Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T18:58:34.434Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

When instrumental inference hides behind seemingly arbitrary conventions—CORRIGENDUM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 December 2022

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Corrigendum
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Institut Jean Nicod, Département d’études cognitives, Ecole normale supérieure, Université PSL, EHESS, CNRS, 75005 Paris, France

In the commentary by Dubourg et al. (Reference Dubourg, Fitouchi and Baumard2022) on the target article by Jagiello et al. (Reference Jagiello, Heyes and Whitehouse2022), the affiliation for all three authors was incorrectly listed as follows:

Département d’études cognitives, Institut Jean Nicod, École normale supérieure-PSL, 75005 Paris, France

It should be listed as above as follows:

Institut Jean Nicod, Département d’études cognitives, Ecole normale supérieure, Université PSL, EHESS, CNRS, 75005 Paris, France. This correction has been made in the commentary online.

This correction has been made to the commentary online.

References

Dubourg, E., Fitouchi, L. & Baumard, N. (2022). When instrumental inference hides behind seemingly arbitrary conventions. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 45, e256. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X22001340CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jagiello, R., Heyes, C. & Whitehouse, H. (2022). Tradition and invention: The bifocal stance theory of cultural evolution. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 45, e249. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X22000383CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed