Introduction
COVID-19 has affected ~199 M individuals, resulting in ~4.24 M deaths worldwide as of August 3, 2021. The scientific community has made tireless efforts to find a suitable remedy for COVID-19 since it was first reported in China’s Wuhan Province (Yamamoto et al., Reference Yamamoto, Bolanos, Fiallos, Strand, Morris, Shahrokhinia, Cushing, Hopp, Tiwari, Hariri, Sokolov, Wheeler, Kaushik, Elsayegh, Eliashiv, Hedrick, Jafari, Johnson and Khorsandi2020; Li et al., Reference Li, Guo and Wang2021; Mei et al., Reference Mei, Wang, Bryant, Wei, Yuan and Li2021; Yang et al., Reference Yang, Xing, Sreekissoon and Li2021; Zhu et al., Reference Zhu, Zhu, Wang, Meng, Wang, Feng, Li, Xiao, Shi and Wang2021). Of most concern at present is the arrival of new, mutated, genetic variants (e.g. the delta variant), suspected to be much more contagious than the original SARS-CoV-2 virus (Hu et al., Reference Hu, Li, Wang, Li and Zhang2020). Clearly, vaccination alone cannot restrict the viral spread; much uncertainty exists about the longevity of immunity acquired from various vaccinations. An urgent need exists, therefore, for scientists to come up with novel formulation(s) that could be used in the fight against the COVID-19.
Several FDA-approved drugs could be useful if re-purposed for treatment against COVID-19 (Jeon et al., Reference Jeon, Ko, Lee, Choi, Byun, Park, Shum and Kim2020). A recent study reported that almost 24 drug candidates were suggested as potential anti-viral drugs in the fight against COVID-19 (Jeon et al., Reference Jeon, Ko, Lee, Choi, Byun, Park, Shum and Kim2020). Most have half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) values ranging from 0.1 to ~10 μM. Among them, niclosamide (NIC) showed significantly greater therapeutic efficacy, having an IC50 of 0.28 μM against SARS-CoV-2, better than many other drugs, such as cyclosporin, imodium, lariam, amdaquine, proscillaridin, digitaline, lanoxin, nabac, salinomycin, ouabain, cepharanthine, ciclesonide, oxyclozanide, anidulafungin, gilteritinib, berbamine, tetrandrine, abemaciclib, ivacaftor, bazedoxifene, and eltrombopag (Jeon et al., Reference Jeon, Ko, Lee, Choi, Byun, Park, Shum and Kim2020).
NIC is an FDA-approved anthelmintic drug, which has been used previously in anti-parasitic (Kao et al., Reference Kao, HuangFu, Tsai, Ho, Jhan, Shen, Tseng, Wang and Lin2018), anti-inflammatory (Huang et al., Reference Huang, Qiu, Zeng, Xiao, Shi, Zou, Ye, Liang, Yang and Xu2015), and anti-cancer (Yu et al., Reference Yu, Liu, Zeng, He, Zhang, Yan, Zeng, Shu, Zhao, Wu, Lei, Zhang, Yang, Wu, Wu, An, Huang, Ji and Gong2018) drug formulations. NIC has limited application, however, because of its poor solubility, and, as a consequence, very low bio-availability (Grifasi et al., Reference Grifasi, Chierotti, Gaglioti, Gobetto, Maini, Braga, Dichiarante and Curzi2015). Various approaches have been made to improve its solubility through chemical modification (Ma et al., Reference Ma, Ma, Gao, Tai, Li, Zhu, Li, Dong and Sun2020), nano-encapsulation (Hatamipour et al., Reference Hatamipour, Jaafari, Momtazi-Borojeni, Ramezani and Sahebkar2019), and co-crystallization, etc. (Grifasi et al., Reference Grifasi, Chierotti, Gaglioti, Gobetto, Maini, Braga, Dichiarante and Curzi2015). For example, polyethyleneglycol (PEG) was modified with NIC to improve its solubility and, thereby, its effective therapeutic benefits in relation to CT26 (Mouse colon carcinoma cells). Such experimental results clearly paved the way for proving that suitably modified NIC formulations could serve as potential drugs for treating viral diseases such as COVID-19.
Most of the NIC-modified formulations were related to cancer therapy; the present pandemic situation requires an alternative medicinal formulation for a quick solution. In this context, loading NIC in a desirable drug carrier is important. Among the various drug carriers that have been tried, inorganic materials such as exfoliated layered double hydroxides (X-LDH) play a vital role because of their excellent biocompatibility and biodegradability (Choi, Reference Choi, Kim, Oh and Choy2018b; Choi et al., Reference Choi, Rejinold, Piao and Choy2021b; Choi & Choy, Reference Choi and Choy2021). LDH-based hybrid NPs have been used widely, therefore, particularly for drug delivery (Yan et al., Reference Yan, Gonca, Zhu, Zhang and Chen2019), bio-imaging (Jin & Park, Reference Jin and Park2019), and tissue engineering (Belgheisi et al., Reference Belgheisi, Nazarpak and Hashjin2020).
The purpose of the current study was to hybridize the biocompatible X-LDH NPs with NIC to form NIC-X-LDH NPs, and thereafter to functionalize the NIC-X-LDH NPs with eudragit S100 (ES100), as an enteric coating agent, to make it responsive at precisely the intestinal pH of 6.8. In order to stabilize and induce fast drug release, Tween 60 was also added as a coating on ES100-NIC-X-LDH NPs for the final oral formulation, which is referred to below as Tween 60-ES100-NIC-X-LDH NPs (Fig. 1).
The major research questions addressed here were: (1) How effectively can the as-made oral formulation act as an NIC-delivery agent? (2) What would be the in vivo PK profile for NIC from the orally administered formulation?
(i) The proposal here is that Tween 60-ES100-NIC-X-LDH-NPs would allow effective NIC delivery because of their various functional properties where X-LDH NPs would enhance a clathrin-mediated endocytosis, while pH-sensitive drug release can be achieved from the ES100 component. The Tween 60 would enhance both stability as well as solubility of NIC from Tween 60-ES100-NIC-X-LDH NPs. (ii) When administered orally, the NIC nanohybrid NPs (Tween 60-ES100-NIC-X-LDH NPs) being muco-adhesive, can be retained for longer in the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) and thereby facilitate sustained release of NIC, resulting in an improved bioavailability.
Materials and Methods
Materials
NIC (C13H8Cl2N2O4) was purchased from Derivados Quimicos, Murcia, Spain. Anhydrous Ethanol (99.9%) and isopropyl alcohol (IPA) were purchased from Daejung, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea. Magnesium nitrate hexahydrate [Mg(NO3)2·6H2O], aluminum nitrate nonahydrate [Al(NO3)3·9H2O], sodium hydroxide (NaOH), and formamide (CH3NO) were obtained from Daejung Co. Ltd., Gyeonggi-do, South Korea. ES100 was purchased from EVONIK (Darmstadt, Germany) and Tween 60 was purchased from TCI (Tokyo, Japan).
Synthesis of Exfoliated Layered Double Hydroxide Nanoparticles (X-LDH NPs)
A co-precipitation method was used to make pristine LDH (Choi et al., Reference Choi, Jeon, Piao and Choy2018a). Initially, a solution mixture of Mg(NO3)2·6H2O (0.012 M) and Al(NO3)3.9H2O (0.006 M) was titrated with 0.5 M NaOH solution. The pH of the solution was adjusted to 10.5 ± 0.2. The subsequent white precipitate was then kept for a 3 h aging process in an N2 atmosphere, and further kept in a 100°C hydrothermal process for one day. Decarbonated water was used to wash the precipitate; then it was freeze-dried. In order to prepare the X-LDH NPs, initially pristine LDH was treated with formamide (0.2 g/100 mL) and kept for 3 days under mechanical stirring until it formed a stable colloidal solution. Then it was centrifuged at 2314× g for 5 min to separate the uniformly dispersed nanosheets of X-LDH from those sheets that had not been exfoliated, which were finally used for the experiments (Ma et al., Reference Ma, Liu, Li, Iyi and Sasaki2006; Ansy et al., Reference Ansy, Lee, Piao, Choi and Choy2018). Because formamide is highly polar (polarity index: 7.3) due to its carbonyl group (C=O) at one end, a strong hydrogen bonding interaction could be expected with the –OH groups of X-LDH. As a result, the replacement of interlayer water with formamide disrupted the original interlayer attraction force allowing the exfoliation process (Ma et al., Reference Ma, Liu, Li, Iyi and Sasaki2006).
Synthesis of Tween 60-ES100-NIC-X-LDH NPs
The detailed synthesis steps are illustrated in Fig. 2. In the initial step, 1 g of NIC was dissolved completely in 100 mL of anhydrous ethanol, which was then added to 100 mL of distilled water + X-LDH NPs dispersed in 75 mL of formamide (150 mg). Then, 200 mg of enteric coating agent ES100 (dissolved in 50 mL of ethanol) was coated on NIC-X-LDH NPs, and further centrifuged at 6429×g for 5 min in order to separate the loaded NIC from un-loaded, then freeze-dried for 2 days to obtain ES100-NIC-X-LDH NPs. Finally, Tween 60 was added as a coating by dispersing the ES100-NIC-X-LDH NPs in 99.9% ethanol for ~30 min, and then the solution obtained was dried under a rotary evaporator (Heidolph Instruments Gm bH & Co. KG, Schwabach, Germany) to obtain the dry powder for the oral formulation desired, Tween 60-ES100-NIC-X-LDH NPs, where the Tween 60 content was 40%.
Recrystallization of NIC under Various Solvents and Solute Conditions
Recrystallization experiments were carried out under various solvents and solute conditions in order to understand the crystalline nature of NIC under such conditions. Several experiments were conducted as follows. All of the dried powders were analyzed by XRD.
Recrystallization of NIC in ethanol.
For this, 1 g of NIC was dissolved in 100 mL of ethanol (99.9%) and stirred for ~15 min until dissolved completely. Thereafter, the solvent was evaporated using a rotary evaporator (Heidolph Instruments Gm bH & Co. KG, Schwabach, Germany) for ~15 min to obtain the dry powder.
Recrystallization of NIC in ethanol/distilled water.
For this, 1 g of NIC was dissolved in 100 mL of ethanol (99.9%) and then stirred for ~15 min until dissolved completely. Thereafter, 100 mL of distilled water was added to the solution above, forming a yellow/white precipitate which was then dried under a rotary evaporator for ~15 min to obtain the powder.
Recrystallization of NIC in formamide.
1 g of NIC was partially dissolved in 75 mL of formamide, which was then transferred to a 110 mm glass petri dish and heated to 60°C to achieve complete dissolution. Formamide was difficult to separate from the solution using rotary evaporation, as the boiling point is very high (~210°C). Once the NIC/formamide solution was dissolved at 60°C, it was cooled to RT (room temperature), allowing precipitation of NIC crystals that were collected after 12 h using 110 mm Whatman filter paper and then dried at 60°C for 3 h in a hot-air oven.
Recrystallization of NIC in formamide/distilled water.
1 g of NIC was partially dissolved in 75 mL of formamide, then 100 mL of distilled water was added and the solution was stirred for 30 min. Once the NIC was dissolved at 60°C, it was cooled to RT, allowing precipitation of the NIC crystals, which then were collected (12 h) using 110 mm Whatman filter paper and dried in a hot-air oven at 60°C for 3 h.
Recrystallization of NIC in ethanol/formamide/distilled water.
1 g of NIC was dissolved fully in 100 mL of ethanol, to which 75 mL of formamide and 100 mL of distilled water were added. The whole solution was stirred for 60 min; the addition of formamide/distilled water resulted in partly dissolved NIC precipitates which were then dissolved at 60°C, and cooled to RT allowing precipitation of NIC crystals, which were collected (12 h) by Whatman filter paper and dried in a hot-air oven at 60°C for 3 h.
Recrystallization of NIC in ethanol/formamide.
1 g of NIC was dissolved fully in 100 mL of ethanol, to which was added 75 mL of formamide and the whole solution was stirred for 60 min. The addition of formamide resulted in only partially dissolved NIC precipitates, so the temperature was raised to 60°C, at which point complete dissolution occurred. The solution was then cooled to RT, which caused precipitation of NIC crystals that were collected by Whatman filter paper (12 h), and further dried in a hot-air oven at 60°C for 3 h.
Recrystallization of NIC in X-LDH NPs/formamide.
1 g of NIC was dissolved in 75 mL of formamide containing X-LDH NPs (X-LD NPs ~150 mg), followed by continuous stirring for 15 min. The solubility of NIC in formamide/X-LDH NPs was only partial, so the temperature was raised to 60°C to effect complete dissolution. It was then cooled to RT to allow precipitation of the NIC crystals, and the resulting powder comprising NIC in X-LDH NPs was collected using Whatman filter paper (12 h) in a hot-air oven.
Recrystallization of NIC in X-LDH/formamide/Tween 60.
Initially, 1 g of NIC was dissolved in 75 mL of formamide solution containing ~ 150 mg X-LDH NPs and stirred continuously for 15 min. 40% Tween 60 was mixed with the above solution and then the mixture was dissolved at 60°C, cooled to RT for precipitation of NIC crystals, and the solids were recovered as before, followed by drying (12 h) in a hot-air oven.
Recrystallization of NIC in ES100/ethanol.
1 g of NIC was dissolved in 100 mL of ethanol and 200 mg of ES100/50 mL ethanol was added to it. The whole solution was stirred for 15 min and the solvent was evaporated using a rotary evaporator for 10 min to obtain powdered samples.
Recrystallization of NIC in ES100/ethanol/Tween 60.
1 g of NIC was dissolved in 100 mL of ethanol and 200 mg of ES100, then a further 50 mL of ethanol was added to it, followed by 40% Tween 60 (~480 mg) and stirred for 15 min. The solvent was evaporated using a rotary evaporator for 10 min to obtain the powdered samples which were analyzed by XRD.
Recrystallization of NIC in ethanol/formamide/Tween 60.
1 g of NIC was initially dissolved in 100 mL of ethanol and then 75 mL of formamide was mixed with the solution and stirred for 30 min. Thereafter, 40% Tween 60 (~ 480 mg) was added. The solution was dissolved at 60°C, then cooled to RT, allowing precipitation of NIC crystals which were collected (12 h) in a hot air oven.
NIC Content Analysis
To measure the NIC content in the final formulations, samples of X-LDH-NIC, ES100-NIC-X-LDH NPs, and the Tween 60-coated solution were mixed thoroughly with 99.9% ethanol and sonicated for 0.6 h in order to remove completely the NIC molecules from the respective samples, then the solutions were syringe-filtered using a 450 nm porous PVDF membrane (Rejinold et al., Reference Rejinold, Choi, Piao and Choy2021). This ultra-sonication and ethanol dissolution process effectively removes all NIC molecules from the precipitate. NIC concentration was measured in the solution by UV-Vis spectroscopy at 333 nm (Jasco-V630 Spectrophotometer, (Jasco Easton, Massachusetts, USA) (Yu et al., Reference Yu, Piao, Rejinold, Jin, Choi and Choy2021). The NIC contents in NIC-X-LDH, ES100-NIC-X-LDH NPs, and the Tween 60-coated NPs were ~ 28.14 ± 2.56, 20.93 ± 0.83, and 14.02 ± 1.29%, respectively.
In vitro Drug-release Study
The NIC release profile was tested based on an existing protocol (Pardhi et al., Reference Pardhi, Chavan, Thipparaboina, Thatikonda, Naidu and Shastri2017) with a dissolution apparatus (DST-810 Lab Fine, Inc., Seoul, South Korea) under a constant temperature of 37°C, and a stirring frequency of ~50 rpm for 24 h. Drug release was conducted in two different solutions with pH values of 1.2 and 6.8, respectively, simulating a human’s gastric and intestinal fluids (Otsuka et al., Reference Otsuka, Shono and Dressman2013), where 2% Tween 60 was dissolved in each solution. The ES100-NIC-X-LDH and Tween 60-ES100-NIC-X-LDH samples with identical NIC contents of 0.015 g were dispersed in a dissolution chamber. The aliquots were collected at pre-scheduled time intervals. For drug release, all the triplicated samples were evaluated by UV-Vis measurement at 333 nm.
Pharmacokinetic (PK) Study
Male Sprague-Dawley rats, ~0.3 kg in weight, were used for PK analysis as per previous protocols (Choi et al., Reference Choi, Piao, Rejinold, Yu, Kim, Jin and Choy2021a; Yu et al., Reference Yu, Piao, Rejinold, Jin, Choi and Choy2021), which were sanctioned by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC No. IA21-00816) at Korea Conformity Laboratories (Incheon, Korea). Prior to the in vivo experiments, the rats were subjected to overnight fasting but with free access to water; thereafter, the dosage of 50 mg of NIC per kg was administered orally (n = 5) based on the formulation of Tween 60-ES100-NIC-X-LDH NPs. After oral administration, ~0.25 mL of blood sample was taken at pre-scheduled time intervals such as 0, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 h. Then the plasma was separated quickly by centrifugation at 43,456×g for 0.25 h at 4°C and kept at –70°C before analysis. Thereafter, the blood samples were analyzed using a High-Performance Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) instrument (L2 SCIENCE Co., Ltd., Gyeonggi-do, Korea) to determine various PK parameters such as t 1/2 (elimination half-life), t max (time required to reach the C max), C max (maximum plasma concentration), and AUC (area under the plasma concentration–time curve).
Characterizations
The NMR spectra were measured with a Bruker/Magnet System 500’54 Ascend at Dankook University, Cheonan, South Korea, using D6-DMSO (Duetero.de, Sejong-si, 30128, South Korea) for all the experiments. The Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectral studies were done using a Jasco FT-IR-6100 spectrometer (Jasco, Tokyo, Japan) using the standard KBr disk method in transmission mode (spectral range 4000–400 cm−1, resolution 1 cm−1, 40 scans per spectrum). For FTIR, ~10 mg of each sample was mixed with 100 mg of KBr pellet; ground well using a mortar and pestle, and pelletized thereafter under a hydraulic press machine at 20 MPa for 1 min. The XRD pattern for each of the samples was measured with a Bruker D2 Phase diffractometer (Karlsruhe, Germany) equipped with CuKα radiation (λ = 1.5418 Å). All the data were recorded at the tube voltage and current of 30 kV and 10 mA, respectively. The step size was ~0.02°2θ, and the scan range was ~2–69.99°2θ. Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS) and zeta potential analyses were carried out using an Otsuka Electronics DLS/ZetaEL-SZ-2000 instrument (Otsuka, Japan) using disposable square cuvettes in both distilled water, and phosphate-buffered saline (PBS)gastro-intestinal solutions. The concentration of each sample for DLS and zeta potential was maintained at 10 mg/mL. UV-vis spectroscopy data were obtained using a Jasco-V630 Spectrophotometer (Easton, Massachusetts, USA), and the freeze-drying was carried out with an Ilshin Biobase instrument (Gyeonggi-do, South Korea) at –53°C. The field emission scanning electron microscopic (FE-SEM) analyses for various samples were done using a Sigma 300 (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) field-emission scanning electron microscope, using samples at a concentration of 1 mg/mL in distilled water and GIT solutions (pH 1.2 and 6.8). The samples prepared were dropped onto a silicon wafer using a 20 μL pipette and dried under ambient condition. For energy dispersive spectrometry (EDS) analyses, the samples were attached to the stub using double-sided carbon tape. All the samples were coated with platinum to reduce the electron charging effect. The elemental distributions of various samples such as recrystallized NIC, NIC-X-LDH NPs, ES100-NIC-X-LDH NPs, and Tween 60-NIC-X-LDH NPs were probed with FE-SEM and (EDS)-elemental mapping analyses (Carl Zeiss Sigma 300). Release studies were carried out using a temperature-controlled dissolution apparatus (DST-810 Lab Fine, Inc., Seoul, South Korea).
Statistical Analysis
The statistical significances of the differences were evaluated with a two-tailed Student’s t-test. A P value of <0.05 was considered as statistically significant.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
NMR and FTIR Characterizations
The possible interaction within Tween 60-ES100-NIC-X-LDH NPs was studied using FTIR analysis. Note that X-LDH and NIC could be interacting via hydrogen bonding predominantly through the amide proton of NIC with the hydroxyl groups on the X-LDH surface. In order to confirm this chemical interaction, an NMR analysis was done as shown in Fig. 3a. The characteristic amide proton in NIC was assigned to 11.4 ppm (Fig. 3a.i)(Jara et al., Reference Jara, Warnken and Williams2021), while the characteristic surface hydroxyl protons found in X-LDH were assigned to ~0.85 ppm and 1.2 ppm, respectively (Fig. 3a.ii)(Sideris et al., Reference Sideris, Nielsen, Gan and Grey2008). The amide proton in NIC and hydroxyl protons from X-LDH NPs were shifted downfield after interaction, indicating clearly their strong interaction via hydrogen bonding. Accordingly, the surface hydroxyl protons from X-LDH NPs were shifted downfield slightly to 1.2 ppm from 0.85 ppm, and to 1.9 ppm from 1.2 ppm, respectively, while the amide proton in the NIC molecule was also shifted downfield slightly to 11.8 ppm from 11.4 ppm with NIC-X-LDH NPs (Fig. 3a.iii), whereas the ES100-NIC-X-LDH NPs (Fig. 3a.iv) was also shifted strongly to 12.4 ppm. This characteristic downfield shift in the tested samples indicated clearly that strong hydrogen bonding interaction occurred not only between NIC and X-LDH NPs, but also between ES100 and NIC-X-LDH NPs as indicated in the structure model (Fig. 3b).
The NMR analysis was further confirmed by the FTIR study as shown in Fig. S1 (Supplementary Material). The –NO2 group in the NIC molecules could also induce a negative charge resulting in a strong interaction with the positively charged X-LDH NPs forming the NIC-X-LDH NPs. In addition, the characteristic C–Cl bond in NIC observed at between 800 and 400 cm–1 was shifted slightly after forming NIC-X-LDH NPs and subsequent modification with ES100 and Tween 60. Similarly, the band at ~1518 cm−1, corresponding to the electronegative –NO2 group in NIC, was shifted after bonding with X-LDH NPs and further coating with ES100 and Tween 60, indicating a contribution of charge interaction in addition to the hydrogen bonding for the formation of hybrid NPs (Fig. S1).
The disappearance of –NH stretching at 3584 cm–1 and –OH bending vibration at 1210 cm−1 in NIC-X-LDH NPs indicated a strong interaction between NIC and X-LDH NPs owing to the hydrogen bonding (Lodagekar et al., Reference Lodagekar, Borkar, Thatikonda, Chavan, Naidu, Shastri, Srinivas and Chella2019) as confirmed by the NMR studies.
In the case of ES100-NIC-X-LDH NPs, the FTIR spectra showed a peak at 2953 cm–1 due to the presence of O–H (carboxylic acid), whereas the band at 1747 cm–1 owing to the C=O ester stretching was shifted slightly due to the hydroxyl interaction with the NIC molecules adsorbed on the X-LDH NPs. On the other hand, the peak at 1450 cm–1 corresponds to the CH3 bending vibrations, whereas the C–O ester signal is found at 1153 cm−1(Fig. S1a,b) (De Leo et al., Reference De Leo, Di Gioia, Milano, Fini, Comparelli, Mancini, Agostiano, Conese and Catucci2020).
The Tween 60 coating on the final sample, ES100-NIC-X-LDH NP, was confirmed by observing the characteristic bands at 2925 and 2865 cm–1, which are assigned for asymmetric (νs) and symmetric (νs) stretching bands for –CH2 functional groups from the Tween 60. The band at 1729 cm–1(C=O stretching in ester group) and the sharp peak at 3483 cm–1 (O–H stretching vibrations) further proved the physical coating on the sample (Fig. S1a). In addition, the improved solubility of Tween 60 coated samples indicated that the hydrophilic head groups of Tween 60 molecules might be projected outward while an inward hydrophobic–hydrophobic interaction might stabilize the coating of Tween 60 on the surface of ES100-NIC-X-LDH (Fig. 3b).
XRD, UV Spectroscopy, DLS and Zeta-potential Analysis
The pristine LDH NPs converted to single sheets, known as exfoliated LDH NPs (X-LDH) as shown in Fig. S2a. To understand this exfoliation process, XRD analysis was performed on pristine LDH as well as X-LDH NPs. According to the XRD analysis, pristine LDH NPs became X-ray amorphous upon exfoliation (Fig. S2b). On the other hand, both NIC-X-LDH NPs and ES100-NIC-X-LDH NPs showed recrystallized phases of NIC in aqueous solution (containing formamide and ethanol solvents) (Fig. S3), indicating that NIC molecules were adsorbed successfully on the surface of the X-LDH NPs. In addition, the surface-adsorption process involved strong hydrogen bonding between hydroxyl groups of X-LDH NPs and amino/hydroxyl groups of NIC molecules as indicated by the NMR analysis (Fig. 3a). Similarly, the ES100 could bond on the surface of NIC-X-LDH NPs through a hydrogen boding interaction. Both NIC-X-LDH NPs and ES100-NIC-X-LDH NPs showed characteristic peaks of a recrystallized NIC phase at 5.29, 10.8, 15.7, 20.03, 21.28, 23.47, 24.94, 25.77, 28.07, and 30.26°2θ, confirming the possibility of recrystallization on the X-LDH surface. On the other hand, the Tween 60-coated sample showed an X-ray amorphous XRD pattern, indicating that the coating was successful and could enhance the solubility of NIC under in vitro and in vivo conditions. In reality, amorphous particles showed better solubility than their crystalline counterparts (Hancock & Parks, Reference Hancock and Parks2000). In the case of the Tween 60-coated sample, the amorphous nature could be due to the hydrophilic head group from Tween 60, oriented outward, as demonstrated in the structure model (Fig. 3b), making the final Tween 60-coated formulation very much water-soluble and dispersible compared to the un-coated one. Additional recrystallization experiments in various solvents and solutes were carried out in order to understand the recrystallization pattern of NIC, showing that the solvents rather than the solute predominantly affected NIC recrystallization (Figs S4, S5). Additional experiments will be performed later to understand more about the recrystallization characteristics of NIC under various solvent conditions.
To confirm the physical coating of Tween 60 on the samples, a UV-Vis spectroscopic analysis was also conducted which showed no specific red or blue shift, indicating that Tween 60 was coated on the external surface of the samples physically (Fig. S6). In addition, the particle-size analysis by DLS showed clearly that Tween 60 coating could increase the particle size from 350 to 520 nm in ethanol solvent (Fig. S7).
The DLS measurements for recrystallized NIC NPs, NIC-X-LDH NPs, ES100-NIC-X-LDH NPs, and Tween 60-ES100-NIC-X-LDH NPs were done in distilled water as shown in Fig. 4a. As expected, Tween 60-ES100-NIC-X-LDH NPs showed a stable particle size of ~215.56 ± 8.72 nm whereas all other control samples had particle sizes of >500 nm. This confirmed clearly the fact that better stability can be obtained with Tween 60 coating. In addition, the zeta potential analysis for the NIC-X-LDH NPs was determined to be +53.79 ± 4.53 mV, which was changed to –66.36 ± 13.63 mV (Fig. 4b, Table 1) in the case of Tween 60-ES100-NIC-X-LDH NPs. Note that Tween 60 coating has dramatically improved the particle size and stability of NPs and might be beneficial for improved anti-viral efficacy in clinical perspectives. In addition, the NIC loaded in the X-LDH NPs could enable a clathrin-mediated endocytosis in the infected cell, thereby improving the therapeutic efficacy of the NIC hybrid drug significantly more than that of the intact NIC drug.
In addition, the particle size of Tween 60-ES100-NIC-X-LDH NPs was evaluated using DLS with gastrointestinal pH solutions. The particle size in a pH 6.8 solution was ~390 nm whereas it became 314 nm at pH 1.2 (Fig. 5a). According to the zeta potential analysis, the surface charge for Tween 60-ES100-NIC-X-LDH NPs at pH 1.2 was –44.97 ± 0.98 mV whereas at pH 6.8, it became –18 ± 2.82 mV (Fig. 5b). The samples at gastrointestinal pH solution remained as a stable suspension as shown in Fig. 5c with a very good Tyndall effect (Li et al., Reference Li, Rui, Bekana and Lai2018)(Fig. 5d).
FE-SEM and Elemental Mapping
As shown in Fig. 5e, the FE-SEM image for Tween 60-ES100-NIC-X-LDH NPs showed the particle size to be ~200 nm. On the other hand, the morphology of samples such as NIC, NIC-X-LDH NPs, and ES100-NIC-X-LDH NPs under the same solvent conditions of ethanol/formamide/distilled water showed a featureless morphology but a kind of aggregated form of particles with sizes of ~500, ~700, and ~800 nm, respectively (Fig. S8a–c). On the contrary, the Tween 60-ES100-NIC-X-LDH NPs had a spherical morphology (Fig. 5e) having a smaller particle size with good stability in an aqueous solution (Fig. S6b, c), indicating that the NIC drug molecules were loaded successfully on the X-LDH NPs. As the particle size was in the optimum range of <200 nm, this formulation should be beneficial for effectively targeting the SARS-CoV-2 virus through an extracellular/intracellular pathway (Vonnemann et al., Reference Vonnemann, Sieben, Wolff, Ludwig, Böttcher, Herrmann and Haag2014). NIC has been known to exert anti-viral properties by inhibiting endocytosis, autophagy, and replication, thereby preventing further maturation of viral particles within the infected cells (Pindiprolu & Pindiprolu, Reference Pindiprolu and Pindiprolu2020).
The elemental mapping analysis also confirmed the presence of all the components such as X-LDH NPs and NIC in the composite particles of Tween 60-ES100-NIC-X-LDH NPs (Fig. S9).
In vitro NIC Release Studies
The release studies were conducted at pH 1.2 and 6.8, mimicking the gastric (Evans et al., Reference Evans, Pye, Bramley, Clark, Dyson and Hardcastle1988) and intestinal conditions, respectively (Koziolek et al., Reference Koziolek, Grimm, Becker, Iordanov, Zou, Shimizu, Wanke, Garbacz and Weitschies2015). A significantly greater NIC release from ES100-NIC-X-LDH was observed (Fig. 6a,b) under the intestinal pH condition, and reached ~100% in 24 h, whereas a restricted release of ~30% was observed at pH 1.2 for the same time period. In order to understand the effect of Tween 60 coating on the NIC release, release studies were done using Tween 60-ES100-NIC-X-LDH NPs under pH conditions of 1.2 and 6.8, both having 2% Tween 60 in the dissolution media. At pH 6.8, ~ 100% of the drug was released in only 1 h at pH 6.8 (Fig. 6a,b), much faster and more completely than under pH 1.2 conditions. Compared to the uncoated sample, coating with Tween 60 increased both the extent and rate of release at both pH values, indicating that coating should be beneficial for enhanced NIC release, especially in the intestinal site.
The enhanced release of NIC at intestinal pH could be due mainly to the improved stability and solubility of NIC when it was composited with ES100 and Tween 60 along with X-LDH NPs. In addition, ES100 can enhance colon- specific targeting (Hales et al., Reference Hales, Tefas, Tomuta, Moldovan, Gulei, Munteanu and Porfire2020; Rehman et al., Reference Rehman, Ranjha, Raza, Hanif, Majed and Ameer2020), which would also be beneficial for COVID-19 patients because the viral loads in the GI tract were reported to be significantly greater than for other organs. As demonstrated schematically in Fig. 6c, the release mechanism for NIC from ES100-NIC-X-LDH NPs could be rationalized mainly by the combined action of ES100 and Tween 60. The latter contributed mainly to the dissolution of the oral drug present regardless of the pH conditions but the former played a decisive role in the drug release under a gastrointestinal solution condition; the NIC release was fairly restricted under an acidic condition due to the low solubility of ES100 at pH 1.2, whereas the 100% release at pH 6.8 was observed because of the swelling and the dissolution of ES100 providing the diffusion pathways of NIC molecules out of ES100-NIC-X-LDH NPs. Here, one of the research goals was to induce a controlled release in the target intestinal site (Khan et al., Reference Khan, Stedul and Kurjakovic2000); therefore, the as-made oral formulation with pH responsive molecules such as ES100 and X-LDH NPs could help to improve the controlled NIC release in vivo. To understand the release kinetics mechanism, the release parameters were fitted to different kinetic equations such as zero-order, first-order, Higuchi Model, Hixon-Crowell Model, and Korsmeyer-Peppas Model (Figs S10, S11). The maximum r2 value of 0.9707 was obtained for the Higuchi model and of 0.9877 for the Korsmeyer-Peppas model for the ES100-NIC-X-LDH NPs (Table S1), when the NIC-release experiments were performed at pH 6.8. A similar trend was shown by the Tween 60-ES100-NIC-X-LDH NPs. Such results are in good agreement with the hypothesis shown in Fig. 6c, because they have been applied generally to the swelling, dissolution, and degradation mechanisms. On the other hand, as expected, the zero- and first-order kinetic equations did not fit the NIC release from hybrid NPs.
In vivo PK Analysis
PK analysis was conducted for Tween 60-ES100-NIC-X-LDH NPs (50 mg/kg) after a single oral administration in rats. The main reason for choosing only Tween 60-ES100-NIC-X-LDH NPs was due to its better stability, optimum particle size, and enhanced drug release (Fig. 6) compared to the uncoated sample. As shown in Fig. 7a,b, the plasma NIC concentration from Tween 60-ES100-NIC-X-LDH NPs maintained its IC50 value at least up to 8 h. In order to have a clear understanding of the quantitative data, various PK parameters such as t 1/2, C max, t max, and AUC were also calculated (Table 2).
*t 1/2 = elimination half-life
**t max = time required to reach the C max
***C max = maximum plasma concentration
***AUC = area under the plasma concentration–time curve
Tween 60-ES100-NIC-X-LDH NPs showed a very high AUClast value of 13924.76 ± 4087.19 ng·h/mL with a t 1/2 of 4.86 ± 0.84 h. In addition, the value for C max was significantly higher at 15328.82 ± 6854.44 ng/mL with a t max of 0.60 ± 0.22 h. The prolonged elimination half-life of NIC in the plasma from Tween 60-ES100-NIC-X-LDH NPs could be attributed to sustained NIC release capability as demonstrated in the in vitro release studies (Fig. 6a,b). Note that even with a very low dosage of 50 mg/kg, Tween 60-ES100-NIC-X-LDH NPs were able to retain the therapeutic concentration for longer than intact NIC, indicating its possible benefits for treating COVID-19 patients. The present formulation showed very high PK parameters, C max (~15,000 ng/mL), t max (0.60 h), and AUC (~14,000 ng·h/mL), compared to those of commercially available Yomesan® , which had C max (~155 ng/mL), t max (4 h), and AUC (~1100 ng·h/mL), according to the previous study (Yu et al., Reference Yu, Piao, Rejinold, Jin, Choi and Choy2021).
CLINICAL PERSPECTIVES
COVID-19 has caused a surging, highly contagious, multi-variant pandemic; the scientific community has responded in many ways, using its knowledge and skills. Tremendous improvements have been made in terms of detection, diagnosis, and therapeutic strategy using nanomaterials. Disadvantages associated with each technique make the scaling up of such lab solutions to factory-scale products difficult, especially as quickly as expected or needed. On the other hand, though various vaccination strategies are emerging, both in developing and developed countries, their actual effectiveness for long-term immunity is still unknown. Nanomaterials are needed for effective delivery of existing potential antiviral drugs such as NIC, which has been repurposed for a wide variety of pathological conditions such as cancers, bacterial and viral infections, etc. Interestingly, Tween 60-ES100-NIC-X-LDHNPs allowed very high NIC concentration (C max) in the plasma after 30 min with a maximum concentration of ~ 15,000 ng./mL, which is the highest value among the data reported in Table 3.
The present authors believe that the oral formulation discussed here, ES100-NIC-X-LDH NPs, would be useful in the fight against SARS-CoV-2 viral infections with no significant harmful effects to the human body, as the individual components comprising ES100-NIC-X-LDH NPs are biocompatible and biodegradable.
Conclusions
The oral formulation based on Tween 60-ES100-NIC-X-LDH NPs was developed successfully for NIC delivery against COVID-19, and was further characterized using NMR, FTIR, FESEM, and EDS to check its physicochemical properties. In vitro NIC release was determined to be significantly greater at the pH (6.8) of intestinal solutions compared to that (1.2) of gastric solutions, confirming that the dissolution property of NIC was greatly improved at pH 6.8, thanks to the enteric coating effect of ES100 and stabilization by Tween 60. In the present PK study, the highest plasma concentration of NIC was obtained after a single oral administration, maintaining the required IC50 value for up to 8 h with a low dose of 50 mg/kg. In addition to the improved C max value, the AUC was also greatly enhanced compared to those values obtained from previous oral formulations. The present repurposed NIC hybrid drug, Tween 60-ES100-NIC-X-LDH NPs, could, therefore, be a potential anti-viral technology for tackling SARS-CoV-2 infections.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s42860-021-00153-6.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (No. 2020R1I1A2074844), by the NRF grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (No. 2020R1F1A1075509), and under the framework of the International Cooperation Program managed by NRF (No. 2017K2A9A2A10013104).
Funding
Funding sources are as stated in the Acknowledgments.
Declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.