Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:54:51.761Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Anthropology and psychiatry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

J. S. Price*
Affiliation:
Odintune Place, Plumpton, East Sussex BN7 3AN, UK. E-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Columns
Copyright
Copyright © 2005 The Royal College of Psychiatrists 

From the perspective of anthropological psychiatry, Harland et al (Reference Harland, Morgan and Hutchinson2004) suggest that the social change experienced by migrants may predispose to schizophrenia. The same may apply to other forms of social change, such as those changes which lead to revitalisation phenomena and new religious movements. Psychiatric anthropologists who have studied new religious movements have pointed out that new forms of belief system may originate in the hallucinatory or delusional experience of a single individual (Reference LittlewoodLittlewood, 1984). Wallace (Reference Wallace1956) applied the term ‘mazeway resynthesis’ to the change in belief system which occurs in prophets, the mazeway being to the individual what culture is to society, so that the prophet awakes to a new reality which he or she then tries to impart to followers; if successful, the prophet becomes the leader of a new religious movement; otherwise, he or she is alienated from the parent group and is likely to be labelled as mentally ill. Foulks (Reference Foulks1977) compared the prophet to the patient with schizophrenia, and noted that they shared not only the capacity to undergo a radical change in belief system but also various ‘premorbid’ features.

For many years population geneticists have been surprised that the genetic tendency to schizophrenia is maintained in spite of the reduced fertility of those affected (Reference CrowCrow, 1995). However, the fertility of cult leaders is often increased, owing to increased mating opportunities within the cult, and to the possibility of an ‘adaptive radiation’ in a new land following the inevitable social and geographical alienation of the cult from the parent group. If the genes responsible for schizophrenia and prophetic experience were the same, it is possible that the fecundity of successful cult leaders might balance the loss of genes both in people with schizophrenia and in unsuccessful cult leaders (Reference Price and StevensPrice & Stevens, 1998).

Such evolutionary speculations are independent of the proximal causes of schizophrenia, which might be a neurodevelopmental disorder or might even be part of the extended phenotype of a micro-organism. But they do suggest that if we find something in the brains of our patients, we should ask our psychiatric anthropological colleagues to look for the same thing in the brains of the founders of new religious movements.

Footnotes

EDITED BY KHALIDA ISMAIL

References

Crow, T. J. (1995) A Darwinian approach to the origins of psychosis. British Journal of Psychiatry, 167, 1225.Google Scholar
Foulks, E. F. (1977) Schizophrenia and revitalisation in pre-modern societies. In: Psychiatry: Areas of Promise and Advancement: A Bicentennial Volume of the University of Pennsylvania (eds J. P. Brady, J. Mendels, M. T. Orne & W. Rieger), pp. 137144. New York: Spectrum.Google Scholar
Harland, R., Morgan, C. & Hutchinson, G. (2004) Phenomenology, science and the anthropology of the self: a new model for the aetiology of psychosis. British Journal of Psychiatry, 185, 361362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Littlewood, R. (1984) The imitation of madness: the influence of psychopathology upon culture. Social Science and Medicine, 19, 705715.Google Scholar
Price, J. S. & Stevens, A. (1998) The human male socialisation strategy set: cooperation, defection, individualism, and schizotypy. Evolution and Human Behavior, 19, 5870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, A. F. C. (1956) Mazeway resynthesis: a biocultural theory of religious inspiration. Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences, 18, 626638.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.