Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T03:14:36.480Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Marginal Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Item Parameters: Application of an EM Algorithm

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

R. Darrell Bock  and
Murray Aitkin
R. Darrell Bock*
Affiliation:
University of Chicago
Murray Aitkin
Affiliation:
University of Lancaster
*
Requests for reprints should be addressed to R. Darrell Bock, Department of Behavioral Sciences, The University of Chicago, 5848 South University Avenue, Chicago, Illinois, 60637.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Maximum likelihood estimation of item parameters in the marginal distribution, integrating over the distribution of ability, becomes practical when computing procedures based on an EM algorithm are used. By characterizing the ability distribution empirically, arbitrary assumptions about its form are avoided. The Em procedure is shown to apply to general item-response models lacking simple sufficient statistics for ability. This includes models with more than one latent dimension.

Keywords

estimation of item parametersEM algorithmitem analysislatent traitdichotomous factor analysisLaw School Aptitude Test (LSAT)
Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 46 , Issue 4 , December 1981 , pp. 443 - 459
Copyright
Copyright © 1981 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Supported in part by NSF grant BNS 7912417 to the University of Chicago and by SSRC (UK) grant HR6132 to the University of Lancaster.

We are indebted to Mark Reiser and Robert Gibbons for computer programming. David Thissen clarified a number of points in an earlier draft.

References

Reference Notes

Thissen, D. Personal communication, 1979.Google Scholar
Thissen, D. Marginal maximum likelihood estimation for the one-parameter logistic model. Manuscript submitted for publication, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Andersen, E. B. Conditional inference for multiple-choice questionnaires. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 1973, 26, 31–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, E. B. Discrete statistical models with social science applications, 1980, Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Andersen, E. B. & Madsen, M. Estimating parameters of the latent population distribution. Psychometrika, 1977, 42, 357–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartholomew, D. J. Factor analysis for categorical data (with Discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 1980, 42, 293–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bock, R. D. Estimating item parameters and latent ability when responses are scored in two or more nominal categories. Psychometrika, 1972, 37, 29–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bock, R. D. Review of The dependability of behavioral measurements. Science, 1972, 178, 1275A–1275A.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bock, R. D., & Jones, L. V. The measurement and prediction of judgment and choice, 1980, Chicago: International Educational Services.Google Scholar
Bock, R. D., & Lieberman, M. Fitting a response model for n dichotomously scored items. Psychometrika, 1970, 35, 179–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christoffersson, A. Factor analysis of dichotomized variables. Psychometrika, 1975, 40, 5–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm (with Discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 1977, 39, 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, G. Linear logistic test model as an instrument in educational research. Acta Psychologica, 1973, 37, 359–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, G. H. Individual testing on the basis of the dichotomous Rasch model. In Van der Kamp, L. J. T., Langerak, W. F., & de Gruijter, D. M. N. (Eds.), Psychometrics for Educational Debates. Chichester: Wiley. 1980, 171–188.Google Scholar
Goldstein, H. Dimensionality, bias, independence, and measurement scale problems in latent trait test score models. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 1980, 33, 234–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haberman, S. J. Maximum likelihood estimates in exponential response models. Annals of Statistics, 1977, 5, 815–841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaiser, H. F. The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 1958, 23, 187–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolakowski, D. & Bock, R. D. NORMOG: Maximum likelihood item analysis and test scoring; normal ogive model, 1973, Chicago: International Educational Services.Google Scholar
Kolakowski, D. & Bock, R. D. LOGOG: Maximum likelihood item analysis and test scoring; logistic model for multiple item responses, 1973, Chicago: International Educational Services.Google Scholar
Laird, N. M. Nonparametric maximum likelihood estimation of a mixing distribution. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1978, 73, 805–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lord, F. M. Practical applications of item characteristic curve theory. Journal of Educational Measurement, 1977, 14, 117–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lord, F. M. Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems, 1980, New York: Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Lord, F. M., & Novick, M. R. Statistical theories of mental test scores, 1968, Reading (Mass.): Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Micko, H. C. A psychological scale for reaction time measurement. Acta Psychologica, 1969, 30, 324–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muthén, B. Contributions to factor analysis of dichotomized variables. Psychometrika, 1978, 43, 551–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramsay, J. O. Solving implicit equations in psychometric data analysis. Psychometrika, 1975, 40, 337–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rao, C. R. Linear statistical inference and its applications, 2nd ed., New York: Wiley, 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samejima, F. Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores. Psychometric Monograph, No. 17, 1969.Google Scholar
Sanathanan, L. & Blumenthal, S. The logistic model and estimation of latent structure. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1978, 73, 794–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheiblechner, H. Das Lernen und Losen komplexer Denkaufgaben. Zeitschrift fur Experimentelle und Angewandte Psychologie, 1972, 19, 476–506.Google Scholar
Stroud, A. H., & Sechrest, D. Gaussian quadrature formulas, 1966, Englewood Cliffs (N.J.): Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Thurstone, L. L. Multiple factor analysis, 1947, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Wood, R. L. Wingersky & Lord, F. M. LOGIST: A computer program for estimating examinee ability and item characteristic curve parameters, 1976, Princeton (N.J.): Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar
Wright, B. D. & Panchapakesan, N. A. A procedure for sample-free item analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1969, 29, 23–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

A correction has been issued for this article:

Errata

R. D. Bock  and M. Aitkin