Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:52:49.552Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 9 - Double Letters to Write Long Vowels

from Part I - Old-fashioned Spellings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 May 2023

Nicholas Zair
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge

Summary

In the second half of the second century BC, the Romans adopted the practice of writing long vowels with double letters from the Oscan alphabet (Oliver 1966: 151–5; Vine 1993: 267–86; Wallace 2011: 18; Weiss 2020: 32). However, it did not remain a standard part of Latin orthography past the end of the Republic. According to Oliver, Wallace and Weiss, the double spelling of long vowels can be found as late as the early fourth century AD. Oliver points out uii (CIL 3.4121) = ‘by force’ from AD 312–323, exercituus (CIL 6.230) for exercitūs ‘of the army’, from AD 222–235, and aara (Lemerle 1937 no. 12) for ārās, fourth century according to Oliver, third century according to Lemerle.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This content is Open Access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/cclicenses/

In the second half of the second century BC, the Romans adopted the practice of writing long vowels with double letters from the Oscan alphabet (Reference OliverOliver 1966: 151–5; Reference VineVine 1993: 267–86; Reference Wallace and ClacksonWallace 2011: 18; Reference WeissWeiss 2020: 32). However, it did not remain a standard part of Latin orthography past the end of the Republic. According to Oliver, Wallace and Weiss, the double spelling of long vowels can be found as late as the early fourth century AD. Oliver points out uii (CIL 3.4121) = ‘by force’ from AD 312–323,Footnote 1 exercituus (CIL 6.230) for exercitūs ‘of the army’, from AD 222–235, and aara (Reference LemerleLemerle 1937 no. 12) for ārās,Footnote 2 fourth century according to Oliver, third century according to Lemerle.

It is difficult to find really plausible examples for the first to fourth centuries AD, partly because the possibility of false positives when searching the EDCS is very high, and partly because it is hard to be sure that a particular instance is not a mistake in the writing. Searches for <aa>, <ee>, <oo> and <uu> provide a small number of at all plausible examples:Footnote 3 Spees (CIL 4.5127, prior to AD 79), [I]uunia (CIL 4.8029, prior to AD 79), lacuus (CIL 12.2606, 2607, first century AD), domuus (CIL 9.4794; first century AD, Reference DessauDessau 1892–1916, 7332), Iuulius (AE 1976.700, AD 201), porticuus (ILA 531, AD 298), Ianuariaas (CIL 11.4033, AD 345, but note a mistake in palcis for pacis), Erclaanius (ICUR 10.26742 = EDB18026, AD 301–349), uoot(a) (AE 1977.540), feceerunt (AE 1972.709), dieebus (CIL 14.1212), duouiratuus (CIL 3.9768).

The writers on language who mention this feature at all consider it old-fashioned. Quintilian mentions it in passing:

at, quae ut uocales iunguntur, aut unam longam faciunt, ut ueteres scripserunt, qui geminatione earum uelut apice utebantur …

When letters which are vowels are joined together, they either make one long vowel, as the ancients wrote, who used this gemination as though it were an apex

(Quintilian, Institutio oratoria 1.4.10)

usque ad Accium et ultra porrectas syllabas geminis, ut dixi, uocalibus scripserunt.

Down to the time of Accius and beyond they [i.e. ‘the ancients’] wrote long syllables with double vowels, as I have mentioned.

(Quintilian, Institutio oratoria 1.7.14)

Unsurprisingly, therefore, use of double letters to write long vowels in the corpora is extremely rare, if not non-existent. The curse tablets provide two possible examples: uoos for uōs ‘you’ (Kropp 11.1.1/26) from Carthage, dated to the second century AD, and ceernis (Kropp 6.1/1) for cernis, from Noricum, mid-second century AD. In neither case can a mere dittography be ruled out. In the case of 6.1/1, additional letters are also written in siuem for sīue (due to anticipation of the following word Iouem?), oporno/tet for oportet and quom/modi for quōmodo (dittography across a line divide). It seems unlikely that ceernis is an intentional use of double letters. In 11.1.1/26 uos is written thus several more times, and no other long vowel is written with double vowels. We also find in this tablet the old-fashioned spelling iodicauerunt for iūdicāuē̆runt (see p. 74). The spelling on this tablet is substandard, but mostly reflects the spoken language. However, there is an unmotivated geminate spelling in coggens for cōgēns ‘forcing’, and a scrambled spelling in Atsurio for Asturiō. I do not think we can be sure that uoos reflects an old-fashioned spelling rather than an accidental dittography.

In addition, we find an instance of q̣uụr (Tab. Vindol. 652) for cūr at Vindolanda between AD 104 and 120. However, while a possible analysis here is that <q> represents /k/ before /u/ and that <uu> represents /uː/, it is more likely that this is a quasi-etymological spelling whereby /qu/ represents *kw (cf. the spellings quom and quum for cum; pp. 165–8). In the Vindonissa tablets, we have the dative Secundi{i}na<e> (T. Vindon. 41). Again, dittography seems more likely than intentional double writing of the vowel.

Footnotes

1 Although Wallace expresses doubt about this example; it is true that the following word, ignis also begins with <i>, so dittography resulting in a sequence III rather than II, is possible (there is no division between these words in the inscription). Reference LeumannLeumann (1977: 13) identifies an example in ‘later’ (später) [i.e. than the Republic] Ursioon(is) (CIL 3.12009).

2 Oliver also wrongly attributes aaram to this inscription; in fact aram is read.

3 In EDCS I searched for ‘aa’ and ‘oo’ in the ‘wrong spelling’ search, with the date range set to 01–400 (in the case of ‘o’ I also used ‘and not’ ‘coop’), and then manually checked the results (20/01/2021). Since searching for the strings ‘ee’, ‘uu’ and ‘ii’ on the EDCS produces far too many results (mostly false positives) to check, in LLDB I searched for ‘i: > II’, ‘e: > EE’, ‘u: > VV’, with a date range of 1–400, counting ‘a hit even if the date is of a narrower interval than the interval given (even only a year)’ and ‘a hit even if the date is of a wider interval than the interval given (in either directions or in both)’ on 24/08/2021. I also searched for ‘i: > II’, which produced 90 results. However, many of these are actually cases of <ii> for /jj/, and some of the others could be instances of old-fashioned <e> with the shape II for /iː/. Since dittography is particularly likely across a line boundary, I disregarded examples where the sequence crossed a line.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×