Hostname: page-component-669899f699-2mbcq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-25T04:26:07.496Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Privilege and prejudice in private online English teaching: Discourses in school-owned recruitment websites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 October 2024

Ephraim V. Domingo Open the ORCID record for Ephraim V. Domingo [Opens in a new window]
Ephraim V. Domingo*
Affiliation:
Asia University, Musashino City, Japan
*
Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Numerous studies have analyzed various aspects of English language teaching to uncover discriminatory employment practices within the field. However, there is a gap in the research regarding the discourses present in school-managed teacher recruitment websites (TRWs), particularly in the field of private online language education (POLE). This study aims to address this gap by investigating how the preferred online English teacher is characterized and what benefits they are promised when visiting these webpages. Using critical discourse analysis, the author analyzed the textual elements of 32 TRWs of online English schools operating in six major markets in Asia. The findings reveal that although a few schools show signs of relatively fair policies and emphasize professional qualifications, most of them appear to exploit native-speakerism through their application requirements and compensation policies that often favor only some groups. The implications emphasize the benefits of creating equitable employment opportunities and professionalizing POLE by leveraging the qualifications and experience of teachers from diverse backgrounds, while ensuring fair compensation. Finally, this study provides practical strategies for present and prospective online teachers on how to take advantage of the opportunities of digital language work while contributing to the attainment of equity in the industry.

Type
Study
Information
Language Teaching , First View , pp. 1 - 15
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Alenazi, O. (2014). The employment of native and non-native speaker EFL teachers in Saudi higher education institutions: Programme administrators’ perspective [Doctoral dissertation, Newcastle University]. Newcastle University eTheses. http://theses.ncl.ac.uk/jspui/handle/10443/2501Google Scholar
Alshammari, A. (2020). Job advertisements for English teachers in the Saudi Arabian context: Discourses of discrimination and inequity. TESOL Journal, 12(2), 1–13. doi:10.1002/tesj.542Google Scholar
Aslan, E., & Thompson, A. S. (2017). Are they really ‘two different species’? Implicitly elicited student perceptions about NESTs and NNESTs. TESOL Journal, 8(2), 277–294. doi:10.1002/tesj.268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, A. (2023). Is native speakerism a privilege in TESOL employment? A comparative study of self-reported hiring discrimination in native and non-native ESL teachers across Spain and the UK [Master's thesis, University of Oxford]. ORA. https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:3a2a3297-1a75-4f19-b44d-cab30aec0046Google Scholar
Bolton, K. (2008). English in Asia, Asian Englishes, and the issue of proficiency. English Today, 24(2), 3–12. doi:10.1017/S026607840800014XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braine, G. (2010). Nonnative speaker English teachers: Research, pedagogy, and professional growth. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braine, G., & Selvi, A. F. (2018). NNEST movement. In Liontas, J. I. (Ed.), The TESOL encyclopedia of English language teaching (pp. 1–6). John Wiley & Sons. doi:10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0039Google Scholar
Canagarajah, S. (1999). Interrogating the ‘native speaker fallacy’: Non-linguistic roots, non-pedagogical results. In Braine, G. (Ed.), Non-native educators in English language teaching (pp. 77–92). Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Chun, S. Y. (2014). EFL learners’ beliefs about native and non-native English-speaking teachers: Perceived strengths, weaknesses, and preferences. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 35(6), 563–579. doi:10.1080/01434632.2014.889141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, E., & Paran, A. (2007). The employability of non-native-speaker teachers of EFL: A UK survey. System, 35(4), 407–430. doi:10.1016/j.system.2007.05.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comprendio, L. J. E. V., & Savski, K. (2020). ‘Asians’ and ‘westerners’: Examining the perception of ‘(non)-native’ migrant teachers of English in Thailand. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 41(8), 673–685. doi:10.1080/01434632.2019.1630419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daoud, S., & Kasztalska, A. (2022). Exploring native-speakerism in teacher job recruitment discourse through legitimation code theory: The case of the United Arab Emirates. Language Teaching Research, 1–21. doi:10.1177/13621688211066883Google Scholar
Deady, K. (2020, June 18). This calculator shows how much you can make teaching English online. Teach Away. https://www.teachaway.com/blog/teach-english-online-salaryGoogle Scholar
Dewaele, J. (2018). Why the dichotomy ‘L1 versus LX user’ is better than ‘native versus non-native speaker.’ Applied Linguistics, 39(2), 236–240. doi:10.1093/applin/amw055Google Scholar
Dewaele, J., Bak, T., & Ortega, L. (2022). Why the mythical ‘native speaker’ has mud on its face. In Slavkov, N., Melo-Pfeifer, S., & Kerschhofer-Puhalo, N. (Eds.), The changing face of the ‘native speaker’: Perspectives from multilingualism and globalization (pp. 25–46). De Gruyter Mouton. doi:10.1515/9781501512353-002Google Scholar
Domingo, E. V. (2022). Native-speakerism in the hiring and visual depiction of teachers in recruitment websites of online English schools in Asia [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Saint Louis University.Google Scholar
Domingo, E. V. (2024). Introducing private online language education: Out-of-the-shadows, technology-powered foreign language teaching. TESOL Journal, 15(1), e731. doi:10.1002/tesj.731CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duchêne, A., & Heller, M. (Eds.). (2011). Language in late capitalism: Pride and profit. Routledge.Google Scholar
Hastings, M. (2019). Neoliberalism and education. In Oxford research encyclopedia of education. Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.404Google Scholar
Holborow, M. (2018). Language, commodification and labour: The relevance of Marx. Language Sciences, 70, 58–67. doi:10.1016/j.langsci.2018.02.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holliday, A. (2005). The struggle to teach English as an international language. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kiczkowiak, M. (2019). Students’, teachers’ and recruiters’ perception of teaching effectiveness and the importance of nativeness in ELT. Journal of Second Language Teaching & Research, 7(1), 1–25.Google Scholar
Kiczkowiak, M. (2020). Recruiters’ attitudes to hiring ‘native’ and ‘non-native speaker’ teachers: An international survey. TESL-EJ, 24(1), 1–22.Google Scholar
Kiczkowiak, M. (2022). Are most ELT course book writers white ‘native speakers’? A survey of 28 general English course books for adults. Language Teaching Research, 1–18. doi:10.1177/13621688221123273.Google Scholar
Kiczkowiak, M., & Lowe, R. J. (2021). Native-speakerism in English language teaching: ‘Native speakers’ more likely to be invited as conference plenary speakers. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 1–16. doi:10.1080/01434632.2021.1974464Google Scholar
Kirkpatrick, A., Patkin, J., & Wu, J. (2013). The multilingual teacher and the multilingual curriculum: An Asian example of intercultural communication in the new era. In Sharifian, F. & Jamarani, M. (Eds.), Intercultural communication in the new era (pp. 263–285). Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203081365Google Scholar
Kozar, O. (2012). Use of synchronous online tools in private English language teaching in Russia. Distance Education, 33(3), 415–420. doi:10.1080/01587919.2012.723164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kozar, O. (2015). Discursive practices of private online tutoring websites in Russia. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 36(3), 354–368. doi:10.1080/01596306.2013.871238Google Scholar
Kozar, O., & Sweller, N. (2014). An exploratory study of demographics, goals and expectations of private online language learners in Russia. System, 45, 39–51. doi:10.1016/j.system.2014.04.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorente, B. P., & Tupas, T. R. F. (2013). Emancipatory hybridity: Selling English in an unequal world. In Rudby, R. & Alsagoff, L. (Eds.), The global-local interface and hybridity: Exploring language and identity (pp. 66–82). Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackenzie, L. (2021). Discriminatory job advertisements for English language teachers in Colombia: An analysis of recruitment biases. TESOL Journal, 12(1), 1–21. doi:10.1002/tesj.535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahboob, A., & Golden, R. (2013). Looking for native speakers of English: Discrimination in English language teaching job advertisements. Voices in Asia Journal, 1(1), 72–81.Google Scholar
Martin, I. P. (2020). Philippine English. In Bolton, K., Botha, W., & Kirkpatrick, A. (Eds.), The handbook of Asian Englishes (pp. 479–500). John Wiley & Sons. doi:10.1002/9781118791882.ch20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Education. (2021, December 24). MOE press conference to present progress in implementing the ‘Double Reduction’ policy [Press release]. http://en.moe.gov.cn/news/press_releases/202201/t20220107_593036.htmlGoogle Scholar
Moussu, L., & Llurda, E. (2008). Non-native English-speaking English language teachers: History and research. Language Teaching, 41(3), 315–348. doi:10.1017/S0261444808005028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Wages and Productivity Commission. (2022). Current real minimum wage rates. https://nwpc.dole.gov.ph/stats/current-real-minimum-wage-rates/Google Scholar
Panaligan, J. H., & Curran, N. M. (2022). ‘We are cheaper, so they hire us’: Discounted nativeness in online English teaching. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 26(2), 246–264. doi:10.1111/josl.12543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rao, Z. (2010). Chinese students’ perceptions of native English-speaking teachers in EFL teaching. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 31(1), 55–68. doi:10.1080/01434630903301941CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruecker, T., & Ives, L. (2015). White native English speakers needed: The rhetorical construction of privilege in online teacher recruitment spaces. TESOL Quarterly, 49(4), 733–756. doi:10.1002/tesq.195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selvi, A. F. (2010). All teachers are equal, but some teachers are more equal than others: Trend analysis of job advertisements in English language teaching. WATESOL NNEST Caucus Annual Review, 1, 156–181.Google Scholar
Si, J. (2020). An analysis of business English coursebooks from an ELF perspective. ELT Journal, 74(2), 156–165. doi:10.1093/elt/ccz049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, W. (2020). A political economy of eikaiwa English language teaching [Doctoral dissertation, University College London]. UCL Discovery. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10108125/Google Scholar
Tajeddin, Z., & Pakzadian, M. (2020). Representation of inner, outer and expanding circle varieties and cultures in global ELT textbooks. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 5(10), 1–15. doi:10.1186/s40862-020-00089-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tajima, M. (2018). Gendered constructions of Filipina teachers in Japan's Skype English conversation industry. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 22(1), 100–117. doi:10.1111/josl.12272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
TESOL. (2006). Position statement against discrimination of nonnative speakers of English in the field of TESOL. https://www.tesol.org/docs/pdf/5889Google Scholar
Tupas, R. (2019). Decentering language: Displacing Englishes from the study of Englishes. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 17(3), 228–245. doi:10.1080/15427587.2019.1641097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Dijk, T. A. (2018). Critical discourse analysis. In Tannen, D., Hamilton, H. E., & Schiffrin, D. (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis. (2nd ed., pp. 466–485). Wiley Blackwell. doi:10.1002/9781118584194.ch22Google Scholar
Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (Eds.). (2009). Methods for critical discourse analysis. Sage.Google Scholar
Yeh, A. (2019). Problematizing the commodification of ESL teaching in the Philippines: Mediating expectations, norms and identity(ies). Journal of English as an International Language, 14(1), 92–118.Google Scholar
Zečević, S. M., & Biševac, E. M. (2022). Popularity of online teaching English as a foreign language to learners from East Asia: Teachers’ perception. Zbornik radova Filozofskog fakulteta u Prištini, 52(4), 69–92. doi:10.5937/zrffp52-40973CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Domingo supplementary material 1

Domingo supplementary material
Download Domingo supplementary material 1(File)
File 15.9 KB
Supplementary material: File

Domingo supplementary material 2

Domingo supplementary material
Download Domingo supplementary material 2(File)
File 21.2 KB
Supplementary material: File

Domingo supplementary material 3

Domingo supplementary material
Download Domingo supplementary material 3(File)
File 18.2 KB