Hostname: page-component-669899f699-tpknm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-26T04:57:32.272Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Lyapunov stability of non-isolated equilibria for strongly irreversible Allen–Cahn equations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2024

Goro Akagi*
Affiliation:
Mathematical Institute and Graduate School of Science, Tohoku University, Aoba, Sendai 980-8578, Japan ([email protected]) (corresponding author)
Messoud Efendiev
Affiliation:
Helmholtz Zentrum München, Institut für Computational Biology, Ingolstädter Landstraße 1, 85764 Neunerberg, Germany ([email protected]; [email protected])
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

The present article is concerned with the Lyapunov stability of stationary solutions to the Allen–Cahn equation with a strong irreversibility constraint, which was first intensively studied in [2] and can be reduced to an evolutionary variational inequality of obstacle type. As a feature of the obstacle problem, the set of stationary solutions always includes accumulation points, and hence, it is rather delicate to determine the stability of such non-isolated equilibria. Furthermore, the strongly irreversible Allen–Cahn equation can also be regarded as a (generalized) gradient flow; however, standard techniques for gradient flows such as linearization and Łojasiewicz–Simon gradient inequalities are not available for determining the stability of stationary solutions to the strongly irreversible Allen–Cahn equation due to the non-smooth nature of the obstacle problem.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Royal Society of Edinburgh

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Akagi, G., Stability of non-isolated asymptotic profiles for fast diffusion. Commun. Math. Phys. 345 (2016), 077100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akagi, G. and Efendiev, M., Allen-Cahn equation with strong irreversibility. European J. Appl. Math. 30 (2019), 707755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akagi, G. and Kajikiya, R., Stability analysis of asymptotic profiles for sign-changing solutions to fast diffusion equations. Manuscripta Mathematica 141 (2013), 559587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akagi, G. and Kajikiya, R., Stability of stationary solutions for semilinear heat equations with concave nonlinearity. Commun. Contemp. Math. 17 (2015), .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akagi, G. and Kimura, M., Unidirectional evolution equations of diffusion type. J. Diff. Eq. 266 (2019), 141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ambrosio, L. and Tortorelli, V. M., Approximation of functionals depending on jumps by elliptic functionals via Γ-convergence. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 43 (1990), 9991036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ambrosio, L. and Tortorelli, V. M., On the approximation of free discontinuity problems. Boll. Un. Mat. Ital. 6-B (1992), 105123.Google Scholar
Arai, T., On the existence of the solution for $\partial \varphi(u'(t)) + \partial \psi(u(t)) \ni f(t)$. J. Fac. Sci. Univ. Tokyo Sec. IA Math. 26 (1979), 7596.Google Scholar
Aso, M., Frémond, M. and Kenmochi, N., Phase change problems with temperature dependent constraints for the volume fraction velocities. Nonlinear Anal. 60 (2005), 10031023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aso, M. and Kenmochi, N., Quasivariational evolution inequalities for a class of reaction-diffusion systems. Nonlinear Anal. 63 (2005), e1207e1217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Attouch, H., Variational convergence for functions and operators, Applicable Mathematics Series (Pitman (Advanced Publishing Program), Boston, MA, 1984).Google Scholar
Barbu, V., Existence theorems for a class of two point boundary problems. J. Diff. Eq. 17 (1975), 236257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonetti, E. and Schimperna, G., Local existence for Frémond’s model of damage in elastic materials. Contin. Mech. Thermodyn. 16 (2004), 319335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonfanti, G., Frémond, M. and Luterotti, F., Global solution to a nonlinear system for irreversible phase changes. Adv. Math. Sci. Appl. 10 (2000), 124.Google Scholar
Bonfanti, G., Frémond, M. and Luterotti, F., Local solutions to the full model of phase transitions with dissipation. Adv. Math. Sci. Appl. 11 (2001), 791810.Google Scholar
Brézis, H., Operateurs Maximaux Monotones et Semi-Groupes de Contractions Dans les Espaces de Hilbert, Math. Studies, Vol. 5 (North-Holland, Amsterdam/New York, 1973).Google Scholar
Brézis, H., Functional analysis, Sobolev spaces and partial differential equations, Universitext, (Springer, New York, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brézis, H. and Oswald, L., Remarks on sublinear elliptic equations. Nonlinear Anal. 10 (1986), 5564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caffarelli, L. A., The obstacle problem revisited. J. Fourier Anal. Appl. 4 (1998), 383402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colli, P., On some doubly nonlinear evolution equations in Banach spaces. Japan J. Indust. Appl. Math. 9 (1992), 181203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colli, P. and Visintin, A., On a class of doubly nonlinear evolution equations. Commun. Partial Differ. Equ. 15 (1990), 737756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Efendiev, M., Finite and infinite dimensional attractors for evolution equations of mathematical physics, GAKUTO International Series, Mathematical Sciences and Applications, Vol. 33 (Gakkōtosho Co. Ltd, Tokyo, 2010).Google Scholar
Efendiev, M. and Mielke, A., On the rate-independent limit of systems with dry friction and small viscosity. J. Convex Anal. 13 (2006), 151167.Google Scholar
Eisenhofer, S., Efendiev, M. A., Ôtani, M., Schulz, S. and Zischka, H., On an ODE-PDE coupling model of the mitochondrial swelling process. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. B 20 (2015), 10311057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, L. C., Partial differential equations, Grad. Stud. Math., Vol. 19, (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2010).Google Scholar
Francfort, G. A. and Marigo, J.-J., Revisiting brittle fractures as an energy minimization problem. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 46 (1998), 13191342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giacomini, A., Ambrosio-Tortorelli approximation of quasi-static evolution of brittle fractures. Calc. Var. Partial Differ. Equ. 22. (2005), 129172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gianazza, U., Gobbino, M. and Savaré, G., Evolution problems and minimizing movements. Rend. Mat. Acc. Lincei IX 5 (1994), 289296.Google Scholar
Gianazza, U. and Savaré, G., Some results on minimizing movements. Rend. Acc. Naz. Sc. dei XL, Mem. Mat. 112 (1994), 5780.Google Scholar
Gustafsson, B., A simple proof of the regularity theorem for the variational inequality of the obstacle problem. Nonlinear Anal. 10 (1986), 14871490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kajikiya, R., Stability and instability of stationary solutions for sublinear parabolic equations. J. Differ. Equ. 264 (2018), 786834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimura, M. and Takaishi, T., Phase field models for crack propagation. Theor. Appl. Mech. Japan. 59 (2011), 8590.Google Scholar
Kinderlehrer, D. and Stampacchia, G., An introduction to variational inequalities and their applications, Pure and Applied Mathematics, Vol. 88 (Academic Press, Inc., New York-London, 1980).Google Scholar
Knees, D., Rossi, R. and Zanini, C., A vanishing viscosity approach to a rate-independent damage model. Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 23 (2013), 565616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luterotti, F., Schimperna, G. and Stefanelli, U., Local solution to Frémond’s full model for irreversible phase transitions. Mathematical models and methods for smart materials (Cortona, 2001), Adv. Math. Appl. Sci., Vol. 62, (World Sci. Publishing, River Edge, NJ, 2002).Google Scholar
Mielke, A. and Theil, F., On rate-independent hysteresis models. Nonlinear Differ. Equ. Appl. NoDEA 11 (2004), 151189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rocca, E. and Rossi, R., Entropic solutions to a thermodynamically consistent PDE system for phase transitions and damage. SIAM J. Math Anal. 47 (2015), 25192586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roubíček, T., Nonlinear partial differential equations with applications, International Series of Numerical Mathematics, Vol. 153 (Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, 2005).Google Scholar
Schimperna, G., Segatti, A. and Stefanelli, U., Well-posedness and long-time behavior for a class of doubly nonlinear equations. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 18 (2007), 1538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segatti, A., Global attractor for a class of doubly nonlinear abstract evolution equations. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 14 (2006), 801820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stefanelli, U., The Brezis-Ekeland principle for doubly nonlinear equations. SIAM J. Control Optim. 47 (2008), 16151642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takaishi, T. and Kimura, M., Phase field model for mode III crack growth in two dimensional elasticity. Kybernetika 45 (2009), 605614.Google Scholar
Visintin, A., Models of phase transitions, Progress in Nonlinear Differential Equations and their Applications, Vol. 28 (Birkhäuser Boston, Inc., Boston, MA, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar