Hostname: page-component-669899f699-rg895 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-25T08:49:24.888Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Rate and setting of neurodevelopmental and psychosocial encounters for children with CHD

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 December 2024

James C. Bohnhoff*
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, MaineHealth, Portland, ME, USA Center for Interdisciplinary Population and Health Research, MaineHealth Institute for Research, Portland, ME, USA
Anya Cutler
Affiliation:
Center for Interdisciplinary Population and Health Research, MaineHealth Institute for Research, Portland, ME, USA
Julia Price
Affiliation:
Center for Health Care Delivery Science, Nemours Children’s Hospital Delaware, Wilmington, DE, USA
Katherine Ahrens
Affiliation:
Public Health, University of Southern Maine Muskie School of Public Service, Portland, ME, USA
Sarah M.B. Gabrielson
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, MaineHealth, Portland, ME, USA
Warren Hathaway
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, MaineHealth, Portland, ME, USA
Thomas A. Miller
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, MaineHealth, Scarborough, ME, USA
*
Corresponding author: James C. Bohnhoff; Email: [email protected]

Abstract

Background:

In North America, less than 30% of children with complex CHD receive recommended follow-up for neurodevelopmental and psychosocial care. While rates of follow-up care at surgical centres have been described, little is known about similar services outside of surgical centres.

Methods:

This cohort study used Maine Health Data Organization’s All Payer Claims Data from 2015 to 2019 to identify developmental and psychosocial-related encounters received by children 0–18 years of age with complex CHD. Encounters were classified as developmental, psychological, and neuropsychological testing, mental health assessment interventions, and health and behaviour assessments and interventions. We analysed the association of demographic and clinical characteristics of children and the receipt of any encounter.

Results:

Of 799 unique children with complex CHD (57% male, 56% Medicaid, and 64% rural), 185 (23%) had at least one developmental or psychosocial encounter. Only 13 children (1.6%) received such care at a surgical centre. Developmental testing took place at a mix of community clinics/private practices (39%), state-based programmes (31%), and hospital-affiliated clinics (28%) with most encounters billing Medicaid (86%). Health and behavioural assessments occurred exclusively at hospital-affiliated clinics, predominately with Medicaid claims (82%). Encounters for mental health interventions, however, occurred in mostly community clinics/private practices (80%) with the majority of encounters billing commercial insurance (64%).

Conclusion:

Children with complex CHD in Maine access developmental and psychosocial services in locations beyond surgical centres. To better support the neurodevelopmental outcomes of their patients, CHD centres should build partnerships with these external providers.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Wernovsky, G, Newburger, J. Neurologic and developmental morbidity in children with complex congenital heart disease. J Pediatr 2003; 142: 68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bellinger, DC, Wypij, D, Rivkin, MJ, et al. Adolescents with d-transposition of the great arteries corrected with the arterial switch procedure: neuropsychological assessment and structural brain imaging. Circulation 2011; 124: 13611369.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sood, E, Newburger, JW, Anixt, JS, et al. Neurodevelopmental outcomes for individuals with congenital heart disease: updates in Neuroprotection, risk-stratification, evaluation, and management: a scientific statement from the American heart association. Circulation 2024; 149: e997e1022.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marino, BS, Lipkin, PH, Newburger, JW, et al. Neurodevelopmental outcomes in children with congenital heart disease: evaluation and management: a scientific statement from the American heart association. Circulation 2012; 126: 11431172.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, TA, Sadhwani, A, Sanz, J, et al. Variations in practice in cardiac neurodevelopmental follow-up programs. Cardiol Young 2020; 30: 16031608.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ortinau, CM, Wypij, D, Ilardi, D, et al. Factors associated with attendance for cardiac neurodevelopmental evaluation. Pediatrics 2023; 152: e2022060995.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glotzbach, KL, Ward, JJ, Marietta, J, et al. The benefits and bias in neurodevelopmental evaluation for children with congenital heart disease. Pediatr Cardiol 2020; 41: 327333.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loccoh, EC, Yu, S, Donohue, J, et al. Prevalence and risk factors associated with non-attendance in neurodevelopmental follow-up clinic among infants with CHD. Cardiol Young 2018; 28: 554560.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
“Census Summary File 1, P2 Urban and Rural.” United States Census Bureau, 2020. https://data.census.gov/.Google Scholar
Maine Health Data Organization. Accessed June 25, 2024. https://mhdo.maine.gov/rules.htm.Google Scholar
Sood, E, Newburger, JW, Anixt, JS, et al. Neurodevelopmental outcomes for individuals with congenital heart disease: updates in Neuroprotection, risk-stratification, evaluation, and management: a scientific statement from the American heart association. Circulation 2024; 149: e997e1022.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rural-Urban Commuting Area Codes - Data.gov. Accessed June 25, 2024. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/rural-urban-commuting-area-codes.Google Scholar
New England Rural Health RoundTable, Rural Data for Action: A Comparative Analysis of Health Data for the New England Region. 2014. Starksboro, VT. https://nerha.memberclicks.net/assets/docs/RHRT_DataBook_2014_FINAL.pdf.Google Scholar
“Child Opportunity Index (COI).” Diversity Data Kids. Accessed February 1, 2024. https://www.diversitydatakids.org/child-opportunity-index.Google Scholar
National Plan and Provider Enumeration System. 201 “National Plan and Provider Enumeration System.” Accessed June 27, 2024. https://npiregistry.cms.hhs.gov/search.Google Scholar
Zablotsky, B, Terlizzi, EP. Mental health treatment among children aged 5-17 years: United States, 2019. NCHS Data Brief 2020; 381: 18.Google Scholar
Ware, J, Butcher, JL, Latal, B, et al. Neurodevelopmental evaluation strategies for children with congenital heart disease aged birth through 5 years: recommendations from the cardiac neurodevelopmental outcome collaborative. Cardiol Young 2020; 30: 16091622.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ilardi, D, Sanz, JH, Cassidy, AR, et al. Neurodevelopmental evaluation for school-age children with congenital heart disease: recommendations from the cardiac neurodevelopmental outcome collaborative. Cardiol Young 2020; 30: 16231636.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Patel, T, Ilardi, D, Kochilas, L. Neurodevelopmental outcomes in children with congenital heart disease: ten years after the American heart association statement. Clin Perinatol 2023; 50: 5366.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Riehle-Colarusso, T, Autry, A, Razzaghi, H, et al. Congenital heart defects and receipt of special education services. Pediatrics 2015; 136: 496504.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cassidy, AR, Butler, SC, Briend, J, et al. Neurodevelopmental and psychosocial interventions for individuals with CHD: a research agenda and recommendations from the cardiac neurodevelopmental outcome collaborative. Cardiol Young 2021; 31: 888899.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Bohnhoff et al. supplementary material

Bohnhoff et al. supplementary material
Download Bohnhoff et al. supplementary material(File)
File 41.8 KB