Hostname: page-component-669899f699-qzcqf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-27T20:30:53.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Institutional design in commons-based sharing economies: platform, care and place

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 December 2024

Bronwen Morgan Open the ORCID record for Bronwen Morgan [Opens in a new window]
Bronwen Morgan*
Affiliation:
UNSW Sydney Faculty of Law and Justice, Sydney, Australia
*
Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper presents an analytical mapping of institutional design possibilities for alternative ways for digital platforms to institutionalise property and corporate form. It builds on the institutional imagination catalysed by three vignettes of experimental sharing economy initiatives presented towards the start of the paper, each of which highlights the imbrication and interdependence between economic and social dimensions of the sharing economy. The paper then interrogates the vignettes through three analytical entry points to the institutional design of commons-based sharing economies: platform, care and place. By remapping the vignettes’ practices around these three entry points, the paper shows how they help constitute the incipient formalisation of commons-based approaches to the sharing economy. The prospects for carrying out a redesign of property and corporate forms more generally thereby become more visible, providing a sound foundation for more in-depth empirical and historical work on alternative trajectories of the sharing economy in the future.

Keywords

commonssharing economyplatform economydigital platformspropertyinstitutions
Type
Article
Information
International Journal of Law in Context , Volume 20 , Special Issue 4: Property in the Sharing Economy: Paradox, Disruption, and Institutional Design , December 2024 , pp. 496 - 513
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bartl, M (2022) On the chances of structural pluralism in the liberal theory of property. International Journal of Law in Context 18(2), 247–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batiot, B, dal Carlo, E, Laclaverie, E, Montagut, A, Noe, J, Paquot, P, Sarda, M and Sabille, B (2020) We, cooperative platforms, stand up to amazon and the others. Fairbnb.Coop – Community Powered Tourism (blog). Available at https://fairbnb.coop/2020/12/10/we-cooperative-platforms-stand-up-to-amazon-and-the-others/ (accessed 10 December 2020). Society Publishers.Google Scholar
Benkler, Y (1994) “Distributive Liberty: A Relational Model of Freedom, Coercion, and Property Law.” Harvard Law Review 107, 859–876.Google Scholar
Boeger, N (2018) The new corporate movement. In Boeger, N and Villiers, C (eds), Shaping the Corporate Landscape: Towards Corporate Reform and Enterprise Diversity. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Bollier, D and Helfrich, S (2019) Free Fair & Alive. Gabriola Island, BC: New Society Publishers.Google Scholar
Carlo Vercellone (Dir. CNRS-CEMTI), Francecso Brancaccio (CNRS-CEMTI), Alfonso Giuliani (CNRS), Federico Puletti (Université Paris Nanterre, Giulia Rocchi (CNRS), and Pierluigi Vattimo (CNRS) (2019) “Data-Driven Disruptive Commons-Based Models.” Decode Project: DEcentralised Citizens Owned Data Ecosystem. European Union. Available at https://www.decodeproject.eu/publications/data-driven-disruptive-commons-based-models-0.Google Scholar
Christodoulidis, EA (1996) The inertia of institutional imagination: A reply to Roberto Unger. The Modern Law Review 59(3), 377–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.1996.tb02086.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, AJ (2020) A labor theory of negotiation: From integration to value creation. Journal of Law and Political Economy 1(1), 147–84. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/94p5w6v6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cottica, A (2018) The economics of Cory Doctorow’s Walkaway. Edgeryders (blog). Available at https://edgeryders.eu/t/the-economics-of-cory-doctorows-walkaway/8828/3?u=alberto (accessed 14 July 2018).Google Scholar
DisCO Coop (2020) Groove is in the heart: DisCO elements – Commons care and governance for distributed organisations. Available at https://disco.coop/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/DisCO_Elements_v1-3.pdf.Google Scholar
Doughnut Economics Action Lab , Biomimicry 3.8, Circle Economy, and C40 Cities (2020) The Amsterdam City Doughnut – A Tool for Transformative Action. Amsterdam: Doughnut Economics Action Lab.Google Scholar
Dyal-Chand, R (2015) Regulating sharing – The sharing economy as an alternative capital | Sharing economy | Market economy. Tulane Law Review 90(2), 241–309.Google Scholar
FairBnB (2020) Leonardo joins Fairbnb.Coop: Our social innovation goes east. Fairbnb.Coop - Community Powered Tourism (blog). https://fairbnb.coop/2020/12/16/leonardo-joins-fairbnb-coop-our-social-innovation-goes-east/ (accessed 16 December 2020).Google Scholar
FairBnB (n.d.) Local node activation. Fairbnb.Coop – Community Powered Tourism (blog). Available at https://fairbnb.coop/local-node-activation/ (accessed 22 January 2021).Google Scholar
Federici, S (2019) Women, reproduction, and the commons. South Atlantic Quarterly 118(4), 711–24. https://doi.org/10.1215/00382876-7825564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, SR and Iaione, C (2015) The city as a commons. Yale Law & Policy Review 34, 281–349.Google Scholar
Graeber, D (2014) What’s the Point If We Can’t Have Fun? The Baffler 24, 50–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirschman, AO (1970) Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States, vol. 25. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Illich, I (1992) Dwelling: Address to the Royal Institute of British Architects York, U.K., July 1984“. (Celebration of the 150th anniversary of the Royal Institute of British Architects). In Illich, I (ed), In the Mirror of the Past: Lectures and Addresses 1978–1990. New York: Marion Boyars.Google Scholar
Institut Municipal d’Informatica de Barcelona (2016) Decentralised Citizens Owned Data Ecosystem | DECODE Project | H2020 | CORDIS. European Commission. Available at https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/732546.Google Scholar
Jackson, S and Palmer, LR (2015) Reconceptualizing ecosystem services: Possibilities for cultivating and valuing the ethics and practices of care. Progress in Human Geography 39(2), 122–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lesniewska, F and Steenmans, K (2023) Circular Economy and the Law: Bringing Justice into the Frame. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Marella, MR (2017) The commons as a legal concept. Law and Critique 28(1), 61–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattei, U and Mancall, M (2019) Communology: The emergence of a social theory of the commons. South Atlantic Quarterly 118(4), 725–46. https://doi.org/10.1215/00382876-7825576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, E (2019) Reimagining Livelihoods: Life Beyond Economy, Society and Environment. Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, B (2018) The sharing economy. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 14(1), 351–66. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-101317-031201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, B and Goldblatt, B (2022) Contested common space, regulation and inclusion at the Coogee Women’s Pool. Legalities 2(2), 182–214. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muldoon, J (2020) Airbnb has been rocked by COVID-19. Do we really want to see it recover? OpenDemocracy (blog). Available at https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/oureconomy/airbnb-has-been-rocked-covid-19-should-it-be-allowed-recover/ (accessed 4 April 2020).Google Scholar
Nannelli, M, Franch, M and Della Lucia, M (2019) Business Models for Sustainability (BMfs) in the Sharing Economy: Emerging Platforms in Accommodation Service. In Management and Sustainability: Creating Shared Value in the Digital Era. Rome: Sapienza University, pp. 279–85.Google Scholar
Nembhard, JG (2014) Collective Courage: A History of African American Cooperative Economic Thought and Practice by Jessica Gordon Nembhard. University Park, Pennsylvania: Penn State Press.Google Scholar
Nicoli, M and Paltrinieri, L (2019) Platform cooperativism: Some notes on the becoming ‘common’ of the firm. South Atlantic Quarterly 118(4), 801–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orsi, J (2012) Practicing Law in the Sharing Economy: Helping People Build Cooperatives, Social Enterprise, and Local Sustainable Economies. Nonprofit Law. Chicago: American Bar Association Book Publishing.Google Scholar
Raworth, K (2017) Doughnut Economics: Seven Ways to Think Like a 21st-Century Economist. White River Junction, Vermont: Chelsea Green Publishing.Google Scholar
Roberts, B, Willemsen, L, Dyer, K and Veselovschi, P (2022) Blueprint 8: Funding governance for systemic transformation: Allocating investment and grant-making for a regenerative and distributive economy. R3.0. 8. Available at https://www.r3-0.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/r3.0-Blueprint-8-Funding-Governance-for-Systemic-Transformation.pdf.Google Scholar
Scanlan, MK (2017) Law and Policy for a New Economy: Sustainable, Just and Democratic. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, N (2024) Governable Spaces: Democratic Design for Online Life. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scholz, RT (2023) Own This! London: Verso Press.Google Scholar
Schor, JB and Wengronowitz, R (2017) The New Sharing Economy: Enacting the Eco-Habitus. In Brown, C and Vergragt, P (eds), Social Change and the Coming of Post-Consumer Society. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Simon, KD (2005) The value of open standards and open-source software in government environments. IBM Systems Journal 44(2), 227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sjåfjell, BK, Russell, R and van der Velden, M (2023) Interdisciplinary Research for Sustainable Business. Zurich: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Srnicek, N (2016) Platform Capitalism. London: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Stack, CB (1974) All Our Kin. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Thompson, M (2021) What’s so new about new municipalism? Progress in Human Geography 45(2), 317–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132520909480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorpe, A (2018) Hegel’s Hipsters: Claiming Ownership in the Contemporary City. Social and Legal Studies 27, 25–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tokic, B (2020) Sustainable tourism explained to my daughter. Fairbnb.Coop – Community Powered Tourism (blog). Available at https://fairbnb.coop/2020/08/03/sustainable-tourism-explained-to-my-daughter/ (accessed 3 August 2020).Google Scholar
Troncoso, S and Ultratel, A (2020) Care before code: Supporting the 58 Development of Distributed Co-Operative Organisations (DisCOs). In Muldoon, J and Strange, W (eds), Platforming Equality: Policy Challenges for the Digital Economy. Hampshire: Autonomy Collective. Available at https://autonomy.work/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/platforming-equality-V3.pdf.Google Scholar
Troncoso, S and Utratel, A (n.d.) Care before code: It’s what makes DisCOs different, 19.Google Scholar
Unger, R (1996) Legal analysis as institutional imagination. Modern Law Review 59, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar