnabel, RD and Taylor, JF (2020) Spliced genes in muscle from Nellore Cattle and their association with carcass and meat quality. Scientific Reports 10, 14701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soares, A, Guimarães, S, Kelly, M, Fortes, M, e Silva, F, Verardo, L, Mota, R and Moore, S (2017) Multiple-trait genomewide mapping and gene network analysis for scrotal circumference growth curves in Brahman cattle. Journal of Animal Science 95, 33313345.Google ScholarPubMed
Sollero, BP, Junqueira, VS, Gomes, CC, Caetano, AR and Cardoso, FF (2017) Tag SNP selection for prediction of tick resistance in Brazilian Braford and Hereford cattle breeds using Bayesian methods. Genetics Selection Evolution 49, 115.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taye, M, Lee, W, Jeon, S, Yoon, J, Dessie, T, Hanotte, O, Mwai, OA, Kemp, S, Cho, S and Oh, SJ (2017) Exploring evidence of positive selection signatures in cattle breeds selected for different traits. Mammalian Genome 28, 528541.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wan, Z-Y, Tong, H-L, Li, Q-Z and Gao, X-J (2011) Influence on cellular signal transduction pathway in dairy cow mammary gland epithelial cells by galactopoietic compound isolated from Vaccariae segetalis. Agricultural Sciences in China 10, 619630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, S-B, Feng, J-Y, Ren, W-L, Huang, B, Zhou, L, Wen, Y-J, Zhang, J, Dunwell, JM, Xu, S and Zhang, Y-M (2016) Improving power and accuracy of genome-wide association studies via a multi-locus mixed linear model methodology. Scientific Reports 6, 110.Google Scholar
Wimmers, K, Murani, E and Ponsuksili, S (2010) Functional genomics and genetical genomics approaches towards elucidating networks of genes affecting meat performance in pigs. Briefings in Functional Genomics 9, 251258.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wolf, MJ, Yin, T, Neumann, GB, Korkuć, P, Brockmann, GA, König, S and May, K (2021) Genome-wide association study using whole-genome sequence data for fertility, health indicator, and endoparasite infection traits in German black pied cattle. Genes 12, 1163.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yamamoto, I, Kaiya, H, Tsutsui, C, Sakai, T, Tsukada, A, Miyazato, M and Tanaka, M (2008) Primary structure, tissue distribution, and biological activity of chicken motilin receptor. General and Comparative Endocrinology 156, 509514.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ye, W, Xu, L, Li, Y, Liu, L, Ma, Z, Sun, D and Han, B (2022) Single nucleotide polymorphisms of ALDH18A1 and MAT2A genes and their genetic associations with milk production traits of Chinese Holstein cows. Genes 13, 1437.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zoheir, KM, Darwish, AM, Liguo, Y and Ashour, AE (2021) Transcriptome comparisons detect new genes associated with apoptosis of cattle and buffaloes preantral follicles. Journal of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology 19, 19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Jabbari Tourchi et al. supplementary material

Jabbari Tourchi et al. supplementary material
Download Jabbari Tourchi et al. supplementary material(File)
File 130.5 KB