Sir: We enjoyed reading the article by Lawrence et al (Psychiatric Bulletin, June 2002, 26, 230-232). The findings complement some work that we have done in this area (Lowe-Ponsford, Psychiatric Bulletin, 2000, 24, 415-417). Our postal questionnaire found that 65% of psychiatrists who replied had prescribed ‘off-label’ within the preceding month.
Medico-legal advice that we obtained (from the Medical Protection Society) was that, not only does Bolam (1957) need to be taken into account, but also the case of Bolitho (1997). This judgement means that the treatment has to withstand logical analysis as well as be accepted by a body of opinion. These considerations need to be taken into account in prescribing, alongside the capacity of the patient.
Many psychiatrists are worried about off-label prescribing and our study showed that 4% of respondents had received complaints about this matter. In our paper, we suggested some guidelines that may avoid many future medico-legal problems for clinicians if they should prescribe off-label.
The College's Psychopharmacology Special Interest Group has discussed this matter and is setting up a small working group (chaired by D. B.) to review the practice of off-label prescribing. We would be delighted to receive the thoughts of colleagues on this subject.
eLetters
No eLetters have been published for this article.