Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T19:36:53.834Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evaluation of crop-topping strategies to reduce common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) seed production in potato production systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 September 2023

Laura Anderson
Affiliation:
Graduate Student, Charlottetown Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Charlottetown, PE, Canada
Scott Neil White
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor, Department of Plant, Food, and Environmental Sciences, Dalhousie University, Truro, NS, Canada
Andrew McKenzie-Gopsill*
Affiliation:
Research Scientist, Charlottetown Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Charlottetown, PE, Canada
*
Corresponding author: Andrew McKenzie-Gopsill; Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Potato producers in Canada’s Atlantic provinces of Prince Edward Island (PE) and New Brunswick rely on photosystem II (PSII)-inhibiting herbicides to provide season-long weed control. Despite this fact, a high proportion of common lambsquarters populations in the region have been identified as resistant to this class of herbicides. Crop-topping is a late-season weed management practice that exploits the height differential between weeds and a developing crop canopy. Two field experiments were conducted in Harrington, PE, in 2020 and 2021, one each to evaluate the efficacy of a different crop-topping strategy, above-canopy mowing or wick-applied glyphosate, at two potato phenological stages, on common lambsquarters viable seed production and potato yield and quality. Mowing common lambsquarters postflowering decreased viable seed production (72% to 91%) in 2020 but increased seed production (78% to 278%) in 2021. Mowing had minimal impact on potato marketable yield across cultivars in both years. In contrast, treating common lambsquarters with wick-applied glyphosate had variable impacts on seed output in 2020 but dramatically reduced seed production (up to 95%) in 2021 when treatments were applied preflowering. Glyphosate damage to potato tubers was not influenced by timing and resulted in a 14% to 15% increase in culled tubers due to black spotting and rot. Our results highlight the importance of potato and common lambsquarters phenology when selecting a crop-topping strategy and demonstrate that above-canopy mowing and wick-applied glyphosate can be utilized for seedbank management of herbicide-resistant common lambsquarters in potato production systems.

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© Crown Copyright - Government of Canada, 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Weed Science Society of America

Introduction

Potato is the highest-value horticultural crop in Canada, with an estimated farm gate value of US$1 billion in 2020 (CATSNet 2021). Canada’s Atlantic provinces of Prince Edward Island (PE) and New Brunswick account for 37% of seeded Canadian potato acreage and 48% of Canada’s fresh potato exports (CATSNet 2021). Potato production systems are subject to a variety of pests that must be mitigated to ensure crop profitability. For example, uncontrolled weed growth costs Canadian potato producers an estimated US$61 million in potential annual yield loss due to reductions in tuber number and quality (Ganie et al. Reference Ganie, Soltani, McKenzie-Gopsill, Felix, Hutchinson, Dille and Sikkema2023). Furthermore, weeds can serve as alternative hosts to the myriad of insect pests, pathogens, and diseases affecting potato production (Boydston et al. Reference Boydston, Mojtahedi, Crosslin, Brown and Anderson2008). Pest management tactics in potato often rely on the use of chemical pesticides, with herbicides composing 25% of annual potato pesticide use (Fernandez-Cornejo et al. Reference Fernandez-Cornejo, Nehring, Osteen, Wechsler, Martin and Vialou2014). Atlantic Canadian potato producers rely on preemergent applications of photosystem II (PSII)-inhibiting herbicides including either metribuzin, a Group 5 triazinone, or linuron, a Group 5 substituted urea (WSSA 2021). These herbicides are applied to over 75% of potato acreage in the Atlantic Canada region (L. MacKinnon, personal communication, 2019). Producers who once relied on a combination of early-season cultivation and row formation (hilling) at ground crack (conventional hilling) followed by a preemergence herbicide application have since transitioned to a one-pass hilling system. In a one-pass hilling system, planting and row formation are carried out simultaneously, and they are followed shortly after by a preemergent PSII-inhibiting herbicide application. This management shift has been found to reduce soil losses by 40% due to reduced soil disturbance, but it does not include burying and killing of early-emerging weed species as in conventionally hilled potatoes (Rajalahti et al. Reference Rajalahti, Bellinder and Hoffmann1999; Xing et al. Reference Xing, Chow, Rees, Meng, Monteith and Stevens2011). In-season broadleaf weed control options in potato are limited to rimsulfuron and metribuzin due to crop safety and limited investment in weed management in horticultural crops (Ganie et al. Reference Ganie, Soltani, McKenzie-Gopsill, Felix, Hutchinson, Dille and Sikkema2023). Therefore the switch to one-pass hilling results in a near-total reliance on a single preemergent herbicide application of metribuzin or linuron to provide season-long weed control in potato from planting to harvest.

Common lambsquarters is a summer annual broadleaf weed that occurs in various environments and cropping systems throughout the northern hemisphere (Bajwa et al. Reference Bajwa, Zulfiqar, Sadia, Bhowmik and Chauhan2019; Warwick and Marriage Reference Warwick and Marriage1982; Williams Reference Williams1963). Its continuous germination pattern allows for multiple flushes throughout the season (Bassett and Crompton Reference Bassett and Crompton1978; Ogg and Dawson Reference Ogg and Dawson1984), and plants can grow up to 2.5 m tall to rapidly overtop a crop canopy, reducing light availability for the crop (Bassett and Crompton Reference Bassett and Crompton1978; Mahoney and Swanton Reference Mahoney and Swanton2008). As such, common lambsquarters is considered one of the most economically significant weeds in potato production systems, with yield losses reported up to 85% (Eberlein et al. Reference Eberlein, Patterson, Guttieri and Stark1997; Parks et al. Reference Parks, Curran, Roth, Hartwig and Calvin1996). Common lambsquarters generally sets seed in late summer and early fall and can produce between 30,000 and 176,000 seeds per plant (Harrison Reference Harrison1990; Stevens Reference Stevens1932). The small, black seeds have little endosperm and can persist in the soil seedbank for more than 20 years (Lewis Reference Lewis1973; Stevens Reference Stevens1932). Common lambsquarters has historically been controlled in potato with metribuzin and linuron. However, widespread resistance of common lambsquarters to the PSII-inhibiting herbicide metribuzin now occurs across the Atlantic Canada potato-growing region (McKenzie-Gopsill et al. Reference McKenzie-Gopsill, Graham, Laforest, Ibarra, Hann and Wagg2020).

Weed control tactics are generally applied prior to or shortly after emergence to protect yield potential, as weeds that emerge before or with the crop during the critical period for weed control have a larger impact on yield than late-emerging weeds (Knezevic et al. Reference Knezevic, Evans, Blankenship, Van Acker and Lindquist2002). Weeds that escape control during this period, whether through misapplication or resistance to herbicides, are much more difficult to manage due to limited in-crop options in potato. Crop-topping is the use of a nonselective management tactic near the end of the growing season when the crop is maturing and the target weed species is flowering (Tidemann et al. Reference Tidemann, Harker, Shirtliffe, Willenborg, Johnson, Sroka, Zuidhof and Duddu2021). This tactic is used to control weeds that escape early-season management and minimize weed seed production. Recent work has shown varying levels of success with mechanical and chemical tactics for control of weeds overtopping a crop canopy. For example, Simard et al. (Reference Simard, Page and Nurse2018) had limited success with mechanical control of common lambsquarters overtopping a soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] canopy with a mechanical weed puller at a targeted 10-cm weed height to use crop height differential. Although the weed puller damaged common lambsquarters, common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.), and redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus L.) in soybean, weeds that started seed formation prior to treatment still produced viable seeds when left on the ground in the field. In controlled conditions, Butler et al. (Reference Butler, Brouder, Johnson and Gibson2013) found that mowing common lambsquarters once reduced total biomass production by 25%, and multiple clippings reduced inflorescence weight by 90%. Common lambsquarters mowed to 5 cm and 10 cm had less total dry weight than that cut to 20 cm, but reducing inflorescence dry weight required repeated clipping treatments (Butler et al. Reference Butler, Brouder, Johnson and Gibson2013). Meyers et al. (Reference Meyers, Jennings, Schultheis and Monks2016) demonstrated greater than 90% control of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri S. Watson) when glyphosate was applied with a wick weeder overtopping a sweet potato [Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.] canopy at 7 and 8 wk after planting. Furthermore, sweet potato yield increased as the wick application timing was delayed. However, Meyers et al. (Reference Meyers, Jennings and Monks2017) and Gilreath et al. (Reference Gilreath, Chase and Locascio2000) found that sequential wick applications reduced sweet potato and pepper yields, respectively, due to increased herbicide exposure and glyphosate drip. To date, no studies have investigated the feasibility of crop-topping in potato production systems.

Further exploration into weed management tactics that can be applied in-season in potatoes to prevent weed seed set and deplete seed viability and seedbank stores is necessary to counter the rise of herbicide-resistant weed biotypes (Geddes and Davis Reference Geddes and Davis2021; Hill et al. Reference Hill, Renner, VanGessel, Bellinder and Scott2016). This is particularly true in horticultural crops like potato, for which few in-season weed management options exist (Ganie et al. Reference Ganie, Soltani, McKenzie-Gopsill, Felix, Hutchinson, Dille and Sikkema2023). In addition, the use of weed management tactics that select against tall weeds can be a strategy to promote a more diversified and therefore less competitive weed community in a horticultural rotation (MacLaren et al. Reference MacLaren, Storkey, Menegat, Metcalfe and Dehnen-Schmutz2020). The objective of the present study was to investigate crop-topping in potato using both mechanical and chemical strategies. We set up two crop-topping experiments, one to evaluate the use of a mower and another to evaluate the use of wick-applied glyphosate, for control of common lambsquarters overtopping a potato canopy using three potato cultivars of varying growth habits. We hypothesized, first, that crop-topping prior to the full flowering of common lambsquarters would increase common lambsquarters control and maximize reductions in seed production but compromise potato yield compared to later applications and, second, that the growth patterns of potato cultivars would influence efficacy and crop injury from crop-topping.

Materials and Methods

Experimental Design

Field experiments were established at the Harrington Experimental Farm (46.35°N, 63.15°W) in Harrington, PE, Canada, in 2020 and 2021. Soil at Harrington is characterized as a fine sandy loam (Orthic Humo-Ferric Podzol, Canadian System of Soil Classification; Humic Cryorthods, U.S. Soil Taxonomy; OM 3% to 3.2%, pH 6.6). Two independent experiments were established: one to evaluate the use of a mower and the other to evaluate the use of wick-applied glyphosate. All other experimental parameters were identical. Both experiments were organized as randomized strip plots with four replicates, three whole-plot factors, and three strip-plot factors per experiment. Whole-plot factors were potato growth habits according to Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) cultivar descriptions (semi-erect, ‘NorValley’ in 2020 and ‘Eva’ in 2021; spreading, ‘Shepody’; upright, ‘Yukon Gold’) (CFIA 2015), and strip-plot factors were mowing timing and wick application timing (none, early, late) in the mowing and wick-applied glyphosate experiment, respectively (n = 36 per experiment). Fields were cultivated (Triple K Cultivator; Kongskilde, Alberslund, Denmark) and spring-tooth harrowed twice, and potato rows were formed prior to hand-planting potatoes. Untreated Elite 1 potato sets were hand-planted on June 4, 2020, and May 25, 2021, at 31-cm, 38-cm, and 31-cm spacing for semi-erect, spreading, and upright cultivars, respectively. Fertility rate varied by cultivar and was banded at planting prior to row closure at the following rates: 150-200-135 kg ha−1 (N-P-K) for the semi-erect and upright cultivars and 160-200-135 kg ha−1 (N-P-K) for the spreading cultivar according to local recommendations. Rows were closed mechanically, and imidacloprid (ADMIRE® 240, 240 g ai L−1; Bayer Crop Science, Calgary, AB, Canada) was applied in-furrow at a rate of 312 g ai ha−1 to provide broad-spectrum control of insect pests. Additional insecticide and fungicide applications were made as required according to local recommendations. Plots consisted of two 5 × 1 m potato rows with one 5 × 1 m potato guard row on adjacent sides for a total plot area of 5 × 4 m (20 m2). Potato hills were formed 4 wk after planting on June 22, 2020, and June 24, 2021. Potatoes were top-killed at maturity with broadcast diquat (Reglone®, 240 g ai L−1; Syngenta Canada, Calgary, AB, Canada) at a rate of 840 g ai ha−1 on September 15, 2020, and September 21, 2021. To evaluate the effects of treatments on yield, one treated row per plot was mechanically harvested on October 1, 2020, and September 30, 2021.

Mowing: Treatment Application

To evaluate the effects of crop-topping with a mower on common lambsquarters and potato, plots were crop-topped at two phenological stages. The early mowing treatment was conducted prior to common lambsquarters flowering, which corresponded to stage 51 according to the BBCH scale (Meier Reference Meier2018), and the late mowing treatment was made after common lambsquarters flowering at stage 69 according to the BBCH scale (Meier Reference Meier2018). Potatoes were at or before late flowering and early tuber formation (BBCH 67/42) for the early mowing treatment and at early fruit development and early tuber formation (BBCH 71/43) for the late mowing treatment. Prior to treatment application, the heights of three common lambsquarters and three potato plants per plot were recorded to determine the average heights of common lambsquarters and potato across the entire experiment. The mower height was set at 10 cm above the average potato height, at 68 cm and 79 cm in 2020 and 72 cm and 68 cm in 2021 for early and late mowing timings, respectively (Table 1). Mowing treatments were conducted on July 30 and August 20 in 2020 and on July 27 and August 16 in 2021 for the early and late mowing timings, respectively. Hedge trimmers were used to simulate a crop mower at a travel speed of 5 km h−1 for all treatments. For both treatment timings, the entire plot was mowed in a single direction at the set height.

Table 1. Mean height of potato and common lambsquarters (CHEAL) prior to early and late mowing and wick weeding treatment application in two separate experiments in 2020 and 2021 at Harrington PE. a

a Values are means ± SE. The height of the mower and wick bar for each treatment is also shown.

Wick-Applied Glyphosate: Treatment Application

To evaluate the effects of crop-topping with wick-applied glyphosate to common lambsquarters and potato, plots were crop-topped at two phenological stages. Early and late wick treatments were conducted at the same time as the mowing experiment, and common lambsquarters and potatoes were at the same phenological stages as described earlier. The wick bar used in this study comprised one 304.8 × 7.62 cm (L × D) and two 76.2 × 7.62 cm (L × D) PVC pipes affixed to stainless steel brackets of the same length (15’ Loader Model Wick Weeder; Vogels Wick Weeders, Kippen, ON, Canada). The system was gravity fed by a 20-L tank affixed to the top of the bracket that allowed product to flow to the attached wick bars. A one-part glyphosate (Roundup WeatherMAX®, 540 g ae L−1; Monsanto, Winnipeg, MB, Canada) and two-parts water solution for a concentration of 180 g ae L−1 of glyphosate was used for both treatment timings, per the manufacturer’s instructions. The wick bar was mounted on a front-end loader tractor to allow for height adjustment. Prior to treatment application, the heights of three common lambsquarters and three potato plants per plot were recorded to determine the average common lambsquarters and potato heights across the experiment. The wick bar was set 10 cm above the average potato height, at 67 cm and 77 cm in 2020 and 70 cm and 59 cm in 2021 for early and late timing of wick treatments, respectively (Table 1). Owing to logistical challenges with the wick bar, only one potato row (5 m2) in each plot was treated at both treatment timings in a single direction at the set height. All measurements, including yield, were taken from the treated potato row.

Data Collection

Data collection in Experiments 1 and 2 was identical. The impact of mowing and wick-applied glyphosate on common lambsquarters control and potato injury was visually assessed 3 wk after treatment application on a 0 to 100 scale where 0 was no effect and 100 was complete plant death. To evaluate the effects of crop-topping with a mower or wick-applied glyphosate on common lambsquarters biomass allocation, three common lambsquarters plants per plot were tagged immediately following treatment application and monitored for the remainder of the season. Prior to seed development, tagged plants were covered by a low-density polyethylene bag (1.2 × 1.5 m [L × D]) to capture shattered seed. Prior to potato harvest, tagged common lambsquarters was cut at the base of the plant and dried on a greenhouse bench for 1 wk. Plants were then sieved with a 200-mm sieve and carefully cleaned using a benchtop seed blower to separate vegetative and reproductive biomass. Vegetative biomass (g plant−1) was dried to constant weight at 60 C prior to weighing. Reproductive biomass (g plant−1) was weighed, and triplicate 50-seed subsamples were counted and weighed to determine thousand seed weight (TSW) (g). Entire seed samples were used for determination of TSW when fewer than 150 seeds were in a sample. Vegetative and reproductive biomasses were used to compute harvest index by dividing the weight of seed biomass by the weight of total biomass. To evaluate the effects of crop-topping on common lambsquarters seed viability, germination tests were conducted on triplicate 50-seed subsamples per plant. Entire seed samples were used for germination tests when there were fewer than 150 seeds in a sample. Ten-millimeter petri plates were lined with filter paper and moistened with 5 mL of distilled H2O. Seeds were added to the filter paper and separated from each other to limit mold growth. Samples were covered with a piece of filter paper, sealed with parafilm, and placed in a growth cabinet (Precision™ Plant Growth Chamber, 504 L; Thermo Scientific, Mississauga, ON, Canada) in the dark at 22 C (Burton et al. Reference Burton, Beckie, Willenborg, Shirtliffe, Schoenau and Johnson2016). Samples were left to germinate for 14 d. Germinated seeds, determined by the presence of a visible radicle or hypocotyl, were then counted to determine germination percentage. Viability of nongerminated seeds was evaluated with a pinch test, where viable seeds were firm when pinched, and these were added to the germinated seeds to determine total viability of the sample. Seed production, measured as viable seeds per plant, was computed using calculated seed biomass, TSW, and germination percentage.

To evaluate the impact of crop-topping with a mower or wick-applied glyphosate on potato, marketable potato and cull yields were determined from harvested plots. Potatoes were graded according to the CFIA potato grading scale (CFIA 2015) using an optical grader (Celox-P-UHD; New Tec, Odense, Denmark) and sorted into small (3.8 to 5.7 cm and 3.8 to 5.08 cm) and Canada #1 (5.7 to 8.9 cm and 5.08 to 8.9 cm) size classes for round and long potatoes, respectively. Potatoes in these two size classes were counted, weighed, added together, and considered marketable yield. Small (<3.8 cm), large (>8.9 cm), misshapen, or sunburned potatoes were counted, weighed, and considered cull yield. To quantify marketable yield lost to glyphosate injury in the wick-applied glyphosate treatment, tubers exhibiting black spotting and rot indicative of glyphosate damage (Supplementary Figure 1 A) were counted as culls and added to cull yield.

Statistical Analysis

All statistical analysis was conducted in the R software environment (RStudio version 4.2.1; R Core Team 2022). All data from both experiments were analyzed separately. Common lambsquarters total biomass, seed biomass, harvest index, TSW, germination percentage, and viable seed production were analyzed with linear mixed effects models with cultivar, treatment timing, year, and their interaction as fixed effects and replication as a random effect using the R package nlme (Pinheiro et al. Reference Pinheiro, Bates, DebRoy, Sarkar, Histerkamp, Van Willigen and Ranke2022). To quantify the impact of crop-topping on potato yield, the percentage of yield lost to culls was calculated for each plot to standardize initial differences in yield among potato cultivars. Potato marketable yield, cull yield, and percentage of yield lost to culls was then analyzed with linear mixed effects models with cultivars, timing, year, and their interaction treated as fixed effects and replication as a random effect. The assumptions of analysis of variance (ANOVA) were evaluated by visual inspection of residual plots. Values with large residuals were considered outliers and removed to conform with ANOVA assumptions. Effects were considered significant at P ≤ 0.05. Where appropriate, least square means were estimated and compared with a Tukey’s honestly significant difference test and a Type I error rate of α = 0.05 with the R package emmeans (Lenth et al. Reference Lenth, Buerkner, Herve, Love, Riebl and Singmann2022). To investigate relationships between potato height and yield parameters and between common lambsquarters height and biomass allocation, as well as between germination percentage and TSW, correlation and regression analysis was conducted using the base functions in RStudio.

Results and Discussion

Impact of Crop-Topping with a Mower on Common Lambsquarters and Potato

Common lambsquarters and potato visual injury 3 wk after application were similar in both years and were therefore combined for presentation. Mowing at early and late treatment timings had no visual impact on potato injury and minimal impact on common lambsquarters in both years (Table 2). A small increase in common lambsquarters visual injury was observed at late treatment timing compared with early timing (11% vs. 3%; Table 2). Overall, mowing resulted in minimal injury to potato and common lambsquarters.

Table 2. Effects of crop-topping with a mower or wick-applied glyphosate in two separate experiments on visual ratings of potato and common lambsquarters (CHEAL) injury at early and late treatment timings in 2020 and 2021 at Harrington PE. a

a Values are means ± SE. Visual injury ratings were estimated on a 0 to 100 scale, where 0 is no plant injury and 100 is complete plant death.

There was an effect of year, mow treatment timing, and the interaction of year, cultivar, and mow treatment timing on common lambsquarters total biomass (P < 0.01), seed biomass (P < 0.01), and harvest index (P = 0.03), and data are presented separately by year (Table 3). Mowing did not affect common lambsquarters total biomass in any potato cultivar in 2020 (Figure 1 A, C, and E). Late mowing did, however, reduced common lambsquarters harvest index by 60% to 70% relative to the control in 2020 (Figure 1 A, C, and E). Results in 2021 were more variable. Early mowing decreased common lambsquarters total biomass in the upright potato cultivar (Figure 1 F) but increased total biomass in the spreading cultivar (Figure 1 D). Similarly, late mowing increased common lambsquarters total biomass in the semi-erect (Figure 1 B) and upright (Figure 1 F) potato cultivars. Despite changes to total biomass accumulation in 2021, mowing timing had minimal impact on common lambsquarters harvest index, which ranged from 12% to 25% and from 20% to 22% in early and late mow treatments, respectively (Figure 1 B, D, and F).

Figure 1. The effect of early and late crop-topping with a mower on common lambsquarters vegetative (light gray bars) and reproductive (dark gray bars) biomass allocation and harvest index (circles) in 2020 (A, C, E) and 2021 (B, D, F) in Harrington PE in semi-erect (A, B), spreading (C, D), and upright (E, F) potato cultivars. Data are least square means ± SEM of total biomass. Values not connected by the same letter are significantly different according to Tukey’s honestly significant difference (α = 0.05). Uppercase letters refer to the effect of treatment timing on total biomass (vegetative and reproductive) accumulation, and lowercase letters refer to the effect of treatment timing on harvest index.

Table 3. ANOVA table of common lambsquarters total biomass, seed biomass, harvest index, germination percentage, and thousand seed weight by year, cultivar, treatment timing, and their interaction following crop-topping with a mower or wick-applied glyphosate. a, b

a Values are P-values. Boldface indicates that the effect was considered significant (P ≤ 0.05).

b Abbreviations: Clt, cultivar; df/ddf, numerator degrees of freedom/denominator degrees of freedom; Time, treatment timing; TSW, thousand seed weight; Yr, year.

Like the effects on common lambsquarters biomass accumulation and allocation, germination percentage was affected by mow timing (P < 0.01), year (P < 0.01), and the interaction of year, cultivar, and treatment timing (P = 0.03) (Table 3), yet minimal differences were found between treatment timings between cultivars (Supplementary Figure 2). Despite the minimal effect on germination percentage, viable seed production was impacted by cultivar (P < 0.01), mowing timing (P < 0.01), year (P < 0.01), and the interaction of year and cultivar (P < 0.01) and of year and timing (P < 0.01) (Table 3) with consistent effects from treatments within years (Figure 2). Late mowing reduced common lambsquarters viable seed production by 72% to 91% in all cultivars in 2020 (Figure 2 A, C, and E). In contrast, regardless of timing, mowing increased viable seed production by 78% to 278% in 2021 (Figure 2 B, D, and F).

Figure 2. Effect of early and late crop-topping with a mower on common lambsquarters viable seeds plant−1 (bars) and thousand seed weight (TSW) (circles) in 2020 (A, C, E) and 2021 (B, D, F) in Harrington PE in semi-erect (A, B), spreading (C, D), and upright (E, F) potato cultivars. Data are least square means ± SEM. Values not connected by the same letter are significantly different according to Tukey’s honestly significant difference (α = 0.05). Uppercase letters refer to the effects of treatment timing on viable seed plant−1, and lowercase letters refer to the effects of treatment timing on TSW.

Common lambsquarters TSW was impacted by mowing timing (P < 0.01), year (P < 0.01), and their interaction (P < 0.01) (Table 3). No differences in TSW across mowing timings or potato cultivars were found in 2020 (Figure 2 A, C, and E). In contrast, common lambsquarters TSW was increased by early mowing in the semi-erect (Figure 2 B) and upright (Figure 2 F) potato cultivars compared with the control in 2021. The common lambsquarters germination percentage was positively correlated with TSW and increased as TSW increased (Figure 3).

Figure 3. Relationship between thousand seed weight (TSW) and germination percentage of common lambsquarters seed following crop-topping with a mower or wick-applied glyphosate.

Like our study, other authors have found inconsistent results when mowing common lambsquarters. For example, in controlled conditions, Butler et al. (Reference Butler, Brouder, Johnson and Gibson2013) observed that common lambsquarters cut once near anthesis recovered 97% of its inflorescence dry weight and that repeated cuts throughout the season were required to reduce seed production. In contrast, the greater reduction of common lambsquarters seed production by delaying mowing to after flowering (BBCH 69) in our study is consistent with the findings of Hill et al. (Reference Hill, Renner, VanGessel, Bellinder and Scott2016), who found that mowing common lambsquarters at flowering (BBCH 60) or when immature seeds were present (BBCH 81) decreased seed shed by up to 99% in soybean. Weed seed size and weight can be highly plastic and affected by the growing environment of the parent plant (Winn Reference Winn1985). We observed a contrasting trade-off across years in response to mowing. In 2020, overall investment in common lambsquarters seed production dropped and viable seed decreased when mowed late. In contrast, in 2021, mowing increased investment in individual seed, and viable seed production increased. Several studies have documented rapid declines in seed number per plant and maintenance of seed weight in common lambsquarters in response to crowding stress (Colquhoun et al. Reference Colquhoun, Boerboom, Binning, Stoltenberg and Norman2001) and decreased light intensity and nitrogen availability (Mahoney and Swanton Reference Mahoney and Swanton2008). Stress periods during later development are known to contribute to declines in seed number while maintaining seed weight and viability in highly plastic species like soybean (McKenzie-Gopsill et al. Reference McKenzie-Gopsill, Lukens, Lee and Swanton2016). Low overall resource availability in 2020 due to an extended period of drought (AAFC 2023) may have contributed to declines in viable seed production of common lambsquarters when mowed late. The contrasting response of increased viable seed production by mowing in 2021 may be due to greater resource availability in that year (AAFC 2023), the R-selected life history strategy of common lambsquarters, and the breaking of apical dominance allowing for an increased number of inflorescences and increased seed production. Together, these results suggest that crop-topping with a mower postflowering can contribute to declines in viable seed production when resources are not sufficient to allow common lambsquarters to recover, thus likely limiting the efficacy of this technique to years with minimal precipitation only.

Potato marketable yield (P < 0.01), cull yield (P < 0.01), and percentage of yield lost to culls (P < 0.01) were affected by the interaction of cultivar and year, yet were not impacted by mowing timing (Table 4). In 2020, marketable yield was 23.5, 20.5, and 14.4 T ha−1 in the semi-erect, spreading, and upright cultivar, respectively (Figure 4 A). Furthermore, in 2020, cull yield varied from a low of 0.5 T ha−1 in the upright cultivar to 1.3 T ha−1 in the semi-erect cultivar (Figure 4 A). The percentage of total yield lost to culls ranged from 3% to 6% in 2020 and was highest in the spreading (6%) and semi-erect (5%) potato cultivars (Figure 4 A). In contrast, marketable yield was higher in 2021 than in 2020 (Figure 4) and was 36.1, 32.0, and 31.3 T ha−1 in the semi-erect, spreading, and upright cultivar, respectively. The increase in marketable yield in 2021 was accompanied by increased cull yield and the percentage of yield lost to culls, which ranged from 4% to 9% (Figure 4 B). Similar to 2020, the percentage lost to culls was highest in the spreading cultivar (9%) compared with the semi-erect and upright cultivars (Figure 4 B).

Table 4. ANOVA table of potato marketable yield, cull yield, and percentage of yield lost to culls by year, cultivar, treatment timing, and their interaction following crop-topping with a mower or wick-applied glyphosate. a, b

a Values are P-values. Boldface indicates that the effect was considered significant (P ≤ 0.05).

b Abbreviations: Clt, cultivar; df/ddf, numerator degrees of freedom/denominator degrees of freedom; Time, treatment timing; Yr, year.

Figure 4. Effect of crop-topping with a mower on yield of marketable tubers (black bars) and culled tubers (gray bars) in 2020 (A) and 2021 (B) of semi-erect, spreading, and upright potato cultivars. Data are least square means ± SEM. Values above bars indicate percentage of yield lost to culls, and letters refer to the effects of treatment timing on percentage of yield lost to culls. Values not connected by the same letter are significantly different according to Tukey’s honestly significant difference (α = 0.05).

The minimal impact of mowing on potato marketable yield in our study contrasts with several studies that have documented improvements to yields in tuber crops following crop-topping. Meyers et al. (Reference Meyers, Jennings, Schultheis and Monks2016) found that crop-topping with a mower in sweet potato at or beyond mid-fruit ripening (BBCH 85/47) decreased cull yield while improving marketable yield. This treatment timing coincided with sweet potato tuber bulking, whereby water, nutrients, and carbohydrates shifted from aboveground vegetation production to belowground reproductive development. By removing the fruits of a tuber-producing crop, resources required for sexual reproduction can be reallocated to the reproductive structures, thus improving tuber quality and marketable yields. Such a response has been observed in several potato cultivars (Jansky and Thompson Reference Jansky and Thompson1990) and wild tuber–forming plants (Van Drunen and Dorken Reference Van Drunen and Dorken2012). Among potato cultivars in this study, however, the trade-off between sexual and asexual reproduction appears to be dependent on environment. Minimal injury to potato reported from early and late mowing, combined with strong competition from common lambsquarters, may have contributed to minimal shifts in reproductive allocation and the incongruences with previous studies. Together our results suggest that potato marketable yields are dependent on cultivar selection and environment and that improved understanding of shifts in biomass allocation in response to crop-topping with a mower in potato is required to elucidate the potential positive effects of mowing on yield.

Impact of Wick Weeding Timing on Common Lambsquarters and Potato

Potato visual injury and common lambsquarters visual injury 3 wk after application were similar across both years and averaged for presentation (Table 2). Potato injury increased from 33% to 49% from early and late wick-applied glyphosate, respectively (Table 2). Potato visual injury symptoms included leaf chlorosis and formation of necrotic tissue along the leaf margins and at the growing point (Supplementary Figure 1 B). In contrast, common lambsquarters visual injury did not differ between early and late treatment timings and was 32% overall (Table 2). Visual injury symptoms included wilting of the main stem and severe necrosis of leaves and reproductive tissue (Supplementary Figure 1 C and D).

Common lambsquarters total biomass (P < 0.01), seed biomass (P < 0.01), and harvest index (P < 0.01) were affected by the interaction of wick weeding timing, cultivar, and year (Table 3). Seed biomass was increased in late treatments compared with early in 2020. However, the late treatment did not differ from the control (Figure 5 A, C, and E). The increase in seed biomass in 2020 resulted in an increase in the harvest index in control–late and late treatments compared with early treatments and ranged from 31% to 40% (Figure 5 A, C, and E). In contrast, early treatment in 2021 increased common lambsquarters total biomass compared with the control in the spreading and upright potato cultivars (Figure 5 D and F) yet did not differ in the semi-erect potato cultivar (Figure 5 B). Similarly, late treatment increased common lambsquarters total biomass over the control in the upright potato cultivar (Figure 5 F). These changes to biomass accumulation in 2021, however, had minimal impact on common lambsquarters harvest index. In general, harvest index increased in the late treatments compared with the early treatments. However, no differences were found between late wick treatment timing and controls (Figure 5 B, D, and F). Whereas common lambsquarters total biomass increased from early wick treatment in the upright cultivar, the harvest index drastically declined from 31% in the control to 1% following the early wick-applied glyphosate treatment (Figure 5 F).

Figure 5. Effect of early and late crop-topping with wick-applied glyphosate on common lambsquarters vegetative (light gray bars) and reproductive (dark gray bars) biomass allocation and harvest index (circles) in 2020 (A, C, E) and 2021 (B, D, F) in Harrington PE in semi-erect (A, B), spreading (C, D), and upright (E, F) potato cultivars. Data are least square means ± SEM of harvest index. Values not connected by the same letter are significantly different according to Tukey’s honestly significant difference (α = 0.05). Uppercase letters refer to the effect of treatment timing on total biomass accumulation, and lowercase letters refer to the effect of treatment timing on harvest index.

Common lambsquarters plants were significantly larger with greater biomass in 2021 compared with 2020, which may have contributed to differences in response to wick-applied glyphosate. Schuster et al. (Reference Schuster, Shoup and Al-Khatib2007) noted that glyphosate absorption was similar between common lambsquarters plants with heights of 2.5, 7.5, and 15 cm, yet noted variation in tolerance across populations regardless of size. Larger plants, however, translocated glyphosate more rapidly through basipetal movement, which can be attributed to their larger carbohydrate sinks (Schuster et al. Reference Schuster, Shoup and Al-Khatib2007). We observed that early treatments in 2021 increased biomass production of common lambsquarters. Hormetic effects, including stimulation of biomass productivity by low doses of glyphosate, have been reported in several crop and weed species (Brito et al. Reference Brito, Tropaldi, Carbonari and Velini2018), including common lambsquarters (Nadeem et al. Reference Nadeem, Abbas, Tanveer, Maqbool, Zohaib and Shehzad2016). Nadeem et al. observed a stimulatory effect of glyphosate on common lambsquarters seedling shoot length and seedling biomass up to a concentration of 16 g ae ha−1. Despite the high concentration of glyphosate used in the present study (180 g ae L−1), visual injury on common lambsquarters was generally confined to the upper portion of the plant. Therefore the high tolerance of common lambsquarters, the sublethal dose, and possible hormetic effects of glyphosate may provide an explanation for improved biomass productivity by early wick treatments.

Common lambsquarters germination percentage (P < 0.01) and TSW (P = 0.04) were impacted by the interaction of wick application timing, potato cultivar, and year (Table 3). The overall common lambsquarters germination percentage was highly variable and ranged from 10.5% to 50.4% across treatments and years (Supplementary Figure 3). In general, the common lambsquarters germination percentage declined (19% to 55%) with early and late treatment in the semi-erect and upright potato cultivars in 2020; however, differences were not significant between treatments and controls (Supplementary Figure 3 A and E). In 2021, the common lambsquarters germination percentage was decreased by 82% and 75% in the spreading (Supplementary Figure 3 D) and upright cultivar (Supplementary Figure 3 F), respectively, following wick-applied glyphosate.

Common lambsquarters viable seed production was impacted by wick application timing (P < 0.01) and the interaction of timing and year (P = 0.03) (Table 3). In 2020, late treatment with wick-applied glyphosate decreased viable seed production in the semi-erect cultivar (36%), yet increased viable seed production (85%) in the upright cultivar (Figure 6 A and F). In contrast, viable seed production declined (95%) following early wick-applied glyphosate in the spreading and upright cultivars in 2021 (Figure 6 D and F). Common lambsquarters TSW did not differ by wick application timing across cultivars in 2020 (Figure 6 A, C, and E). Similarly, common lambsquarters TSW did not differ by wick weeding timing in 2021, except for late wick weeding in the semi-erect cultivar, which decreased compared with the control (Figure 6 B, D, and F).

Figure 6. Effect of early and late crop-topping with wick-applied glyphosate on common lambsquarters viable seeds plant−1 (bars) and thousand seed weight (TSW) (circles) in 2020 (A, C, E) and 2021 (B, D, F) in Harrington PE in semi-erect (A, B), spreading (C, D), and upright (E, F) potato cultivars. Data are least square means ± SEM. Values not connected by the same letter are significantly different according to Tukey’s honestly significant difference (α = 0.05). Uppercase letters refer to the effects of treatment timing on viable seeds plant−1, and lowercase letters refer to the effects of treatment timing on TSW.

Wick-applied glyphosate at the early timing reduced common lambsquarters seed production in 2021 only. The impact of glyphosate on reducing viable weed seed production has been reported in a variety of species, including pitted morning glory (Ipomoea lacunosa L.), velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti Medik.), and giant foxtail (Setaria faberi Herrm.) (Biniak and Aldrich Reference Biniak and Aldrich1986; Bennett and Shaw Reference Bennett and Shaw2000; Culpepper and York Reference Culpepper and York2000). Walker and Oliver (Reference Walker and Oliver2008) observed that a single glyphosate application at flowering reduced seed production of numerous weed species by greater than 83%. Glyphosate accumulates in the plant reproductive sinks, including floral buds, where it disrupts embryo and endosperm development (Pline et al. Reference Pline, Price, Wilcut, Edmisten and Wells2001). Reduced seed production from early wick application made as flowering was initiated may be due to increased glyphosate absorption to sink tissues and disruption of subsequent flower and seed production. It is unclear why this effect was so dramatic in 2021 compared with 2020, but it may have been due to low biomass accumulation overall in 2020 and an extended drought period limiting glyphosate translocation (AAFC 2023). Therefore, although wick-applied glyphosate may provide a hormetic effect on common lambsquarters biomass production, doses can be sufficient to disrupt seed development and seed viability, and further studies with varying glyphosate doses are warranted. If integrated into weed management practices, wick-applied glyphosate could reduce common lambsquarters seed production and aid in significantly reducing seedbank stores.

The different response of common lambsquarters to wick-applied glyphosate treatments between potato cultivars may be related to morphological features of each cultivar. Many potato cultivars do not vary in their ability to suppress weeds (Colquhoun et al. Reference Colquhoun, Konieczka and Rittmeyer2009; Conley et al. Reference Conley, Binning and Connell2001). On the other hand, early-emerging, short stature, and highly branched cultivars have been shown to provide superior weed suppression over erect, less leafy cultivars (Barbaś et al. Reference Barbaś, Sawicka, Marczak and Pszczółkowski2020). Although our results do not show a consistent response, environmental differences between years may influence potato emergence and early canopy development across cultivars. These differences may in turn have affected wick treatment interception and subsequently common lambsquarters growth and seed production.

Potato marketable yield (P < 0.01) was impacted by the interaction of year and wick timing, yet cull yield (P < 0.01) and percentage of yield lost to culls (P < 0.01) differed by year and wick timing, but not their interaction (Table 4). Overall, potato marketable yield was 71% greater (P < 0.01) in 2021 than in 2020 and averaged 33.1 and 19.4 T ha−1, respectively (Figure 7). Cull yield was 70% greater (P < 0.01) in 2021 than in 2020 and averaged 2.91 and 9.53 T ha−1, respectively (Figure 7). Regardless of wick application timing or year, wick-applied glyphosate consistently increased the percentage of yield lost to culls by 14% to 15% (Figure 7). These results suggest that wick weeding negatively impacts potato yield and quality. The timing of wick application did not influence this effect. Yield losses following wick treatments were likely due to interception with the wick bar and subsequent phytotoxic effects of glyphosate across potato cultivars (Bailey et al. Reference Bailey, Wilson and Hines2002; Friesen and Wall Reference Friesen and Wall1984; Hutchison et al. Reference Hutchison, Eberlein and Tonks2017). Felix et al. (Reference Felix, Boydston and Burke2011) found that potato yields were most sensitive to glyphosate injury when applied at the hooking (BBCH 51/40) and tuber initiation (BBCH 57/41) stages, potentially due to disruptions in sucrose shunting. Similarly, Meyers et al. (Reference Meyers, Jennings, Schultheis and Monks2016) found that sweet potato tolerance to glyphosate drip from a wick bar increased as the plants matured. This highlights the importance of potato cultivar growth pattern as an important consideration for crop-topping with a wick bar and of possible evaluation of a range of wiper designs and changes to the physical properties of the herbicide solution to reduce risk of glyphosate drip onto potato plants (Harrington and Ghanizadeh Reference Harrington and Ghanizadeh2017).

Figure 7. Impact of early and late crop-topping with wick-applied glyphosate on yield of potato marketable tubers (black bars) and culled tubers (gray bars) in 2020 (A) and 2021 (B). Data are least square means ± SEM. Values above bars indicate percentage of yield lost to culls, and letters refer to the effects of treatment timing on percentage of yield lost to culls. Values not connected by the same letter are significantly different according to Tukey’s honestly significant difference (α = 0.05).

Our results demonstrate that crop-topping in potato production systems can be a viable method of late-season common lambsquarters control and can be incorporated into an integrated weed management program to target the weed seedbank. Further research into treatment applications made at additional potato and common lambsquarters phenological stages and using a range of glyphosate rates should be considered. Elucidation of the critical period of weed seed control (Geddes and Davis Reference Geddes and Davis2021) in common lambsquarters and timing crop-topping applications to this period may provide greater reductions in viable seed return. Furthermore, combining wick or mow treatments together with potato fungicidal spray application schedules could provide a low-cost integration of herbicide-resistant weed management strategies to potato production systems. Additional research into sequential and bidirectional wick and mow treatments and other crop-topping methods, such as electricity, may provide further avenues to improve consistency in reducing common lambsquarters seed production without compromising yield.

Practical Implications

This study evaluated the efficacy and feasibility of two different crop-topping strategies in potato production systems, mowing or wick weeding, to target common lambsquarters resistant to PSII-inhibiting herbicides overtopping a potato canopy. Field studies were conducted over two growing seasons and quantified the effects of crop-topping strategies on common lambsquarters biomass production, reproductive allocation, and seed viability, as well as their effects on potato injury and marketable yield across several potato cultivars. We found that timing crop-topping with a mower to postflowering in common lambsquarters can reduce seed output with negligible effects on potato marketable yield across cultivars. We also show that the use of a wick-applied glyphosate can result in substantial injury to potato tubers with variable impact on common lambsquarters reproductive output regardless of timing and cultivar. This study contributes to the development of seedbank management strategies for common lambsquarters in potato production and demonstrates the viability of crop-topping as part of an integrated weed management plan.

Supplementary material

The supplementary material for this article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2023.61

Acknowledgments

Funding for this project was provided by Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (Grant no. J-001871) to AMG. The authors thank Ashley Nicolle MacDonald for technical assistance. The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Footnotes

Associate Editor: Rodrigo Werle, University of Wisconsin

References

[AAFC] Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (2023) Canadian drought monitor 2002—undefined. Ottawa, ON: Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Open Government. https://agriculture.canada.ca/atlas/data_donnees/canadianDroughtMonitor/maps_cartes/en/. Accessed: March 20, 2023Google Scholar
Bailey, WA, Wilson, HP, Hines, TE (2002) Response of potato (Solanum tuberosum) and selected weeds to sulfentrazone. Weed Technol 16:651658 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bajwa, AA, Zulfiqar, U, Sadia, S, Bhowmik, P, Chauhan, BS (2019) A global perspective on the biology, impact and management of Chenopodium album and Chenopodium murale: two troublesome agricultural and environmental weeds. Environ Sci Pollut R 26:53575371 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barbaś, P, Sawicka, B, Marczak, BK, Pszczółkowski, P (2020) Effect of mechanical and herbicide treatments on weed densities and biomass in two potato cultivars. Agriculture 10:455 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bassett, IJ, Crompton, CW (1978) The biology of Canadian weeds. 32. Chenopodium album L. Can J Plant Sci 58:10611072 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, AC, Shaw, DR (2000) Effect of preharvest desiccants on weed seed production and vitality. Weed Technol 14:530538 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biniak, BM, Aldrich, RJ (1986) Reducing velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) and giant foxtail (Setaria faberi) seed production with simulated–roller herbicide applications. Weed Sci 34:256259 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boydston, R, Mojtahedi, H, Crosslin, J, Brown, C, Anderson, T (2008) Effect of hairy nightshade (Solanum sarrachoides) presence on potato nematodes, diseases, and insect pests. Weed Sci 56:151154 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brito, IP, Tropaldi, L, Carbonari, CA, Velini, ED (2018) Hormetic effects of glyphosate on plants. Pest Manage Sci 74:10641070 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burton, NR, Beckie, HJ, Willenborg, CJ, Shirtliffe, SJ, Schoenau, JJ, Johnson, EN (2016) Evaluating seed shatter of economically important weed species. Weed Sci 64:673682 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, RA, Brouder, SM, Johnson, WG, Gibson, KD (2013) Response of four summer annual weeds to mowing frequency and height. Weed Technol 24:798802 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[CATSNet] Statistics Canada (2021) Potato Market Information Review 2020–2021. Ottawa, ON: Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. https://agriculture.canada.ca/sites/default/files/documents/2022-02/potato_market_review_revue_marche_pomme_terre_2020-eng.pdf. Accessed: September 29, 2023Google Scholar
[CFIA] Canadian Food Inspection Agency (2015) Grade requirements for fresh vegetables. In Canadian Grade Compendium: Volume 2. Fresh Fruit or Vegetables. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Food Inspection Agency. https://inspection.canada.ca/about-cfia/acts-and-regulations/list-of-acts-and-regulations/documents-incorporated-by-reference/canadian-grade-compendium-volume-2/eng/1519996239002/1519996303947?chap=3. Accessed: October 4, 2023Google Scholar
Colquhoun, J, Boerboom, CM, Binning, LK, Stoltenberg, DE, Norman, JM (2001) Common lambsquarters photosynthesis and seed production in three environments. Weed Sci 49:334339 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colquhoun, JB, Konieczka, CM, Rittmeyer, RA (2009) Ability of potato cultivars to tolerate and suppress weeds. Weed Technol 23:287291 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conley, SP, Binning, LK, Connell, TR (2001) Effect of cultivar, row spacing, and weed management on weed biomass, potato yield, and net crop value. A J Potato Res 78:3137 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culpepper, AS, York, AC (2000) Weed management in ultra narrow row cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Technol 14:1929 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eberlein, CV, Patterson, PE, Guttieri, MJ, Stark, JC (1997 ) Efficacy and economics of cultivation for weed control in potato (Solanum tuberosum). Weed Technol 11:257264 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felix, J, Boydston, R, Burke, CE (2011) Potato response to simulated glyphosate drift. Weed Technol 25:637644 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernandez-Cornejo, J, Nehring, R, Osteen, C, Wechsler, S, Martin, A, Vialou, A (2014) Pesticide use in U.S. agriculture: 21 selected crops, 1960–2008. USDA-ERS Economic Information Bulletin EIB-124. Washington, DC: USDA. 86 pGoogle Scholar
Friesen, GH, Wall, DA (1984) Response of potato (Solanum tuberosum) cultivars to metribuzin. Weed Sci 32:442444 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ganie, ZA, Soltani, N, McKenzie-Gopsill, AG, Felix, J, Hutchinson, PJ, Dille, JA, Sikkema, PH (2023) Potential potato yield loss from weed interference in the United States and Canada. Weed Technol 37:2124 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geddes, CM, Davis, AS (2021) The critical period for weed seed control: a proposed framework to limit weed seed return. Weed Res 61:282287 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilreath, JP, Chase, CA, Locascio, SJ (2000) Phytotoxic effects of glyphosate on pepper (Capsicum annuum). Weed Technol 14:488494 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrington, KC, Ghanizadeh, H (2017) Herbicide application using wiper applicators—a review. Crop Prot 102:5662 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, SK (1990) Interference and seed production by common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci 38:113118 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, EC, Renner, KA, VanGessel, MJ, Bellinder, RR, Scott, BA (2016) Late-season weed management to stop viable weed seed production. Weed Sci 64:112118 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchison, PJS, Eberlein, CV, Tonks, DJ (2017) Broadleaf weed control and potato crop safety with postemergence rimsulfuron, metribuzin, and adjuvant combinations. Weed Technol 18:750756 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jansky, SH, Thompson, DM (1990) The effect of flower removal on potato tuber yield. Can J Plant Sci 70:12231225 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knezevic, SZ, Evans, SP, Blankenship, EE, Van Acker, RC, Lindquist, JL (2002) Critical period for weed control: the concept and data analysis. Weed Sci 50:773786 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenth, RV, Buerkner, P, Herve, M, Love, J, Riebl, H, Singmann, H (2022) EMMEANS: estimated marginal means, aka least-square means. R package version 1.6.2-1. https://CRAN.R-project.org/web/packages/emmeans/index.html. Accessed: August 22, 2021Google Scholar
Lewis, J (1973) Longevity of crop and weed seeds: survival after 20 years in soil. Weed Res 13:179191 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacLaren, C, Storkey, J, Menegat, A, Metcalfe, H, Dehnen-Schmutz, K (2020) An ecological future for weed science to sustain crop production and the environment: a review. Agron Sustain Dev 40:129 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, KJ, Swanton, CJ (2008) Nitrogen and light affect the adaptive traits of common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album). Weed Sci 56:8190 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKenzie-Gopsill, A, Graham, G, Laforest, M, Ibarra, S, Hann, S, Wagg, C (2020) Occurrence and management of PSII-inhibitor-resistant Chenopodium album L. in Atlantic Canadian potato production. Agronomy 10:1369 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKenzie-Gopsill, AG, Lukens, L, Lee, E, Swanton, CJ (2016) Does the presence of neighbouring weeds alter the expression of adaptive plasticity to subsequent drought stress in soybean? Field Crop Res 192:144153 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meier, U (2018) Growth Stages of Mono- and Dicotyledonous Plants. 2nd ed. Berlin, Germany: Federal Biological Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry. 158 p. https://www.politicheagricole.it/flex/AppData/WebLive/Agrometeo/MIEPFY800/BBCHengl2001.pdf. Accessed: September 29, 2023Google Scholar
Meyers, SL, Jennings, KM, Monks, DW (2017) Sweetpotato response to simulated glyphosate wick drip. Weed Technol 31:130135 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyers, SL, Jennings, KM, Schultheis, JR, Monks, DW (2016) Evaluation of wick-applied glyphosate for Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) control in sweetpotato. Weed Technol 30:765772 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadeem, MA, Abbas, T, Tanveer, A, Maqbool, R, Zohaib, A, Shehzad, MA (2016) Glyphosate hormesis in broad-leaved weeds: a challenge for weed management. Arch Agron Soil Sci 63:344351 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogg, AG, Dawson, JH (1984) Time of emergence of eight weed species. Weed Sci 32:327335 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parks, RJ, Curran, WS, Roth, GW, Hartwig, NL, Calvin, DD (1996) Herbicide susceptibility and biological fitness of triazine-resistant and susceptible common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album). Weed Sci 44:517522 Google Scholar
Pinheiro, J, Bates, D, DebRoy, S, Sarkar, D, ESPACK, Histerkamp, S, Van Willigen, B, Ranke, J (2022) NLME: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3.1-152. https://CRAN.R-project.org/web/packages/nlme/index.html. Accessed: August 16, 2021Google Scholar
Pline, WA, Price, AJ, Wilcut, JW, Edmisten, KL, Wells, R (2001) Absorption and translocation of glyphosate in glyphosate-resistant cotton as influenced by application method and growth stage. Weed Sci 49:460467 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rajalahti, RM, Bellinder, RR, Hoffmann, MP (1999) Time of hilling and interseeding affects weed control and potato yield. Weed Sci 47:215225 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R Core Team (2022) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. 16 pGoogle Scholar
Schuster, CL, Shoup, DE, Al-Khatib, K (2007) Response of common lamb’s quarters (Chenopodium album) to glyphosate as affected by growth stage. Weed Sci 55:147151 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simard, MJ, Page, ER, Nurse, RE (2018) Can weeds overtopping soybean or adzuki bean be mechanically pulled to reduce their seed input? Weed Technol 33:159165 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, OA (1932) The number and weight of seeds produced by weeds. Am J Bot 19:784794 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tidemann, BD, Harker, KN, Shirtliffe, SJ, Willenborg, CJ, Johnson, EN, Sroka, E, Zuidhof, J, Duddu, H (2021) Evaluation of panicle removal methods and crop topping applications as supplemental tools for wild oat (Avena fatua) management. Weed Technol 35:932944 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Drunen, WE, Dorken, ME (2012) Trade-offs between clonal and sexual reproduction in Sagittaria latifolia (Alismataceae) scale up to affect the fitness of entire clones. New Phytol 196:606616 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walker, ER, Oliver, LR (2008) Weed seed production as influenced by glyphosate applications at flowering across a weed complex. Weed Technol 22:318325 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warwick, SI, Marriage, PB (1982) Geographical variations in population of Chenopodium album resistant and susceptible to atrazine. II. Photoperiod and reciprocal transfer studies. Can J Bot 60:494495 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, JT (1963) Biological flora of the British Isles Chenopodium album L. J Ecol 51:711725 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winn, AA (1985) Effects of seed size and microsite on seedling emergence of Prunella vulgaris in four habitats. J Ecol 1:831840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[WSSA] Weed Science Society of America (2021) WSSA–Herbicide Site of Action (SOA) classification list. https://wssa.net/wssa/weed/herbicides/. Accessed: March 2, 2022Google Scholar
Xing, Z, Chow, L, Rees, HW, Meng, F, Monteith, J, Stevens, L (2011) A comparison of effects of one-pass and conventional potato hilling on water runoff and soil erosion under simulated rainfall. Can J Soil Sci 91:279290 Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Mean height of potato and common lambsquarters (CHEAL) prior to early and late mowing and wick weeding treatment application in two separate experiments in 2020 and 2021 at Harrington PE.a

Figure 1

Table 2. Effects of crop-topping with a mower or wick-applied glyphosate in two separate experiments on visual ratings of potato and common lambsquarters (CHEAL) injury at early and late treatment timings in 2020 and 2021 at Harrington PE.a

Figure 2

Figure 1. The effect of early and late crop-topping with a mower on common lambsquarters vegetative (light gray bars) and reproductive (dark gray bars) biomass allocation and harvest index (circles) in 2020 (A, C, E) and 2021 (B, D, F) in Harrington PE in semi-erect (A, B), spreading (C, D), and upright (E, F) potato cultivars. Data are least square means ± SEM of total biomass. Values not connected by the same letter are significantly different according to Tukey’s honestly significant difference (α = 0.05). Uppercase letters refer to the effect of treatment timing on total biomass (vegetative and reproductive) accumulation, and lowercase letters refer to the effect of treatment timing on harvest index.

Figure 3

Table 3. ANOVA table of common lambsquarters total biomass, seed biomass, harvest index, germination percentage, and thousand seed weight by year, cultivar, treatment timing, and their interaction following crop-topping with a mower or wick-applied glyphosate.a,b

Figure 4

Figure 2. Effect of early and late crop-topping with a mower on common lambsquarters viable seeds plant−1 (bars) and thousand seed weight (TSW) (circles) in 2020 (A, C, E) and 2021 (B, D, F) in Harrington PE in semi-erect (A, B), spreading (C, D), and upright (E, F) potato cultivars. Data are least square means ± SEM. Values not connected by the same letter are significantly different according to Tukey’s honestly significant difference (α = 0.05). Uppercase letters refer to the effects of treatment timing on viable seed plant−1, and lowercase letters refer to the effects of treatment timing on TSW.

Figure 5

Figure 3. Relationship between thousand seed weight (TSW) and germination percentage of common lambsquarters seed following crop-topping with a mower or wick-applied glyphosate.

Figure 6

Table 4. ANOVA table of potato marketable yield, cull yield, and percentage of yield lost to culls by year, cultivar, treatment timing, and their interaction following crop-topping with a mower or wick-applied glyphosate.a,b

Figure 7

Figure 4. Effect of crop-topping with a mower on yield of marketable tubers (black bars) and culled tubers (gray bars) in 2020 (A) and 2021 (B) of semi-erect, spreading, and upright potato cultivars. Data are least square means ± SEM. Values above bars indicate percentage of yield lost to culls, and letters refer to the effects of treatment timing on percentage of yield lost to culls. Values not connected by the same letter are significantly different according to Tukey’s honestly significant difference (α = 0.05).

Figure 8

Figure 5. Effect of early and late crop-topping with wick-applied glyphosate on common lambsquarters vegetative (light gray bars) and reproductive (dark gray bars) biomass allocation and harvest index (circles) in 2020 (A, C, E) and 2021 (B, D, F) in Harrington PE in semi-erect (A, B), spreading (C, D), and upright (E, F) potato cultivars. Data are least square means ± SEM of harvest index. Values not connected by the same letter are significantly different according to Tukey’s honestly significant difference (α = 0.05). Uppercase letters refer to the effect of treatment timing on total biomass accumulation, and lowercase letters refer to the effect of treatment timing on harvest index.

Figure 9

Figure 6. Effect of early and late crop-topping with wick-applied glyphosate on common lambsquarters viable seeds plant−1 (bars) and thousand seed weight (TSW) (circles) in 2020 (A, C, E) and 2021 (B, D, F) in Harrington PE in semi-erect (A, B), spreading (C, D), and upright (E, F) potato cultivars. Data are least square means ± SEM. Values not connected by the same letter are significantly different according to Tukey’s honestly significant difference (α = 0.05). Uppercase letters refer to the effects of treatment timing on viable seeds plant−1, and lowercase letters refer to the effects of treatment timing on TSW.

Figure 10

Figure 7. Impact of early and late crop-topping with wick-applied glyphosate on yield of potato marketable tubers (black bars) and culled tubers (gray bars) in 2020 (A) and 2021 (B). Data are least square means ± SEM. Values above bars indicate percentage of yield lost to culls, and letters refer to the effects of treatment timing on percentage of yield lost to culls. Values not connected by the same letter are significantly different according to Tukey’s honestly significant difference (α = 0.05).

Supplementary material: PDF

Anderson et al. supplementary material

Figures 1-3

Download Anderson et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 607.1 KB