Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T09:24:59.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Table of Cases

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  aN Invalid Date NaN

Marina Fortuna
Affiliation:
Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, The Netherlands
Kostia Gorobets
Affiliation:
Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, The Netherlands
Panos Merkouris
Affiliation:
Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, The Netherlands
Andreas Føllesdal
Affiliation:
Universitetet i Oslo
Geir Ulfstein
Affiliation:
Universitetet i Oslo
Pauline Westerman
Affiliation:
Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, The Netherlands
Type
Chapter
Information
Customary International Law and Its Interpretation by International Courts
Theories, Methods and Interactions
, pp. xxiii - xxxiii
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This content is Open Access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/cclicenses/

Permanent Court of International Justice (PCIJ)

  • Case Concerning Certain German Interests in Polish Upper Silesia (Merits) [1926] PCIJ Rep 5, Series A No 7

  • Mavrommatis Palestine Concessions (Greece v. Britain) (Objection to the Jurisdiction of the Court) [1924] PCIJ Series A No 2

  • Nationality Decrees Issued in Tunis and Morocco (Advisory Opinion) [1923] PCJ Series B No 4

  • S.S. ‘Lotus’ case (France v. Turkey) [1927] PCIJ Series A No 10

  • S.S. ‘Wimbledon’ (UK, France, Italy and Japan v. Germany) [1923] PCIJ Series A No 1

  • Status of Eastern Carelia (Advisory Opinion) [1923] PCIJ Rep 6

International Court of Justice (ICJ)

  • Accordance with International Law of the Unilateral Declaration of Independence in Respect of Kosovo (Advisory Opinion) [2010] ICJ Rep 403

  • Anglo-Norwegian Fisheries (United Kingdom v. Norway) (Judgment) [1951] ICJ Rep 116

  • Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro) (Judgment) [2007] ICJ Rep 43

    • Joint Declaration of Judges Shi and Koroma

  • Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Croatia v. Serbia) (Judgment) [2008] ICJ Rep 413

  • Arbitral Award of 31 July 1989 (Guinea-Bissau v. Senegal) [1991] ICJ Rep 53

  • Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Uganda) (Judgment) [2005] ICJ Rep 168

    • Separate Opinion of Judge Elaraby

    • Separate Opinion of Judge Kooijmans

  • Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Uganda) (Reparations, Judgment) [2022] ICJ Rep 1

  • Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (New Application: 2002) (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Rwanda) (Jurisdiction and Admissibility) [2006] ICJ Rep 6

  • Arrest Warrant (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Belgium) (Jurisdiction and Admissibility) [2002] ICJ Rep 3

    • Separate Opinion of Judge Koroma

    • Joint Separate Opinion of Judges Higgins, Kooijmans, and Buergenthal

    • Dissenting Opinion of Judge van den Wyngaert

  • Avena and Other Mexican Nationals (Mexico v. United States of America) (Judgment) [2004] ICJ Rep 12

  • Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Company Limited (New Application: 1962) (Belgium v. Spain) [1970] ICJ Rep 3

  • Case Concerning the Temple of Preah Vihear (Cambodia v. Thailand) (Merits) [1962] ICJ Rep 39

    • Separate Opinion of Vice-President Alfaro

  • Case of the Monetary Gold Removed from Rome in 1943 (Preliminary Question) [1954] ICJ Rep 19

  • Certain Iranian Assets (Islamic Republic of Iran v. United States of America) (Preliminary Objections) [2019] ICJ Rep 7

    • Separate Opinion of Judge ad hoc Brower

  • Certain Phosphate Lands in Nauru (Nauru v. Australia) (Preliminary Objections) [1992] ICJ Rep 240

  • Certain Questions of Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters (Djibouti v. France) (Judgment) [2008] ICJ Rep 177

  • Colombian-Peruvian Asylum Case (Judgment) [1950] ICJ Rep 266

  • Continental Shelf (Libya/Malta) (Judgment) [1985] ICJ Rep 13

  • Corfu Channel (United Kingdom v. Albania) (Judgment) [1949] ICJ Rep 4

    • Separate Opinion of Judge Azevedo

  • Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary in the Gulf of Maine Area (Canada/USA) (Judgment) [1984] ICJ Rep 246

  • Diallo Case (Guinea v. DR Congo) (Judgment) [2007] ICJ Rep 582

  • Difference Related to Immunities from Legal Process of a Special Rapporteur of the Commission on Human Rights (Advisory Opinion) [1999] ICJ Rep 62

  • Dispute Regarding Navigational and Related Rights (Costa Rica v. Nicaragua) (Judgment) [2009] ICJ Rep 213

  • East Timor (Portugal v. Australia) (Judgment) [1995] ICJ Rep 90

    • Dissenting Opinion of Judge Weeramantry

    • Dissenting Opinion of Judge Skubiszewski

  • Fisheries (UK v. Norway) (Judgment, Dissenting Opinion of Judge Reed) [1951] ICJ Rep 116

  • Fisheries Jurisdiction Case (UK v. Iceland; Germany v. Iceland) (Merits) [1974] ICJ Rep 3

  • Frontier Dispute (Burkina Faso/Republic of Mali) (Judgment) [1986] ICJ Rep 554

  • Gabčíkovo-Nagymaros Project (Hungary v. Slovakia) (Merits) [1997] ICJ Rep 7

    • Separate Opinion of Judge Bedjaoui

  • Immunities and Criminal Proceedings (Equatorial Guinea v. France) (Preliminary Objections) [2018] ICJ Rep 1

  • Interhandel (Switzerland v. United States of America) (Preliminary Objections) [1959] ICJ Rep 6

  • International Status of South West Africa (Advisory Opinion) [1950] ICJ Rep 128

  • Interpretation of the Agreement of 25 March 1951 between the WHO and Egypt (Advisory Opinion) [1980] ICJ Rep 73

    • Separate Opinion of Judge Guillaume

  • Jadhav Case (India v. Pakistan) (Merits) [2019] ICJ Rep 418

    • Declaration of Judge Robinson

  • Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany/Italy; Greece intervening) [2012] ICJ Rep 99

    • Dissenting Opinion of Judge Trindade

  • Kasikili/Sedudu Island (Botswana v. Namibia) (Judgment) [1999] ICJ Rep 1045

  • LaGrand Case (Germany v. United States of America) (Judgment) [2001] ICJ Rep 466

  • Legal Consequences for States of the Continued Presence of South Africa in Namibia (South West Africa) Notwithstanding Security Council Resolution 276 (1970) (Advisory Opinion) [1971] ICJ Rep 16

  • Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (Advisory Opinion) [2004] ICJ Rep 136

  • Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons (Advisory Opinion) [1996] ICJ Rep 226

    • Dissenting Opinion of Judge Schwebel

    • Dissenting Opinion of Judge Higgins

  • Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. Belgium) (Preliminary Objections) [2004] ICJ Rep 279

  • Maritime Delimitation and Territorial Question between Qatar and Bahrain (Qatar v. Bahrain) (Merits) [2001] ICJ Rep 40

  • Maritime Delimitation in the Area between Greenland and Jan Mayen (Denmark v. Norway) (Merits) [1993] ICJ Rep 38

  • Maritime Delimitation in the Indian Ocean (Somalia v. Kenya) (Preliminary Objections) [2017] ICJ Rep 3

  • Maritime Dispute (Peru v. Chile) (Judgment) [2014] ICJ Rep 3

  • Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. United States of America) (Jurisdiction and Admissibility) [1984] ICJ Rep 392

  • Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. United States of America) (Merits) [1986] ICJ Rep 14

  • North Sea Continental Shelf Cases (Germany/Netherlands; Germany/Denmark) (Judgment) [1969] ICJ Rep 3

    • Separate Opinion of Judge Ammoun

    • Dissenting Opinion of Judge Tanaka

    • Dissenting Opinion of Judge Sørensen

    • Dissenting Opinion of Judge Lachs

  • Nottebohm (Liechtenstein v. Guatemala) (Preliminary Objections) [1953] ICJ Rep 111.

  • Nottebohm (Liechtenstein v. Guatemala) (Judgment, Second Phase) [1955] ICJ Rep 4

  • Nuclear Tests (Australia v. France) (Judgment) [1974] ICJ Rep 253

  • Obligation to Negotiate Access to the Pacific Ocean (Bolivia v. Chile) (Merits) [2018] ICJ Rep 507

    • Dissenting Opinion of Judge ad hoc Daudet

  • Oil Platforms (Islamic Republic of Iran v. United States of America) (Preliminary Objections) [1996] ICJ Rep 182

  • Oil Platforms (Islamic Republic of Iran v. United States of America) (Judgment) [2003] ICJ Rep 161

    • Separate Opinion of Judge Higgins

    • Separate Opinion of Judge Kooijmans

  • Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay (Argentina v. Uruguay) (Judgment) [2010] ICJ Rep 14

    • Separate Opinion of Judge Trindade

  • Questions of the Delimitation of the Continental Shelf between Nicaragua and Colombia beyond 200 Nautical Miles from the Nicaraguan Coast (Nicaragua v. Colombia) (Preliminary Objections) [2016] ICJ Rep 100

    • Declaration of Judge Robinson

  • Questions Relating to the Obligation to Prosecute or Extradite (Belgium v. Senegal) (Judgment) [2012] ICJ Rep 422

  • Questions Relating to the Seizure and Detention of Certain Documents and Data (Timor‐Leste v. Australia) (Provisional Measures) [2014] ICJ Rep 147

  • Reparation for Injuries Suffered in the Service of the United Nations (Advisory Opinion) [1949] ICJ Rep 174

    • Opinion of Judge Alvarez

    • Dissenting Opinion of Judge Krylov

  • Reservations to the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Advisory Opinion) [1951] ICJ Rep 15

    • Joint Dissenting Opinion of Judges Guerrero, McNair, Read and& Hsu Mo

  • South West Africa (Liberia v. South Africa) (Judgment) [1966] ICJ Rep 6

  • Territorial and Maritime Dispute (Nicaragua v. Colombia) (Judgment) [2012] ICJ Rep 624

  • Territorial and Maritime Dispute between Nicaragua and Honduras in the Caribbean Sea (Nicaragua v. Honduras) (Judgment) [2007] ICJ Rep 659

  • Territorial Dispute (Libyan Arab Jamahiriya v. Chad) (Judgment) [1994] ICJ Rep 6

  • United States Diplomatic and Consular Staff in Tehran (USA v. Iran) (Judgment) [1980] ICJ Rep 3

  • Voting Procedure on Questions Related to Reports and Petitions Concerning the Territory of South West Africa (Advisory Opinion) [1955] ICJ Rep 84

    • Separate Opinion of Judge Klaestad

    • Separate Opinion of Judge Lauterpacht.

  • Western Sahara (Advisory Opinion) [1975] ICJ Rep 12

  • Whaling in the Antarctic (Australia v. Japan; New Zealand intervening) (Judgment) [2014] ICJ Rep 226

    • Separate Opinion of Judge Cançado Trindade

Memorials in ICJ Cases

International Criminal Court (ICC)

  • Decision on the Prosecution’s Application for a Warrant of Arrest against Omar Hassan Ahmad Al Bashir, ICC-02/05-01/09 (4 March 2009)

  • Situation in the State of Palestine, ‘Prosecution Request Pursuant to Article 19(3) for a Ruling on the Court’s Territorial Jurisdiction in Palestine’ Decision (5 February 2021) ICC-01/18

  • The Prosecutor v. Dominic Ongwen, ICC-02/04-01/15 (4 February 2021)

  • The Prosecutor v. Omar Hassan Ahmad Al Bashir ICC-02/05-01/09 (6 June 2005)

  • The Prosecutor v. Omar Hassan Ahmad Al Bashir, ICC-02/05-01/09-1 (4 March 2009)

  • The Prosecutor v. Omar Hassan Ahmad Al Bashir, ICC-02/05-01/09-94 (12 July 2010)

  • The Prosecutor v. Omar Hassan Al Bashir, ICC-02/05-01/09, AC ICC-02/05-01/09 OA2 (6 May 2019)

  • The Prosecutor v. Omar Hassan Al Bashir, ICC-02/05-01/09-397-Anx1 (6 May 2019)

  • The Prosecutor v. Omar Hassan Ahmad Al Bashir (Judgment in the Jordan Referral re Al-Bashir Appeal) ICC-02/05-01/09-397-Corr (6 May 2019)

  • The Prosecutor v. Uhuru Muigai Kenyatta, ICC-01/09-02/11 (18 October 2013)

    • Separate further opinion of Judge Eboe-Osuji

International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY)

  • The Prosecutor v. Aleksovski (Judgment) ICTY-95-14-1-A (24 March 2000)

  • The Prosecutor v. Aleksovski (Appeals Chamber Judgment) ICTY-95-14/1-A (24 March 2000)

  • The Prosecutor v. Delalić and ors (Judgment) ICTY-96-21-T (16 November 1998)

  • The Prosecutor v. Delalić and ors (Judgment) ICTY-96-21-A (20 February 2001)

  • The Prosecutor v. Duško Tadić (Interlocutory Appeal) ICTY, IT-94-1-A (2 October 1995)

  • The Prosecutor v. Duško Tadić (Appeals Chamber Judgment) ICTY-94-1-A (15 July 1999)

  • The Prosecutor v. Furundžija (Judgment) ICTY-95-17/1 (10 December 1998)

  • The Prosecutor v. Hadžihasanović and ors (Interlocutory Appeal) ICTY-01-47-AR72 (16 July 2003)

    • Dissenting Opinion of Judge Shahabudeen

  • The Prosecutor v. Kordic and Cerkez (Judgment) ICTY-95-14/2-T (26 February 2001)

  • The Prosecutor v. Kordic and Cerkez (Judgment) ICTY-95–14/2-A (17 December 2004)

  • The Prosecutor v. Krstic (Judgment) ICTY-98-33-T (2 August 2001)

  • The Prosecutor v. Kunarac and ors (Judgment) ICTY-96-23-T and ICTY-96-23/1 (22 February 2001)

  • The Prosecutor v. Kupreškić (Judgment) ICTY-95-16-T (14 January 2000)

  • The Prosecutor v. Prlić and ors (Judgment vol 1) IСTY-04-74- A (29 November 2017)

  • The Prosecutor v. Radovan Karadzic (Judgment) ICTY, IT-95-5/18-T (24 March 2016)

Special Court for Sierra Leone (SCSL)

  • Prosecutor v. Charles Ghankay Taylor (Judgment) SCSL-03-01-T (18 May 2012)

  • Prosecutor v. Morris Kallon and Brima Buzzy Kamara (Decision on Challenge to Jurisdiction) SCSL-2004-15-AR72(E) (13 March 2004)

Special Court for Lebanon (STL)

  • Prosecutor v. Ayyash and ors, STL-11-01/I (Interlocutory Decision on the Applicable Law, 16 February 2011)

Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia (ECCC)

  • Prosecutor v. Chea, Case 002 (Pre-Trial Chamber, Decision on Appeals by Nuon Chea and Ieng Thirith against the Closing Order, 15 February 2011)

  • Prosecutor v. Chea and Samphan, Case 002/02 (Judgment, 16 November 2018)

Arbitration

  • Blockade of Portendic (Great Britain v. France) [1843] 42 BFSP 1377

  • Différend concernant l’accord Tardieu-Jaspar (Belgium/France) Award of 1 March 1937, UNRIAA, vol III, 1713

  • Georges Pinson Case (France/United Mexican States) Award of 13 April 1928, UNRIAA, vol V, 422

  • Lance Paul Larsen v. The Hawaiian Kingdom (Final Award) (2001) PCA

  • The South China Sea Arbitration (The Republic of Philippines v. The People’s Republic of China) (Final Award) (2016) PCA

  • Trail Smelter Arbitration (United States v. Canada) [1941] 3 RIAA 1905, 1965

International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID)

  • Alex Genin, Eastern Credit Limited, Inc. and A.S. Baltoil v. Estonia (Award) ICSID Case No ARB/99/2 (25 June 2001)

  • Asian Agricultural Products Ltd. (AAPL) v. Republic of Sri Lanka (Award) ICSID Case No ARB/87/3 (27 June 1990)

  • Azurix Corp v. Argentina (I) (Decision on Jurisdiction) ICSID Case No ARB/01/12 (8 December 2003)

  • Bayindir Insaat Turizm Ticaret Ve Sanayi AS v. Pakistan (Award) ICSID Case No ARB/03/29 (27 August 2009)

  • Cable Television of Nevis, Ltd and Cable Television of Nevis Holdings, Ltd v. St Kitts and Nevis (Award) ICSID Case No ARB/95/2 (13 January 1997)

  • CMS Gas Transmission Company v. Argentina (Decision on Jurisdiction) ICSID Case No ARB/01/8 (17 July 2003)

  • Compañía de Aguas del Aconquija SA and Vivendi Universal SA (formerly Compañía de Aguas del Aconquija, S.A. and Compagnie Générale des Eaux) v. Argentina (I) (Decision on Annulment) ICSID Case No ARB/97/3 (3 July 2002)

  • Consortium RFCC v. Morocco (Decision on Jurisdiction) ICSID Case No ARB/00/6 (16 July 2001)

  • Corn Products International, Inc v. United Mexican States (Award) ICSID Case No ARB (AF)/04/1(18 August 2009)

    • Separate Opinion of Andreas F Lowenfeld

  • Deutsche Bank AG v. Sri Lanka (Award) ICSID Case No ARB/09/2 (31 October 2012)

  • Emilio Agustín Maffezini v. Spain (Decision of the Tribunal on Objections to Jurisdiction) ICSID Case No ARB/97/7 (25 January 2000)

  • Enron Creditors Recovery Corporation (formerly Enron Corporation) and Ponderosa Assets, LP v. Argentina (Decision on Jurisdiction) ICSID Case No ARB/01/3 (14 January 2004)

  • Gustav F W Hamester GmbH & Co KG v. Ghana (Award) ICSID Case No ARB/07/24 (18 June 2010)

  • Helnan Inqsazternational Hotels A/S v. Egypt (Decision on Objection to Jurisdiction) ICSID Case No ARB/05/19 (17 October 2006)

  • Hussein Nuaman Soufraki v. The United Arab Emirates (Award) ICSID Case No ARB/02/7 (7 July 2004)

  • InfraRed Environmental Infrastructure GP Limited and ors v. Spain (Decision on the Continuation of the Stay of the Enforcement of the Award) ICSID Case No ARB/14/12 (27 October 2020)

  • Jan de Nul NV and Dredging International NV v. Egypt (Award) ICSID Case No ARB/04/13 (6 November 2008)

  • Karkey Karadeniz Elektrik Uretim AS v. Pakistan (Award) ICSID Case No ARB/13/1 (22 August 2017)

  • Liberian Eastern Timber Corporation v. Liberia (Award) ICSID Case No ARB/83/2 (31 March 1986)

  • Marfin Investment Group Holdings SA, Alexandros Bakatselos and ors v. Cyprus (Award) ICSID Case No ARB/13/27 (26 July 2018)

  • Pan American Energy LLC and BP Argentina Exploration Company v. Argentina (Decision on Preliminary Objections) ICSID Case No ARB/03/13 (27 July 2006)

  • Salini Costruttori SpA and Italstrade SpA v. Morocco (Decision on Jurisdiction) ICSID Case No ARB/00/4 (23 July 2001)

  • Siemens AG v. Argentina (Decision on Jurisdiction) ICSID Case No ARB/02/8 (3 August 2004)

  • Stadtwerke München GmbH and ors v. Spain (Award) ICSID Case No ARB/15/1 (2 December 2019)

  • The Rompetrol Group NV v. Romania (Decision on Respondent’s Preliminary Objections on Jurisdiction and Admissibility) ICSID Case No ARB/06/3 (18 April 2008)

  • Tulip Real Estate Investment and Development Netherlands BV v. Turkey (Award) ICSID Case No ARB/11/28 (10 March 2014)

  • Vacuum Salt Products Ltd v. Ghana (Award) ICSID Case No ARB/92/1 (16 February 1994)

  • Wena Hotels Ltd v. Egypt (Decision on Annulment) ICSID Case No ARB/98/4 (5 February 2002) [81]. See also Perenco Ecuador Limited v. Ecuador (Decision on Annulment) ICSID Case No ARB/08/6 (28 May 2021)

  • White Industries Australia Limited v. India (Award) (30 November 2011)

European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR)

  • Al-Adsani v. The United Kingdom, App no 35763/97 (21 November 2001)

    • Joint dissenting opinion of Judges Rozakis and Caflisch

  • Al-Dulimi and Montana Management Inc. v. Switzerland, App no 5809/08 (26 November 2013)

  • Banković and ors v. Belgium and ors, App no 52207/99 (Admissibility) (12 December 2001)

  • Cruz Varas and ors v. Sweden, App no 46/1990/237/307 (20 March 1991)

  • Cudak v. Lithuania, App no 15869/02 (23 March 2010)

  • Fogarty v. the United Kingdom, App no 37112/97 (21 November 2001)

  • Golder v. United Kingdom, App no 4451/70 (21 February 1975)

  • Hassan v. the United Kingdom, App no 29750/09 (16 September 2014)

  • Loizidou v. Turkey, App no 15318/89 (18 December 1996)

  • Mamatkulov and Askarov v. Turkey, App no 46827/99 and 46951/99 (4 February 2005)

  • McElhinney v. Ireland, App no 31253/96 (21 November 2001)

  • Oleynikov v. Russia, App no 36703/04 (14 March 2013)

  • Radunović and ors v. Montenegro, App no 45197/13, 53000/13 and 73404/13 (25 October 2016)

  • Rinau v. Lithuania, App no 10926/09 (14 January 2020)

  • Sabel El Leil v. France, App no 34869/05 (29 June 2011)

  • Soering v. United Kingdom, App no 14038/88 (7 July 1989)

Inter-American Court of Human Rights (IACtHR)

  • Mayagna (Sumo) Awas Tingni Community v. Nicaragua (Merits, Reparations and Costs) Inter-American Court of Human Rights Series C No 79 (2001)

Iran–United States Claims Tribunal (IUSCT)

  • Eastman Kodak Company v. the Government of Iran (Award No 329-227/12384-3) IUSCT Case No 227 (11 November 1987)

  • Flexi-Van Leasing, Inc v. Iran (Award No 259-36-1) IUSCT Case No 36 (13 October 1986)

  • Foremost Tehran, Inc, Foremost Shir, Inc, and ors v. Iran, the Ministry of Economic Affairs and Finance, and ors (Award No 220-37/231-1) IUSCT Case Nos 37 and 231 (11 April 1986)

  • International Technical Products Corporation and ITP Export Corporation, Its Wholly Owned Subsidiary v. Iran and Its Agencies, the Islamic Republic Iranian Air Force and the Ministry of National Defense, Acting for the Civil Aviation Organization (Award No 196-302-3) IUSCT Case No 302 (28 October 1985)

  • Otis Elevator Company v. Iran and Bank Mellat (formerly Foreign Trade Bank of Iran) (Award No 304-284-2) IUSCT Case No 284 (29 April 1987)

  • PepsiCo, Inc v. Iran, Foundation for the Oppressed, Zamzam Bottling Company, and ors (Award No 260-18-1) IUSCT Case No 18 (13 October 1986)

  • Schering Corporation v. Iran (Award No 122-38-3) IUSCT Case No 38 (16 April 1984)

  • SEDCO Inc v. National Iranian Oil Company and Iran (Award No 419-128/129-2) IUSCT Case Nos 128 and 129 (30 March 1989)

    • Opinion of Judge Khalilian

Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU)

  • A and ors v. Minister van Buitenlandse Zaken (C-158/14) [2016] ECLI:EU:C:2016:734

  • A Racke GmbH & Co v. Hauptzollamt Mainz (C-162/96) [1998] ECR I-3655

  • Aboubacar Diakité v. Commissaire général aux réfugiés et aux apatrides (C-285/12) [2013] ECLI:EU:C:2013:500

  • Ahlström Osakeyhtiö and ors v. Commission (89/85, 104/85, 114/85, 116/85, 117/85 and 125/85 to 129/85) (Woodpulp) [1993] ECLI:EU:C:1993:120

  • Air Transport Association of America (ATAA) & ors v. Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change (C-366/10) [2011] EU:C:2011:864

  • Amministrazione delle finanze dello Stato v. Denkavit italiana Srl (61/79) [1980] ECR 1205

  • Anklagemyndigheden v. Peter Michael Poulsen and Diva Navigation Corp (C-286/90) [1992] ECR I–6019

  • Council of the European Union v. Front populaire pour la libération de la saguia-el-hamra et du rio de oro (Front Polisario) (C-104/16 P)[2016] ECLI:EU:C:2016:973

  • Danisco Sugar AB v. Allmänna ombudet (C-27/96) [1997] ECR I-6653

  • Firma Brita GmbH v. Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Hafen (C-386/08) [2010] ECLI:EU:C:2010:91

  • Front populaire pour la libération de la Saguia el-Hamra et du Rio de oro (Front Polisario) v. Council of the European Union (T-279/19) [2021] ECLI:EU:T:2021:639

  • Front populaire pour la libération de la Saguia el-Hamra et du Rio de oro (Front Polisario) v. Council of the European Union (T-344/19 and T-356/19) [2021] ECLI:EU:T:2021:640

  • Hauer v. Land Rheinland Pfalz (44/79) [1979] ECR 3727

  • Hellenic Republic v. Commission of the European Communities (C-203/07 P) [2008] ECR I-8161

  • Helm Düngemittel GmbH v. Hauptzollamt Krefeld (C-613/12) [2014] ECLI:EU:C:2014:52

  • Hungary v. Slovakia (C-364/10) [2012] ECLI:EU:C:2012:630

  • J Nold, Kohlen- und Baustoffgroßhandlung v. Commission of the European Communities (4/73) [1974] ECR 491

  • Janko Rottman v. Freistaat Bayern (C-135/08) [2010] ECLI:EU:C:2010:104

    • Opinion of AG Maduro, ECLI:EC:C:2009:588

  • Kadi and Al Barakaat International Foundation v. Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities (C-402/05 P and C-415/05 P) [2008] ECR I–6351

  • LG v. Rina SpA, Ente Registro Italiano Navale (C-641/18) Opinion of AG Szpunar [2020] ECLI:EU:C:2020:3

  • LTTE v. Council (T-208/11) [2014] ECLI:EU:T:2014:885

  • Omega Spielhallen- und Automatenaufstellungs-GmbH v. Oberbürgermeisterin der Bundesstadt Bonn (C-36/02) [2004] ECR I–9609

  • Opel Austria GmbH v. Council of the European Union (T-115/94) [1997] ECR II-39

  • Opinion 2/15 (Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Singapore) [2016] ECLI:EU:C:2016:992

  • Ahmed Mahamdia v. People’s Democratic Republic of Algeria (154/11) Opinion of AG Mengozzi [2012] ECLI:EU:C:2012:309

  • Raad van bestuur van de Sociale verzekeringsbank v. LF Evans (C-179/13) [2014] ECLI:EU:C 2014:2015

  • Western Sahara Campaign UK v. Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs and Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (C-266/16) [2018] ECLI:EU:C:2018:118

    • Opinion of AG Wathelet, ECLI:EU:C:2018:1

  • Yvonne van Duyn v. Home Office (42/74) [1974] ECR 1337

Other Courts and Judicial Bodies

  • AA Megalidis v. Turkey [1932] 4 Annual Digest of Public International Law Cases 395

  • GATT, Dispute Settlement Panel Report on United States Restrictions on Imports of Tuna (1994) 33 ILM 839

  • Lake Lanoux (France v. Spain) (1957) 12 RIAA 281

  • M/V ‘Norstar’ (Panama v. Italy) (Preliminary Objections, Order of 15 Mar 2016) ITLOS Reports 2016

  • Responsibilities and Obligations of States Sponsoring Persons and Entities with Respect to Activities in the Area (Advisory Opinion) ITLOS Reports 2011

  • Responsibilities and Obligations of States with Respect to the Activities in the Area (Request for Advisory Opinion Submitted to the Seabed Dispute Chambers) Advisory Opinion, ITLOS Reports 2011

  • WTO, Turkey – Restriction on Imports of Textiles and Clothing Products, Report of the Panel (31 May 1999) WT/DS34/R

Decisions of National Courts

  • Australia, Federal Court, Ure v. The Commonwealth of Australia [2016] FCAFC 8

  • Canada, Supreme Court, Nevsun Resources Ltd v. Araya, 2020 SCC 5

  • Canada, Supreme Court, R v. Hape, 2007 CSC 26

  • England and Wales, Court of Appeal, R v. Bottrill, ex parte Kuechenmeister [1947] 1 KB 41

  • England and Wales, House of Lords, Maclaine Watson v. Department of Trade [1989] 3 All ER 523

  • England and Wales, House of Lords, R v. Bow St Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex parte Pinochet Ugarte (Pinochet III) [(1999] 2 WLR 827

  • France, Conseil Constitutionnel, Decision no 94–352 (18 January 1995)

  • Germany, Bundesverfassungsgericht, Order of First Senate (17 December 1975) 1 BvR 63/68

  • Germany, Bundesverfassungsgericht, Order of First Senate (3 November 1987) 1 BvR 1257/84

  • Germany, Bundesverfassungsgericht, Order of First Senate (7 March 1990) 1 BvR 1215/87

  • Singapore, Court of Appeal, Van v. Public Prosecutor (20 October 2004) SGCA 47

  • Switzerland, Federal Criminal Court, A v. Office of the Attorney General of Switzerland, BB.2011.140 (25 July 2012)

  • Switzerland, Federal Supreme Court (12 October 2012) BGE 139 I 16

  • United States, Supreme Court, Jacobellis v. Ohio (378 U.S. 184)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×