Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T20:24:23.032Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Antioxidative and immunomodulatory effects of tributyrin supplementation on experimental colitis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 August 2012

Alda J. Leonel*
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry and Immunology, Institute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Avenida Antonio Carlos, 6627, Pampulha, Belo Horizonte, CEP 31270-901, MG, Brazil
Lílian G. Teixeira
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry and Immunology, Institute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Avenida Antonio Carlos, 6627, Pampulha, Belo Horizonte, CEP 31270-901, MG, Brazil
Rafael P. Oliveira
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry and Immunology, Institute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Avenida Antonio Carlos, 6627, Pampulha, Belo Horizonte, CEP 31270-901, MG, Brazil
Andrezza F. Santiago
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry and Immunology, Institute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Avenida Antonio Carlos, 6627, Pampulha, Belo Horizonte, CEP 31270-901, MG, Brazil
Nathália V. Batista
Affiliation:
Department of Morphology, Institute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
Talita R. Ferreira
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry and Immunology, Institute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Avenida Antonio Carlos, 6627, Pampulha, Belo Horizonte, CEP 31270-901, MG, Brazil
Rosana C. Santos
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical and Toxicological Analysis, Faculty of Pharmacy, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
Valbert N. Cardoso
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical and Toxicological Analysis, Faculty of Pharmacy, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
Denise C. Cara
Affiliation:
Department of Morphology, Institute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
Ana M. C. Faria
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry and Immunology, Institute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Avenida Antonio Carlos, 6627, Pampulha, Belo Horizonte, CEP 31270-901, MG, Brazil
Jacqueline Alvarez-Leite
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry and Immunology, Institute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Avenida Antonio Carlos, 6627, Pampulha, Belo Horizonte, CEP 31270-901, MG, Brazil
*
*Corresponding author: A. J. Leonel, fax +55 3134092614, email [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Tributyrin (TBT) is a TAG composed of three butyric acids that has beneficial effects on ulcerative colitis due to its trophic, anti-inflammatory, pro-apoptotic and anti-carcinogenic properties. The goal of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and mechanisms of action of TBT supplementation in the prevention of mucosal damage in experimental colitis. Mice received either a control diet or a TBT-supplemented diet for 15 d. Colitis was induced by dextran sodium sulphate administration during the last 7 d. Mucosal damage and the activation of immune cells and cytokines were determined by histological score, flow cytometry and ELISA. Leucocyte rolling and adhesion were assessed by intravital microscopy. Oxidative stress was determined by monitoring hydroperoxide concentration and evaluating superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase activities. Intestinal permeability was analysed using diethylenetriaminepentaacetate acid (99mTcDTPA). Compared with the colitis group, the animals in the colitis+TBT group had reduced mucosal damage and neutrophil and eosinophil mucosal infiltration, which were associated with a higher percentage of regulatory T cells (Treg) and higher levels of transforming growth factor β and IL-10 in the lamina propria. The level of in vivo leucocyte adhesion in the colon microvasculature was reduced after TBT supplementation. A lower level of hydroperoxide and higher levels of SOD and catalase activities were associated with TBT supplementation. TBT-supplemented mice showed reduced intestinal permeability to the levels intermediate between the control and colitis groups. In conclusion, the present results show that TBT has positive effects on colonic restructuring in experimental colitis. Additionally, TBT supplementation changes the immune response by controlling inflammation and regulating the expression of anti-inflammatory cytokines and Treg.

Type
Full Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2012

Tributyrin (TBT) is a TAG present in butter. It is composed of three molecules of butyric acid which is a four-carbon SCFA produced from the fermentation of dietary fibres and undigested carbohydrates by intestinal microbiota. Butyrate is the preferential fuel of colonocytes and functions as a trophic, anti-inflammatory, pro-apoptotic and anti-carcinogenic agent(Reference Bailon, Cueto-Sola and Utrilla1Reference Kinoshita, Suzuki and Saito7). All these properties make butyrate a potential adjuvant in the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases, particularly ulcerative colitis (UC).

UC begins in the rectum and extends along the colon in the retrograde direction(Reference Serpe, Canaparo and Daperno3, Reference Ferguson, Shelling and Browning8). The active phase of UC is characterised by crypt abscesses and ulcerations that affect the mucosa and submucosa. The ulcerations cause intense inflammatory infiltrate and oxidative stress in the colon. Although the aetiology of the disease is not fully understood, a combination of genetic, immune and environmental factors is involved in the disease onset(Reference Dianzani, Cavalli and Zara2, Reference Danese and Fiocchi9Reference Yan, Kolachala and Dalmasso15).

Butyrate enemas have been used in the treatment of UC with positive clinical results(Reference Scheppach16Reference Patz, Jacobsohn and Gottschalk-Sabag18). Oral butyrate supplementation effectively reduces inflammation in experimental studies of dextran sodium sulphate (DSS)-induced colitis(Reference Vieira, Leonel and Sad4). However, oral butyrate use in clinical trials is limited due to its disagreeable odour and its unwanted side effects, which include nausea, headache and anorexia(Reference Dianzani, Cavalli and Zara2, Reference Serpe, Canaparo and Daperno3). Despite these limitations, oral butyrate reduces inflammatory infiltrate and enhances mucosal regeneration(Reference Dianzani, Cavalli and Zara2, Reference Serpe, Canaparo and Daperno3). TBT is not volatile and is odourless. Moreover, similar to other medium-chain TAG, TBT is hydrolysed more rapidly by lipases than long-chain fatty acids. TBT does not require bile salts for absorption because it is water-soluble, and can be absorbed as an intact TAG. Once inside the intestinal epithelial cell, it is rapidly hydrolysed into three molecules of butyrate by specific cellular lipases(Reference Dianzani, Cavalli and Zara2, Reference Edelman, Bauer and Khanwani19). Thus, oral supplementation of TBT could potentially replace butyrate enemas in UC treatment. However, the faster absorption rate of butyrate along the proximal areas of the gastrointestinal tract could reduce the amount of butyrate released in the distal colon, where most of the UC lesions are located.

In the present study, we evaluated the efficacy of oral TBT supplementation in a model of DSS-induced UC. We investigated TBT action on mucosal trophism, the intestinal barrier, oxidative stress and the profiles of immune cells and cytokines.

Methods

Experimental protocol

The present study followed the institutional and national guidelines for the care and use of animals. All experimental procedures were approved by the Ethics Committee for Animal Experimentation of the Federal University of Minas Gerais (#223/2008). Mice (C57BL/6, 8 weeks old) were divided into three groups. The control animals received water and the standard rodent diet AIN-93M(Reference Reeves, Nielsen and Fahey20). The colitis animals received a DSS solution and the standard diet. The colitis+TBT animals received a DSS solution and a TBT-supplemented standard diet (5 g/kg diet). The animals were kept in collective cages with 12 h light–dark cycles, controlled temperature (22 ± 2°C) and free access to food and water. The animals' weight and their food and water intakes were evaluated weekly.

In the main experiment, the diet was offered for 2 weeks and DSS (molecular weight 36 000–50 000 Da; MP Biomedicals) was added to the drinking water (2·0 %) on the 8th experimental day. On the 10th or 15th experimental day (3 or 7 d after the introduction of DSS, respectively), all animals were euthanised under anaesthesia for removal of blood and organs. The results were obtained after 7 d of DSS administration, unless otherwise stated.

The colon was removed and fixed in 4 % formaldehyde for 4 h. The tissue was then embedded in paraplast and sectioned (10 μm thick) for haematoxylin and eosin staining. After image acquisition using Image Pro Plus software (Media Cybernetics), the images were analysed using a semi-quantitative score as described previously(Reference McCafferty, Sihota and Muscara21).

The intestinal permeability experiments were performed on the day of killing (15th experimental day). The animals were given 100 μl diethylenetriaminepentaacetate acid (DTPA) labelled with 3·7 MBq of 99mtechnetium by oral administration 4 h before killing. The determination of the level of radiation in the blood of animals was performed using an automatic scintillator (Mor; Abbott). The results are presented as the percentage of the radiation dose, which was calculated using the following formula:

$$\begin{eqnarray} \%\,Dose = (CPM\,in\,blood\times 100)/CPM\,of\,the\,standard\,dose, \end{eqnarray}$$

where CPM is counts per min.

The enzyme activities of myeloperoxidase, N-acetylglucosaminidase and eosinophil peroxidase were evaluated in the colon, as described previously(Reference Werner and Szelenyi22). Briefly, tissue samples were homogenised and centrifuged. The pellets were dissolved in 0·5 % hexadecyl trimethyl ammonium bromide (HETAB) in phosphate buffer and, after homogenisation and freezing/thawing sessions, the suspensions were centrifuged and the supernatants were used for the quantification of the enzymes. For eosinophil peroxidase quantification, 75 μl of the supernatant were added to 75 μl O-phenylenediamine (Sigma-Aldrich), diluted in Tris–HCl and H2O2, and incubated at 37°C in the dark for 30 min. The reaction was stopped by adding 50 μl H2SO4, and then fluorescence was read at 492 nm. For myeloperoxidase quantification, 25 μl of the supernatant were added to 25 μl 3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine (Sigma-Aldrich) in dimethyl sulphoxide (Sigma-Aldrich) and the mixture was incubated at 37°C for 5 min. Then, 100 μl of H2O2 were added to the supernatant. The reaction was stopped by adding H2SO4, and then fluorescence was read at 450 nm. For N-acetylglucosaminidase quantification, the precipitates were dissolved in Triton X-100 (0·1%; Sigma-Aldrich) and then centrifuged. Then, 100 μl of the supernatant were added to 100 μl p-nitrophenyl-N-acetyl-β-d-glucosamine (Sigma-Aldrich) in citrate/phosphate buffer. After incubation, 100 μl of glycine buffer were used to stop the reaction, and fluorescence was read at 400 nm.

To isolate leucocytes for flow cytometry, the caecal lymph node and spleen were macerated in complete Roswell Park Memorial Institute medium and processed as described previously(Reference Taylor, Thomas, Mills and Klaus23). The leucocytes in the lamina propria were separated as described previously(Reference Santiago, Alves and Oliveira24). The cell suspensions were incubated with specific antibodies and then fixed (1 % paraformaldehyde) and analysed by flow cytometry (FACScan; Becton Dickinson). Data acquisition was performed using CELLQuestTM and analysed using FlowJo software 7.6 (Treestar). The analyses were performed in the specific gates for lymphocytes or monocytes/dendritic cell populations. We used the following antibody combinations (BD Pharmingen) to detect specific cell types: regulatory T lymphocytes (CD4+CD25+LAP+ and CD4+CD25+FOXP3+ cells); T helper lymphocyte memory cells (CD4+CD44+); activated T helper lymphocytes (CD4+CD69+); B1 lymphocytes (CD5+CD19+ cells); activated B lymphocyte (CD19+CD21+ cells); monocyte and macrophage (MOMA+ cells); activated macrophage (MOMA+CD80+ cells); dendritic cells (CD11c+ cells). For cytokine analyses (TNF-α, interferon γ, IL-4, IL-1β, IL-17, IL-10 and transforming growth factor β (TGF-β)), colons were homogenised in the extraction solution and centrifuged (10 000 rpm, 10 min, 4°C). The supernatant collected was used to detect cytokines by ELISA using commercial kits (R&D Systems) according to the manufacturer's instructions.

The total blood leucocyte counts were analysed in a Neubauer chamber after Turk staining (1:10 dilution). The differential count was performed using the Quick Panoptic kit (LaborClin).

Intravital microscopy was performed in the colon of mice after overnight fasting. The procedure was performed while the animals were under anaesthesia. After intravenous rhodamine 6G (Sigma Chemical) injection (0·15 mg/kg), the colonic microcirculation was visualised by fluorescence microscopy (Nikon Eclipse). Rolling cells were defined as the number of leucocytes passing by a certain point during 1 min in a specific colonic venule. Adherent cells were defined as cells remaining in a same region for at least 30 s. The results were expressed as the number of adherent cells in a 100 μm region of a specific venule.

Oxidative stress in the colon was evaluated by analysing several factors including thiobarbituric acid-reactive species(Reference Buege and Aust25), hydroperoxide concentration(Reference Banerjee, Kumar and Kumar26), superoxide dismutase activity(Reference Dieterich, Bieligk and Beulich27) and catalase activity(Reference Nelson and Kiesow28). All results were normalised to total protein concentration in the colon. Protein concentration was analysed using the Lowry method(Reference Lowry, Rosebrough and Farr29).

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 5.0 software (GraphPad). Results were evaluated by the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test for normality, and Grubbs' tests and box plot for outliers. Data with a normal distribution were tested using one-way ANOVA and Newman–Keuls post hoc test analysis, while non-parametric data were tested by Kruskal–Wallis ANOVA and Dunn's tests. Results are expressed as means with their standard errors with a significance level of 5 % (P< 0·05).

Results

Weight gain and food and water intakes were similar among all groups before DSS administration. During the 7 d of DSS administration, as expected, there was weight loss in both groups receiving DSS, regardless of whether they received TBT (Table 1).

Table 1 Weight variation, food intake and water intake* (Mean values with their standard errors)

Control, group receiving the standard diet; colitis, group receiving the standard diet and dextran sodium sulphate (DSS); colitis+TBT, group receiving the tributyrin-rich diet and DSS.

a,bMean values with unlike superscript letters were significantly different (P< 0·05; one-way ANOVA and Newman–Keuls multiple comparison test).

* n 11 per group for food and water intake with 7 d of DSS administration; n 3 per group for food and water intake with 3 d of DSS administration; n 12/14 per group for weight variation with 7 and 3 d of DSS administration.

Colitis was histologically confirmed in the colitis group by the presence of areas with intense ulceration, the depletion of goblet cells, the presence of abscesses in the crypts, the thickening of the muscle layers and an intense level of inflammatory infiltrate. The animals supplemented with TBT, compared with non-supplemented mice, presented an improved mucosal architecture (with more preserved areas), a reduced extension and intensity of the inflammatory infiltrate, and an absence of mucosal ulcerations (Fig. 1). In the colitis group, both the apical and basal regions of the mucosa were compromised. However, in the colitis+TBT group, the apical part of the mucosa had some architectural damage, whereas the basal mucosal cells were undamaged (Fig. 1(C)). The total histopathological score and the individual score items were improved with TBT supplementation (Fig. 1(D)–(F)).

Fig. 1 Histopathological analysis of the colonic mucosa of animals from (A) the control group receiving the standard diet (□), (B) the colitis group receiving the standard diet and dextran sodium sulphate (DSS) () and (C) the colitis+tributyrin (TBT) group receiving the TBT-rich diet and DSS (), and (D) the total histopathological score and components: (E) mucosal architecture, inflammatory infiltration and muscle layer thickness, (F) depletion of goblet cells and mucosal abscesses of colonic mucosa (n 4 per group). , Present; □, absent. a,b,cMean values with unlike letters were significantly different (P< 0·05; one-way ANOVA and Newman–Keuls multiple comparison test). (A colour version of this figure can be found online at http://www.journals.cambridge.org/bjn)

Because the level of inflammatory cell infiltration was reduced in the colitis+TBT group, we analysed the intensity of macrophage, neutrophil and eosinophil infiltration. The results showed increased infiltration of both neutrophils and eosinophils in the colitis group. The level of neutrophil and eosinophil infiltration was significantly reduced after TBT supplementation (Fig. 2(A) and (B)). There were no differences observed in macrophage infiltration (Fig. 2(C)).

Fig. 2 Evaluation of the enzyme activities of (A) eosinophil peroxidase (EPO), (B) myeloperoxidase (MPO) and (C) N-acetylglucosaminidase (NAG), as an indirect determination of eosinophil, neutrophil and macrophage infiltration, respectively. Intravital microscopy showing (D) the rolling and (E) the adhesion of leucocytes in the colons of animals from the control group receiving the standard diet, the colitis group receiving the standard diet and dextran sodium sulphate (DSS) and the colitis+tributyrin (TBT) group receiving the TBT-rich diet and DSS (n 10 mice per group for EPO, MPO and NAG; n 3/4 per group for adhesion and rolling). a,b,cMean values with unlike letters were significantly different (P< 0·05; one-way ANOVA and Newman–Keuls multiple comparison test).

We also evaluated the distribution of lymphocyte subtypes, dendritic cells and activated macrophage in the lamina propria, caecal lymph node, spleen and blood. Compared with the colitis group, the percentages of these cell types were not significantly different in the colitis+TBT group. However, only the colitis+TBT group presented higher percentages of LAP+regulatory T cells (Treg) and activated macrophages in the lamina propria compared with the control group (Table 2). The changes in immune cells in the lymph nodes are similar to those seen in the lamina propria. The immune cell profile of the spleen and blood was not significantly affected by colitis because the cell distribution was similar among all groups (Table 2).

Table 2 Profile of leucocytes in the lamina propria, caecal lymph node, spleen and blood of mice from the control group receiving the standard diet, the colitis group receiving the standard diet and dextran sodium sulphate (DSS), the colitis+tributyrin (TBT) group receiving the TBT-rich diet and dextran sodium sulphate* (Mean values with their standard errors, n 4–5 per group)

a,bMean values with unlike superscript letters were significantly different (P< 0·05; one-way ANOVA and Newman–Keuls multiple comparison test).

* 7 d of DSS administration.

All data represent percentage of cells in each respective gate, except for total number of blood cells, which are expressed as cells/mm3 blood.

The balance between the pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines was also evaluated. There were no differences observed in the levels of TNF-α, interferon γ, IL-4 and IL-17 (Fig. 3(A)–(D)). However, IL-1β was significantly elevated in the colitis+TBT group compared with the other groups (Fig. 3(E)). The concentration of the anti-inflammatory cytokine TGF-β was increased in TBT-supplemented mice compared with the controls (Fig. 3(F)). Moreover, the reduction of IL-10 levels caused by colitis was partially reversed by TBT supplementation, as indicated by the fact that the IL-10 level in the colitis+TBT group was similar to that between the control and colitis levels (Fig. 3(G)).

Fig. 3 Cytokine concentrations in the colons of animals from the control group receiving the standard diet, the colitis group receiving the standard diet and dextran sodium sulphate (DSS) and the colitis+tributyrin (TBT) group receiving the TBT-rich diet and DSS (n 4–6 per group for each cytokine). a,b,cMean values with unlike letters were significantly different (P< 0·05; one-way ANOVA and Newman–Keuls multiple comparison test). IFN-γ, interferon γ; TGF-β, transforming growth factor β.

These changes in mucosal inflammation were confirmed by in vivo evaluation of leucocyte rolling and adhesion in the colon microvasculature. The number of rolling cells was augmented in both colitis groups compared with the control group. However, TBT supplementation partially reversed the increased cell adhesion observed in the colitis group (Fig. 2(D) and (E)).

According to the thiobarbituric acid-reactive species results, the level of lipid peroxidation showed no difference among the experimental groups (Fig. 4(A)). The increased hydroperoxide concentration after colitis induction was lower in TBT-supplemented mice (Fig. 4(B)). Associated with this partial improvement in hydroperoxide concentration, superoxide dismutase and catalase activities were also increased by TBT supplementation compared with the non-supplemented group (Fig. 4(C) and (D)).

Fig. 4 (A) Analysis of thiobarbituric acid-reactive species (TBARS), measurement of (B) hydroperoxide level, (C) superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity and (D) catalase activity in the colon of animals from the control group receiving the standard diet, the colitis group receiving the standard diet and dextran sodium sulphate (DSS) and the colitis+tributyrin (TBT) group receiving the TBT-rich diet and DSS (n 5/6 per group for TBARS, n 4 per group for hydroperoxide and n 4/5 per group for superoxide dismutase and catalase). a,bMean values with unlike letters were significantly different (P< 0·05; one-way ANOVA and Newman–Keuls multiple comparison test). MDA, malondialdehyde.

To investigate the colon damage induced by colitis, we evaluated the 99mTc recovery in the blood of a standard dose of 99mTcDTPA given by oral administration. 99mTcDTPA was minimally absorbed throughout the intestines in the control group (Fig. 5). The present results confirm the increase in permeability in the animals from the colitis group. The results of the present experiment show that TBT reduces the intestinal permeability to intermediate levels between the colitis and control groups.

Fig. 5 Intestinal permeability of animals from the control group receiving the standard diet, the colitis group receiving the standard diet and dextran sodium sulphate (DSS) and the colitis+tributyrin (TBT) group receiving the TBT-rich diet and DSS (n 5 per group). a,bMean values with unlike letters were significantly different (P< 0·05; one-way ANOVA and Newman–Keuls multiple comparison test).

We also evaluated colitis evolution by studying TBT action after 3 d of colitis induction. The animal weight gain and water and food intake were similar between the groups. These results suggest that the intensity of colitis was moderate and did not affect general metabolism (Table 1).

Although no weight loss was observed, it was possible to see areas with discrete ulcerations, goblet cell depletion and moderate inflammatory infiltrate in both colitis groups (Fig. 6). Additionally, the histological score did not show any improvement in the colitis+TBT group (Fig. 6(D)–(F)). An analysis of neutrophil and eosinophil infiltration showed increased neutrophil infiltration in both colitis groups. However, there was a small but significant reduction in TBT-supplemented mice (Fig. 7(B)). Eosinophil infiltration was similar among the groups (Fig. 7(A)).

Fig. 6 Histopathological analysis of the colonic mucosa of animals from (A) the control group receiving the standard diet (□), (B) the colitis group receiving the standard diet and dextran sodium sulphate (DSS) () and (C) the colitis+tributyrin (TBT) group receiving the TBT-rich diet and DSS for 3 d (), and (D) the total histopathological score and components: (E) mucosal architecture, inflammatory infiltration and muscle layer thickness, (F) depletion of goblet cells and mucosal abscesses of colonic mucosa (n 5 per group). , Present; □, absent. a,bMean values with unlike letters were significantly different (P< 0·05; one-way ANOVA and Newman–Keuls multiple comparison test). (A colour version of this figure can be found online at http://www.journals.cambridge.org/bjn)

Fig. 7 Evaluation of the enzyme activities of (A) eosinophil peroxidase (EPO) and (B) myeloperoxidase (MPO), as an indirect determination of eosinophil and neutrophil infiltration, respectively; (C) analysis of thiobarbituric acid-reactive species (TBARS), and measurement of (D) hydroperoxide levels, (E) superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity and (F) catalase activity of colons of animals from the control group receiving the standard diet, the colitis group receiving the standard diet and dextran sodium sulphate (DSS) and the colitis+tributyrin (TBT) group receiving the TBT-rich diet and DSS for 3 d (n 3/6 per group for EPO and MPO, n 4/6 per group for TBARS and hydroperoxide and n 6/8 per group for SOD and catalase). a,b,cMean values with unlike letters were significantly different (P< 0·05; one-way ANOVA and Newman–Keuls multiple comparison test). MDA, malondialdehyde.

An analysis of oxidative stress showed that the alteration of hydroperoxide concentration as well as catalase activity occurred earlier in the DSS-treated groups (Fig. 7(D) and (F)). Collectively, the results suggest that a reduction of neutrophil infiltration, with its consequent reduction of oxidative stress, were the earliest detectable events after TBT supplementation.

Discussion

The present results show that TBT supplementation, acting pre-emptively, provides the same beneficial effects as butyrate in UC that were observed in our previous study(Reference Vieira, Leonel and Sad4). The present results suggest that faster repair, instead of damage prevention, is the main mechanism of TBT action. In addition to the trophic effects evidenced by histology, TBT supplementation was able to control inflammation by reducing the migration of neutrophils and eosinophils. Additionally, TBT increased the population of Treg and the concentrations of TGF-β and IL-10 anti-inflammatory cytokines. The induction of oxidative stress, an important component of cellular damage, was also attenuated mainly by the up-regulation of catalase and superoxide dismutase activities. This modulation of inflammatory status was shown by the in vivo demonstration of impaired leucocyte adhesion in the colonic microvasculature of TBT-supplemented mice.

The trophic effects of butyrate on colonocytes are well known(Reference Hamer, Jonkers and Venema6, Reference Menzel, Luhrs and Zirlik30, Reference Hallert, Björck and Nyman31) and are related to an increase in cell metabolism, cell differentiation and proliferation, and reconstruction of the damaged colonic mucosa. Similar to butyrate(Reference Vieira, Leonel and Sad4), TBT supplementation was able to improve the mucosal architecture, reducing the size and severity of lesions. However, the present study goes beyond the histological aspects of such effects and reveals some of the mechanisms by which TBT modulates the inflammatory response related to colon damage.

We treated mice for 3 or 7 d with DSS to induce colitis. We chose these DSS administration times because intestinal epithelial renewal (from the basal to apical regions) occurs every 3–4 d. Therefore, all intestinal cells were renewed at least once after the beginning of DSS administration, offering a more homogeneous result. Additionally, considering the intestinal cells' renewal and also the differences between the apical and basal cells, we supplemented mice 7 d before DSS administration to guarantee that all cells had been exposed to TBT during their maturation period. The colon histology data after 3 or 7 d of colitis induction suggest that the effects of TBT start as soon as 3 d after colitis induction. Supplementation with TBT improves the mucosal architecture and neutrophil infiltration.

Associated with its trophic action, we observed that TBT supplementation improved the intestinal permeability. 99mTcDTPA is used to determine the paracellular permeability in situations of discrete changes in the intestinal barrier. However, if the lesion is large enough to cause the loss of cellular integrity, 99mTcDTPA will have access to the systemic circulation by a transcellular route. Because we observed a complete loss of the mucosal architecture in the colitis group, both paracellular and transcellular permeability were increased. The improvement in mucosal lesions and the absence of ulcerations suggest that transcellular permeability is being repaired by TBT. However, paracellular permeability is still altered because the 99mTcDTPA recovery in the blood of TBT-supplemented animals is between those of the control and colitis groups. The present study confirms in an experimental model the results obtained by several in vitro studies that show the effect of butyrate on permeability(Reference Hamer, Jonkers and Venema6, Reference Kinoshita, Suzuki and Saito7, Reference Menzel, Luhrs and Zirlik30, Reference Peng, He and Chen32).

Eosinophils and neutrophils are known inflammatory effectors in UC. The infiltration of these cell types can enhance mucosal damage and dysfunction that perpetuates colon inflammation(Reference Rothenberg, Mishra and Brandt33Reference Coppi, Thomazzi and de Ayrizono36). Eosinophils can cause tissue damage by releasing lipid mediators such as platelet-activating factor, leukotrienes and toxic granule protein(Reference Rothenberg, Mishra and Brandt33, Reference Rothenberg37). It has been suggested that eosinophils also act as antigen-presenting cells that stimulate T-cell proliferation and activation(Reference Wolever, Fernandes and Rao38). Neutrophil migration is responsible for extensive colon damage as well as the release of toxic components and free radicals(Reference Elson, Sartor and Tennyson39, Reference Wirtz and Neurath40). Supplementation with TBT was also able to reduce neutrophil infiltration, the predominant inflammatory cell type in acute UC. This result further confirms the anti-inflammatory effects of TBT. Similar results were observed when intraluminal infusions of butyrate or SCFA were administrated in DSS-induced colitis rats(Reference Venkatraman, Ramakrishna and Shaji41, Reference Videla, Vilaseca and Antolin42). It should be noted that reduced neutrophil infiltration associated with TBT is the earliest effect detected by the present study. The reduction in neutrophils can be detected with only 3 d of colitis induction, which occurs before the histological evidence of mucosal damage and improvement of inflammatory score were observable. The effect on neutrophil infiltration may be due to a direct effect of TBT (or butyrate) on these inflammatory cells or may be due to a faster mucosal repair, which would reduce intraluminal inflammatory stimuli. Cell rolling and adhesion are initial steps for cell infiltration. Our intravital microscopy data suggest that the lower neutrophil infiltration observed in the present study was due to impaired cell adhesion in the colon microvasculature, slowing the access of inflammatory cells to the damaged mucosa. The present data are supported by others showing the effect of butyrate in reducing the expression of the adhesion molecule vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 and inhibiting the adhesion of leucocytes to the vascular endothelium(Reference Dianzani, Cavalli and Zara2, Reference Menzel, Luhrs and Zirlik30).

In addition to the enhanced inflammatory infiltrate, colitis is also linked to extensive mucosal injury. Mucosal injury increases the production and release of reactive oxygen species such as superoxide and H2O2 by neutrophils(Reference Rezaie, Parker and Abdollahi10, Reference Naito, Takagi and Yoshikawa35, Reference Damiani, Benetton and Stoffel43). In the present study, the reduction of neutrophil infiltration after TBT supplementation resulted in a reduced production of hydroperoxides. A reduction of reactive oxygen species production should be accompanied by the down-regulation of superoxide dismutase and catalase activities due to a reduction of their substrates. However, the present experiments showed an increased activity of both enzymes after TBT supplementation. These data suggest that TBT has a direct effect on the activity of these antioxidant enzymes. A similar finding has been described previously for butyrate(Reference Sauer, Richter and Pool-Zobel44). In addition to the influence on enzyme activity, butyrate also increases the expression of enzymes by acting as an inhibitor of the enzyme histone deacetylase(Reference Sauer, Richter and Pool-Zobel44Reference Abrahamse, Pool-Zobel and Rechkemmer46).

The level of macrophage infiltration was not different among any of the groups. However, TBT-supplemented mice had a significantly higher percentage of activated macrophages than the control group.

The concentration of IL-1β was elevated in animals supplemented with TBT compared with the control animals. IL-1β is produced by activated macrophages and is an important mediator of the pro-inflammatory response. Besides this effect, IL-1β regulates several important processes including cell proliferation, differentiation and apoptosis(Reference Al-Sadi and Ma47, Reference Ligumsky, Simon and Karmeli48). Thus, the increase in IL-1β levels in the colitis+TBT group is associated with the improvement in the mucosal architecture. These results suggest that IL-1β has a cell-proliferative role and is important to mucosal regeneration, rather than a role as a pro-inflammatory effector. Supplementation with TBT was also linked to the elevation of the anti-inflammatory cytokines IL-10 and TGF-β. IL-10 is an anti-inflammatory cytokine with a critical role in inflammatory diseases. IL-10 can decrease the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines and is associated with inflammatory intestinal diseases(Reference McCafferty, Sihota and Muscara21, Reference Li and He49). IL-10 knockout mice develop bowel inflammation characterised by discontinuous transmural lesions affecting the small and large intestines and by the dysregulated production of pro-inflammatory cytokines, indicating that endogenous IL-10 is a central regulator of the mucosal immune response(Reference McCafferty, Sihota and Muscara21). Moreover, IL-10 deficiency in patients with UC contributes to persistent inflammation(Reference Li and He49). The present results are in agreement with the beneficial effect of IL-10 on the intestinal mucosa. The increased levels of IL-10 in colitis+TBT mice demonstrate that TBT is able to modulate inflammation and colonic homeostasis, which is consistent with previously described in vitro studies(Reference Serpe, Canaparo and Daperno3, Reference Vinolo, Rodrigues and Hatanaka50).

In addition to regulating IL-10, TBT supplementation also increased TGF-β production. This cytokine and its subtypes are highly pleiotropic cytokines secreted by virtually all cell types. In the immune system, TGF-β has a modulator effect and can induce FOXP3-positive Treg. In the presence of IL-6, TGF-β induces IL-17-producing Th17 cells and a pro-inflammatory response. In the present study, the increase in TGF-β in the colitis+TBT group was associated with increases in Treg (LAP+) cells. However, the levels of IL-17+ cells were not affected. These data indicate a regulatory, rather than an inflammatory, action for TGF-β.

Treg cells were significantly increased in both colitis groups compared with the control group, which is especially important because in animal models, the infusion of Treg cells can cure ongoing colitis and is associated with a migration of injected Treg into the mesenteric lymph node and the colon(Reference Mottet, Uhlig and Powrie51, Reference Liu, Hu and Xu52). Although FOXP3+ Treg were increased in both colitis groups, only the colitis+TBT group had a statistically significant increase in LAP+ Treg cells compared with the control group. In addition to FOXP3+ Treg cells, the intestinal mucosa can also induce CD4+LAP+T cells, as observed in the present study. The surface expression of latency associated peptide (LAP) on Treg cells is induced by FOXP3(Reference Oida and Weiner53). TGF-β, a cytokine increased by TBT supplementation, is also responsible for LAP expression and LAP+ Treg cells. Therefore, the analyses of FOXP3+ and LAP+ Treg cells expressed in the lamina propria suggest that LAP+ Treg are the most important Treg induced by TBT supplementation.

It is interesting that oral administration of a short-chain TAG can control the immune response because it suggests that the supplementation of butyrate functions as more than a major fuel for colonocytes and may interfere with cell migration and interaction with the lamina propria.

In conclusion, the present results show that oral administration of TBT has positive effects on the colonic restructuring in experimental colitis. In addition to reducing mucosal damage and intestinal permeability, TBT supplementation causes several changes in the immune response, mainly through inflammation control as a result of regulating the expression of anti-inflammatory cytokines and Treg cells.

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Maria Helena Alves de Oliveira who was responsible for the animal facility, and the following sources of support: Pró-Reitoria de Pesquisa da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (PRPq); CNPq (National Counsel of Technological and Scientific Development); CAPES (Coordination of Personal Improvement of Higher Education); FAPEMIG (Foundation for Research Support of Minas Gerais). A. J. L. designed and conducted the research, analysed the data and wrote the paper. L. G. T. and T. R. F. helped in conducting the research. A. M. C. F., R. P. O. and A. F. S. helped in performing the flow cytometry analysis and cytokine ELISA assays. N. V. B. and D. C. C. carried out the intravital microscopy and helped in conducting the histological analysis. R. C. S. and V. N. C. helped in performing the intestinal permeability experiments. J. A.-L. supervised the work and wrote the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

1Bailon, E, Cueto-Sola, M, Utrilla, P, et al. (2010) Butyrate in vitro immune-modulatory effects might be mediated through a proliferation-related induction of apoptosis. Immunobiology 215, 863873.Google Scholar
2Dianzani, C, Cavalli, R, Zara, GP, et al. (2006) Cholesteryl butyrate solid lipid nanoparticles inhibit adhesion of human neutrophils to endothelial cells. Br J Pharmacol 148, 648656.Google Scholar
3Serpe, L, Canaparo, R, Daperno, M, et al. (2010) Solid lipid nanoparticles as anti-inflammatory drug delivery system in a human inflammatory bowel disease whole-blood model. Eur J Pharm Sci 39, 428436.Google Scholar
4Vieira, EL, Leonel, AJ, Sad, AP, et al. (2011) Oral administration of sodium butyrate attenuates inflammation and mucosal lesion in experimental acute ulcerative colitis. J Nutr Biochem 23, 430436.Google Scholar
5Guilloteau, P, Martin, L, Eeckhaut, V, et al. (2010) From the gut to the peripheral tissues: the multiple effects of butyrate. Nutr Res Rev 23, 366384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Hamer, HM, Jonkers, D, Venema, K, et al. (2008) Review Article: the role of butyrate on colonic function. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 27, 104119.Google Scholar
7Kinoshita, M, Suzuki, Y & Saito, Y (2002) Butyrate reduces colonic paracellular permeability by enhancing PPARgamma activation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 293, 827831.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8Ferguson, LR, Shelling, AN, Browning, BL, et al. (2007) Genes, diet and inflammatory bowel disease. Mutat Res 622, 7083.Google Scholar
9Danese, S & Fiocchi, C (2006) Etiopathogenesis of inflammatory bowel diseases. World J Gastroenterol 12, 48074812.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10Rezaie, A, Parker, RD & Abdollahi, M (2007) Oxidative stress and pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease: an epiphenomenon or the cause? Dig Dis Sci 52, 20152021.Google Scholar
11Chapman-Kiddell, CA, Davies, PS, Gillen, L, et al. (2010) Role of diet in the development of inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 16, 137151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12Roessner, A, Kuester, D, Malfertheiner, P, et al. (2008) Oxidative stress in ulcerative colitis-associated carcinogenesis. Pathol Res Pract 204, 511524.Google Scholar
13Spencer, AU, Yang, H, Haxhija, EQ, et al. (2007) Reduced severity of a mouse colitis model with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition. Dig Dis Sci 52, 10601070.Google Scholar
14Strober, W, Fuss, I & Mannon, P (2007) The fundamental basis of inflammatory bowel disease. J Clin Invest 117, 514521.Google Scholar
15Yan, Y, Kolachala, V, Dalmasso, G, et al. (2009) Temporal and spatial analysis of clinical and molecular parameters in dextran sodium sulfate induced colitis. PLoS One 4, e6073.Google Scholar
16Scheppach, W (1996) Treatment of distal ulcerative colitis with short-chain fatty acid enemas. A placebo-controlled trial. German-Austrian SCFA Study Group. Dig Dis Sci 41, 22542259.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17Scheppach, W, Sommer, H, Kirchner, T, et al. (1992) Effect of butyrate enemas on the colonic mucosa in distal ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology 103, 5156.Google Scholar
18Patz, J, Jacobsohn, WZ, Gottschalk-Sabag, S, et al. (1996) Treatment of refractory distal ulcerative colitis with short chain fatty acid enemas. Am J Gastroenterol 91, 731734.Google ScholarPubMed
19Edelman, MJ, Bauer, K, Khanwani, S, et al. (2003) Clinical and pharmacologic study of tributyrin: an oral butyrate prodrug. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 51, 439444.Google Scholar
20Reeves, PG, Nielsen, FH & Fahey, GC (1993) AIN-93 purified diets for laboratory rodents: final report of the American Institute of Nutrition ad hoc writing committee on the reformulation of the AIN-76A rodent diet. J Nutr Biochem 123, 19301951.Google Scholar
21McCafferty, DM, Sihota, E, Muscara, M, et al. (2000) Spontaneously developing chronic colitis in IL-10/iNOS double-deficient mice. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 279, G90G99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22Werner, U & Szelenyi, I (1992) Measurement of MPO activity as model for detection of granulocyte infiltration in different tissues. Agents Actions, Spec No. C101–C103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23Taylor, PM, Thomas, DB & Mills, KHG (1987) In vitro culture and T cell lines and clones. In Lymphocytes: A Practical Approach [Klaus, GGB, editor]. Washington, DC: IRL Press.Google Scholar
24Santiago, AF, Alves, AC, Oliveira, RP, et al. (2011) Aging correlates with reduction in regulatory-type cytokines and T cells in the gut mucosa. Immunobiology 216, 10851093.Google Scholar
25Buege, JA & Aust, SD (1978) Microsomal lipid peroxidation. Methods Enzymol 52, 302310.Google Scholar
26Banerjee, D, Kumar, PA, Kumar, B, et al. (2002) Determination of absolute hydrogen peroxide concentration by spectrophotometric method. Curr Sci 83, 11931194.Google Scholar
27Dieterich, S, Bieligk, U, Beulich, K, et al. (2000) Gene expression of antioxidative enzymes in the human heart: increased expression of catalase in the end-stage failing heart. Circulation 101, 3339.Google Scholar
28Nelson, DP & Kiesow, LA (1972) Enthalpy of decomposition of hydrogen peroxide by catalase at 25°C (with molar extinction coefficients of H2O2 solution in the UV). Anal Bichem 49, 474478.Google Scholar
29Lowry, OH, Rosebrough, NJ, Farr, AL, et al. (1951) Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem 193, 265275.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
30Menzel, T, Luhrs, H, Zirlik, S, et al. (2004) Butyrate inhibits leukocyte adhesion to endothelial cells via modulation of VCAM-1. Inflamm Bowel Dis 10, 122128.Google Scholar
31Hallert, CB, Björck, I, Nyman, M, et al. (2003) Increasing fecal butyrate in ulcerative colitis patients by diet: controlled pilot study. Inflamm Bowel Dis 9, 116121.Google Scholar
32Peng, L, He, Z, Chen, W, et al. (2007) Effects of butyrate on intestinal barrier function in a Caco-2 cell monolayer model of intestinal barrier. Pediatr Res 61, 3741.Google Scholar
33Rothenberg, ME, Mishra, A, Brandt, EB, et al. (2001) Gastrointestinal eosinophils. Immunol Rev 179, 139155.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
34Lampinen, M, Backman, M, Winqvist, O, et al. (2008) Different regulation of eosinophil activity in Crohn's disease compared with ulcerative colitis. J Leukoc Biol 84, 13921399.Google Scholar
35Naito, Y, Takagi, T & Yoshikawa, T (2007) Neutrophil-dependent oxidative stress in ulcerative colitis. J Clin Biochem Nutr 41, 1826.Google Scholar
36Coppi, LC, Thomazzi, SM, de Ayrizono, ML, et al. (2007) Comparative study of eosinophil chemotaxis, adhesion, and degranulation in vitro in ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 13, 211218.Google Scholar
37Rothenberg, ME (2004) Eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders (EGID). J Allergy Clin Immunol 113, 1128, quiz 29.Google Scholar
38Wolever, TM, Fernandes, J & Rao, AV (1996) Serum acetate:propionate ratio is related to serum cholesterol in men but not women. J Nutr 126, 27902797.Google Scholar
39Elson, CO, Sartor, RB, Tennyson, GS, et al. (1995) Experimental models of inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology 109, 13441367.Google Scholar
40Wirtz, S & Neurath, MF (2007) Mouse models of inflammatory bowel disease. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 59, 10731083.Google Scholar
41Venkatraman, A, Ramakrishna, BS, Shaji, RV, et al. (2003) Amelioration of dextran sulfate colitis by butyrate: role of heat shock protein 70 and NF-kappaB. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 285, G177G184.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
42Videla, S, Vilaseca, J, Antolin, M, et al. (2001) Dietary inulin improves distal colitis induced by dextran sodium sulfate in the rat. Am J Gastroenterol 96, 14861493.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
43Damiani, CR, Benetton, CA, Stoffel, C, et al. (2007) Oxidative stress and metabolism in animal model of colitis induced by dextran sulfate sodium. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 22, 18461851.Google Scholar
44Sauer, J, Richter, KK & Pool-Zobel, BL (2007) Physiological concentrations of butyrate favorably modulate genes of oxidative and metabolic stress in primary human colon cells. J Nutr Biochem 18, 736745.Google Scholar
45Rosignoli, P, Fabiani, R, De Bartolomeo, A, et al. (2001) Protective activity of butyrate on hydrogen peroxide-induced DNA damage in isolated human colonocytes and HT29 tumour cells. Carcinogenesis 22, 16751680.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
46Abrahamse, SL, Pool-Zobel, BL & Rechkemmer, G (1999) Potential of short chain fatty acids to modulate the induction of DNA damage and changes in the intracellular calcium concentration by oxidative stress in isolated rat distal colon cells. Carcinogenesis 20, 629634.Google Scholar
47Al-Sadi, RM & Ma, TY (2007) IL-1beta causes an increase in intestinal epithelial tight junction permeability. J Immunol 178, 46414649.Google Scholar
48Ligumsky, M, Simon, PL, Karmeli, F, et al. (1990) Role of interleukin 1 in inflammatory bowel disease-enhanced production during active disease. Gut 31, 686689.Google Scholar
49Li, MC & He, SH (2004) IL-10 and its related cytokines for treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. World J Gastroenterol 10, 620625.Google Scholar
50Vinolo, MA, Rodrigues, HG, Hatanaka, E, et al. (2011) Suppressive effect of short-chain fatty acids on production of proinflammatory mediators by neutrophils. J Nutr Biochem 22, 849855.Google Scholar
51Mottet, C, Uhlig, HH & Powrie, F (2003) Cutting edge: cure of colitis by CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells. J Immunol 170, 39393943.Google Scholar
52Liu, H, Hu, B, Xu, D, et al. (2003) CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells cure murine colitis: the role of IL-10, TGF-beta, and CTLA4. J Immunol 171, 50125017.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
53Oida, T & Weiner, HL (2010) TGF-beta induces surface LAP expression on murine CD4 T cells independent of Foxp3 induction. PLoS One 5, e15523.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1 Weight variation, food intake and water intake* (Mean values with their standard errors)

Figure 1

Fig. 1 Histopathological analysis of the colonic mucosa of animals from (A) the control group receiving the standard diet (□), (B) the colitis group receiving the standard diet and dextran sodium sulphate (DSS) () and (C) the colitis+tributyrin (TBT) group receiving the TBT-rich diet and DSS (), and (D) the total histopathological score and components: (E) mucosal architecture, inflammatory infiltration and muscle layer thickness, (F) depletion of goblet cells and mucosal abscesses of colonic mucosa (n 4 per group). , Present; □, absent. a,b,cMean values with unlike letters were significantly different (P< 0·05; one-way ANOVA and Newman–Keuls multiple comparison test). (A colour version of this figure can be found online at http://www.journals.cambridge.org/bjn)

Figure 2

Fig. 2 Evaluation of the enzyme activities of (A) eosinophil peroxidase (EPO), (B) myeloperoxidase (MPO) and (C) N-acetylglucosaminidase (NAG), as an indirect determination of eosinophil, neutrophil and macrophage infiltration, respectively. Intravital microscopy showing (D) the rolling and (E) the adhesion of leucocytes in the colons of animals from the control group receiving the standard diet, the colitis group receiving the standard diet and dextran sodium sulphate (DSS) and the colitis+tributyrin (TBT) group receiving the TBT-rich diet and DSS (n 10 mice per group for EPO, MPO and NAG; n 3/4 per group for adhesion and rolling). a,b,cMean values with unlike letters were significantly different (P< 0·05; one-way ANOVA and Newman–Keuls multiple comparison test).

Figure 3

Table 2 Profile of leucocytes in the lamina propria, caecal lymph node, spleen and blood of mice from the control group receiving the standard diet, the colitis group receiving the standard diet and dextran sodium sulphate (DSS), the colitis+tributyrin (TBT) group receiving the TBT-rich diet and dextran sodium sulphate* (Mean values with their standard errors, n 4–5 per group)

Figure 4

Fig. 3 Cytokine concentrations in the colons of animals from the control group receiving the standard diet, the colitis group receiving the standard diet and dextran sodium sulphate (DSS) and the colitis+tributyrin (TBT) group receiving the TBT-rich diet and DSS (n 4–6 per group for each cytokine). a,b,cMean values with unlike letters were significantly different (P< 0·05; one-way ANOVA and Newman–Keuls multiple comparison test). IFN-γ, interferon γ; TGF-β, transforming growth factor β.

Figure 5

Fig. 4 (A) Analysis of thiobarbituric acid-reactive species (TBARS), measurement of (B) hydroperoxide level, (C) superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity and (D) catalase activity in the colon of animals from the control group receiving the standard diet, the colitis group receiving the standard diet and dextran sodium sulphate (DSS) and the colitis+tributyrin (TBT) group receiving the TBT-rich diet and DSS (n 5/6 per group for TBARS, n 4 per group for hydroperoxide and n 4/5 per group for superoxide dismutase and catalase). a,bMean values with unlike letters were significantly different (P< 0·05; one-way ANOVA and Newman–Keuls multiple comparison test). MDA, malondialdehyde.

Figure 6

Fig. 5 Intestinal permeability of animals from the control group receiving the standard diet, the colitis group receiving the standard diet and dextran sodium sulphate (DSS) and the colitis+tributyrin (TBT) group receiving the TBT-rich diet and DSS (n 5 per group). a,bMean values with unlike letters were significantly different (P< 0·05; one-way ANOVA and Newman–Keuls multiple comparison test).

Figure 7

Fig. 6 Histopathological analysis of the colonic mucosa of animals from (A) the control group receiving the standard diet (□), (B) the colitis group receiving the standard diet and dextran sodium sulphate (DSS) () and (C) the colitis+tributyrin (TBT) group receiving the TBT-rich diet and DSS for 3 d (), and (D) the total histopathological score and components: (E) mucosal architecture, inflammatory infiltration and muscle layer thickness, (F) depletion of goblet cells and mucosal abscesses of colonic mucosa (n 5 per group). , Present; □, absent. a,bMean values with unlike letters were significantly different (P< 0·05; one-way ANOVA and Newman–Keuls multiple comparison test). (A colour version of this figure can be found online at http://www.journals.cambridge.org/bjn)

Figure 8

Fig. 7 Evaluation of the enzyme activities of (A) eosinophil peroxidase (EPO) and (B) myeloperoxidase (MPO), as an indirect determination of eosinophil and neutrophil infiltration, respectively; (C) analysis of thiobarbituric acid-reactive species (TBARS), and measurement of (D) hydroperoxide levels, (E) superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity and (F) catalase activity of colons of animals from the control group receiving the standard diet, the colitis group receiving the standard diet and dextran sodium sulphate (DSS) and the colitis+tributyrin (TBT) group receiving the TBT-rich diet and DSS for 3 d (n 3/6 per group for EPO and MPO, n 4/6 per group for TBARS and hydroperoxide and n 6/8 per group for SOD and catalase). a,b,cMean values with unlike letters were significantly different (P< 0·05; one-way ANOVA and Newman–Keuls multiple comparison test). MDA, malondialdehyde.