Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T06:58:01.531Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Building and evaluating effective mental health networks in rural communities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 June 2014

G Sartore
Affiliation:
Centre for Rural and Remote Mental Health, University of Newcastle
B Kelly
Affiliation:
Centre for Rural and Remote Mental Health, University of Newcastle
L Fragar
Affiliation:
Australian Centre for Agricultural Health and Safety, The University of Sydney
J Fuller
Affiliation:
Northern Rivers University Department of Rural Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
H Stain
Affiliation:
Centre for Rural and Remote Mental Health, University of Newcastle
A Tonna
Affiliation:
Centre for Rural and Remote Mental Health, University of Newcastle
G Pollard
Affiliation:
Centre for Rural and Remote Mental Health, University of Newcastle
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Abstracts from ‘Brainwaves’— The Australasian Society for Psychiatric Research Annual Meeting 2006, 6–8 December, Sydney, Australia
Copyright
Copyright © 2006 Blackwell Munksgaard

Background:

Rural communities suffer significant disadvantage in accessing mental health services. Conversely, these communities may have greater capacity to develop and maintain networks of nontraditional service providers to compensate for this lack of access; however, many agencies are unaware of each others' roles in maintaining the health of the community. A novel method of building and evaluating mental health service networks was trailed in rural New South Wales.

Methods:

Workshops providing education and support for agencies involved in providing services to rural communities were held in 12 locations. Participants' knowledge of mental health issues and the role of other support agencies, and their confidence in using this knowledge, were evaluated by pre- and postworkshop surveys. A new method of evaluating existing network strength and efficacy, using structured key informant interviews and network analysis methods, was trailed in several locations. Local service networks were re-evaluated following the workshops to determine the extent, direction and determinants of network change.

Results:

About 96 workshop participants completed pre- and postworkshop surveys. Significant improvements in knowledge, confidence and social distance were found. Local referral networks were successfully mapped and changes in local communities following the workshops were evaluated.

Conclusions:

Existing networks of service providers in rural communities have substantial capacity to act in nontraditional ways to improve the mental health of those communities. A relatively simple intervention, combined with ongoing support from local health agencies, can increase this capacity and the strength and efficiency of networks.