Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-12T19:41:19.531Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Association Between Dextromethorphan/Bupropion with Alcohol and Substance Misuse: Reports to the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2024

Angela T.H. Kwan
Affiliation:
Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada Brain and Cognition Discovery Foundation, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Roger S. McIntyre*
Affiliation:
Brain and Cognition Discovery Foundation, Toronto, Ontario, Canada Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
*
Corresponding author: Roger S. McIntyre; Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective

Dextromethorphan/bupropion (DXM/BUP) received Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for the treatment of adults with major depressive disorder (MDD) in August 2022. This combination is not known to have abuse liability and is not currently scheduled by the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA). Notwithstanding, dextromethorphan is a drug of abuse. Herein, we sought to determine whether DXM/BUP has alcohol and/or substance misuse liability.

Methods

We evaluated spontaneous reports of terms such as “alcohol problem, alcoholism, alcohol abuse, substance dependence, substance use disorder (SUD), substance abuse, drug dependence, drug use disorder and drug abuse” in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). The FAERS is a spontaneous reporting database of adverse events submitted to the FDA.

Results

We performed a comparative assessment of the alcohol and/or substance misuse liability of DXM/BUP since its market authorization in August 2022, using acetaminophen as the control. Dextromethorphan served as the upper-bound reference point. Our findings showed that, since August 2022, dextromethorphan had a significant reporting odds ratio (ROR) for “drug abuse.” In contrast, DXM/BUP did not have a significant ROR for any of the categories of alcohol and/or substance misuse evaluated. Limitations of our findings derive largely from the limitations of the FAERS and its data capture method.

Conclusion

The absence of alcohol or substance misuse reported to the FAERS with DXM/BUP accords with the lack of evidence of abuse liability prior to FDA approval and its non-scheduling by the DEA.

Type
Original Research
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Introduction

Dextromethorphan/bupropion (DXM/BUP) is a combination treatment that received approval from the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in August 2022 for adults with major depressive disorder (MDD).Reference Akbar, Rhee and Ceban1, Reference Iosifescu, Jones and O’Gorman2 This combination is currently under development for other psychiatric and medical disorders (ie, agitation in Alzheimer’s disease, smoking cessation, and treatment resistant depression).3, Reference McIntyre, Alsuwaidan and Baune4 Dextromethorphan, a synthetic analog of codeine, has little to no affinity for mu (μ), kappa (κ), and/or delta (δ) opioid receptors.Reference Silva and Dinis-Oliveira5 Consequently, dextromethorphan does not exhibit prominent analgesic, euphoric, and/or respiratory suppression effects.Reference Silva and Dinis-Oliveira5

Dextromethorphan is an uncompetitive N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist and a σ1 receptor agonist.Reference McClure and Daniels6Reference Ohi, Tsunekawa and Haji8 Dextromethorphan also exhibits inhibition of serotonin and norephedrine reuptake transporters as well as modulation of nicotinic receptors.Reference Silva and Dinis-Oliveira5 The rationale behind the combination of DXM/BUP derives from the pharmacokinetic observation of the rapid and extensive clearance of dextromethorphan when prescribed alone.Reference Stahl9 Bupropion, an aminoketone, is FDA-approved as an antidepressant for adults with MDD, seasonal affective disorders, and smoking cessation.Reference Huecker, Smiley and Saadabadi10 Furthermore, bupropion is an inhibitor of cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6), thereby prolonging the half-life and increasing the bioavailability of dextromethorphan.Reference Hole, Arnestad, Molden and Haslemo11, Reference Sager, Tripathy and Price12

Dextromethorphan, one of the most common antitussive agents in over-the-counter (OTC) cough and cold medicine, is accessible in tablet form or through illicit channels.Reference Silva and Dinis-Oliveira5, Reference Linn, Long and Pagel13, Reference Karami, Major, Calderon and McAninch14 Abuse liability of dextromethorphan is well documented.Reference Karami, Major, Calderon and McAninch14Reference Olives, Boley, LeRoy and Stellpflug16 It could be hypothesized that the abuse liability of dextromethorphan is partially derived from its major active metabolite, dextrorphan.Reference Silva and Dinis-Oliveira5, Reference McClure and Daniels6, Reference Vearrier and Grundmann17 Although the combination of DXM/BUP is not scheduled and is not known to have abuse liability, there remains a need to surveil whether there is any association with alcohol and/or substance misuse in the general population.Reference Blair, Wells and Ko18

Herein, we sought to address the aforementioned concern by evaluating reports to the United States FDA of substance- and alcohol-related behaviors associated with DXM/BUP since its FDA approval in August 2022.

Methods

We retrieved information from the United States Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), a database that contains post-marketing adverse event reports submitted to the FDA. Our analysis focused on DXM/BUP starting from August 2022 to coincide with the FDA approval date for DXM/BUP. The identification of DXM/BUP involved using their non-proprietary names and included an assessment of alcohol- and substance-related issues, encompassing categories such as “alcohol problem, alcoholism, alcohol abuse, substance dependence, substance use disorder, substance abuse, drug dependence, drug use disorder, and drug abuse.”19

Our methodology is similar to that of a recent publication examining the safety of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs).Reference McIntyre, Mansur, Rosenblat and Kwan20 The timeframe for the considered medications spanned from August 2022 to September 30, 2023, capturing both the number of cases (n) and total cases of psychiatric disorders (N) (Table 1). To examine disproportionate reporting between cases and non-cases, we calculated the reporting odds ratio (ROR) using the formula: odds ratio = (odds of the event in the exposed group)/(odds of the event in the non-exposed group).Reference Tenny and Hoffman21

Figure 1. Forest plots showing the reporting odds ratio (ROR) for alcohol and substance misuse comparing dextromethorphan/bupropion to acetaminophen as the control.

Table 1. Dextromethorphan/Bupropion-Associated Alcohol and Substance Misuse Cases Identified in the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), Using Acetaminophen as the Control

a Search terms for dextromethorphan/bupropion included: “bupropion hydrochloride/dextromethorphan hydrobromide, bupropion/dextromethorphan, auvelity.”

b Search terms for dextromethorphan included: “dextromethorphan, dextromethorphan hydrobromide.”

The FAERS database was searched from 2022 to September 30, 2023 for dextromethorphan/bupropion, dextromethorphan and acetaminophen (control).

In this context, the ROR represents the odds ratio for the occurrence of substance and alcohol misuse, using codes adopted by the FAERS (ie, “alcohol problem, alcoholism, alcohol abuse, substance dependence, substance use disorder, substance abuse, drug dependence, drug use disorder and drug abuse”) associated with DXM/BUP (ie, “bupropion hydrochloride/dextromethorphan hydrobromide, bupropion/dextromethorphan and auvelity”) compared to acetaminophen (ie, acetaminophen, tylenol, and panadol) as the control. Dextromethorphan (ie, dextromethorphan and dextromethorphan hydrobromide) served as an upper-bound reference point. We calculated upper and lower 95% confidence intervals (CI) at an alpha risk of 5%, determining statistical significance based on whether the lower 95% CI exceeded 1.0, indicating disproportionate reporting.Reference Woods22 Forest plots were generated using RStudio version2023.06.1 + 524 “DesertSunflower” Release (b51c81cc303d4b52b010767e5b30438beb904641, 2023-09-25) for Windows.

Results

The statistical analysis was performed using Microsoft Excel 2021 and R version 4.3.1. For DXM/BUP between August 2022 and September 30, 2023, there were 0 reports of alcohol problem, alcoholism, alcohol abuse, substance dependence, substance use disorder, substance abuse, drug dependence, and drug use disorder, with only 1 report of drug abuse. The RORs for DXM/BUP were independently compared to acetaminophen, serving as the control (Table 1).

Comparison of dextromethorphan/bupropion to acetaminophen

When comparing DXM/BUP to acetaminophen as the control, the RORs for alcohol problem, alcoholism, alcohol abuse, substance dependence, substance use disorder, substance abuse, drug dependence, and drug use disorder were all 0. However, for drug abuse, the ROR was 0.018 (95% CI 0.0025–0.13, p ≤ 0.0001), indicating a significantly lower risk compared to acetaminophen.

Additionally, dextromethorphan served as an upper-bound reference point and was compared to acetaminophen across the same categories. The RORs for alcohol problem, alcohol abuse, substance dependence, substance use disorder, and drug use disorder were all 0. For alcoholism (ROR 3.05, 95% CI 0.42–22.25; p = 0.27), substance abuse (0.74; 95% CI 0.18–2.98; p = 0.67), drug dependence (ROR 1.01, 95% CI 0.48–2.16; p = 0.97), and drug abuse (ROR 2.66, 95% CI 1.93–3.65; p ≤ 0.0001), specific RORs were computed.

Discussion

Herein, we did not identify a significant increase in the RORs for all FAERS categories of alcohol and/or substance misuse disorder associated with DXM/BUP since its FDA marketing authorization in August 2022. Additionally, we observed a significantly elevated ROR for dextromethorphan in the category of drug abuse compared to acetaminophen.

The combination DXM/BUP is not commercially available as a proprietary formulation in any other country outside of the United States as of February 2024. Individuals living with MDD have higher rates of substance use disorder (SUD) and alcohol use disorder (AUD) relative to the general population.Reference Puddephatt, Irizar, Jones, Gage and Goodwin23Reference Onaemo, Fawehinmi and D’Arcy25 Consequently, individuals with MDD have greater susceptibility to misusing drugs with abuse liability, underscoring the importance of characterizing the abuse liability of any approved agents likely to be prescribed and/or self-administered by a person living with MDD.

A limitation of the FAERS is its reliance on spontaneous adverse event reporting and cannot be considered a comprehensive capture of all adverse events experienced in the general population.26 In addition, comprehensive sociodemographic, clinical, as well as family and treatment histories of individuals reported to the FAERS are not available. Moreover, the FAERS database does not provide sufficient data to inform causative models.Reference Fedak, Bernal, Capshaw and Gross27 Another limitation of our analysis is the relatively short observation interval, justified by the fact that DXM/BUP was only recently FDA-approved. Nonetheless, it could be conjectured that increased clinician awareness of abuse liability with dextromethorphan may enhance vigilance and reporting of cases for abuse liability if present with DXM/BUP. An additional aspect for consideration is that DXM/BUP is a proprietary product available via prescription indicated for persons with MDD. In contrast, DXM is available through different informal and formal routes (eg, internet) and cannot be assumed to be implemented for identical therapeutic considerations as DXM/BUP. Consequently, the likelihood of reporting safety concerns with DXM may be dissimilar from the likelihood of reporting adverse events with DXM/BUP.

Conclusion

In summary, we did not identify a significant increase in the reporting of alcohol and/or substance misuse abuse with DXM/BUP relative to acetaminophen. However, we did observe a significant increase in abuse liability for dextromethorphan. The absence of alcohol or substance misuse reported to the FAERS with DXM/BUP aligns with the lack of evidence of abuse liability prior to FDA approval and its DEA non-scheduling.

Author contribution

All authors (ATH Kwan and RS McIntyre) conceptualized, designed, and drafted the manuscript, as well as provided critical review for important intellectual concept and approved the final version to be published. ATH Kwan analyzed and interpreted the data. All authors agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Disclosure

Dr. Roger S. McIntyre has received research grant support from CIHR/GACD/National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) and the Milken Institute; speaker/consultation fees from Lundbeck, Janssen, Alkermes, Neumora Therapeutics, Boehringer Ingelheim, Sage, Biogen, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Purdue, Pfizer, Otsuka, Takeda, Neurocrine, Sunovion, Bausch Health, Axsome, Novo Nordisk, Kris, Sanofi, Eisai, Intra-Cellular, NewBridge Pharmaceuticals, Viatris, Abbvie, Atai Life Sciences. Dr. Roger S. McIntyre is a CEO of Braxia Scientific Corp.

References

Akbar, D, Rhee, TG, Ceban, F, et al. Dextromethorphan-bupropion for the treatment of depression: a systematic review of efficacy and safety in clinical trials. CNS Drugs. 2023;37(10):867881.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iosifescu, DV, Jones, A, O’Gorman, C, et al. Efficacy and safety of AXS-05 (dextromethorphan-bupropion) in patients with major depressive disorder: a phase 3 randomized clinical trial (GEMINI). J Clin Psychiatry. 2022;83(4). doi:10.4088/JCP.21m14345CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McIntyre, RS, Alsuwaidan, M, Baune, BT, et al. Treatment-resistant depression: definition, prevalence, detection, management, and investigational interventions. World Psychiatry. 2023;22(3):394412.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silva, AR, Dinis-Oliveira, RJ. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of dextromethorphan: clinical and forensic aspects. Drug Metab Rev. 2020;52(2):258282.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McClure, EW, Daniels, RN. Classics in chemical neuroscience: dextromethorphan (DXM). ACS Chem Neurosci. 2023;14(12):22562270.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nguyen, L, Robson, MJ, Healy, JR, Scandinaro, AL, Matsumoto, RR. Involvement of sigma-1 receptors in the antidepressant-like effects of dextromethorphan. PLoS One. 2014;9(2):e89985.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ohi, Y, Tsunekawa, S, Haji, A. Dextromethorphan inhibits the glutamatergic synaptic transmission in the nucleus tractus solitarius of guinea pigs. J Pharmacol Sci. 2011;116(1):5462.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stahl, SM. Dextromethorphan/bupropion: a novel oral NMDA (N-methyl-d-aspartate) receptor antagonist with multimodal activity—Addendum. CNS Spectr. 2020;25(6):803.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huecker, MR, Smiley, A, Saadabadi, A. Bupropion. Treasure Island, Florida: StatPearls Publishing; 2023.Google Scholar
Hole, K, Arnestad, M, Molden, E, Haslemo, T. Dose-dependent inhibition of CYP2D6 by bupropion in patients with depression. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2021;41(3):281285.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sager, JE, Tripathy, S, Price, LSL, et al. In vitro to in vivo extrapolation of the complex drug-drug interaction of bupropion and its metabolites with CYP2D6; simultaneous reversible inhibition and CYP2D6 downregulation. Biochem Pharmacol. 2017;123:8596.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Linn, KA, Long, MT, Pagel, PS. “Robo-tripping”: dextromethorphan abuse and its anesthetic implications. Anesth Pain Med. 2014;4(5):e20990.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karami, S, Major, JM, Calderon, S, McAninch, JK. Trends in dextromethorphan cough and cold products: 2000-2015 National Poison Data System intentional abuse exposure calls. Clin Toxicol. 2018;56(7):656663.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ritter, D, Ouellette, L, Sheets, JD, et al. “Robo-tripping”: dextromethorphan toxicity and abuse. Am J Emerg Med. 2020;38(4):839841.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olives, TD, Boley, SP, LeRoy, JM, Stellpflug, SJ. Ten years of robotripping: evidence of tolerance to dextromethorphan hydrobromide in a long-term user. J Med Toxicol. 2019;15(3):192197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vearrier, D, Grundmann, O. Clinical pharmacology, toxicity, and abuse potential of opioids. J Clin Pharmacol. 2021;61(Suppl 2):S70S88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blair, G, Wells, C, Ko, A, et al. Dextromethorphan and bupropion reduces high level remifentanil self-administration in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2020;193:172919.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Center for Drug Evaluation, Research. Drug Approvals and Databases. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Published December 20, 2023. Accessed January 14, 2024. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/development-approval-process-drugs/drug-approvals-and-databasesGoogle Scholar
McIntyre, RS, Mansur, RB, Rosenblat, JD, Kwan, ATH. The association between glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) and suicidality: reports to the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). Expert Opin Drug Saf. Published online December 13, 2023. doi:10.1080/14740338.2023.2295397Google Scholar
Tenny, S, Hoffman, MR. Odds Ratio. Treasure Island, Florida: StatPearls Publishing; 2023.Google ScholarPubMed
Woods, RH. Potential cerebrovascular accident signal for risankizumab: a disproportionality analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2023;89(8):23862395.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Puddephatt, JA, Irizar, P, Jones, A, Gage, SH, Goodwin, L. Associations of common mental disorder with alcohol use in the adult general population: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Addiction. 2022;117(6):15431572.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saha, S, Lim, CC, Degenhardt, L, et al. Comorbidity between mood and substance-related disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2022;56(7):757770.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Onaemo, VN, Fawehinmi, TO, D’Arcy, C. Comorbid cannabis use disorder with major depression and generalized anxiety disorder: a systematic review with meta-analysis of nationally representative epidemiological surveys. J Affect Disord. 2021;281:467475.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Center for Drug Evaluation, Research. FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) Public Dashboard. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Published December 7, 2023. Accessed January 14, 2024. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/questions-and-answers-fdas-adverse-event-reporting-system-faers/fda-adverse-event-reporting-system-faers-public-dashboardGoogle Scholar
Fedak, KM, Bernal, A, Capshaw, ZA, Gross, S. Applying the Bradford Hill criteria in the 21st century: how data integration has changed causal inference in molecular epidemiology. Emerg Themes Epidemiol. 2015;12:14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1. Forest plots showing the reporting odds ratio (ROR) for alcohol and substance misuse comparing dextromethorphan/bupropion to acetaminophen as the control.

Figure 1

Table 1. Dextromethorphan/Bupropion-Associated Alcohol and Substance Misuse Cases Identified in the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), Using Acetaminophen as the Control