Hostname: page-component-55f67697df-twqc4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-09T21:06:00.874Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Season × genotype interaction studies for identification of stable performing accessions for pod yield and attributing traits in French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2025

Channappa Mahadevaiah Open the ORCID record for Channappa Mahadevaiah [Opens in a new window]  and
Mudki Virupakshappa Dhananjaya Open the ORCID record for Mudki Virupakshappa Dhananjaya [Opens in a new window]
Channappa Mahadevaiah*
Affiliation:
Division of Vegetable Crops, ICAR-Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Bangalore, India
Mudki Virupakshappa Dhananjaya
Affiliation:
Division of Vegetable Crops, ICAR-Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Bangalore, India
*
Corresponding authors: C. Mahadevaiah; Email: [email protected]; M. V. Dhananjaya; Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Additive main effects and multiplicative interactive effect stability model (AMMI) was used in the present study to understand the impact of season × genotype interaction (SGI) on pod yield and its attributing traits. A total of 86 determinate growth habit type French bean germplasm were evaluated in randomized block design with two replications in three different seasons. Significant variability was observed for genotypes, seasons and SGI. The component ‘seasons’ contributed more than 50% of variability to pod yield, pod number per plant and days to flowering (DFL), and ‘genotypes’ accounted more than 50% of phenotypic variation for pod length and pod width. The SGI signals were observed for pod yield per plant, number of pods per plant, pod weight and DFL, and SGI accounted for more than 20% phenotypic variability for all traits. We identified IIHR-155 and IIHR-11 as the promising genotypes across three seasons based on their position on AMMI biplots, stability indices combined with high trait mean, estimates of best linear unbiased prediction and minimal crossover interaction. The results from the present study are highly useful for utilization in crop improvement programmes to evolve the season-specific varieties and varieties with wide adaptability in French bean.

Keywords

adaptabilityFrench beangenotype × environment interactionseasonsstability
Type
Research Article
Information
Plant Genetic Resources , Volume 23 , Issue 3 , June 2025 , pp. 165 - 173
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of National Institute of Agricultural Botany

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Ajay, BC, Kumar, N, Kona, P, Gangadhar, K, Rani, K, Rajanna, GA and Bera, SK (2023) Integrating data from asymmetric multi-models can identify drought-resistant groundnut genotypes for drought hot-spot locations. Scientific Reports 13, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alake, CO (2018) Genotype × environment interaction effects on pod yield and pod number in West African Okra. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science 64, 1503–1517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ali, M, Elsadek, A and Salem, EM (2018) Stability parameters and AMMI analysis of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Egyptian Journal of Agronomy 40, 59–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarado, G, Rodrígueza, FM, Pachecoa, A, Burgueñoa, J, Crossaa, J, Vargasa, M, Pérez-Rodríguezd, O and Lopez-Cruze, MA (2020) META-R: a software to analyze data from multi-environment plant breeding trials. Crop Journal 8, 745–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anuradha, N, Patro, TSSK, Singamsetti, A, Rani, YS, Triveni, U, Kumari, AN, Govanakoppa, N, Pathy, TL and Tonapi, VA (2022) Comparative study of AMMI- and BLUP-based simultaneous selection for grain yield and stability of finger millet [Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertn.] genotypes. Frontiers in Plant Science 12, 786839.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ashwini, KVR, Ramesh, S and Sunitha, NC (2021) Comparative BLUP, YREM-based performance and AMMI model-based stability of horse gram [Macrotyloma uniflorum (Lam.) Verdc.] genotypes differing in growth habit. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 68, 457–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balakrishnan, C, Kumar, A, Raj, R, Verma, VK, Touthang, L, Kumar, R, Rai, M, Da, SP and Mishra, VM (2024) Exploring the genetic diversity, population structure and stability for yield related traits in rice germplasm of northestern India. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution. doi: 10.1007/s10722-024-02109-wGoogle Scholar
Beebe, S (2012) Common bean breeding in the tropics. In Janick, J (ed.), Plant Breeding Reviews, Volume 36. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., pp. 357–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bitocchi, E, Rau, D, Bellucci, E, Rodriguez, M, Murgia, ML, Gioia, T, Santo, D, Nanni, L, Attene, G and Papa, R (2017) Beans (Phaseolus ssp.) as a model for understanding crop evolution. Frontiers in Plant Science 8, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bomma, N, Shruthi, HB, Soregaon, CD, Anil, G, Suma, K, Pranati, J, Lohithaswa, CH, Patil, DK, Kumar, N, Sandeep, S, Anilkumar, V and Gangashetty, PI (2024) Multi-environment testing for G × E interactions and identification of high-yielding, stable, medium-duration pigeonpea genotypes employing AMMI, GGE biplot, and YREM analyses. Frontiers in Plant Science 15, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bulyaba, R, Winham, DM, Lenssen, AW, Moore, KJ, Kelly, JD, Brick, MA, Wright, EM and Ogg, JB (2020) Genotype by location effects on yield and seed nutrient composition of common bean. Agronomy 10, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canales, FJ, Montilla-Bascón, G, Gallego-Sánchez, LM, Flores, F, Rispail, N and Elena, P (2021) Deciphering main climate and edaphic components driving oat adaptation to Mediterranean environments. Frontiers in Plant Science 12, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chapman, SC, Cooper, M, Hammer, GL and Butler, DG (2000) Genotype by environment interactions affecting grain sorghum. II. Frequencies of different seasonal patterns of drought stress are related to location effects on hybrid yields. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 51, 209–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaurasia, S (2020) Chapter 17 – Green beans. In Jaiswal, AK (ed.), Nutritional Composition and Antioxidant Properties of Fruits and Vegetables. London, UK: Academic Press Inc., Elsevier, pp. 289–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Das, J, Poonia, V, Jha, S and Goyal, MK (2020) Understanding the climate change impact on crop yield over eastern Himalayan region: ascertaining GCM and scenario uncertainty. Theoretical and Applied Climatology 142, 467–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Debouck, DG, Toro, O, Paredes, OM, Johnson, WC and Gepts, P (1993) Genetic diversity and ecological distribution of Phaseolus vulgaris (Fabaceae) in north-western South America. Economic Botany 47, 408–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dinsa, T, Balcha, U and Tadesse, F (2022) AMMI analysis for green pod yield stability of snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes evaluated in East Shewa Zone, Oromia, Ethiopia. Journal of Scientific Agriculture 6, 46–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elias, AA, Robbins, KR, Doerge, RW and Tuinstra, MR (2016) Half a century of studying genotype × environment interactions in plant breeding experiments. Crop Science 56, 2090–2105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farshadfar, E, Mahmodi, N and Yaghotipoor, A (2011) AMMI stability value and simultaneous estimation of yield and yield stability in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L. Australian Journal of Crop Science 5, 1837–1844.Google Scholar
Gauch, HG (2013) A simple protocol for AMMI analysis of yield trials. Crop Science 53, 1860–1869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gauch, HG and Zobel, RW (1997) Identifying mega-environments and targeting genotypes. Crop Science 37, 311–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelete, SH, Negash, K, Tsegaye, D and Teshome, S (2022) Yield performance and adaptation of advanced large-seeded common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L. genotypes in Ethiopia. Ecological Genetics and Genomics 25, 100149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gepts, P (1998) Origin and evolution of common bean: past events and recent trends. HortScience 33, 1124–1130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, PH and Ranalli, P (1997) Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Field Crops Research 53, 131–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joshi, BD, Mehra, KL and Station, R (1993) Adaptability in French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Indian Journal of Plant Genetic Resources 6, 73–77.Google Scholar
Levene, H (1960) Robust tests for equality of variances. In Olkin, I (ed.), Contributions to Probability and Statistics. Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, pp. 278–292.Google Scholar
Ligarreto-Moreno, G and Pimentel-Ladino, C (2022) Grain yield and genotype × environment interaction in bean cultivars with different growth habits. Plant Production Science 25, 232–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Z, Fan, X, Huang, W, Yang, J, Zheng, Y, Wang, S and Qiu, L (2017) Stability analysis of seven agronomic traits for soybean [(Glycine max (L.) Merr.] Tokachi Nagaha and its derived cultivars using the AMMI model. Plant Production Science 20, 499–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahadevaiah, C, Hapase, P, Sreenivasa, V, Hapase, R, Swamy, HKM, Anilkumar, C, Mohanraj, K, Hemaprabha, G and Ram, B (2021) Delineation of genotype × environment interaction for identification of stable genotypes for tillering phase drought stress tolerance in sugarcane. Scientific Reports 11, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Malhotra, RS, Singh, M and Erskine, W (2007) Genotype × environment interaction and identification of dual-season cultivars in chickpea. Euphytica 158, 119–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mekbib, F (2003) Yield stability in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes. Euphytica 130, 147–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohapatra, M (2002) Recent trends in climate of Bangalore. Mausam 53, 425–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molenaar, H, Boehm, R and Piepho, HP (2018) Phenotypic selection in ornamental breeding: it's better to have the BLUPs than to have the BLUEs. Frontiers in Plant Science 871, 1–14.Google Scholar
Mutari, B, Sibiya, J, Gasura, E, Kondwakwenda, A, Matova, PM, Chirwa, R (2022) Genotype × environment interaction and stability analyses of grain yield and micronutrient (Fe and Zn) concentrations in navy bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes under varied production environments. Field Crops Research 286, 108607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nimbalkar, A, Baviskar, AP and Bajaj, VH (2006) AMMI approach for seed yield and stability of French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding 66, 343–344.Google Scholar
Pacheco-Gil, RÁ, Vargas, M, Alvarado, G, Rodríguez, F, Crossa, J and Juan, B (2015) GEA-R (genotype × environment analysis with R for Windows) Version 4.1.Google Scholar
Piepho, HP (1994) Best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) for regional yield trials: a comparison to additive main effects and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) analysis. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 89, 647–654.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Piepho, HP (1998a) Empirical best linear unbiased prediction in cultivar trials using factor-analytic variance–covariance structures. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 97, 195–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piepho, HP (1998b) Methods for comparing the yield stability of cropping systems – a review. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 180, 193–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piepho, HP, Möhring, J, Melchinger, AE and Büchse, A (2008) BLUP for phenotypic selection in plant breeding and variety testing. Euphytica 161, 209–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purchase, JL, Hatting, H and van Deventer, CS (2000) Genotype × environment interaction of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in South Africa: II. Stability analysis of yield performance. South African Journal of Plant and Soil 17, 101–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raghuvanshi, R and Sharma, RK (2016) Response of two cultivars of Phaseolus vulgaris L. (French beans) plants exposed to enhanced UV-B radiation under mountain ecosystem. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 23, 831–842.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rajashekara, S (2019) Annual and seasonal variation of rainfall in urban landscapes of the Bengaluru region, India. Environmental Analysis & Ecology Studies 5, 535–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rajashekara, S (2020) Monthly and annual variation of temperature in urban habitats of the Bengaluru region, India. Transactions on Science and Technology 7, 29–34.Google Scholar
Rebecca, T, Oliveira, AD, Gravina, GDA, De, GHF, Araujo, LCD, Araújo, KC, Pureza, D, Junior, A, Vivas, M and Daher, RF (2018) Multivariate analysis used as a tool to select snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes. Australian Journal of Crop Science 12, 67–73.Google Scholar
Reddy, M, Nair, AK, Senthilkumar, M, Hebbar, SS, Aghora, TS, Pichaimuthu, M, Varalakshmi, B, Singh, TH, Dhananjaya, MV, Prasanna, HC, Padmini, K, Rao, ES, Thangama, M, Rajashankar, , Mahadevaiah, C, Raghu, BR, Ponnam, N, Hegde, V, Mishra, S, Sridhar, V and Kumar, S (2023) Production Technologies of Vegetable Crops – A Hand Book. Dr Sanjay Kumar Singh, Director, Bangalore: ICAR-Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Hesaraghatta Lake Post, 560089.Google Scholar
Robinson, GK (1991) That a BLUP is a good thing: the estimation of random effects. Statistical Science 6, 1–8.Google Scholar
Roselló, M, Villegas, D, Álvaro, F, Soriano, JM, Lopes, MS, Nazco, R and Royo, C (2019) Unravelling the relationship between adaptation pattern and yield formation strategies in Mediterranean durum wheat landraces. European Journal of Agronomy 107, 43–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salegua, V, Melis, R, Fourie, D, Sibiya, J and Musvosvi, C (2020) Grain yield, stability and bacterial brown spot disease of dark red kidney dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes across six environments in South Africa. Australian Journal of Crop Science 14, 1433–1442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shimray, PW, Bharadwaj, C, Patil, BS, Sankar, SM, Kumar, N, Priya, S, Reddy, P, Singhal, T, Hegde, V, Parida, SK, Roorkiwal, M, Varshney, RK and Verma, P (2022) Evaluation and identification of stable chickpea lines for yield-contributing traits from an association mapping panel. Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding 82, 208–216.Google Scholar
Traka-Mavrona, E, Georgakis, D and Koutsika-Sotiriou, M (2014) Improvement in the stability and yield performance of a snap bean cultivar. Journal of Vegetable Crop Production 9, 37–41.Google Scholar
Verma, VK, Kumar, A, Rymbai, H, Talang, H, Devi, MB, Baiswar, P and Hazarika, S (2023) Genetic diversity and stability analysis of sweet potato accessions of north-eastern India grown under the mid-hill conditions of Meghalaya. Plant Genetic Resources: Characterisation and Utilisation 21, 537–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vilela, FO and Gravina, GA (2011) Stability of F 7:8 snap bean progenies in the northern and northwestern regions of Rio de Janeiro State. Horticultura Brasileira 29, 84–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yan, W (1999) A study on the methodology of cultivar evaluation based on yield trial data with special reference to winter wheat in Ontario. The University of Guelph.Google Scholar
Zobel, RW, Wright, MJ and Gauch, HG (1988) Statistical analysis of a yield trial. Agronomy Journal 80, 388–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Mahadevaiah and Dhananjaya supplementary material

Mahadevaiah and Dhananjaya supplementary material
Download Mahadevaiah and Dhananjaya supplementary material(File)
File 624.8 KB