Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-02T17:39:12.791Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Direct numerical simulation of a supersonic turbulent boundary layer with hydrogen combustion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2024

Chuhan Wang Open the ORCID record for Chuhan Wang [Opens in a new window]  and
Chunxiao Xu Open the ORCID record for Chunxiao Xu [Opens in a new window]
Chuhan Wang
Affiliation:
AML, Department of Engineering Mechanics, Tsinghua University, 100084 Beijing, PR China
Chunxiao Xu*
Affiliation:
AML, Department of Engineering Mechanics, Tsinghua University, 100084 Beijing, PR China
*
†Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The complex behaviours of supersonic turbulent boundary-layer flows interacting with combustion is explored through the use of direct numerical simulations. The chosen flow model is a non-premixed hydrogen–air flame ignited within a three-dimensional supersonic turbulent flat-plate boundary layer operating at a Mach number of 2.33 and a friction Reynolds number of approximately 1000. The simulation involves a finite-rate model for the hydrogen–air reaction including 9 species and 19 steps with adiabatic non-catalytic wall conditions. The inlet flow consists of preheated air in the main stream and a hydrogen film injected in proximity to the cold wall, inducing mixing and ignition in the outer layer. The specific inlet configuration leads to two successive transition stages of distinct mechanisms, with the first stage related to the mixing-layer instability and the second one to the boundary-layer instability. The excess Reynolds stresses resulting from the transition exhibit a downstream decrease, with values being lower than canonical adiabatic profiles, particularly in the outer layer. This difference is attributed to the reduced local friction Reynolds numbers, associated with the non-classical wall-normal distributions of density and viscosity. The effect of combustion on the recovery process and skin friction is analysed in comparison with a supplemented chemistry-frozen setting. Velocity–temperature and velocity–species correlations are further examined. The wall-normal profiles of turbulent Prandtl number tend to classical non-reacting values and the turbulent Schmidt number is only slightly affected by the reaction. The strong Reynolds analogy linking velocity and temperature fluctuations is found to be invalid in the outer layer due to the presence of large-scale temperature fluctuations and the inhomogeneity of hydrogen gas distribution, as revealed by a spectrum analysis. A statistical analysis of elementary reactions at varying wall-normal distances is provided, highlighting the dominance of hydrogen atom depletion in the inner region and the prevalence of water vapour production in the outer region, together contributing to the chemical heat release across the boundary layer. Turbulence–chemistry interaction is assessed through a comparison of mean turbulent and laminar chemical heat release rates, showing significant differences of up to an order of magnitude. Using a simple diagnostic tool, the modelling of fluctuations associated with hydrogen gas and two intermediate products is found to be crucial for turbulent chemistry closure.

JFM classification

Compressible Flows: Compressible boundary layers Reacting Flows: Turbulent reacting flows Compressible Flows: Supersonic flow
Type
JFM Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 998 , 10 November 2024 , A1
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, G. & Gooderum, P. 1974 Exploratory tests of two strut fuel injectors for supersonic combustion. NASA-TN-D-7581.Google Scholar
Baars, W.J., Hutchins, N. & Marusic, I. 2016 Spectral stochastic estimation of high-Reynolds-number wall-bounded turbulence for a refined inner-outer interaction model. Phys. Rev. Fluids 1 (5), 054406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bao, W., Hu, J., Zong, Y., Yang, Q., Chang, J., Wu, M. & Yu, D. 2014 Ignition characteristics of a liquid-kerosene-fueled scramjet during air throttling combined with a gas generator. J. Aerosp. Engng 27 (5), 06014003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barth, J.E., Wheatley, V. & Smart, M.K. 2013 Hypersonic turbulent boundary-layer fuel injection and combustion: skin-friction reduction mechanisms. AIAA J. 51 (9), 2147–2157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baurle, R.A. & Girimaji, S.S. 2003 Assumed PDF turbulence–chemistry closure with temperature-composition correlations. Combust. Flame 134 (1–2), 131–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baurle, R.A., Hsu, A.T. & Hassan, H.A. 1995 Assumed and evolution probability density functions in supersonic turbulent combustion calculations. J. Propul. Power 11 (6), 1132–1138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belanger, J. & Hornung, H. 1992 A combustion driven shock tunnel to complement the free piston shocktunnel T5 at GALCIT. In 28th Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, p. 3968. AIAA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyce, R.R., Paull, A., Stalker, R.J., Wendt, M., Chinzei, N. & Miyajima, H. 2000 Comparison of supersonic combustion between impulse and vitiation-heated facilities. J. Propul. Power 16 (4), 709–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burrows, M.C. & Kurkov, A.P. 1973 An analytical and experimental study of supersonic combustion of hydrogen in vitiated air stream. AIAA J. 11 (9), 1217–1218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Candler, G.V. 2019 Rate effects in hypersonic flows. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 51, 379–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cebeci, T. 2012 Analysis of Turbulent Boundary Layers. Elsevier.Google Scholar
Ceci, A., Palumbo, A., Larsson, J. & Pirozzoli, S. 2022 Numerical tripping of high-speed turbulent boundary layers. Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 36 (6), 865–886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, R.J. & Bade Shrestha, S.O. 2014 Boundary layer combustion for skin friction drag reduction in scramjet combustors. In 50th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference, p. 3667. AIAA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cogo, M., Salvadore, F., Picano, F. & Bernardini, M. 2022 Direct numerical simulation of supersonic and hypersonic turbulent boundary layers at moderate-high Reynolds numbers and isothermal wall condition. J. Fluid Mech. 945, A30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Renzo, M. & Urzay, J. 2021 Direct numerical simulation of a hypersonic transitional boundary layer at suborbital enthalpies. J. Fluid Mech. 912, A29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donde, P., Koo, H. & Raman, V. 2012 A multivariate quadrature based moment method for LES based modeling of supersonic combustion. J. Comput. Phys. 231 (17), 5805–5821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drummond, J.P., Rogers, R.C. & Hussaini, M.Y. 1987 A numerical model for supersonic reacting mixing layers. Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Engng 64 (1–3), 39–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duan, L., Beekman, I. & Martin, M.P. 2010 Direct numerical simulation of hypersonic turbulent boundary layers. Part 2. Effect of wall temperature. J. Fluid Mech. 655, 419–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duan, L. & Martín, M.P. 2011 Assessment of turbulence–chemistry interaction in hypersonic turbulent boundary layers. AIAA J. 49 (1), 172–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, J.R., Boles, J.A. & Baurle, R.A. 2012 Large-eddy/Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes simulation of a supersonic reacting wall jet. Combust. Flame 159 (3), 1127–1138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eklund, D. & Stouffer, S. 1994 A numerical and experimental study of a supersonic combustor employing sweep ramp fuel injectors. In 30th Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, p. 2819. AIAA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fan, Y., Li, W. & Pirozzoli, S. 2019 Decomposition of the mean friction drag in zero-pressure-gradient turbulent boundary layers. Phys. Fluids 31 (8), 086105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fang, J., Zheltovodov, A., Yao, Y., Moulinec, C. & Emerson, D. 2020 On the turbulence amplification in shock-wave/turbulent boundary layer interaction. J. Fluid Mech. 897, A32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fu, Y., Yu, C.P., Yan, Z. & Li, X.L. 2019 DNS analysis of the effects of combustion on turbulence in a supersonic $\mathrm {H}_2$/air jet flow. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 93, 105362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gao, Z., Jiang, C., Pan, S. & Lee, C.-H. 2015 Combustion heat-release effects on supersonic compressible turbulent boundary layers. AIAA J. 53 (7), 1949–1968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gatski, T.B. & Bonnet, J.-P. 2013 Compressibility, Turbulence and High Speed Flow. Academic.Google Scholar
Gaviglio, J. 1987 Reynolds analogies and experimental study of heat transfer in the supersonic boundary layer. Intl J. Heat Mass Transfer 30 (5), 911–926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, K.P., Fu, L. & Moin, P. 2021 Velocity transformation for compressible wall-bounded turbulent flows with and without heat transfer. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118 (34), e2111144118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huang, P.G., Coleman, G.N. & Bradshaw, P. 1995 Compressible turbulent channel flows: DNS results and modelling. J. Fluid Mech. 305, 185–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, H. & Candler, G. 1998 Thermochemical interactions in the linear stability of hypersonic boundary layers. In 29th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference, p. 2438. AIAA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolár, V. 2009 Compressibility effect in vortex identification. AIAA J. 47 (2), 473–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koo, H., Donde, P. & Raman, V. 2011 A quadrature-based LES/transported probability density function approach for modeling supersonic combustion. Proc. Combust. Inst. 33 (2), 2203–2210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leyva, I., Laurence, S., Beierholm, A., Hornung, H., Wagnild, R. & Candler, G. 2009 Transition delay in hypervelocity boundary layers by means of $\mathrm {CO}_2$/acoustic instability interactions. In 47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, p. 1287. AIAA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, J., Zhao, Z.W., Kazakov, A. & Dryer, F.L. 2004 An updated comprehensive kinetic model of hydrogen combustion. Intl J. Chem. Kinet. 36 (10), 566–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, J.Y., Yu, M., Sun, D., Liu, P.X. & Yuan, X.X. 2022 Wall heat transfer in high-enthalpy hypersonic turbulent boundary layers. Phys. Fluids 34 (8), 085102.Google Scholar
Li, X., Leng, Y. & He, Z. 2013 Optimized sixth-order monotonicity-preserving scheme by nonlinear spectral analysis. Intl J. Numer. Meth. Fluids 73 (6), 560–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, X.-L., Fu, D.-X. & Ma, Y.-W. 2006 Direct numerical simulation of a spatially evolving supersonic turbulent boundary layer at $Ma=6$. Chin. Phys. Lett. 23 (6), 1519.Google Scholar
Li, X.L., Fu, D.X., Ma, Y.W. & Liang, X. 2010 Direct numerical simulation of shock/turbulent boundary layer interaction in a supersonic compression ramp. Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 53, 1651–1658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, K.C., Ryan, M., Carter, C., Gruber, M. & Raffoul, C. 2010 Raman scattering measurements of gaseous ethylene jets in a Mach 2 supersonic crossflow. J. Propul. Power 26 (3), 503–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, M., Fang, J., Deng, X. & Chen, Z.X. 2023 Effects of inflow turbulence on a cavity-stabilised supersonic premixed hydrogen flame: a direct numerical simulation study. arXiv:2305.10178.Google Scholar
Liu, F.J., Wang, Y. & Piao, Y. 2017 a Linear stability analysis of interactions between mixing layer and boundary layer flows. Chin. J. Aeronaut. 30 (4), 1327–1335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, H., Gao, Z., Jiang, C. & Lee, C.-H. 2020 Studies of combustion effects on near-wall turbulence in supersonic flows by large eddy simulation. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 107, 106328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, H., Gao, Z., Tang, Y., Jiang, C. & Lee, C.-H. 2017 b Improvement of skin friction and heat transfer prediction theory of turbulent boundary-layer combustion of hydrogen. Intl J. Hydrogen Energy 42 (41), 26123–26131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lu, X., Zhang, S. & Qin, J. 2024 Effects of ammonia combustion on skin friction characteristics for supersonic flow. Intl J. Mech. Sci. 263, 108793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahle, I., Foysi, H., Sarkar, S. & Friedrich, R. 2007 On the turbulence structure in inert and reacting compressible mixing layers. J. Fluid Mech. 593, 171–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, M. & Candler, G. 2001 Temperature fluctuation scaling in reacting boundary layers. In 15th AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, p. 2717. AIAA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, M., Weirs, V., Olejniczak, D. & Candler, G. 1998 DNS of reacting hypersonic turbulent boundary layers. In 29th AIAA, Fluid Dynamics Conference, p. 2817. AIAA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Micka, D.J. & Driscoll, J.F. 2009 Combustion characteristics of a dual-mode scramjet combustor with cavity flameholder. Proc. Combust. Inst. 32 (2), 2397–2404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Modesti, D. & Pirozzoli, S. 2016 Reynolds and Mach number effects in compressible turbulent channel flow. Intl J. Heat Fluid Flow 59, 33–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morkovin, M.V. 1962 Effects of compressibility on turbulent flows. Mécanique de la Turbulence 367 (380), 26.Google Scholar
Park, C. 1993 Review of chemical-kinetic problems of future NASA missions. I – Earth entries. J. Thermophys. Heat Transfer 7 (3), 385–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Passiatore, D., Sciacovelli, L., Cinnella, P. & Pascazio, G. 2021 Finite-rate chemistry effects in turbulent hypersonic boundary layers: a direct numerical simulation study. Phys. Rev. Fluids 6 (5), 054604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Passiatore, D., Sciacovelli, L., Cinnella, P. & Pascazio, G. 2022 Thermochemical non-equilibrium effects in turbulent hypersonic boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 941, A21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Passiatore, D., Sciacovelli, L., Cinnella, P. & Pascazio, G. 2023 Shock impingement on a transitional hypersonic high-enthalpy boundary layer. Phys. Rev. Fluids 8 (4), 044601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patel, A., Boersma, B.J. & Pecnik, R. 2016 The influence of near-wall density and viscosity gradients on turbulence in channel flows. J. Fluid Mech. 809, 793–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peter, J.M.F. & Kloker, M.J. 2022 Direct numerical simulation of supersonic turbulent flow with film cooling by wall-parallel blowing. Phys. Fluids 34 (2), 025125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pirozzoli, S. & Bernardini, M. 2011 Turbulence in supersonic boundary layers at moderate Reynolds number. J. Fluid Mech. 688, 120–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pirozzoli, S., Grasso, F. & Gatski, T.B. 2004 Direct numerical simulation and analysis of a spatially evolving supersonic turbulent boundary layer at $M=2.25$. Phys. Fluids 16 (3), 530–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poggie, J., Bisek, N.J. & Gosse, R. 2015 Resolution effects in compressible, turbulent boundary layer simulations. Comput. Fluids 120, 57–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poinsot, T. & Lelef, S.K. 1992 Boundary conditions for direct simulations of compressible viscous flows. J. Comput. Phys. 101 (1), 104–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poinsot, T. & Veynante, D. 2005 Theoretical and Numerical Combustion. RT Edwards.Google Scholar
Qu, Z., Li, X., Luo, F., Long, Y. & Chen, W. 2024 Mechanisms and characteristics of wall skin friction reduction by boundary layer injection under hypervelocity inflow conditions. Intl J. Heat Fluid Flow 106, 109269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ren, Z. & Pope, S.B. 2008 Second-order splitting schemes for a class of reactive systems. J. Comput. Phys. 227 (17), 8165–8176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renard, N. & Deck, S. 2016 A theoretical decomposition of mean skin friction generation into physical phenomena across the boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 790, 339–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubesin, M.W. 1990 Extra compressibility terms for favre-averaged two-equation models of inhomogeneous turbulent flows. NASA-CR-177556.Google Scholar
Seleznev, R.K., Surzhikov, S.T. & Shang, J.S. 2019 A review of the scramjet experimental data base. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 106, 43–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stalker, R.J. 2005 Control of hypersonic turbulent skin friction by boundary-layer combustion of hydrogen. J. Spacecr. Rockets 42 (4), 577–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storch, A., Bynum, M., Liu, J. & Gruber, M. 2011 Combustor operability and performance verification for HIFiRE flight 2. In 17th AIAA International Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies Conference, p. 2249. AIAA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strang, G. 1968 On the construction and comparison of difference schemes. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 5 (3), 506–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suraweera, M., Mee, D. & Stalker, R. 2005 Skin friction reduction in hypersonic turbulent flow by boundary layer combustion. In 43rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, p. 613. AIAA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tretyakov, P.K. 2012 Organization of a pulsed mode of combustion in scramjets. Combust. Explos. Shock Waves 48, 677–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urzay, J. 2018 Supersonic combustion in air-breathing propulsion systems for hypersonic flight. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 50, 593–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voland, R., Auslender, A., Smart, M., Roudakov, A., Semenov, V. & Kopchenov, V. 1999 CIAM/NASA Mach 6.5 scramjet flight and ground test. In 9th International Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies Conference, p. 4848. AIAA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volpiani, P. 2021 Numerical strategy to perform direct numerical simulations of hypersonic shock/boundary-layer interaction in chemical nonequilibrium. Shock Waves 31 (4), 361–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vyasaprasath, K., Oh, S., Kim, K.-S. & Choi, J.-Y. 2015 Numerical studies of supersonic planar mixing and turbulent combustion using a detached eddy simulation (DES) model. Intl J. Aeronaut. Space Sci. 16 (4), 560–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waidmann, W., Alff, F., Brummund, U., Böhm, M., Clauss, W. & Oschwald, M. 1994 Experimental investigation of the combustion process in a supersonic combustion ramjet (SCRAMJET). In DGLR Jahrbuch, pp. 629–638. AIAA.Google Scholar
Wei, J., Zhang, S., Zuo, J., Qin, J., Zhang, J. & Bao, W. 2023 Effects of combustion on the near-wall turbulence and performance for supersonic hydrogen film cooling using large eddy simulation. Phys. Fluids 35 (3), 035112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenzel, C., Selent, B., Kloker, M. & Rist, U. 2018 DNS of compressible turbulent boundary layers and assessment of data/scaling-law quality. J. Fluid Mech. 842, 428–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, D., Wang, J. & Chen, S. 2023 Reynolds number and wall cooling effects on correlations between the thermodynamic variables in hypersonic turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 965, A4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, D.H., Wang, J.C., Wan, M.P., Yu, C.P., Li, X.L. & Chen, S.Y. 2021 Effect of wall temperature on the kinetic energy transfer in a hypersonic turbulent boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 929, A33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xue, R., Zheng, X., Yue, L., Zhang, Q., He, X., Yang, J., Weng, C. & Li, Z. 2021 Reduction of surface friction drag in scramjet engine by boundary layer combustion. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 115, 106788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xue, R., Zheng, X., Yue, L., Zhang, S. & Weng, C. 2020 Numerical study on supersonic boundary-layer transition and wall skin friction reduction induced by fuel wall–jet combustion. Acta Astronaut. 174, 11–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yan, Z., Fu, Y., Wang, L., Yu, C.P. & Li, X.L. 2022 Effect of chemical reaction on mixing transition and turbulent statistics of cylindrical Richtmyer–Meshkov instability. J. Fluid Mech. 941, A55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, M., Dong, S.W., Liu, P.X., Tang, Z.G., Yuan, X.X. & Xu, C.X. 2023 a Post-shock turbulence recovery in oblique-shock/turbulent boundary layer interaction flows. J. Fluid Mech. 961, A26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, M., Li, B., Zhou, Q.Q., Sun, D. & Yuan, X.X. 2024 Turbulent heat flux and wall heat transfer in hypersonic turbulent boundary layers with wall disturbances. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 145, 108879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, M. & Xu, C.X. 2022 Predictive models for near-wall velocity and temperature fluctuations in supersonic wall-bounded turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 937, A32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, M. & Xu, C.-X. 2021 Compressibility effects on hypersonic turbulent channel flow with cold walls. Phys. Fluids 33 (7), 075106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, M., Xu, C.-X. & Pirozzoli, S. 2019 Genuine compressibility effects in wall-bounded turbulence. Phys. Rev. Fluids 4 (12), 123402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, M., Zhao, M., Tang, Z., Yuan, X. & Xu, C. 2022 A spectral inspection for turbulence amplification in oblique shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interaction. J. Fluid Mech. 951, A2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, M., Zhou, Q.Q., Dong, S.W., Yuan, X.X. & Xu, C.X. 2023 b Compressibility effects in supersonic and hypersonic turbulent boundary layers subject to wall disturbances. J. Fluid Mech. 972, A32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zabaikin, V.A. 2003 Quality of a high-enthalpy flow upon electric-arc heating of air in a facility for investigating supersonic combustion. Combust. Explos. Shock Waves 39, 23–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, C., Duan, L. & Choudhari, M.M. 2017 Effect of wall cooling on boundary-layer-induced pressure fluctuations at Mach 6. J. Fluid Mech. 822, 5–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, C., Duan, L. & Choudhari, M.M. 2018 Direct numerical simulation database for supersonic and hypersonic turbulent boundary layers. AIAA J. 56 (11), 4297–4311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, P.J.Y., Wan, Z.H., Liu, N.S., Sun, D.J. & Lu, X.Y. 2022 Wall-cooling effects on pressure fluctuations in compressible turbulent boundary layers from subsonic to hypersonic regimes. J. Fluid Mech. 946, A14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Y.S., Bi, W.T., Hussain, F., Li, X.L. & She, Z.S. 2012 Mach-number-invariant mean-velocity profile of compressible turbulent boundary layers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 (5), 054502.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhao, R., Zuo, Z., Wang, X., Yuan, W. & Wen, C. 2024 Direct numerical simulation of high-enthalpy turbulent boundary-layer flow with light gas injections. AIAA J. 62 (3), 956–965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, J., Adrian, R.J., Balachandar, S. & Kendall, T.M. 1999 Mechanisms for generating coherent packets of hairpin vortices in channel flow. J. Fluid Mech. 387, 353–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhu, X.K., Yu, C.P., Tong, F.L. & Li, X.L. 2017 Numerical study on wall temperature effects on shock wave/turbulent boundary-layer interaction. AIAA J. 55 (1), 131–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuo, J., Zhang, S., Wei, D., Meng, L., Qin, J., Bao, W. & Haidn, O.J. 2020 Effects of combustion on supersonic film cooling using gaseous hydrocarbon fuel as coolant. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 106, 106202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar