Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T22:49:15.424Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Wide exposure to Coxiella burnetii in ruminant and feline species living in a natural environment: zoonoses in a human–livestock–wildlife interface

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 October 2016

M. G. CANDELA*
Affiliation:
Área de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Departamento de Sanidad Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain
A. CABALLOL
Affiliation:
Área de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Departamento de Sanidad Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain
P. M. ATANCE
Affiliation:
Área de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Departamento de Sanidad Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain
*
*Author for correspondence: Dr M. G. Candela, Área de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Departamento de Sanidad Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de Murcia, 30100 Murcia, Spain. (Email: [email protected])
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Assessment of the role of wild and domestic hosts as potential reservoirs of misdiagnosed zoonoses, such as Q fever by Coxiella burnetii, is an important public health issue today both for wildlife conservation and management of disease in human–livestock–wildlife interface. This study used ELISA, an indirect antibody, to research (2003–2013) C. burnetii infection in seven free-living wild and domestic ruminant species and in European wildcats (Felis silvestris). The animals studied were 0 European wildcats, 21 Spanish ibex (Capra pyrenaica), 314 red deer (Cervus elaphus), 556 fallow deer (Dama dama), 211 European mouflon (Ovis aries musimon), eight roe deer (Capreolus capreolus), 407 bovines (Bos taurus) and 3739 sheep (Ovis aries). All the animals shared the same habitat in the Serranía de Cuenca Natural Park (Castile-La Mancha, Spain). The study area is an example of human–domestic–wildlife interface where people and domestic animals live in close proximity to wildlife. Observed C. burnetii seropositive frequencies were: 33·3% European wildcats, 23·8% Spanish ibex, 22·5% domestic sheep 1·5% red deer, 1·4% European mouflon, 0·24% cattle, 0·18% fallow deer and 0% roe deer. The study found a wide C. burnetii prevalence of previous and present exposure in wild and domestic ruminant hosts in the Serranía de Cuenca Natural Park and reports the first evidence of C. burnetii exposure in free-living European wildcats.

Type
Short Report
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Q fever (coxiellosis in animals), caused by Coxiella burnetii, is an important worldwide zoonosis, with a very broad host range [Reference Maurin and Raoult1]. Forty percent of primary infections in humans are symptomatic and clinically polymorphic. The illness can be acute or chronic and may have serious sequelae, such as endocarditis, debilitating post-Q fever fatigue and granulomatous lesions in bone and soft tissues [Reference Maurin and Raoult1]. C. burnetii, recently included in the order Legionellales, has been detected in many host species, including vertebrate and invertebrate taxa. It can be found in ticks and other arthropods, but unlike other members belonging to its former family, Rickettsiaceae, C. burnetii maintenance is not dependent on arthropod transmission. The main mode of infection is via inhalation of contaminated aerosols from parturient secretions of infected animals. Considering that cattle, sheep and goats are the most commonly reported sources of infection for humans, it is striking that C. burnetii infection has scarcely been observed in wildlife species from areas with consolidated human–livestock–wildlife contact. Given the recent upsurge of outbreaks in humans reported in many parts of the world [Reference van der Hoek2Reference Ruiz Seco4], the aim of this study was to analyse C. burnetii infection in eight free-living wild and domestic species, including locally vulnerable species.

The species studied shared the same habitat in the Serranía de Cuenca Natural Park (SCNP) (Central Spain, 1° 51′–2° 03′ West, 40° 12′–40° 28′ North), a partially protected area (25 724 ha) with a traditional Mediterranean mountainous landscape. The survey was conducted between 2003 and 2013. The sample size used in this study was proportional to the population density of each species in the study territory. The sample comprised 21 Spanish ibex (Capra pyrenaica), 314 red deer (Cervus elaphus), 556 fallow deer (Dama dama), 211 European mouflon (Ovis aries musimon) and eight roe deer (Capreolus capreolus). The European wildcat (Felis silvestris) population in central Spain has, for its part, remained stable in recent years. Considering a minimum home range of 1·95 km2/animal [Reference Monterroso5], we estimated a maximum wildcat population of 128 for the SCNP. We also took into account the minimum seroprevalence reported for wild or stray cats in similar studies [Reference Meredith6] to calculate the minimum sample size required for wildcats from the SNCP. Assuming an expected seroprevalence of 25% (±3%) and a 95% confidence level, a minimum sample of 11 wildcats in the SNCP would be necessary. In consequence, samples were taken from nine wildcats. Samples from domestic animals totalled 407 cattle (Bos taurus) and 3739 sheep (Ovis aries), which were located in the SNCP at the time of sampling. Samples from domestic animals were obtained following the World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE) notifiable diseases official control and eradication programmes. Blood samples from wild ruminants were extracted from the jugular vein in live animals trapped with fixed capture boxes or directly from the heart or thoracic cavity in sport-hunted animals. Wildcats were trapped with fixed box traps, were anesthetized with a mixture of ketamine hydrochloride (Imalgene; Merial, France) and xylazine (Rompún; Bayer, Spain) and were released after reanimation at the same place of capture. Samples from wildcats were taken from the radial vein.

Blood samples collected were put into separator tubes (Venoject II, Terumo Europe, Leuven, Belgium), and centrifuged at 1800 g for 10 min to obtain sera, which were stored at −20 °C until analyses were performed. Both wild and domestic ruminant sera were tested for antibodies against C. burnetii using the commercially available CHEKIT* Q-Fever Antibody ELISA test kit (IDEXX, Switzerland), which uses ELISA plates coated with an inactivated mixture of C. burnetii phase I and II antigens (Nine Mile strain). The monoclonal secondary antibody used in this ELISA blocks an epitope that is shared by all the species belonging to the suborder Ruminantia (J. I. Salido, Technical Service Europe South IDEXX, personal communication). Samples were tested in duplicate and optical densities (ODs) were normalized using the formula:

$${\rm S}/{\rm P}\% = \,\displaystyle{{\left( {{\rm OD}_{{\rm sample}} -{\rm OD}_{{\rm negative \; control}}} \right)} \over {\left( {{\rm OD}_{{\rm positive}} -{\rm OD}_{{\rm negative \; control}}} \right)}} \times 100.$$

Following the manufacturers’ instructions, sera with S/P ⩾40% was considered positive, S/P <30% was deemed negative, and results in the interval 30%⩽S/P<40% were taken as inconclusive. Moreover, according to the manufacturers, the assay has a 99% diagnostic sensitivity (Se) and a 88·57% specificity (Sp). Wildcat sera were similarly tested at 1:400 dilution in duplicates following IDEXX Q-fever ELISA instructions. To adapt the ELISA to wildcat sera, we had to make some modifications along the lines of a previous validation assay performed with stray cat sera (M. G. Candela, unpublished results). Briefly, modifications made in the validated stray-cat assay included: (i) using a peroxidase-conjugated affinity purified goat anti-cat IgM (Bethyl Laboratories Inc., USA), which was titrated and used at a 1:5000 dilution in PBS; (ii) including stray-cat sera as positive and negative controls to normalize tested sera as described above. Corrected OD values of the stray-cat sera were plotted through a binomial distribution that separates positive and negative curves enabling us to select the best control sera. The stray cats selected as controls were seronegative to Toxoplasma gondii, Chlamydophila spp., Bartonella felis, feline immunodeficiency virus, feline leukaemia virus, feline coronavirus and feline panleukcopenia virus; (iii) using a 50% S/P% cut-off point, which has been shown to provide the highest specificity when using a receiver-operating curve analysis in the stray-cat samples [Reference Greiner7].

χ 2 test, or when appropriate, Fisher's exact test, was used to test differences between species in the proportion of animals displaying serological evidence of exposure to C. burnetti and significance was considered at P < 0·05 for a double-tailed test. Odds ratios [with 95% Cornefield confidence intervals (CI)] were used to estimate the risk of C. burnetii exposure associated to different host species.

Antibodies against C. burnetii were detected in all species tested, except in roe deer. Seroprevalence was 33% (95% CI 2·53–64·13) in European wildcats, 24% (95% CI 5·59–42·03) in Spanish ibex, 19% (95% CI 17·68–20·19) in domestic sheep, 1·6% (95% CI 0·21–2·98) in red deer, 1·4% (95% CI 0·00–3·02) in European mouflon, 0·2% (95% CI 0–0·727) in cattle, and 0·1% (95% CI 0–0·53) in fallow deer (Table 1). The odds ratio (OR) of seropositivity was significantly higher in domestic sheep compared to the other species (P < 0·05) (Table 1).

Table 1. Prevalence of present/previous exposure to Coxiella burnetii

Odds ratio (OR) of the exposure to C. burnetii. χ 2 difference test

D, Doubtful; P, prevalence of exposure (frequency expressed in %); No., total number of samples; CI, confidence interval; NP, not performed (it is not possible when the sample is small).

Our results indicate that C. burnetii infection is widespread in wild and domestic species that share the same habitat in the SCNP, and suggest that some (mainly sheep and Spanish ibex) may play a significant role in the Q fever–coxiellosis epidemiological cycle in the protected area studied. The presence of animals displaying serological evidence of exposure to C. burnetii does not necessarily imply that animals remain infected and shed organisms into the environment. However, the reasonably high prevalence of previous exposure in these populations suggests that infection is probably widespread within the animals in the SCNP, and that these animals may potentially be a source of infection for other animals and humans. It is important to note that a variety of human activities (rearing domestic herds, hunting, forestry works, ecotourism) are carried out in this human–domestic–wildlife interface, where people and their domestic animals live in close proximity to wildlife.

Q fever has been diagnosed in animals and people in Spain with variable seroprevalence [Reference Ruiz Seco4, Reference Espejo8]. It has also been recognized as an important public health problem in other European rural areas in The Netherlands [Reference van der Hoek2] and in France [Reference King3]. Furthermore, it has been associated with living and working near ruminant farms or manure-covered fields [Reference King3, Reference Ruiz Seco4], where the wind factor increases the risk of infection [Reference Tissot-Dupont9]. The risk of infection can also increase in the spring months, when most of the births in wild and domestic ruminants occur. Most human Q fever cases in Spain [Reference Espejo8] and Southern France [Reference King3] also appear in spring. The high C. burnetii infection found in sheep from the SCNP and their potential role in human infection requires researching.

The ELISA technique used in the survey successfully detected the immunoglobulin response against C. burnetii in the ruminant species analysed, except in roe deer. This technique, which is recommended by the OIE [10], shows high sensitivity and good specificity. The IDEXX Q-fever ELISA can be used in different ruminant species, since it uses an unspecific conjugate that binds to a common IgG epitope present in the suborder Ruminantia (IDEXX technical services, personal communication). This kit was previously used and assessed by our research group in a C. burnetii study on roe deer [Reference Candela11].

Our study shows for the first time that free-living European wildcats are exposed to infection with C. burnetii, which suggests they should be considered a part of the epidemiological cycle of C. burnetii, in the same way as stray and pet cats [Reference Meredith6, Reference Komiya12, Reference Shapiro13]. Seroepidemiological studies conducted in stray cats in Japan and the UK have reported high prevalence values of antibodies to C. burnetii, ranging from 33·3% to 72·67% [Reference Meredith6, Reference Komiya12]. Although it is difficult to compare reported seroprevalence due to the different methodologies used, these studies provide an overview of the level of infection in free-roaming felines and highlight their potential zoonotic risk to humans. In addition, domestic felines have been recently considered as both a reservoir [Reference Komiya12, Reference Shapiro13] and an important route of infection to humans [Reference Shapiro13].

As with many other infectious diseases in humans, IgM antibodies appear first in response to C. burnetii infection and persist for at least 1 year. IgG appears later and can persist for several years [Reference Tissot-Dupont14]. Since the antigen used by our ELISA is a mix between phases I and II of C. burnetii, we have not been able to distinguish between phases. However, if the immunological pattern developed by wildcats mimics the features observed in humans, the use of an anti-IgM conjugate in the modified ELISA could maximize the detection of acute infection in the sampled animals.

The wide home range of the wildcats and the difficulties in capturing them, as well as the comparatively low density of this feline species, may explain why few wildcats have been tested and the wide confidence range observed in C. burnetii seroprevalence. Wildcats were captured reasonably far from each other and seroprevalence detected in our study is in agreement with those reported by other authors [Reference Meredith6, Reference Komiya12]. Nevertheless, it should be borne in mind that a possible explanation for the prevalence detected could be infections acquired in agonistic encounters between males, or the fact that some of the animal tested belonged to a litter born from an infected female. Most of the epidemiological features of C. burnetii transmission in wildcats remain to be elucidated.

In summary, this study confirms the exposure to infection in wild and domestic animals in the SCNP, including wildcats, whose exposure to infection has not been previously described. There is a clear need for further interdisciplinary studies involving veterinary, biological and medical services to improve our understanding of the complexity of the Q fever–coxiellosis epidemiology in its natural environment in Spain.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors thank Julian G. Mangas, Xoxé Pardavila, Adrián Lamosa and the other enthusiastic biologists for their support with wildcat trapping work. We also like thank the ‘Albaladejito’ Veterinary Laboratory, veterinary practitioners, farmers and gamekeepers from the Serranía de Cuenca Regional Game Reserve who helped us with the field work. The authors also thank Dr Berriatua and Dr Barberá, for the critical review of the manuscript, and the fruitful discussion and support about distribution phenomena of serological data. Finally, we thank the anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments, which helped to improve the quality of the manuscript. Financial support for this research was provided by the Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria (INIA), the Government of Castilla-La Mancha, and the Universidad de Murcia.

DECLARATION OF INTEREST

None.

References

REFERENCES

1. Maurin, M, Raoult, D. Q Fever. Clinical Microbioly Reviews 1999; 12: 518553.Google Scholar
2. van der Hoek, W, et al. Q fever in the Netherlands: an update on the epidemiology and control measures. Eurosurveillance 2010; 15: pii: 19520.Google Scholar
3. King, LA, et al. Outbreak of Q fever, Florac, Southern France, Spring 2007. Vector Borne and Zoonotic Diseases 2011; 11: 341347.Google Scholar
4. Ruiz Seco, MP, et al. Q fever: 54 new cases from a tertiary hospital in Madrid. Revista Clínica Española 2011; 211: 240244.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Monterroso, P, et al. Spatial ecology of the European wildcat in a Mediterranean ecosystem: dealing with small radio-tracking datasets in species conservation. Journal of Zoology 2009; 279: 2735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Meredith, AL, et al. Coxiella burnetii (Q-Fever) seroprevalence in prey and predators in the United Kingdom: Evaluation of infection in wild rodents, foxes and domestic cats using a modified ELISA. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases 2015; 62: 639649.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Greiner, M, et al. Principles and practical application of the receiver-operating characteristic analysis for diagnostic tests. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 2000; 45: 2341.Google Scholar
8. Espejo, E, et al. Clinical presentation of acute Q fever in Spain: seasonal and geographical differences. International Journal of Infectious Diseases 2014; 26: 162164.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Tissot-Dupont, H, et al. Wind in November, Q fever in December. Emerging Infectious Diseases 2004; 10: 12641269.Google Scholar
10. OIE Terrestrial Manual. Q fever, chapter 2·1·12, pp. 1–13, 2010.Google Scholar
11. Candela, M, et al. Pathogens of zoonotic and biological importance in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus): seroprevalence in an agro-system population in France. Research in Veterinary Science 2014; 96: 254259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Komiya, T, et al. Seroprevalence of Coxiella burnetii infections among cats in different living environments. Journal of Veterinary Medical Science 2003; 65: 10471048.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13. Shapiro, A. Seroprevalence of Coxiella burnetii in domesticated and feral cats in eastern Australia. Veterinary Microbiology 2015; 177: 154161.Google Scholar
14. Tissot-Dupont, H, et al. Q fever serology: cutoff determination for microimmunofluorescence. Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology 1994; 1: 189196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Prevalence of present/previous exposure to Coxiella burnetii