Hostname: page-component-669899f699-2mbcq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-28T14:20:02.391Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How Long Does a Memory Last? Bayesian Chronological Modelling and the Temporal Scope of Commemorative Practices at Aeneolithic Monjukli Depe, Turkmenistan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 October 2024

Ilia Heit Open the ORCID record for Ilia Heit [Opens in a new window]
Ilia Heit*
Affiliation:
German Archaeological Institute Eurasia Department Im Dol 2-6 D-14197 Berlin Germany Email: Ilia.Heit@dainst.de
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this paper the history of one house and a human burial in the prehistoric settlement of Monjukli Depe, Turkmenistan, serves as a case study for the use of Bayesian chronological modelling to approach the reach of past memories. The method combines relative and absolute chronological data and aims not only at a more precise and robust chronology of past events, but also allows estimations of duration of particular processes. However, chronological models must be constructed with care, since the prior archaeological information significantly affects the output. The comparison of three alternative models for the Aeneolithic settlement of Monjukli Depe shows that prior information in modelling has a considerable impact on duration estimates for periods of the settlement history. The modelling chronology for Monjukli Depe allows the tracing of commemorative practices at a generational scale—the memory of Monjukli Depe House 14 was transmitted over several generations of inhabitants long after the house destruction. It is clear that houses possessed a great value in the social life of the settlement since local building histories were remembered over a long time.

Type
Research Article
Information
Cambridge Archaeological Journal , Volume 34 , Issue 4 , November 2024 , pp. 757 - 773
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bayliss, A., 2009. Rolling out revolution: using radiocarbon dating in archaeology. Radiocarbon 51(1), 123–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayliss, A., Benson, D., Galer, D., Humphrey, L., McFadyen, L. & Whittle, A., 2007. One thing after another: the date of the Ascott-under-Wychwood long barrow. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 17(S1), 29–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayliss, A., Bronk Ramsey, C., van der Plicht, H. & Whittle, A., 2007. Bradshaw and Bayes: towards a timetable for the Neolithic. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 17(S1), 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayliss, A., Popescu, E.S., Beavan-Athfield, N., Bronk Ramsey, C., Cook, G.T. & Locker, A., 2004. The potential significance of dietary offsets for the interpretation of radiocarbon dates: an archaeologically significant example from medieval Norwich. Journal of Archaeological Science 31(5), 563–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berdiev, O., 1972. Mondzhukly-depe—mnogosloynoe poselenie neolita i rannego eneolita v yuzhnom Turkmenistane [Monjukli Depe—a multi-layered Neolithic and Early Aeneolithic settlement in southern Turkmenistan]. Karakumskie Drevnosti 4, 11–34.Google Scholar
Bernbeck, R. & Pollock, S., 2016. Scalar differences: temporal rhythms and spatial patterns at Monjukli Depe, southern Turkmenistan. Antiquity 90, 64–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernbeck, R., Hofmann, K. & Sommer, U., 2017. Mapping memory, space and conflict, in Between Memory Sites and Memory Networks, eds Hofmann, K., Bernbeck, R. & Sommer, U.. (Berlin Studies of the Ancient World 45.) Berlin: Edition Topoi, 9–32.Google Scholar
Booth, T.J. & Brück, J., 2020. Death is not the end: radiocarbon and histo-taphonomic evidence for the curation and excarnation of human remains in Bronze Age Britain. Antiquity 94, 1186–1203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C., 2009a. Dealing with outliers and offsets in radiocarbon dating. Radiocarbon 51(3), 1023–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C., 2009b. Radiocarbon analysis of radiocarbon dates. Radiocarbon 51(1), 337–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brück, J. & Booth, T.J., 2022. The ambivalent dead: curation, excarnation and complex post-mortem trajectories in Middle and Late Bronze Age Britain. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 88, 193–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buck, C.E., 2004. Bayesian chronological data interpretation: where now?, in Tools for Constructing Chronologies: Crossing disciplinary boundaries, eds Buck, C.E. & Millard, A.R.. (Lecture Notes in Statistics 177.) London: Springer, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buck, C.E., Litton, C.D. & Smith, A.F.M., 1992. Calibration of radiocarbon results pertaining to related archaeological events. Journal of Archaeological Science 19(5), 497–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cereda, S., forthcoming. All the small things: a microstratigraphic investigation of earthen deposits at the site of Monjukli Depe, in Living in the Village: Excavations at Monjukli Depe, 2010–2014 (provisional title), Volume 3, eds Pollock, S., Bernbeck, R. & Heit, I.. Leiden: Sidestone Press.Google Scholar
Cersoy, S., Zazzo, A., Rofes, J., et al., 2017. Radiocarbon dating minute amounts of bone (3–60 mg) with ECHoMICADAS. Scientific Reports 7(1), 7141.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Edinborough, K., Porčić, M., Martindale, A., Brown, T.J., Supernant, K. & Ames, K.M., 2017. Radiocarbon test for demographic events in written and oral history. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114(47), 12436–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Egbers, V., 2019. The house as process. A biography of Building 10 in Monjukli Depe, in Looking Closely: Excavations at Monjukli Depe, Turkmenistan, 2010–2014, Volume 1, eds Pollock, S., Bernbeck, R. & Öğüt, B.. Leiden: Sidestone Press, 107–32.Google Scholar
Eger, J., 2022. Mensch-Tier-Verhältnisse in Monjukli Depe. Eine Analyse des sozialen Zusammenlebens in einer neolithisch-äneolithischen Siedlung in Turkmenistan [Human–animal relations in Monjukli Depe. An analysis of social interaction in a Neolithic–Aeneolithic settlement in Turkmenistan]. Leiden: Sidestone Press.Google Scholar
Fenner, J.N., 2005. Cross-cultural estimation of the human generation interval for use in genetics-based population divergence studies. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 128(2), 415–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garrow, D., Meadows, J., Evans, C. & Tabor, J., 2014. Dating the dead: a high-resolution radiocarbon chronology of burial within an Early Bronze Age barrow cemetery at Over, Cambridgeshire. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 80, 207–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harding, J., 2005. Rethinking the great divide: long-term structural history and the temporality of event. Norwegian Archaeological Review 38(2), 88–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heit, I., 2019. Chronological modelling for Monjukli Depe and the Kopet Dag Region, in Looking Closely: Excavations at Monjukli Depe, Turkmenistan, 2010–2014, Volume 1, eds Pollock, S., Bernbeck, R. & Öğüt, B.. Leiden: Sidestone Press, 81–106.Google Scholar
Heit, I., 2021. Dem Wandel auf der Spur—Bau- und Wohnpraktiken im prähistorischen Kopet Dag aus einer multiskalaren Zeitperspektive [Tracing change – building and dwelling practices in prehistoric Kopet Dag from a multi-scalar time perspective]. PhD dissertation, Freie Universität Berlin.Google Scholar
Higham, T., Warren, R., Belinskij, A., Härke, H. & Wood, R., 2010. Radiocarbon dating, stable isotope analysis, and diet-derived offsets in 14C ages from the Klin-Yar Site, Russian North Caucasus. Radiocarbon 52(2), 653–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodder, I. & Pels, P., 2010. History houses, in Religion in the Emergence of Civilization: Çatalhöyük as a case study, ed. Hodder, I.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 163–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofmann, K., Bernbeck, R. & Sommer, U. (eds), 2017. Between Memory Sites and Memory Networks. (Berlin Studies of the Ancient World 45.) Berlin: Edition Topoi.Google Scholar
Ingold, T., 1993. The temporality of the landscape. World Archaeology 25(2), 152–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joyce, R.A., 2000. Heirlooms and houses: materiality and social memory, in Beyond Kinship: Social and material reproduction in house societies, eds Joyce, R.A. & Gillespie, S.D.. Philadelphia (PA): University of Pennsylvania Press, 189–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joyce, R.A. & Gillespie, S.D., 2000. Beyond Kinship: Social and material reproduction in house societies. Philadelphia (PA): University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kubelková, H., 2019. ‘Fire is a good servant but a bad master’: the burnt House 14 at Monjukli Depe, in Looking Closely: Excavations at Monjukli Depe, Turkmenistan, 2010–2014, Volume 1, eds Pollock, S., Bernbeck, R. & Öğüt, B.. Leiden: Sidestone Press, 133–62.Google Scholar
Kuijt, I., 2001. Place, death, and the transmission of social memory in Early agricultural communities of the Near Eastern Pre-Pottery Neolithic. Archaeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association 10(1), 80–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, G., 2005. The Archaeology of Time. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Marciniak, A., Barański, M.Z., Bayliss, A., et al., 2015. Fragmenting times: interpreting a Bayesian chronology for the Late Neolithic occupation of Çatalhöyük East, Turkey. Antiquity 89, 154–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAnany, P.A. & Hodder, I., 2009. Thinking about stratigraphic sequence in social serms. Archaeological Dialogues 16(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, D., 1994. Artefacts and the meanings of things, in Companion Encyclopedia to Anthropology, ed. Ingold, T.. London/New York: Routledge, 396–419.Google Scholar
Mills, B.J. & Walker, W.H., 2008a. Introduction. Memory, materiality, and depositional practice, in Memory Work: Archaeologies of material practices, eds Mills, B.J. & Walker, W.H.. Santa Fe (NM): School for Advanced Research Press, 3–23.Google Scholar
Mills, B.J. & Walker, W.H. (eds), 2008b. Memory Work: Archaeologies of material practices. Santa Fe (NM): School for Advanced Research Press.Google Scholar
Nishiaki, Y., Guliyev, F., Kadowaki, S. & Omori, T., 2018. Neolithic residential patterns in the southern Caucasus: radiocarbon analysis of rebuilding cycles of mudbrick architecture at Göytepe, west Azerbaijan. Quaternary International (Special issue: Multidisciplinary approaches in the definition of high-resolution events to interpret past human behaviour: a new challenge in archaeology) 474(B), 119–30.Google Scholar
Öğüt, B., forthcoming. Animal dung and plant remains in the middle of the village, in Living in the Village: Excavations at Monjukli Depe, 2010–2014 (provisional title), Volume 3, eds Pollock, S., Bernbeck, R. & Heit, I.. Leiden: Sidestone Press.Google Scholar
Overholtzer, L., 2015. Agency, practice, and chronological context: a Bayesian approach to household chronologies. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 37, 37–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollock, S. & Bernbeck, R., 2019. Stratigraphy and settlement layout, in Looking Closely: Excavations at Monjukli Depe, Turkmenistan, 2010–2014, Volume 1, eds Pollock, S., Bernbeck, R. & Öğüt, B.. Leiden: Sidestone Press, 33–80.Google Scholar
Pollock, S., Bernbeck, R. & Öğüt, B., eds. 2019. Looking Closely: Excavations at Monjukli Depe, Turkmenistan, 2010–2014, Volume 1. Leiden: Sidestone Press.Google Scholar
Pollock, S., Bernbeck, R., Öğüt, B., et al., 2013. The second season of excavations at Monjukli Depe, Turkmenistan, 2011. Archäologische Mitteilungen aus Iran und Turan 45, 51–98.Google Scholar
Pollock, S. & Heit, I., 2023. Living amidst the ruins: continuities, interruptions, and memory in a 5th mill. BCE village in the Kopet Dag foothills, in From Households to Empires: Papers in honor of Bradley J. Parker, eds Kennedy, J. & Mullins, P.. Leiden: Sidestone Press, 63–78.Google Scholar
Reimer, P.J., Austin, W.E.N, Bard, E., et al., 2020. The IntCal20 Northern Hemisphere Radiocarbon Age Calibration Curve (0–55 cal kBP). Radiocarbon 62(4), 725–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robb, J.E. & Pauketat, T., 2013. From moments to millennia. Theorizing scale and change in human history, in Big Histories, Human Lives. Tackling problems of scale in archaeology, eds Robb, J.E. & Pauketat, T.. Santa Fe (NM): School of Advanced Research Press, 3–33.Google Scholar
Rol, N., 2019. Dealing with the dead in Aeneolithic Monjukli Depe: norms and Handlungsräume in burial practices, in Looking Closely: Excavations at Monjukli Depe, Turkmenistan, 2010–2014, Volume 1, eds Pollock, S., Bernbeck, R. & Öğüt, B.. Leiden: Sidestone Press, 213–64.Google Scholar
Scarre, G., 2006. Can archaeology harm the dead?, in The Ethics of Archaeology: Philosophical perspectives on archaeological practice, eds Scarre, C. & Scarre, G.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 181–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shanks, M. & Tilley, C.Y., 1987. Social Theory and Archaeology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Squires, K., Booth, T. & Roberts, C.A., 2019. The ethics of sampling human skeletal remains for destructive analyses, in Ethical Approaches to Human Remains: A global challenge in bioarchaeology and forensic anthropology, eds Squires, K., Errickson, D. & Márquez-Grant, N.. Cham: Springer International, 265–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steadman, D.L.W., 2019. Demography and pathology at Monjukli Depe, in Looking Closely: Excavations at Monjukli Depe, Turkmenistan, 2010–2014, Volume 1, eds Pollock, S., Bernbeck, R. & Öğüt, B.. Leiden: Sidestone Press, 265–88.Google Scholar
Tasić, N., Marić, M., Filipović, D., et al., 2016. Interwoven strands for refining the chronology of the Neolithic Tell of Vinča-Belo Brdo, Serbia. Radiocarbon 58(4), 795–831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, J., 1996. Time, Culture, and Identity: An interpretative archaeology. New York (NY): Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Urwin, C., Hua, Q. & Arifeae, H., 2021. Combining oral traditions and Bayesian chronological modelling to understand village development in the Gulf of Papua (Papua New Guinea). Radiocarbon 63(2), 647–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Dyke, R.M., 2019. Archaeology and social memory. Annual Review of Anthropology 48(1), 207–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Dyke, R.M. & Alcock, S.E. (eds), 2003. Archaeologies of Memory. Malden (MA): Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittle, A., Barclay, A., Bayliss, A., McFadyen, L., Schulting, R. & Wysocki, M., 2007. Building for the dead: events, processes and changing worldviews from the thirty-eighth to the thirty-fourth centuries cal. BC in southern Britain. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 17(S1), 123–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Heit supplementary material 1

Heit supplementary material
Download Heit supplementary material 1(File)
File 14 KB
Supplementary material: File

Heit supplementary material 2

Heit supplementary material
Download Heit supplementary material 2(File)
File 2.8 KB
Supplementary material: File

Heit supplementary material 3

Heit supplementary material
Download Heit supplementary material 3(File)
File 2.8 KB
Supplementary material: File

Heit supplementary material 4

Heit supplementary material
Download Heit supplementary material 4(File)
File 3 KB